Connect with us

News

N21m monthly salary: Disclose running costs or face legal action- SERAP tells NASS leadership

Published

on

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has asked the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas to disclose the “exact amount of monthly running costs” allotted to members of the National Assembly.

SERAP requested the spending details of any of such running costs as well.

This was contained in a statement dated August 17, 2024, signed by Kolawole Oluwadare, Deputy Director of SERAP.

The group’s demand is coming on the heels of the recent controversy surrounding the salary of Senators.

Advertisement

A former Senator representing Kaduna Central, Senator Shehu Sani, had stated that Senators receive over N13 million monthly, but the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission faulted his claim.

In its statement however, SERAP urged the NASS leadership to “promptly end the alleged practice by the National Assembly of fixing its own salaries, allowances and running costs, in conformity with the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended], and the country’s international obligations.”

It also called them “to end the alleged practice of paying running costs into the personal accounts of lawmakers, and to refer the alleged misuse or mismanagement of the running costs to appropriate anticorruption agencies for investigation and prosecution where there is relevant admissible evidence.”

The statement also urged the NASS leadership to “promptly disclose the total amount of running costs that have so far been paid to and received by the lawmakers and to ensure the return of any misused or mismanaged public funds.”

Advertisement

The organisation said: “We are concerned about the practice by the lawmakers of fixing their salaries, allowances, and running costs, as well as the opacity and the spending of millions of naira in running costs by lawmakers.”

It added, “The constitutional oath of office of lawmakers requires them to ensure transparency and accountability in the exact amounts of salaries, allowances and running costs they receive.”

The letter, read in part: “The provisions of paragraph N, section 32(d) of the Third Schedule to the Nigerian Constitution clearly make it unlawful for the National Assembly to fix its own salaries, allowances and running costs.”

“The allegations that members of the National Assembly are fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs are entirely inconsistent and incompatible with the constitutional oath of office and the object and purpose of the UN Convention against Corruption to which Nigeria is a state party.”

Advertisement

‘Personal money shall in no circumstances be paid into a government bank account, nor shall any public money be paid into a private bank account.’”

“In the Seventh Schedule to the Nigerian Constitution, members lawmakers commit to strive to ‘preserve the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy contained in the Constitution’, [and to] perform their ‘functions honestly, faithfully’, to act ‘always in the interest of the well-being and prosperity of Nigeria’.”

“Lawmakers also commit ‘preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of Nigeria; and abide by the Code of Conduct contained in the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution.’”

“‘Public function’ means activities in the public interest, not against it. The reports that lawmakers are fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs amount to private self-interest or self-dealing. It is also detrimental to the public interest.”

Advertisement

“SERAP notes that Section 15(5) of the Nigerian Constitution requires public institutions to abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power. Section 16(2) of the Nigerian Constitution further provides that, ‘the material resources of the nation are harnessed and distributed as best as possible to serve the common good.’”

“According to our information, members of the National Assembly are currently fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs. The running costs are reportedly paid directly into the personal accounts of members.”

“Senator Kawu Sumaila, representing Kano South Senatorial District, recently disclosed in an interview with BBC Hausa that each Nigerian senator earns at least N21 million monthly in running costs, salaries, and allowances.”

“Mr Sumaila reportedly said, ‘My monthly salary is less than N1 million. After deductions, the figure comes down to a little over N600,000. Given the increase effected, in the Senate, each senator gets N21 million every month as running cost.’”

Advertisement

“According to reports, former President Olusegun Obasanjo recently alleged that the lawmakers fix their own salaries and allowances, contrary to the recommendation of the Revenue Mobilisation Fiscal Allocation Commission (RMAFC).”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

New Tax Bills Not To Merge Govt Agencies, Cause Job Losses – FIRS

Published

on

By Gloria Ikibah
Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Zack Adedeji, has explained that the four new tax reform bills are meant to combine all scattered tax laws into one, making it easier to manage.
Adedeji who stated this at a meeting with the House of Representatives Committee on Finance, said the bills presented to the National Assembly were not about raising or introducing new taxes, this is even as he also clarified that the reforms will not merge any government agencies or cause job losses.
He said, “We want to harmonize all the tax laws because we have different tax laws scattered in various establishment laws. This leads to multiple taxes because each agency enforces its own tax law.”
The FIRS boss further noted that no agency is more important than another, and each must carry out its duties. This, he said was not good for the economy, which is why President Tinubu wants to combine all the tax laws into one system.
He added, “As we stand today, there is no law regulating or monitoring cryptocurrency. We can’t isolate ourselves from global developments, so one of the goals is to organize the fiscal framework efficiently.”
Adedeji also highlighted that the reform will help government spending. “For example, before the Treasury Single Account (TSA), the government could have money in one bank but still borrow from another. TSA now gives a clear picture of where government funds are”.
He further stressed the need for transparency in revenue collection, and assured that the government is not looking to tax poverty or inflation.
“We want the tax laws to be simple so that people can comply easily.
“The reforms will also update old tax laws to fit current realities. We’re still using a tax integrity test from 1939 when there was no internet or online shopping. These bills aim to align Nigeria with international standards and attract investment.”
“We will never increase the rate or number of taxes. The president believes in harmonizing the taxes we have, with fewer than 20 types of taxes”, he added.
He stated that the proposed Nigeria Tax Act will put all tax laws in one book, reducing the number of taxes, citing the example of the Education Tax Act, which collects a percentage for various funds, and said compliance has been an issue and the new act will make this simpler.
“The Nigeria Tax Administration Act will harmonize the administration of taxes, ensuring a uniform process so people don’t have to navigate different systems”, he noted.
Adedeji also discussed renaming the FIRS to Nigeria Revenue Service to reflect its role in collecting taxes for both the federal and state governments, as well as from international companies like Google and Jumia.
“The final reform is the establishment of a Joint Revenue Board to create a legal framework for resolving conflicts between states and local governments over revenue collection.
“These tax reforms will stimulate the economy and lay a foundation for the type of economy the president envisions”, he concluded.
Chairman of the Committee, James Faleke, earlier in his remarked that the meeting was to give members firsthand information on the necessity of the bills ahead of their second reading.
Continue Reading

News

Parents Of 2-year Old Boy Killed By NDLEA Demand N2b Compensation

Published

on

By Gloria Ikibah
The parents of a two-year-old boy, Ivan Omhonria, who was shot and killed, and his younger brother, Eromonsele, who was shot in the eye by officers of the Nigerian Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), are demanding N2 billion in compensation from the Agency.
Naijablitznews.com recalled that the incident took place in Delta State in 2023, when Eromonsele, who survived, was only one year old.
The father, Fidelis, who appeared before the House of Representatives Committee on Public Petitions, expressed bitterness that the NDLEA has neglected them since the tragedy occurred over a year ago. He also disclosed that Eromonsele’s health has been getting worse due to a lack of proper medical care.
The family had filed a petition against the NDLEA, and the first hearing was held on Wednesday, at the National Assembly Complex in Abuja.
During the hearing, NDLEA’s lawyer, Muniat Adeleye, stated that the Agency had agreed to pay the family N25 million, with N5 million already sent as the first installment, and that the payment was to be spread over five months.
Adeleye expressed surprise at the petition, and said, “The Agency did not expect it, as the matter had already been resolved with an agreement between both parents.”
However, when asked for the signed agreement, Adeleye, who is the Assistant Director of Prosecution and Legal Services, admitted that it had not been signed. This upset the Committee, which demanded that NDLEA Chairman, Brigadier General Buba Marwa (rtd), appear at the next hearing.
Fidelis denied any such agreement, saying, “I was shocked to hear about an agreement just now. I’m not a party to any agreement. Yes, the NDLEA Chairman called me after the incident and said he was sorry and that he would send me a token from his personal funds. He didn’t mention an amount, but later, I received N5 million in my wife’s account. That’s all. So where did the N25 million agreement come from?”
The family’s lawyer added, “We demanded N2 billion in compensation, but the NDLEA never responded. They ignored us with arrogance. A life was lost, and another child’s future is at risk because of the eye injury. We want the House to make sure the NDLEA takes responsibility and compensates the family properly.”
Chairman of the Committee, Rep. Mike Etaba, expressed the seriousness of the matter, “This is a grave issue. Nigerians and the world are watching us. At the next hearing, the NDLEA head must appear in person to explain what steps he has taken to help this family. The money sent was just a token to cover some medical costs, not part of any agreement. No one should claim there was a N25 million agreement.”
The matter was adjourned to October 22, 2024.
Continue Reading

News

Companies Blame Host Communities For Oil Theft, Pipeline Vandalism

Published

on

…seek intervention of NASS for legal framework
By Gloria Ikibah
Aieto and Nigeria Agip (now Oando) Oil companies have given different submissions before the House of Representatives’ Environment Committee, during the ongoing investigative hearing into oil theft, pipeline vandalism, and their environmental impact in oil-producing states on Tuesday in Abuja.
The hearing was occasioned by a lot of petitions from host communities affected by Aieto’s and Oando’s operations, who drew special attention on the environmental and economic concerns caused by oil spills and sabotage.
Both companies stressed the need for legislative intervention by the House of Representatives to create legal framework that discourages acts harmful to the nation’s economy and ecosystem.
Oando Team Lead, Philip Akuduro, blamed a significant portion of oil spillage on host communities, citing theft and vandalism as primary causes.
He stated, “Data by Oando on Burutu in Southern Ijaw revealed that virtually over 90% of oil theft and pipeline vandalism were perpetrated by members of the host communities, whose increasing penance and capacity to steal from the common well knows no bounds.”
“Host communities are individually and collectively sabotaging efforts of oil companies to minimize incidences of spillages in their area. Our operations, largely covering onshore and marshy areas, are easily accessible to vandals. Their activities result in spillage and pollution, as oil spills are swiftly spread by strong underwater currents.”
But members of the committee, mostly from the Niger Delta region, led by Chairman Rep. Julius Pondi (representing Ijaw South), vehemently were against the generalized accusations.
They particularly objected to the terms “increasing appetite and capacities for theft,” and therefore urged Oando to withdraw the statement, which the company did spot-on.
Chief Operating Officer of Aieto, Ewarezi Useh, who emphasised the importance of maintaining a good relationship with host communities, however noted that vested interests often lead to conflicts between oil companies and local communities.
Useh credited such clashes to the significant drop in production to 700,000 barrels per day in 2018, which later improved through the efforts of combined security stakeholders.
Rep. Julius Pondi reaffirmed the commitment of the committee to address the root causes of environmental degradation and pollution caused by oil company operations.
He disclosed that there will be an oversight visit to Oando’s operation sites in Delta State to verify their claims of cleaning up the aftermath of a May 2024 oil spill in the area.
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News