Connect with us

Health

Infected Blood Scandal: 10 Things to Know as Death Toll Surpasses 30,000

Published

on

The Infected Blood Scandal stands as a tragic chapter in medical history, marked by profound human suffering, institutional failures, and a quest for justice and accountability. More than 30,000 people, including children, were infected with viruses such as HIV and hepatitis after being given tainted blood between the 1970s and early 1990s.

A bombshell report released Monday found that the tainted blood affair was covered up by successive governments and health officials and largely could have been avoided. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak issued a “wholehearted and unequivocal” apology and promised compensation for everyone affected.

Key Points to Know About the Infected Blood Scandal
1. Scope and Impact

The scandal unfolded in the 1970s and 1980s when thousands of patients in the United Kingdom were infected with HIV and hepatitis C through contaminated blood products. It’s estimated that over 4,000 people were affected, many of whom were haemophiliacs or received blood transfusions.

Advertisement

2. Contaminated Blood Products
The primary cause of the scandal was the use of blood products sourced from high-risk donors, including prisoners, drug users, and paid donors. These products were not properly screened for infections, leading to widespread transmission of HIV and hepatitis C.

3. Haemophilia Community Impact
Haemophiliacs were disproportionately affected due to their reliance on blood products for clotting factor replacement therapy. Many were infected with HIV and hepatitis C, leading to severe illness, premature death, and significant psychological trauma for patients and their families.

4. Government Involvement
Government agencies and health authorities were implicated for their role in the procurement, regulation, and distribution of contaminated blood products. Criticisms include negligence, inadequate safety protocols, and a lack of transparency and accountability.

5. Delayed Response
Despite early warnings and evidence of contamination, authorities failed to take timely action to address the risks and protect patients. Delays in implementing screening measures and withdrawing contaminated products exacerbated the spread of infections and contributed to the scale of the tragedy.

Advertisement

6. Campaign for Justice
Survivors, families of victims, and advocacy groups have long campaigned for justice, accountability, and compensation. Their efforts have led to inquiries, legal proceedings, and calls for government apologies and reparations.

7. Inquiry and Investigations
In 2017, the United Kingdom launched the Infected Blood Inquiry, a public inquiry tasked with examining the causes, scale, and impact of the scandal. The inquiry aims to uncover the truth, hold accountable those responsible, and provide closure and support to affected individuals and communities.

8. Medical and Ethical Failures
The scandal exposed systemic failures in the healthcare system, including inadequate regulation, ethical lapses, and a disregard for patient safety. It raised questions about medical ethics, informed consent, and the responsibility of healthcare providers to prioritize patient welfare.

9. Legacy and Lessons
The legacy of the scandal endures as a reminder of the human cost of negligence and incompetence in healthcare. It underscores the importance of robust safety protocols, transparency, and accountability in medical practice and public health policy.

Advertisement

10. Ongoing Impact
Despite decades having passed since the scandal, its impact continues to reverberate within affected communities. Many survivors still grapple with health complications, stigma, and the emotional toll of their experiences. Efforts to address the long-term needs of survivors and provide support and redress remain ongoing.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health

Frequent ejaculation not certain to prevent prostate cancer – Urologists

Published

on

The Association of Urological Surgeons in Nigeria, NAUS, has expressed concern about the recent and continued circulation in the public space of what it labelled as misinformation on social media and mainstream media regarding the link between frequent ejaculation and the risk of prostate cancer.

In a position statement on “Risk of Prostate Cancer and Frequency of Ejaculation” obtained by Vanguard, the executive committee of the NAUS – a professional organisation dedicated to advancing the field of urology in Nigeria – noted that while some studies have explored a potential correlation between increased ejaculation frequency and a reduced risk of prostate cancer, the evidence remains inconclusive, and more research is needed to fully understand the connection.

The statement – CAC/TT/No. 125351 – dated December 16, 2024, and jointly signed by the Association’s President, Prof. N.K. Dakum, and Secretary General, Prof. Muhammed Ahmed, cautioned that at this time, it is important to interpret the existing evidence carefully, and frequent ejaculation should not be seen as a guaranteed way to prevent prostate cancer.

The Association said that as a body of experts, it had a sense of duty to clarify the claims to prevent the spread of misleading information regarding ejaculation and prostate cancer risk

Advertisement

The statement reads: The Association of Urological Surgeons, Nigeria (NAUS) has observed with concern the recent and continued dissemination of information on social media platforms and even the main stream media in Nigeria regarding the relationship between sex/frequent ejaculation and the risk of prostate cancer.

“There is a need, as professionals in the field to make a statement in that regard in order to avoid the perpetuation of often misleading and inaccurate statements or conclusions.

“We, therefore, wish to state that while there are studies suggesting a potential association between frequent ejaculation and reduced prostate cancer risk, the evidence is not yet conclusive, and more research is needed to fully understand the relationship between the two.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

NAFDAC raises the alarm over fake Paludex drugs, uncovers counterfeit hub in Aba

Published

on

NAFDAC has warned Nigerians about the sale and distribution of fake Paludex tablets and suspensions across the country.

The agency announced on its X account (formerly Twitter) that fake Paludex Artemether/Lumefantrine tablets (80mg/480mg) were falsely labelled as being made by Impact Pharmaceutical Ltd, located at Standard Industrial Layout, Emene, Enugu State.

It added that these fake drugs are being distributed by MD Life Sciences Ltd, also based in Emene Industrial Layout, Enugu.

NAFDAC further revealed the discovery of counterfeit Paludex dry powder for oral suspension (180mg/1080mg), meant for children.

Advertisement

NAFDAC stated that the counterfeit Paludex oral suspension was falsely labelled as being manufactured by Impact Pharmaceutical Ltd, located at No. 33A/33B Standard Industrial Layout, Enugu, and Ecomed Pharma Limited in Ogun State, and marketed by MD Life Sciences Ltd.

The agency revealed that laboratory tests conducted by a WHO-prequalified laboratory in Germany showed that both products contained zero per cent of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API). Additional tests conducted by NAFDAC also confirmed the absence of any API in the products.

The statement further disclosed that the fake products are not listed in NAFDAC’s database of registered drugs, and the NAFDAC registration numbers displayed on the packaging are fake.

NAFDAC emphasized that authentic Artemether/Lumefantrine tablets or suspensions are a combination of two active ingredients, Artemether and Lumefantrine, used for treating acute, uncomplicated malaria in both adults and children.

Advertisement

“The illegal marketing of medicines or counterfeit medicines poses a great risk to the health of people.

“By not complying with the regulatory provisions, the safety, quality, and efficacy of the products are not guaranteed.

“Also, poor-quality pediatric formulations or medicines in general have the potential of causing treatment failure when the API content is below the prescribed dose,” it said.

NAFDAC said that all its zonal directors and state coordinators have been directed to carry out surveillance and mop up the fake products within their zones and states.

Advertisement

It also implored distributors, healthcare providers, and patients to exercise caution and vigilance within the supply chain to avoid distribution, administration, and use of the products.

The agency said that all medical products must be obtained from authorised/licensed suppliers.

“The products’ authenticity and physical condition should be carefully checked.

“Anyone in possession of any of the above-mentioned products is advised to immediately discontinue the sale or use and submit stock to the nearest NAFDAC office.

Advertisement

The agency advised the public, especially those who have used any of the products to seek immediate medical advice from a qualified healthcare professional.

It also advised healthcare professionals and consumers to report any suspicion of substandard and falsified medicines to the nearest NAFDAC office, NAFDAC on 0800-162-3322 or via email: [email protected].

In another development, NAFDAC also identified Eziukwu Market, also known as Cemetery Market in Aba, Abia State, as a major hub for producing and distributing fake and substandard products.

This discovery followed an operation led by NAFDAC’s South-East Zonal Director, Martins Iluyomade, on Tuesday.

Advertisement

During the operation, Iluyomade described the market as a centre for large-scale production and distribution of counterfeit goods, comparing its impact to “weapons of mass destruction.” Despite earlier raids, including a major one in December 2023, the illegal activities have persisted.

Iluyomade expressed frustration that people continue to prioritize profits over public health and safety. He also pointed out that the market leaders had previously signed an agreement with NAFDAC during the last operation, promising to expose those involved in these illegal activities.

However, he stressed that the market’s leadership must now answer serious questions about their failure to stop the production and sale of fake products.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

‘Blessed’: US Woman Sees Second Chance In Life After Pig Kidney Transplant

Published

on

Towana Looney donated a kidney to her mother in 1999 only for the remaining one to fail years later due to pregnancy complications.

Now, the 53-year-old from Alabama has become the latest recipient of a gene-edited pig kidney — and is currently the only living person in the world with an animal organ transplant, New York’s NYU Langone hospital announced Tuesday.

“I’m overjoyed, I’m blessed to have received this gift, this second chance at life,” Looney said during a press conference, held three weeks after the procedure.

Xenotransplantation, transplanting organs from one species to another, has long been a tantalizing yet elusive scientific goal. Early experiments on primates faltered, but recent advances in gene editing and immune system management have brought the dream closer to reality.

Advertisement

Pigs have emerged as the ideal donors: they grow quickly, produce large litters and are already part of the human food supply.

Advocates hope this approach can help address the severe organ shortage in the United States, where more than 100,000 people are waiting for transplants, including over 90,000 in need of kidneys.

A last chance

Looney had been living with dialysis since December 2016 — eight grueling years. High blood pressure caused by preeclampsia had taken its toll, leaving her with chronic kidney disease.

Advertisement

Despite receiving priority on transplant waiting lists as a living donor, her search for a compatible kidney was a frustrating dead end. Her unusually high levels of harmful antibodies made rejection almost inevitable, and as her body lost viable blood vessels to support dialysis, her health declined.

Out of options, Looney applied to join a clinical trial for pig kidney transplants, and finally underwent the seven-hour surgery on November 25.

Asked how she felt afterward, Looney’s joy was infectious. “I’m full of energy, I’ve got an appetite… and of course, I can go to the bathroom. I haven’t been going in eight years!” she laughed, adding that she plans to celebrate at Disney World.

Jayme Locke, a surgeon on the transplant team, described the results with awe. “The kidney functioned essentially exactly like a kidney from a living donor,” she said, adding that Looney’s husband saw a rosiness in her cheeks for the first time in years.

Advertisement

“That is the miracle of transplantation.”

Cautious optimism

Looney’s surgery is the third time a gene-edited pig kidney has been transplanted into a human who is not brain dead.

Rick Slayman, the first recipient, died in May, two months after his procedure at Massachusetts General Hospital. The second, Lisa Pisano, initially showed signs of recovery following her surgery at NYU Langone, but the organ had to be removed after 47 days, and she passed away in July.

Advertisement

Looney, however, was not terminally ill before the transplant, noted Robert Montgomery, who led the surgery. Each case, he emphasized, provides critical lessons for refining the techniques.

The kidney was provided by biotech company Revivicor, which breeds genetically modified herds in Virginia. A Massachusetts-based company, eGenesis, provided the kidney for Slayman.

Looney’s organ has 10 genetic edits to improve compatibility with the human body — an advance over Revivicor’s earlier efforts that used kidneys with a single gene edit and included the pig’s thymus gland to help train the host’s immune system and prevent rejection.

Montgomery, a pioneer in the field who performed the world’s first gene-edited pig organ transplant in a brain-dead patient in 2021, said both methods are likely to enter clinical trials “probably by this time next year, or even sooner.”

Advertisement

“This is a watershed moment for the future of transplantation,” said Kevin Longino, CEO of the National Kidney Foundation. The nonprofit’s polling shows that patients and families favor faster clinical trial progress, believing the risk of inaction outweighs the uncertainties of xenotransplantation.

Looney was discharged December 6 to a nearby New York City apartment. Though her high antibody levels remain a concern, doctors are monitoring her closely using wearable technology and are trying a novel drug regimen to prevent rejection.

Periodic hospital visits may still be required, but the team remains optimistic she can return home in three months.

AFP

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News