News
Outcry against Tax Reform Bills misplaced, says Senator Umeh

The senator representing Anambra Central on the platform of the Labour Party (LP), Victor Umeh, has said there is nothing to fear about the Tax Reform Bills currently before the National Assembly for consideration and passage.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had, in October, transmitted four Tax Reform Bills to the National Assembly for consideration. The President had said the proposed reforms were aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s fiscal institutions and ensuring the actualisation of his administration’s comprehensive development plans for the country.
The President’s introduction of the Bills had ignited public outcry, leading to widespread debates across Nigeria.
Umeh, who addressed reporters yesterday in Abuja, noted that despite the criticisms against the proposed tax reforms, the Federal Government only has to properly market the Bills to Nigerians to enable them have a better understanding of the contents to clear their doubts.
The lawmaker, who is the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Diaspora Matters and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), stressed that reforms were necessary steps and actions the government needed to take to bring about the changes that would guarantee the growth of the economy and make life better for the citizens.
“Globally, what people don’t like to do is to pay tax. Nobody likes to pay money. But a system that has worked effectively would have the confidence of its citizens to pay tax. When you charge tax that people will not be willing to pay and then you use force to get the tax, it is not a good tax.
“Any tax that you use force to get is not a good tax. A good tax is one that people will be willing to pay. And so, it will be easy to administer, and the collection process will be easy.
“If they know that the government would pay the money they are paying as tax to provide infrastructure and services, people will be more persuaded to pay tax. But in Nigeria, we are in a situation where Nigerians have lost faith in governance.
“So, any action that is geared towards taxing the citizens would receive immediate rejections. That is what we are seeing with the Tax Bills.
“People have not been able to read the Bills. They have continued to rely on social media posts to condemn the proposed tax reforms. I have read the Tax Reform Bills. I can tell that in as much as we will be doing consultation, I have not seen anything that is very harmful in the Bills that should warrant a total rejection.
“What we need to do is to explain and ensure that people understand the purpose and the intent of the Bills. So, the government has a lot of work to do to market its objectives to the Nigerian people and do things that will promote confidence on the part of Nigerians.
“The drivers of the government should be able to show that they are ready to be like ordinary people so that when you are asking Nigerians to pay money, they will know that they are not paying this money for you to go and buy luxuries for yourself and your family,” Umeh said.
News
How Nnamdi Kanu sit-at-home order led to the killing of retired Judge – Witness

A prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu on Thursday, told a Federal High Court in Abuja that, Kanu’s broadcast led to the killing of a former Senior Special Adviser (SSA) to ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, Ahmed Gulak, and others.
In a recorded session played before the trial Judge, Justice James Omotosho, the prosecution witness, an official of the Department of State Services (DSS), led by Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, alleged that Kanu’s broadcast in which he ordered followers to “deal with” anyone violating his sit-at-home directive directly preceded the murder of Gulak on May 30, 2021.
The witness, the second so far called by the prosecution said, he was part of the DSS’ team that investigated the complaint made against Kanu by the then Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami, and that, the defendant’s broadcast also led to the killing of a retired judge, Justice Stanley Nnaji and an intending military couple, Sergeant Audu Lucas, Private Glory Matthew.
The witness said Kanu, in one of his broadcasts, ordered his followers to enforce a sit-in at home in all South-Eastern states, and as a result, many people who went out of their houses on that day were killed.
He said investigation revealed that Sergeant Lucas and Private Matthew were not only killed by those who were enforcing Kanu’s sit-at-home order, but they were also beheaded.
The witness said investigation also revealed that before killing Gulak, those enforcing the sit at home directive by Kanu, blamed him (Gulak) for coming out on a day their leader asked people not to go out of their homes.
Kanu, however, denied responsibility for the violence, insisting that his movement is non-violent and that IPOB cannot be involved in any criminality.
He admitted operating a radio programme but denied that his broadcasts led to killings in Lagos during the End SARS protests, arguing that Lagos is not within the Biafran territory.
The prosecution’s witness, codenamed PWBBB, claimed that the video evidence linked Kanu to violent acts, including the burning of police stations and the beheading of officers in Lagos.
Kanu said he was not directly involved in the day-to-day running of both organisations (IPOB and ESN), which he said were managed by their states’ coordinators.
The defendant also said, in the video, that he made broadcasts in respect of the End SARS protest and other broadcasts on Radio Biafra.
Kanu, who said he facilitated the establishment of ESN, explained that the organisation was necessitated by the killings of the people of the South East and faulted the invasion of his house by armed soldiers, which he said accounted for why he left the country for fear of being killed.
He argued that the invasion was unnecessary and also faulted the manner he was arrested in Kenya and brought back to Nigeria.
He said the protest in Lagos during the End SARS protest was outside the Biafran territory and that the destruction witnessed during the protest could not have been due to his broadcast.
Kanu said he does not have authority over his members, adding that if he had authority over them, he would not have subscribed to the referendum; he would have just pronounced Biafra into existence.
In the video, Kanu denied that IPOB is responsible for the violent attacks in some parts of the south east and the killings witnessed, adding that “IPOB is a peaceful movement. The IPOB is a non-violent movement.”
Defence counsel, Paul Erokoro, SAN, objected to the admissibility of the video, requesting time to consult further.
Following agreement by lawyers in the matter, Justice James Omotosho adjourned till May 14, 21 and 22, 2025 for further hearing.
News
Nigeria Needs To Focus on Local Solutions to Fight Poverty – Speaker Abbas

By Gloria Ikibah
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rep. Tajudeen Abbas, has said the fight against poverty in Nigeria must start at the community level.
Representatives by the Chief Whip of the House, Rep. Isiaka Ibrahim, at the inauguration of a new House Committee focused on community and social development on Wednesday, Abbas stressed that real change will only happen when policies are designed to meet the everyday needs of people in towns and villages.
He also called on the government to create people-friendly programmes that reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.
The event, held at the National Assembly in Abuja, marked the official takeoff of the Committee on Community and Social Development Agency/NG-Cares. Abbas urged members of the Committee to approach their work with honesty and a genuine desire to help struggling Nigerians.
News
White smoke rises, new pope elected at Vatican +Video

By Francesca Hangeior
White smoke billowed from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel on Thursday, signalling that cardinals locked inside have elected a new leader for the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics.
Thousands of pilgrims and curious onlookers in St Peter’s Square cheered and applauded as the smoke appeared and bells began to ring, indicating the 2,000-year-old institution has its 267th pope.
All eyes now turn to the balcony of St Peter’s Basilica to see who has been elected to succeed Pope Francis, an Argentine reformer who died last month after 12 years as leader of the worldwide Church.
The new pontiff will be introduced in Latin with his chosen papal name and address the world for the first time.
He faces a momentous task: as well as asserting his moral voice on a conflict-torn global stage, he faces burning Church issues from the continued fall-out from the sexual abuse scandal to the Vatican’s troubled balance sheets.
Some 133 “Princes of the Church” from five continents — the largest conclave ever — began voting on Wednesday afternoon.
Sworn to secrecy, on pain of excommunication, their only means of communicating their progress to the outside world was by sending up smoke through the chimney of the Sistine Chapel.
On Wednesday evening and then again on Thursday lunchtime, the smoke was black, emitting disappointed sighs from the tens of thousands watching.
But on Thursday afternoon just after 6pm (1600 GMT) the smoke emitted was white, confirming that the Catholic Church has a new spiritual leader.
By tradition, he now enters the Room of Tears — where freshly-elected popes give free rein to their emotions — to don a papal cassock for the first time, before returning to the Sistine Chapel so the cardinals can pledge their obedience.
He will then appear on the balcony along with a senior cardinal, who will announce to the waiting crowds “Habemus Papem” (“We have a pope”).
The pope will then give a short speech and impart his first “Urbi et Orbi” (“To the City and the World”) blessing.
The election has come at a time of great geopolitical uncertainty, which was seen as a key voting issue, along with the rifts within the Church.
Francis was a compassionate reformer who prioritised migrants and the environment, but he angered traditionalists who wanted a defender of doctrine rather than a headline-maker.
Some 80 percent of the cardinal electors were appointed by Francis. Hailing from 70 countries around the world, it was the most international conclave ever.
That was no guarantee, however, that the cardinals would pick someone in his vein.
The question was whether to choose a pastor or diplomat, a liberal or conservative, someone versed in the Curia — the Church’s governing body — or a relative outsider from areas of the world where Catholic faith is thriving.
Before the cardinals were locked into the Sistine Chapel Wednesday, their dean Giovanni Battista Re urged them to choose someone able to protect the Church’s unity.
The next pope must also be able to lead “at this difficult and complex turning point in history”, amid raging conflicts around the world and the rise of ultra-nationalist parties.
The Church has also had difficulty in adapting to the modern world, with declining priest numbers and increasingly empty pews in the West.
The papal inauguration usually takes place less than a week after the election with a mass celebrated before political and religious leaders from around the world.
The new pope will likely do a tour of St Peter’s Square in his popemobile for the first time, before delivering a homily outlining his priorities.
-
Entertainment20 hours ago
I’m broke yet accused of money laundering – VDM breaks silence after EFCC release
-
News8 hours ago
BREAKING! Finally, White Smoke Emerges From Sistine Chapel as Vatican Elects New Pope
-
News13 hours ago
Breaking: Three Serving PDP HoR Members Defect to APC
-
News20 hours ago
Edo police rescue kidnapped PDP chairman, 36 others
-
News21 hours ago
Tomato Ebola Causes Loss of N1.3 Billion, Contributing to Rising Food Prices
-
News14 hours ago
Finally, IMF deletes Nigeria from its debtors list
-
News12 hours ago
Ex-Governor Uduaghan, Daughter Dump PDP, Join APC
-
News21 hours ago
Sad! Five members of one family die of food poisoning