News
Court Bars Turaki-Led NWC From PDP National Secretariat
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/images-67.jpeg&description=Court Bars Turaki-Led NWC From PDP National Secretariat', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/images-67.jpeg&description=Court Bars Turaki-Led NWC From PDP National Secretariat', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court Abuja, has restrained the Kabiru Turaki-led National Working Committee (NWC) from gaining access into the national secretariat of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Abuja.
Justice Abdulmalik made the order while delivering judgment in a suit instituted by a group of the party loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike.
Justice Abdulmalik also ordered security agencies, including the Nigerian Police Force (NPF), Department of State Services (DSS), among others, to give adequate protection to the PDP led by Abdulrahman Mohammed while accessing the secretariat.
The judge held that the purported national convention held by the Turaki-led group on November 15 and 16, 2025, in Ibadan and the election of the party’s officials, against the valid court orders, was a nullity.
She said the convention violated Section 287(3) of the Nigerian Constitution (as amended), as well as the PDP’s constitution.
Turaki, a former minister (centre), addressing delegates at the Ibadan convention in 2025.
The judge described the expulsion of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, and his allies from the party during the 2025 convention as an affront to the order of the court.
“I considered the expulsion of the members of the plaintiffs as not only an affront to the subsisting judgment, but also a direct assault on a democratic and principled society,” the judge said.
She said such action had no place where the rule of law is in practice.
According to the judge, all proceedings, resolutions, and decisions taken at the said convention, including the suspension of members of the first plaintiff, were unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void, and of no effect.
Abdulrahman-led Suit
The camp of the FCT minister, led by its acting National Chairman, Mohammed Abdulrahman, had filed the suit.
In the suit, the PDP, Abdulrahman, and the National Secretary, Samuel Anyanwu, had prayed the court to stop the police and DSS from allowing Turaki-led leadership (listed as fifth to 25th defendants) access to the party’s national secretariat at Wadara Plaza in Abuja.
The new PDP NWC members, led by Abdulrahman, emerged through a consensus.
They also sought an order of injunction, restraining INEC from accepting any other office address or any other address from the Turaki-led leadership as the PDP’s office address other than as already contained in the commission’s records.
They further sought an order of injunction, restraining the Turaki leadership from parading themselves as representatives of the PDP in any capacity whatsoever, among other reliefs.
Justice Abdulmalik had earlier granted an ex parte motion brought by the plaintiffs directing parties not to take any action pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
Following the order, the Turaki-led faction challenged the decision at the Court of Appeal.
They also filed an application for the court to stay proceedings in the suit pending the decision of the appeal court.
The Turaki group, through their lawyer, equally filed a motion on notice asking Justice Abdulmalik to recuse (withdraw) herself from the case.
They argued that there existed a reasonable and well-founded apprehension of the likelihood of bias against them in the manner the suit had been handled by the judge.
Judgment
Delivering the judgment, Justice Abdulmalik held that, in line with the Constitution and other enabling statutes, including earlier judgments, it would not shy away from its duty to do what is just in the circumstances.
The judge said that the main determinant of the case is Section 287(3) of the Constitution, which provides that the decisions of the Federal High Court and other courts established by the Constitution shall be enforced by all authorities and persons across the federation.
She observed that “in spite of the judgments which have not been set aside, the fifth to 25th defendants went ahead and organised the convention.”
Justice Abdulmalik added that those same judgments had also been affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
Wike addressing delegates at the PDP national convention in Abuja on Sunday, March 29, 2026.
She further cited that a party’s constitution is meant to be followed by its members; hence, the issues raised in the originating summons by the plaintiffs were meritorious.
She, therefore, granted the declaratory and injunctive reliefs sought.
“The defendants are bound to comply with and give full effect to the subsisting judgments of the Federal High Court earlier referred to.
“The first to fourth defendants are not entitled to recognise or give effect, in any manner whatsoever, to the purported national convention held on 15 and 16 November 2025 by the fifth to 25th defendants and their associates.
“The purported convention, including the election of officers and suspension of members, is unconstitutional, null and void, ” she ruled.
Justice Abdulmalik said the plaintiffs (Wike’s group) were entitled to remain in office and continue to use the party’s national secretariat and properties.
‘No Shred Of Evidence’
On the application filed for the judge to recuse herself from the case, she held that the Turaki-led faction failed to substantiate the argument with evidence that the court was biased.
She also held that allegations of bias must be proven with credible evidence, not mere suspicion.
The judge observed that claims of a “likelihood of bias” are “a state of mind, incapable of precise definition,” and must be supported by “cogent and credible evidence.”
The judge said she found “no shred of evidence” to justify the allegation and stressed that the mere grant of an ex parte order did not amount to bias.
On the request to transfer the case back to the chief judge (CJ) for reassignment, she held that the power to assign cases lies with the CJ and that it was “not the place of counsel to determine which judge will hear and determine their case.”
Justice Abdulmalik further stated that any dissatisfaction with her decisions was a matter for appeal, not recusal, and consequently refused the application for lack of merit.
On the motion challenging the competence of the suit, the judge also declined to strike out the case.
She further rejected the arguments that the court lacked jurisdiction and that the plaintiffs had no locus standi.
The defendants had argued that the dispute was purely an internal party affair, an abuse of court process, and that the plaintiffs lacked the legal right to institute the suit.
In her decision, the judge held that “jurisdiction is the lifewire and pillar upon which any matter can be determined” and must be assessed based on the originating processes.
She found that the claims involved the interpretation and enforcement of constitutional and statutory provisions, as well as compliance with earlier court judgments.
She, therefore, agreed with the plaintiffs that the suit was within the court’s jurisdiction.
The judge, who held that the objections raised by the defendants lacked merit, dismissed the application in its entirety.
The Wike-led PDP, on Sunday, held its national convention where Abdulrahaman emerged as the substantive national chairman.
Justice James Omotosho and Justice Peter Lifu of the FHC in Abuja had, in separate judgments in 2025, barred the PDP leadership led by Turaki from holding its national convention.
There were also counter-decisions from the Oyo State High Court.
News
ADC Southwest Leaders Demand Removal Of Aregbesola As Interim National Secretary
Leaders of the African Democratic Congress, ADC, in the South West have asked the party’s national leadership to immediately remove Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as Interim National Secretary, accusing him of brazen constitutional violations that are threatening the party ahead of 2027.
The South West leaders, in a petition dated July 28, 2026, signed by state chairmen from across the zone and addressed to the National Chairman, said they resolved during an emergency meeting in Ibadan that Aregbesola’s conduct had plunged the ADC into avoidable crises.
According to DAILY POST, the copies of the letter signed by Olusoji Adebiyi, Ogun State Secretary; Abideen Okanlawon, Osun State Acting Chairman; Adesola Akitunde, Osun State Youth Leader; Yinka Olona, Oyo State Chairman; Adebimpe Adelowo, Oyo State member; Ilesanmi Olaiya, Ekiti State Chairman, among others, were copied to the National Working Committee (NWC), National Executive Committee (NEC), the party’s 2027 presidential candidate, the vice-presidential candidate, and the National Legal Adviser.
The chairmen alleged that Aregbesola created a parallel structure across South West states under the name “Omoluabi Progressive” and began parading officers of the splinter group as legitimate ADC executives from the ward to the state level, asserting that this directly contravenes the ADC constitution.
They cited Article 22, Section 1 (2, 3, 8, 9, 10 and 11) of the party’s constitution, listing offences including breach of the constitution, acts likely to bring the party into disrepute, disobedience to lawful directives, creation of parallel organs, and collusion to convene unauthorised meetings.
The petitioners also accused the former Osun State governor of using his office to interfere in the party’s candidate selection process, alleging that on the last day for uploading National Assembly candidates, Aregbesola “colluded with some cohorts within INEC” to remove duly elected ADC candidates who emerged from INEC-monitored primaries and replace them with members of his Omoluabi Progressive group who never purchased nomination forms.
They also blamed Aregbesola for the lingering crises in Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti and Ondo states, alleging that he usurped the functions of the National Organising Secretary by appointing parallel primary election committees and submitting them to INEC.
Part of the petition reads:
“We, the undersigned State Chairmen of the South West Zone of the ADC, on behalf of the ADC South West Zonal Stakeholders, write to officially transmit our resolutions reached during the South West Zone emergency stakeholders’ meeting held on July 28, 2026, in Ibadan and equally request urgent action regarding the ceaseless, blatant violations and brazen breaches of our party’s constitution by OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA.
“OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA acted directly in contravention of our great party’s constitution by creating parallel party structures across the South West states, including local government areas and wards, under the name and style of Omoluabi Progressive, and parading the so-called officers of this splinter group as the legitimate structures and officers of our great party across the South West, contrary to the provisions of the party constitution.
“His actions and activities do not in any way befit the status, carriage, disposition and character expected of any person occupying the high-ranking and sensitive position of National Secretary of a great party like the ADC.
“We equally learnt from reliable sources that OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA used his position as National Secretary to collude with some of his cohorts within INEC to, on July 14, 2026, the last day for uploading National Assembly candidates, unlawfully infiltrate the party’s system and fraudulently substitute the names of successful National Assembly candidates who emerged through INEC-monitored primary elections across the South West and other zones of the country with members of his Omoluabi Progressive splinter group, who did not even purchase nomination forms in the first place.”
The South West ADC leaders demanded that the coalition leadership review Aregbesola’s appointment and relieve him of his position, urging it to present a new, “competent, loyal and patriotic” replacement.
“OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA is not fit to hold the position of Interim National Secretary. His continued stay in office will spell doom for the party.
“We therefore request the coalition leadership to review the appointment of OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA as Interim National Secretary, relieve him of this position, and request the APC extraction of the coalition to present a new, suitable person who is competent, loyal, amiable, patriotic and possesses the native intelligence required to lead the South West zone and the ADC to victory in 2027,” the petition added.
They urged the NWC and NEC to act urgently to stem the crisis and save the party ahead of the 2027 general elections.
News
Explain Missing School Records In INEC Form – Buhari’s Ex-Minister Challenges Tinubu
Former Minister of Sports, Solomon Dalung, has called on President Bola Tinubu to explain why the sections for his primary and secondary school qualifications were left blank in the personal particulars he submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the 2027 presidential election.
Dalung made the call in a post on his X account on Saturday while reacting to the nomination documents published by INEC.
According to him, his comments were based on the documents released by the electoral commission and should not be interpreted as an allegation against the President.
“I just read the published particulars of presidential candidates released by INEC for the 2027 election, and one thing immediately caught my attention,” Dalung wrote.
He noted that Tinubu listed only his university degree while leaving the sections for his primary and secondary school qualifications blank.
The former minister said the omission raises questions that deserve clarification, stressing that public trust is strengthened through openness and transparency.
“If there is a perfectly reasonable explanation, Nigerians deserve to hear it. Public office, especially the presidency, is built on public trust. Trust flourishes where there is openness, not ambiguity,” he stated.
Dalung argued that the same standard of accountability demanded of other political actors should also apply to the incumbent president.
He maintained that the issue was not whether Tinubu attended any particular primary or secondary school, but whether holders of public office should provide complete disclosures in official documents.
Dalung further stated that transparency remains the easiest way to address public concerns, adding that silence often fuels speculation.
“The same standard applied to every other candidate should apply to the incumbent President. No more, no less.
“The easiest way to put every question to rest is transparency. Silence rarely ends speculation; openness usually does,” he added.
DAILY POST reports that Dalung’s remarks followed the publication of the personal particulars of presidential candidates by INEC on Saturday.
A review of Tinubu’s EC9 nomination form showed that the President listed only a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration obtained from Chicago State University in 1979 under the educational qualifications section, while the spaces provided for his primary and secondary school qualifications were left blank.
The President, however, attached copies of his university degree certificate and National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) certificate as part of the supporting documents submitted to INEC.
News
Why I Need To Go Beg God — Ex-JAMB Registrar
Former Registrar of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB), Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, has said he will return to teaching and religious activities after completing his tenure at the board, revealing that one of his priorities is to seek God’s forgiveness after spending 10 years in public office.
He made the disclosure while handing over to his successor, Prof. Segun Aina, during an event on Friday.
Oloyede also defended the board’s decision to impose a three-year ban on a 2023 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) candidate, Mmesoma Ejikeme, over the manipulation of her examination result.
According to him, his years in office exposed him to situations that tested his personal values and spiritual life, leaving him convinced that he now needs time for reflection, repentance and renewed commitment to his faith.
Speaking at the handover ceremony, Oloyede said he would return to the classroom and devote more time to his religious activities after leaving office. He explained that his decade in public service had affected certain aspects of his spiritual life and personal principles, making it necessary for him to seek God’s forgiveness and accept responsibility for actions taken while in office.
Reflecting on his tenure, Oloyede credited the achievements recorded by JAMB to the dedication and cooperation of the board’s workforce.
He also expressed confidence that the new registrar would build on the reforms implemented during the past decade, saying the successes achieved during his administration were made possible through the collective commitment and hard work of JAMB staff. He added that he was optimistic Prof. Aina would take the board to greater heights.
Oloyede also revisited the controversy involving Mmesoma Ejikeme, maintaining that JAMB acted appropriately when it sanctioned the candidate after discovering that her UTME score had been altered from 249 to 362. He said the board’s action was aimed solely at protecting the integrity of its examination process.
He described Mmesoma as “our daughter” and said the board handled the matter like a responsible parent correcting a child rather than acting out of malice.
Oloyede said the board harboured no ill feelings towards the candidate, adding that its only regret was that she altered her result. He noted that although many Nigerians were initially misled into believing her claims, those who supported her accepted the truth once the facts emerged.
He further expressed regret that many people initially believed the false narrative surrounding the case because parents naturally want to trust their children. However, he said the eventual revelation of the facts vindicated JAMB’s position and affirmed the board’s actions.
-
News24 hours ago‘Stop complaining about Buhari, others for your failures,’ Atiku slams Tinubu
-
News24 hours agoJust in: After Hugh Backlash, FIFA finally Scrap Infantino’s £15B World Cup Private Investment Proposal
-
News24 hours agoColonel Behind Alleged Tinubu Coup Plot Admits Failed Promotion Pushed Him, Reveals How He Was Lured By Army Chiefs
-
News23 hours agoHow Prison Inmate on D*ath Row Livestreamed On TikTok, Earned Money From Ogun Prison
-
News23 hours agoINEC Rejects PDP’s Submission Of Jonathan As 2027 Presidential Candidate
-
News22 hours agoUK PM Burnham slams Infantino, says he’s the ‘wrong man’ to lead FIFA
-
News20 hours agoElon Musk reveals Nigeria had four million more births than EU
-
Entertainment6 hours agoWhy I Don’t Want Any Of My Children To Make Music – Davido
