Connect with us

Opinion

EFCC, Legal Fees and Foreign Currency: Where Does The Law Stand? -By Imran Ridwan, Esq.

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The recent warning by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (“EFCC”) that lawyers who charge clients in foreign currencies may be prosecuted raises an important question of Nigerian law: does the charging or denomination of professional legal fees in foreign currency constitute a criminal offence, or is the matter principally one of professional and regulatory compliance?

The EFCC’s position, as publicly reported, is that charging clients in dollars is “illegal and unethical” because the Naira is Nigeria’s legal tender. The Commission reportedly disclosed that it was already handling two cases involving lawyers who allegedly charged clients in US dollars and warned that it would prosecute culpable practitioners.

The statement deserves serious consideration. Lawyers are subject to a statutory remuneration regime, the Naira is unquestionably Nigeria’s currency, and foreign-exchange transactions are regulated. Nevertheless, criminal liability cannot be founded merely upon an assertion that a practice is unethical or contrary to regulatory policy. There must be a specific written law creating the offence.

The distinction is particularly important because the National Industrial Court of Nigeria has previously considered the legality of denominating contractual entitlements in US dollars under sections 15 and 20 of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act (“CBN Act”) and rejected the proposition that those provisions, by themselves, make such denomination illegal. Adedipe v Oracle Software Nigeria Ltd therefore provides an important judicial lens through which to examine the EFCC’s recent position.

Advertisement

The Naira and the CBN Act
Section 15 of the CBN Act provides that the unit of currency in Nigeria is the Naira. Section 20 establishes CBN-issued currency notes as legal tender in Nigeria.

There is, however, a distinction between legal tender, denomination, and payment.

In Adedipe v Oracle Software Nigeria Ltd, the National Industrial Court considered an argument that contractual compensation denominated in US dollars was illegal by virtue of sections 15 and 20 of the CBN Act. The Court found no provision in the Act expressly declaring the denomination of a contractual obligation in foreign currency illegal.

The Court further observed that section 20(5), which criminalises refusal to accept the Naira, expressly contemplates circumstances in which other currencies may be used as a medium of exchange. It therefore concluded that section 20 concerns payment and does not, by its language, prohibit every instance of foreign-currency denomination.

Advertisement

This distinction is critical.

A contract may be denominated in a foreign currency while payment is made in Naira at the applicable exchange rate. That is legally different from insisting that payment must be made in foreign currency.

Consequently, the proposition that “the Naira is legal tender, therefore every agreement denominated in dollars is illegal” is too broad as a matter of statutory interpretation.

Can a CBN Circular Create a Criminal Offence?
The CBN has, at various times, issued circulars against the pricing or denomination of goods and services in foreign currency in Nigeria. Such regulatory instruments are relevant and cannot simply be ignored.

Advertisement

However, a fundamental constitutional principle must be borne in mind.

Section 36(12) of the Constitution provides that a person shall not be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and its penalty prescribed in a written law.

An administrative circular cannot, by itself, create a criminal offence where the enabling statute has not done so.

This was precisely the concern expressed by the National Industrial Court in Adedipe. The Court held that the CBN circulars relied upon by the defendant had gone beyond the wording of section 20 of the CBN Act by purporting to prohibit denomination in foreign currency. It further stated that a circular could not override an Act of the National Assembly.

Advertisement

That reasoning is highly relevant to the EFCC’s present position.

If a lawyer is to be criminally prosecuted merely because his professional fee was stated in US dollars, the prosecution must identify the specific written law creating the offence. It would not be sufficient simply to rely upon a CBN circular or upon the general proposition that the Naira is Nigeria’s legal tender.

The Professional Position Is Different
The conclusion above does not mean that lawyers have an unrestricted right to structure their professional fees in any manner they choose.

Legal practitioners operate within a statutory professional framework.

Advertisement

Section 15 of the Legal Practitioners Act empowers the Legal Practitioners Remuneration Committee to regulate the remuneration of lawyers. Pursuant to that authority, the Legal Practitioners Remuneration (For Business, Legal Services and Representation) Order 2023 was made. The Order commenced on 16 May 2023 and prescribed remuneration for various categories of professional services, including consultations, legal opinions, incorporation, litigation and property transactions.

The professional rules must therefore be distinguished from the criminal law.

A lawyer who adopts a fee arrangement inconsistent with the Remuneration Order may expose himself to professional disciplinary consequences, even where the particular conduct does not amount to a criminal offence.

Thus, the more defensible proposition is that Nigerian lawyers should not routinely dollarise ordinary domestic professional fees without considering the Remuneration Order, the Rules of Professional Conduct and applicable foreign-exchange regulations.

Advertisement

Foreign Currency Is Not Per Se Illegal
There is also a danger in treating foreign currency itself as unlawful.

Nigeria operates a regulated foreign-exchange market and Nigerian law recognises legitimate transactions involving foreign currency. The Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act regulates foreign-exchange transactions rather than imposing an absolute prohibition upon the possession, receipt or use of foreign currency.

This is especially relevant to legal practitioners who act for:
foreign residents;
multinational corporations;
international financial institutions;
foreign investors;
non-resident Nigerians; and
clients involved in cross-border transactions or international arbitration.

It would therefore be difficult to sustain a blanket proposition that no Nigerian lawyer may ever receive a professional fee in foreign currency.

Advertisement

The legality of a particular transaction must depend upon its circumstances, including the identity and residence of the client, where the services are rendered, the currency in which the fee is denominated, the currency and method of payment, and the channel through which payment is received.

The EFCC’s Jurisdiction
The EFCC undoubtedly has jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute economic and financial crimes within its statutory mandate. A lawyer is not immune from criminal investigation merely because he is a member of the legal profession.

But the converse is equally important: the EFCC cannot transform every professional or regulatory infraction into an EFCC offence.

If a lawyer charges an excessive professional fee, the matter may principally be one of professional regulation.

Advertisement

If a lawyer breaches the Remuneration Order, disciplinary consequences may arise.

If a lawyer engages in an unlawful foreign-exchange transaction, the applicable foreign-exchange legislation must be examined.

If, however, the transaction involves fraud, money laundering, concealment of criminal proceeds, forgery or another offence within the EFCC’s jurisdiction, the criminal dimension becomes clear.

The relevant question is therefore not simply whether dollars were involved. What unlawful conduct, if any, accompanied the transaction?

Advertisement

Lawyers and EFCC Investigations
The EFCC’s reported concern that some lawyers assist suspects in frustrating investigations also requires careful qualification.

A lawyer does not obstruct justice merely because he represents a person under investigation.

The lawful exercise of a client’s rights, including applying for bail, challenging an unlawful arrest or detention, questioning the jurisdiction of an investigating agency, or instituting fundamental-rights proceedings, is an ordinary incident of legal representation.

The position is entirely different where a lawyer knowingly fabricates evidence, procures false documents, deceives the court, destroys evidence, or otherwise participates in criminal conduct.

Advertisement

If allegations that lawyers have fabricated medical records for bail applications are established, such conduct would raise serious professional and potentially criminal consequences.

The proper distinction is therefore between legitimate advocacy and participation in illegality.

The EFCC’s Warning About Its Name
The Commission’s warning against lawyers invoking its name to justify excessive fees is, in principle, uncontroversial.

A lawyer is entitled to negotiate professional fees within the applicable legal and professional framework. He is not entitled, however, to falsely represent that a fee has been imposed or approved by the EFCC, the court, the CBN or another public authority.

Advertisement

Where such a representation is knowingly false and money is obtained on that basis, the conduct may go beyond professional misconduct and potentially disclose a criminal offence.

Conclusion
The EFCC is entitled to investigate and prosecute lawyers whose conduct constitutes economic or financial crime. It is also legitimate for the Commission and the NBA to insist upon professional integrity within the legal profession.

Nevertheless, the proposition that every lawyer who charges a client in foreign currency automatically commits an EFCC offence requires a considerably greater legal foundation.

The Naira is Nigeria’s currency and legal tender. Foreign-exchange transactions are regulated. Lawyers are subject to the Legal Practitioners Remuneration Order and the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Advertisement

But professional impropriety, regulatory breach and criminal liability are not synonymous.

Most significantly, Adedipe v Oracle Software Nigeria Ltd establishes that sections 15 and 20 of the CBN Act do not, in their express terms, make the mere denomination of a contractual obligation in US dollars illegal. The National Industrial Court also held that a CBN circular cannot enlarge an Act of the National Assembly or create an illegality which the statute itself does not contain.

Accordingly, the prudent position for Nigerian lawyers is to quote ordinary domestic professional fees in Naira, comply with the 2023 Remuneration Order and applicable professional rules, and exercise particular care in cross-border transactions involving foreign currency.

But where the EFCC proposes criminal prosecution, it must go further. It must identify the specific statutory offence, establish that the offence falls within its jurisdiction, and prove every essential ingredient beyond reasonable doubt.

Advertisement

The real legal issue, therefore, is not whether a lawyer has mentioned dollars on an invoice. It is whether the particular transaction contravenes a law that validly imposes criminal liability.

That distinction is fundamental to the rule of law.

Ridwan Imran Esq. Dip in Law, B. A English Literature, LLB(Hons), BL.
The author is a legal practitioner with a primary interest in corporate law and litigation. With a passion for legal research, writing, and advocacy, the author is dedicated to providing insightful analysis of evolving legal issues and contributing to scholarly and professional discussions on the law. The author can be reached via [email protected] or 08131077061.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Opinion

Mutfwang’s Orange Economy Push: Turning Plateau’s Culture Into Jobs and Prosperity

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

 

By Chris Ishaku.

 

For decades, Plateau State has worn the celebrated label, “Home of Peace and Tourism.” Governor Caleb Mutfwang’s administration is now attempting something more ambitious: converting the state’s tourism, culture and creativity from largely celebrated assets into productive economic resources capable of creating jobs, attracting investment and broadening the state’s economy.
That is the significance of the Orange Economy strategy recently presented by the Plateau State Government at the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru.

Advertisement

The concept encompasses economic activity built around culture, creativity and intellectual property — including film, music, fashion, performing arts, tourism, digital content and design. Significantly, this is also the subject of NIPSS Senior Executive Course 48, whose participants are spending 10 months examining how Nigeria can harness the sector for sustainable development.
For Plateau, the opportunity is unusually compelling.
The state possesses a combination of natural attractions, cultural diversity and creative institutions that few states can replicate. Its more than 50 ethnic groups provide an extensive reservoir of festivals, cuisine, crafts, music, dance and traditions. Jos also hosts the Nigerian Film Corporation and National Film Institute, institutions capable of supporting the development of a larger film and entertainment ecosystem. NIPSS participants themselves identified Plateau’s tourism assets and creative ecosystem during an earlier tour of the state.
The encouraging aspect of the Mutfwang initiative is that the government is beginning to look beyond merely promoting festivals. It is attempting to construct an economic architecture around them.
The administration’s ₦4 billion MSME matching fund with the Bank of Industry, for example, could help address one of the perennial problems confronting young entrepreneurs: access to capital. Executive Order No. 10 of 2024, providing a framework for public-private partnerships, could similarly help bring private capital and expertise into projects government cannot sustainably finance alone.
Equally important is the proposed revival of Hill Station Hotel, Plateau Hotel and Jos Wildlife Park. These are not merely nostalgic landmarks. Properly redeveloped and professionally managed, they can become economic assets supporting hospitality businesses, tour operators, restaurants, transportation providers and hundreds of other enterprises.
The declaration of December as Plateau’s official tourism month also has considerable potential. Tourism thrives partly on predictability. Establishing a recognised annual season gives airlines, hotels, entertainment promoters, tour operators and visitors something around which to plan.
There is also a wider opportunity. Jos has long enjoyed an important place in Nigeria’s creative history. Building a modern ecosystem around film, music, fashion, digital production and entertainment could help retain young talent that might otherwise migrate to Lagos or Abuja.
Indeed, Mutfwang had already told NIPSS in February that the Orange Economy represented a pathway towards economic diversification and sustainable development. The latest blueprint therefore suggests an attempt to translate that proposition into specific interventions rather than leaving it as rhetoric.
There are, nevertheless, hurdles that will determine whether the ambition succeeds. Study Group 4 of NIPSS identified funding, security and legal frameworks among the issues Plateau must address to realise its potential. Security is especially consequential because tourists and investors require confidence in their destinations.
Implementation will consequently be the ultimate test.
The Mutfwang administration should now establish measurable targets: tourist arrivals, private investment attracted, creative businesses financed, jobs generated, hotel occupancy, internally generated revenue and the number of tourism facilities restored. Publishing those figures periodically would allow Plateau residents to judge whether the Orange Economy strategy is delivering tangible results.
What Mutfwang has got right is the direction: Plateau’s mountains, weather, cultures, films, festivals and creative talents should not exist merely as objects of admiration. They are economic assets.
If the administration can provide security, infrastructure, financing and credible private-sector partnerships around them, the familiar description of Plateau as the Home of Peace and Tourism could acquire a more economically meaningful dimension — a home of tourism, creativity, enterprise and jobs.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Surging Energy demands and challenges of Ai

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Sonny Aragba-Akpore

While findings show that artificial intelligence (AI) is both a driver of efficiency, but a growing challenge, leading AI and cloud providers saw their individual emissions rise between 2020 and 2024, driven by soaring energy demand and expansion of infrastructure.

These findings indicate that AI may provide answers to general energy requirements, but the challenges ahead may reduce the excitement it brings. New studies released by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), recently have reports that evaluated the climate performance of 200 digital companies globally using publicly disclosed data relating to the 2024 reporting year.

The fifth edition of Greening Digital Companies tracks greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy consumption, climate targets, renewable energy use and, for the first time, climate transition planning before drawing the conclusion of the challenges of AI ahead.

Advertisement

The report released last week in Geneva, Switzerland by ITU says that despite progress in climate reporting and renewable electricity use, digital companies are falling short in cutting emissions at the pace required to achieve global climate targets, quoting the new report Greening Digital Companies: Monitoring Emissions and Climate Commitments 2026.

“While digital technologies offer immense potential for climate action, their rising energy demands and emissions cannot be overlooked,” according to Doreen Bogdan-Martin, ITU Secretary-General adding that “Environmental sustainability must be built into how we design, power and scale the technologies shaping our shared digital future.”
Indeed, AI,s growing energy demand highlights the urgency to align digital opportunities with climate goals.

In what looked like AI,s double edged sword, the report identifies AI as an increasingly important factor shaping the sector’s emission trajectory. “Operational emissions from four major AI and cloud providers have soared, reaching up to 239 per cent of their 2020 levels, while 14 large telecom operators reduced their emissions by 11 per cent over the same period.”

ITU submits that “while AI supports climate action through energy optimization, renewable forecasting, and efficiency gains, it comes with its own environmental costs.

Advertisement

The report underlines the critical need for AI growth to align with clean energy investments and emissions management.” The report identifies priority actions, such as strengthening climate reporting, reducing Scope 3 emissions, improving the implementation of climate transition plans, and aligning AI and digital infrastructure expansion with clean energy development.

“The ICT sector has the innovation, resources, and influence to help shape a more sustainable digital future,” said Cosmas Luckyson Zavazava, Director of ITU’s Telecommunication Development Bureau. “Rearising that potential means turning climate commitments into implementation, cutting emissions, strengthening collaboration among various sector actors and ensuring that digital growth, including AI, advances alongside clean energy development.”

ITU supports this work through collaborative initiatives like its Expert Group on
Telecommunication/ICT Indicators, with a key sub-group developing harmonized national-level indicators for tech-related GHG emissions and energy use.

The latest findings also reinforce ITU’s Green Digital Action Initiative, which calls for greater transparency on energy use, emissions, and progress toward science-based targets. The ITU submits that Climate reporting has improved, but significant gaps remain. “While 89 per cent of companies reported direct emissions (Scope 1) and 81 per cent reported purchased energy (Scope 2), only 47 per cent reported emissions from across all relevant value chain activities (Scope 3).
On Greenhouse gas emissions the report indicates that “In 2024, digital companies reported 301 million tonnes of operational emissions (Scope 1 and 2) in carbon dioxide equivalent, equivalent to 0.8 per cent of global energy-related emissions and a 1.2 per cent increase from 2023.

Advertisement

For companies disclosing value-chain emissions (Scope 3), these dominated their carbon footprint, accounting for 76 per cent of total emissions and underscoring the sector’s challenges in supply chains, manufacturing, and product use.
The report says of electricity consumption that “163 companies reported consuming 494 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2024, equivalent to approximately 1.7 per cent of global electricity consumption. Over half of this electricity consumption (54 per cent) was concentrated in just 10 companies, surpassing the yearly electricity use of some countries.”

“While digital companies remain among the world’s largest corporate purchasers of renewable electricity, only 25 of the 200 companies assessed reported sourcing 100 per cent renewable electricity.” The report indicates that Climate targets show that 151 (or 76 per cent) of the assessed companies submitted near-term reduction targets for Scope 1 and 2 emissions, reflecting both voluntary leadership and the influence of investor expectations, scientific and awareness-raising campaigns, and emerging regulatory requirements.

“However, just 114 targets were validated by science-based frameworks with 85 assessed as on track based on progress to date. On Climate transition plans, Only 81 companies (41 per cent) demonstrated comprehensive plans to meet climate goals, including strategic ambition, implementation and engagement strategies, clear metrics, targets, and governance. “This highlights the urgent need for more robust planning to manage the necessary economic, social and energy transitions “adding that
“Digital companies need to engage suppliers and address emissions across the products and services they rely on,” according to Gerbrand Haverkamp, Executive Director of the World Benchmarking Alliance. “For example, the electronics sector, which provides many inputs underpinning digital infrastructure, accounts for 53 per cent of reported emissions across all three subsectors.”

​The ITU has put in place global standards and frameworks connecting digital networks with sustainable energy infrastructure. It has also developed technical recommendations—such as ITU-T L.1332 for network infrastructure energy efficiency and ITU-T L.1510 for digital environmental key performance indicators—to measure and reduce power loss in telecom facilities and data centres.

Advertisement

AI and Power Grids are part of measures that the ITU addresses the dual role of artificial intelligence as both a major driver of surging electricity demand and a smart tool for optimizing power grid performance. Through Smart Energy Solutionist creates frameworks like ITU-T L.1385, by providing guidelines for smart industrial energy management systems to improve efficiency and reliability in manufacturing and building infrastructures. And in order to Bridge Global Divides the ITU initiatives emphasize expanding resilient connectivity and investing in foundational energy infrastructure, particularly in developing regions like Africa, to achieve sustainable digital development.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Leadership Man of the Year: WHY ABDUL SAMAD, NDUKA MATTER.

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Garba Shehu

This year, the Leadership newspaper is conferring its prestigious Man of the Year award on two Nigerian icons in recognition of their leadership journeys:

Prince Nduka Obaigbena, one of Nigeria’s most famous and admired media figures is a man who shaped, and continues to shape different eras in Nigerian journalism.

Abdul Samad Isyaku Rabi’u, born on August 4, 1960 is a Nigerian billionaire businessman and cement magnate.
His is a name that goes far beyond the boardroom. While he is renowned as the chairman BUA Group of Companies which he transformed into a global business empire, his contributions extend well beyond the corporate world.
Abdul Samad’s philanthropy is a beacon of hope for millions, and his selfless  giving continues to leave lasting impressions on Nigeria, Africa and the world.

Advertisement

By showing that business can move beyond the notion of profit, Samad, as fondly called by friends has showcased how true leadership is not only about business success but also about creating a lasting social impact.

As the executive chairman of BUAFOODS,  he drove the expansion of the conglomerate into Nigeria’s most capitalized company, with a share price of approximately ₦760.60 and a market capitalization of roughly ₦13.69 trillion.

Currently, he is Africa’s second richest person with a net worth estimated at between $13 billion and $19 billion in 2026.

Samad has always stood for more than business. To Nigerians, he  personifies kindness, purpose, and institution-building. He is Nigeria’s, indeed Africa’s philanthropic giant.

Advertisement

When the Covid-19 crisis rocked and racked livelihoods, lives and even nations across the globe, Nigerian business leaders formed what they called the Coalition Against COVID-19, known as CACOVID. Led by Aliko Dangote, Africa’s wealthiest man, the coalition was backed by Access Bank Group, Zenith Bank, Guaranty Trust Bank, and several others including the BUA Chairman, Abdul Samad.

Rather than solely funding temporary relief, which he noted was the major shortcoming of the CACOVID relief programs he and the others put in place, Abdul Samad seized the momentum to sharpen and accelerate his visionary legacy of transforming lives in Nigeria through philanthropy and social impact initiatives.

It’s the famous American author and motivational speaker Tony Robbins who said
“by changing nothing, nothing changes.”
Like a bolt from the sky, came in 2021, the Abdul Samad Rabi’u foundation, ASR Africa Initiative which is the brainchild of the industrialist and philanthropist, with an annual pledge of $100,000,000 (USD) with Nigeria to benefit $50,000,000 (USD) yearly and the rest of Africa, $50,000,000 (USD) in what is the largest private philanthropic giving of its kind by an individual on the continent.

He believes in using wealth to uplift society and to address some of the most pressing challenges facing humanity. From education to healthcare, water supply to rural development, Samad’s  charitable efforts have touched countless lives.

Advertisement

As one of the world’s leading philanthropists of the 21st century, Abdul Samad’s compassionate ethos of giving is evident in his generous donations to education and healthcare.

ASR has built, among many other projects, a N310 million students hostel at the Federal University of Technology, Minna; a N270 million Abdul Samad Rabi’u Sports Complex at the University of Jos; N250 million admin block at the Federal University of Technology, Owerri; N250 million sports center at UNIPORT; N1 billion learning facility at UNILORIN; another billion Naira Integrated Agric Center at the Bayero University, Kano and a language center at the Nigerian Defence Academy, NDA.

The foundation has, to its credit, several other projects including lecture theaters, auditoria, classrooms, libraries, laboratories, staff quarters and offices, ICT facilities, books, journals and periodicals, machines and other research equipment thrown at institutions of learning in Nigeria, Ghana and other African countries.

ASR Africa has also made contributions to the well-being of our defence and security agencies through projects such the N2 billion Naira Nigerian Navy medical center in the FCT; a N500 million immigration staff accommodation for the Immigration Service and another N500 million for the Correctional Center (Prisons Service); a 150 bed mega hospital for the police in Abuja, and a hospital for the immigration service in Bauchi.

Advertisement

The foundation has built a palace for the Royal Igbogila Kingdom in Ijesha in Ogun State for N1 billion; a contribution of N5 billion to the IBB national library project and the ongoing construction of the Malam Abdulkarim Juma’a mosque in Zaria.

The history and extent of his passionate support for health and welfare is another little-known detail about Samad.
Through this foundation, he has enabled the construction and rehabilitation of healthcare facilities, equipping them, developing research capabilities for researchers, healthcare practitioners and community level service providers.

Among the many projects executed include a N2.5 billion teaching hospital at Akwa Ibom State University, Uyo, a N2.5 billion school of nursing at Sokoto State University in Tambuwal, a N2.5 billion school of health technology in Gwadabawa also Sokoto state; a N2.5 billion Oncology and diagnostic center in Ilorin; a N2.5 billion Stella Obasanjo Hospital in Edo state, a N250 million clinic at the Nigerian Law School as well as a record number of hospitals in Kano, Katsina, FCT, Bauchi and Sokoto given ambulances and tuberculosis centers. Ten states got kits for sexual assault repentance centers.

In his effortless stride of his giving, Samad sparked a national enthusiasm when he offered a cash reward package of up to USD1.5 million to the Super Eagles during the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) in January, 2025.
In the end, we lost the semi-final to the host nation, Morocco in a penalty shootout.

Advertisement

Despite the defeat, he still went ahead dishing out USD 500,000 in appreciation of the team’s “resilience, passion, and strong performance throughout the tournament.”

Through philanthropy and strong conviction with an eye on nation building, Abdul Samad continues to create and support countless social uplift programmes in areas such as health, education, national security, water, sports , livelihoods and social welfare, all with one core purpose — to improve the quality of life of those it touches at home in Nigeria and other countries in Africa.

His selection as the 2026 “Man of the Year” by the Leadership Media Group is an eloquent testimony to why Abdul Samad,  a major global player, matters.

… And Nduka Obaigbena.

Advertisement

I have told my Nduka story on these pages before but given the importance I attach to it, its bears repeating.
Many years ago, we met at his instance to decide if would partner with him in his upcoming magazine, TheWeek, with ties to the Time Magazine where Mr. Obaigbena had worked in the past.

After all has been said, our representative at meeting asked an important question:
What happens if the beautiful dream crashes? Is there a fallback to it?
Our host, Nduka Obaigbena shoved aside the issue, saying we are all taking a risk, there is nothing to lose. None of us here has a family.

We, (I and my editor, Malam Kabiru Yusuf) decided that this would be a dangerous journey; the  the guy is not a serious person, we concluded.

TheWeek took off and crashed but in its place, he went on to found ThisDay.

Advertisement

Malam Kabiru, with a few friends started the Daily Trust which has gone on to break so many barriers and myths and about the success or lack of it in publishing in Northern Nigeria.The Trust Newspapers are today printed simultaneously in Abuja, where they are headquartered in a five-story building, in Kano, Maiduguri, Lagos and Port Harcourt, the only one to so in the country.

Nduka Obaigbena has built ThisDay (Leaders and Company) into one of the country’s most respected media organisations, comprising not only the flagship ThisDay but also several other publications, and Arise International TV network.

Recognizing the potential importance of digital media, Nduka launched Lekeelekee,  the first global social media platform built out of Africa, “blending Tik-Tok, X , WhatsApp into a culturally aligned , mobile-first experience for African and the diaspora.” Users say Lekeelekee is fun and easy to use.

In this growing communications empire, ThisDay has a reputation for thorough, accurate, and well-written journalism, setting standards for politics, economy, business and society reporting. Through this paper, Nduka gave this country its first all-color newspaper.

Advertisement

In 1998, the Nigerian Guild of Editors gave him an award in recognition of his transformative contributions to journalism and media in the country.

Arise continues to grow in size and reputation with a tradition of being a watchdog for misdeeds by politicians and aggressive interviewing  techniques that have become a subject of discussion among communications scholars and practitioners. Nduka must be credited with a rare ability to create and manage this world class media empire and in the people he choses to run it, the choice of a top flight management team, and  a willingness on his part to support the staff in and out of office, even when pressured to do otherwise.

In addition to being publisher, Nduka has led the Newspaper Proprietors Association of Nigeria, NPAN and is a patron of the Nigerian Press Organization, NPO, after leading it as president, giving him, overall, a latitude of authority, wealth, financial power, social privilege, and outstanding public respect.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News