Ossai Ovie Success, an aide to Delta State Governor Sheriff Oborevwori, has criticised former Kogi Central senator, Dino Melaye, over his outfit at a recent protest in Abuja.
Melaye had attended a protest organised by the African Democratic Congress (ADC), where party leaders and supporters gathered at the headquarters of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The protest was against the commission’s decision to withdraw recognition of the party’s leadership.
Reacting through a Facebook post, Ossai said he was unhappy that Melaye wore a shirt said to be worth about ₦2.6 million to a protest aimed at demanding a better country. He argued that such an amount could be used to support many young people. 
He said, “I am disappointed in Dino Melaye for wearing a fendi of £1,426 equivalent to N2.6Million Naira shirt to a protest ground and be demanding for a better Nigeria.
“That T-shirt can create jobs for hundreds of youths . I am really disappointed.”
At the same time, the ADC intensified its dispute with INEC during the protest in Abuja. As part of the demonstration, members of the party sang Nigeria’s former national anthem, “Arise, O Compatriots,” as a symbol of their stand.
The protesters then moved to the INEC office, where they submitted a letter addressed to the commission’s chairman, Professor Joseph Amupitan. In the letter dated April 8, 2026, the party made serious claims and strong demands.
The ADC clearly called for the chairman to step down or be removed from office immediately. It said this demand was not just political, but necessary to protect the integrity of the institution. The party accused him of misconduct, misuse of office, and acting outside constitutional limits.
The letter also claimed that INEC, under his leadership, is no longer neutral. According to the party, some actions and communications from the commission show support for certain groups within the party. It warned that this could reduce public trust and affect confidence in future elections.
The ADC further argued that the chairman went beyond his powers by trying to explain court decisions publicly. It said only the courts have the authority to interpret their judgments, and any attempt by INEC to do so could violate the principle of separation of powers.
