Connect with us

News

SERAP faults data bill, warns against social media crackdown

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has urged the National Assembly to immediately withdraw the proposed Nigeria Data Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2026, describing it as a “backdoor attempt” to regulate social media and expand government control over online expression.

The rights group warned that the bill, if passed in its current form, would grant regulators sweeping powers to shut down digital platforms operating in Nigeria, thereby threatening the constitutionally guaranteed rights to freedom of expression, access to information and digital communication.

In a letter dated July 18, 2026, addressed to the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, SERAP said the proposed legislation should be rejected because it violates both the Nigerian Constitution and Nigeria’s international human rights obligations.

The letter was signed by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare.

Advertisement

Sponsored by Ned Nwoko (APC, Delta North), the bill seeks to compel social media platforms, data controllers and data processors operating in Nigeria to establish physical offices in the country.

It also empowers the Nigeria Data Protection Commission to prohibit or shut down the operations of any entity that fails to comply within 30 days.

SERAP stated that the localisation requirement would expose technology companies to undue political influence and make it easier for authorities to pressure digital platforms.

According to the organisation, “Requirements compelling technology companies to establish local offices would increase government leverage over platforms, facilitate political pressure, make censorship demands easier and expose local employees to retaliation.”

Advertisement

It added, “The Bill would create sweeping powers capable of shutting down or excluding social media platforms from the Nigerian market and expose millions of Nigerians to serious violations of their constitutionally and internationally guaranteed human rights.”

The organisation recalled previous efforts by the National Assembly to regulate social media, noting that they generated widespread public opposition and human rights concerns.

“The current Bill revives substantially similar proposals previously introduced by Senator Nwoko, raising renewed concerns that localisation requirements are being used as a vehicle for expanding governmental control over digital platforms and online expression,” the letter stated.

SERAP warned that it would challenge the legislation in court if it were eventually signed into law.

Advertisement

“Should the Bill be enacted into law in its current or substantially similar form, SERAP shall promptly take all appropriate legal actions to challenge its legality in the public interest and to ensure that Nigerians’ fundamental rights are fully protected,” it said.

The organisation maintained that while governments have a legitimate interest in regulating digital platforms and ensuring compliance with domestic laws, such regulation must conform with constitutional safeguards and international human rights standards.

“Measures regulating digital services should enhance transparency, accountability and users’ rights—not create additional tools for censorship, surveillance or political interference,” SERAP said.

It argued that the bill empowers the Nigeria Data Protection Commission to prohibit the operations of digital platforms without adequate procedural safeguards.

Advertisement

“A law empowering regulators to exclude digital platforms from Nigeria inevitably interferes with the rights of the people who rely upon those platforms. The proposed section 5(p) in the Bill authorises the NDPC to prohibit entities from conducting operations in Nigeria without adequate procedural safeguards,” it stated.

According to SERAP, the proposed legislation contains no requirement for prior judicial authorisation, no obligation to consider less restrictive alternatives, and no meaningful opportunity for affected companies to remedy alleged non-compliance beyond what it described as an arbitrary 30-day period.

“The Bill cannot survive scrutiny under Section 45 of the Nigerian Constitution, which permits restrictions on fundamental rights only where they are prescribed by law, pursue a legitimate objective and are reasonably justifiable in a democratic society,” the organisation added.

It further argued that there was no evidence that existing powers under the Nigeria Data Protection Act were inadequate or that current enforcement mechanisms had failed.

Advertisement

“The Bill imposes one of the most severe sanctions available: the exclusion of digital platforms from Nigeria merely because they have not established a physical office,” SERAP said.

The group also warned that the proposal could undermine Nigeria’s digital economy and innovation ecosystem by discouraging investment and increasing compliance costs for startups, artificial intelligence developers, educational institutions and research organisations.

According to SERAP, “Mandatory localisation requirements substantially increase compliance costs, particularly for startups, open-source projects, educational institutions, research organisations, AI developers and smaller technology companies, while reducing Nigeria’s attractiveness as a destination for innovation and investment.”

The organisation noted that the proposal conflicts with the objectives of the Nigeria Startup Act 2022 and the National Digital Economy Policy and Strategy.

Advertisement

SERAP also cited the judgment of the ECOWAS Court of Justice in SERAP and Others v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, which held that the Federal Government’s suspension of Twitter violated the rights to freedom of expression, access to information and media freedom.

“Although the present Bill differs from the Twitter suspension in form, it creates the possibility of achieving the same result indirectly by empowering regulators to prohibit digital platforms from operating in Nigeria,” it said.

The organisation further relied on international human rights standards, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and the African Commission’s Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa.

It also referenced warnings by former United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, David Kaye, against requiring technology companies to establish local offices as a means of facilitating censorship or indirect governmental pressure over content moderation decisions.

Advertisement

SERAP maintained that no major democratic country requires every social media platform to establish a physical office as a blanket condition for operating.

“The National Assembly should immediately reject and withdraw the Bill, as it is manifestly incompatible with the Nigerian Constitution and Nigeria’s obligations under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” the organisation said.

It added, “The National Assembly should seize this opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to constitutional democracy, the rule of law and Nigeria’s digital future by immediately withdrawing the Bill.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Reps Probe Alleged Fake Presidential Council as Head of Civil Service Confirms Budget Participation, Approval for 314 Posts

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives on Monday intensified its investigation into the controversial Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PEAC/PFIPC), as the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation (HCSF), Didi Walson-Jack, confirmed that representatives of the body participated in the 2025 Annual Manpower Budget Defence and obtained approval for 314 positions.

The disclosure came during the inauguration of the House Ad-hoc Committee investigating the circumstances surrounding the existence and operations of the council, chaired by Rep. Yusuf Gagdi.

The probe follows growing public concern over reports that the council, whose legal status has been questioned, appeared in official government processes, including budget preparations and personnel planning, despite uncertainty surrounding its establishment and operational mandate.

Advertisement

Appearing before lawmakers in Abuja, Walson-Jack explained that while the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation (OHCSF) has no authority to establish government agencies, it received a request from the council seeking approval of its organisational structure.

She said the request was first submitted on 6 August 2025 but was initially rejected because the required supporting documents were not attached.

According to her, after the necessary documentation was later presented, approval was granted for a workforce comprising 14 existing personnel already engaged by the council and an additional 300 positions.

She said: “The Council in question submitted a request to the OHCSF for approval of its organisational structure on the 6th of August 2025 without providing the requisite documents.

Advertisement

“The request was earlier declined due to non-submission of relevant documents. However, after the required documents were submitted, approval for a total workforce of 314 positions, comprising 14 existing officers engaged by the Council and 300 additional positions, was issued.”

The Head of Service also disclosed that official records showed the approved establishment was collected by a representative of the council.

“The records of the Organisation Design and Development Department further confirmed that the authorised establishment was collected on behalf of the Council by a certain gentleman who represented the PEAC/PFIPC,” she stated.
Walson-Jack further revealed that officials representing the council took part in the 2025 Annual Manpower Budget Defence Exercise.

According to her, “Representatives of the Council participated in the 2025 Annual Manpower Budget Defence Exercise. They were led by a lady who identified herself as the Deputy Director of Administration and appeared before officers of the Organisation Design and Development Department during the organisation’s bilateral manpower defence.”

Advertisement

She explained that following the engagement, the request was processed in line with existing administrative procedures and subsequently approved.

However, she insisted that the Office of the Head of Service never posted any civil servants to the council.

“Following the bilateral engagements with the Council’s representatives during the 2025 Annual Manpower Project Defence Exercise, the request was reviewed by officers of the Organisation Design and Development Department and, in accordance with the Office’s established administrative procedure, the fourth batch, comprising 88 Ministries, Extra-Ministerial Departments and Agencies, including the Agency in question, was approved on the 18th of July 2025 by the Permanent Secretary, Common Services Office, who was overseeing the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation at that time.

“There was no deployment of officers by the OHCSF to the Council because recruitment and placement of staff in agencies are not within the responsibility of the Office,” she said.

Advertisement

She also clarified that staff salaries and allowances are handled by other statutory agencies.

“Remuneration and emoluments of personnel are under the purview of the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission, while the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission is responsible for the remuneration of political appointees and chief executive officers,” she explained.

Walson-Jack further disclosed that the office occupied by the council at the Federal Secretariat belonged to the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF).

“The office occupied by the Council in Phase Three of the Federal Secretariat forms part of the office spaces allocated to the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation through a letter dated 16 November 2023,” she said.

Advertisement

She maintained that every matter relating to the council’s establishment, administration and supervision falls under the jurisdiction of the OSGF and other relevant government institutions.

The Head of Service also confirmed that two officials linked to the approval process had been released to the Nigeria Police for questioning.

According to her, Mrs Patricia Akhigbe, under whose supervision the approval was processed, alongside Mr Jacob Oluwafemi David, are currently assisting investigators.

She disclosed that the approval process was carried out manually because the electronic document management system was not functioning at the time.

Advertisement

“The approval was done using physical files because the management system was down during the period. I personally discovered that all the documents relating to the Council were fake, although this was after the matter became public,” she added.

Also testifying before the committee, Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Yemi Cardoso, represented by the Director of Banking Services, Hamisu Abdullahi, disclosed that the apex bank opened two accounts for the council.

He said one was a domiciliary dollar account while the other was a pound sterling account.

According to him, both accounts have remained inactive since they were created.

Advertisement

“The mandate to open the accounts was received on 30 July 2025 from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation through a letter dated 29 July 2025. The necessary verification was conducted, but no further instruction followed. There has been no inflow or outflow on both accounts from inception till date,” he said.

Chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Dr Musa Aliyu, informed lawmakers that the anti-graft agency had already launched its own investigation.

He appealed for more time to conclude preliminary findings.

“We have commenced investigation and collecting documents as well as interacting with officials that we feel are necessary in order to help us unravel this issue.

Advertisement

“I urge the Ad-hoc Committee to give the Commission a little time, maybe between today, tomorrow and the next day, so that we can return and inform the House how far we have gone and what we have discovered,” he said.

Declaring the investigative hearing open, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Tajudeen Abbas, represented by the House Majority Leader, Rep. Julius Ihonvbere, said the investigation was aimed solely at establishing the facts.

“The discussions surrounding the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council have dominated media reports, public commentary and policy debates regarding its legal status, institutional mandate, operational framework, relationship with existing agencies and, importantly, its appearance within the Federal Budget Framework despite widespread uncertainty regarding its establishment.

“These questions deserve clear, factual and authoritative answers. The House of Representatives has therefore not constituted this Committee to validate speculation or amplify controversy. Neither is this a political exercise. Our objective is simply to establish the facts,” he said.

Advertisement

He stressed that the investigation was about safeguarding public institutions rather than targeting individuals.

“This investigation is not about any individual. It is about the integrity of public administration. Conduct your proceedings with fairness and, as much as possible, protect the rights of every witness. Give every interested party an opportunity to be heard. Follow the evidence wherever it leads. Let your conclusions be guided neither by public pressure nor political convenience, but by facts, the Constitution and the law.

“The credibility of parliamentary oversight rests not on the conclusions it reaches, but on the integrity of the process by which those conclusions are reached. As the People’s House, we are committed to ensuring that every institution entrusted with public authority is subject to public accountability,” he said.

At the close of proceedings, the committee resolved to invite the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Ministers of Finance, Budget and Economic Planning, Attorney-General of the Federation, Accountant-General of the Federation, Director-General of the Budget Office, Inspector-General of Police, as well as heads of several key agencies, including the Federal Character Commission, Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission, and Fiscal Responsibility Commission.

Advertisement

The committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to ensure the appearance of the two officials from the Office of the Head of the Civil Service to provide further explanations on their roles in the matter when the investigation resumes on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

News

FHC grants Miyetti Allah President N2.6bn bail over $2.63m money laundering

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja has granted the National President of Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, Bello Bodejo, bail in the sum of ₦2 billion over alleged money laundering charges involving $2.63 million.

In a ruling delivered on Tuesday, Justice Ekwo held that Bodejo was entitled to bail because the offences for which he was charged are bailable under Nigerian law.

The court ordered that the defendant must produce one surety in the like sum, adding that the surety must be a resident of Abuja, possess a three-year tax clearance certificate and own landed property worth ₦2 billion within the Federal Capital Territory.

Justice Ekwo further directed that the property documents be verified by the court registrar before the bail conditions could be perfected.

Advertisement

The court also ordered Bodejo to surrender his international passport to the registrar and barred him from travelling outside Nigeria without the permission of the court.

Following the ruling, the judge adjourned the case until October 5, 6 and 7 for the commencement of trial.

Bodejo was arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on multiple counts of alleged money laundering after the anti-graft agency accused him of receiving large cash payments outside the banking system in violation of Nigeria’s anti-money laundering laws.

According to the EFCC, the Miyetti Allah leader allegedly accepted cash payments totalling about $2.63 million from a former Accountant-General of Bauchi State, Sa’idu Abubakar, in separate transactions conducted between 2022 and 2024 without routing the funds through financial institutions as required by law.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Court sentences pastor to death for killing daughter over witchcraft claim

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

A Cross River High Court sitting in Calabar has sentenced a 51-year-old apostle, Ubong Bassey Etim, to death by hanging for the murder of his 16-year-old daughter, Deborah Bassey, who had Down syndrome and was falsely accused of being a witch.

Justice Blessing Egwu of High Court No. 11 delivered the judgment on Friday finding Etim guilty of murder and ordering that he be executed by hanging.

The court heard that the incident occurred on February 15, 2025, when Deborah was killed after being branded a witch, a case that sparked outrage among child rights advocates and organisations campaigning against witchcraft branding.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News