Connect with us

News

Trump employs Musk as ‘special employee’ without salary

Published

on

Elon Musk is joining the US government after all as special employee but at no cost to America as he would not be needing any wage for his services.

President Donald Trump previously tapped Musk to lead his Department of Government Efficiency, but the tech billionaire, who also serves as the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, was not technically a federal employee. But now, he is, according to a source familiar with his relationship with Trump administration.

Hours after Musk announced a plan to shutter the U.S.

Agency for International Development (USAID) on X, the social media platform he owns, a White House official told USA TODAY he was officially joining the federal government.

Advertisement

Trump made Musk a “special government employee,” the official said. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later confirmed to reporters that Musk had officially joined the administration. The designation allows Musk to work for the federal government with or without compensation for a limited amount of time. He also received a government email and an office. The administration official said Musk would not receive a paycheck.

Leavitt said she didn’t know the status of Musk’s security clearance or whether he had completed a background check.

“He has abided by all applicable federal laws,” she said.

The status change affirms that Musk is working in lockstep with Trump, whom he said he ran his plans to dismantle USAID by and had the president’s full backing to pursue.

Advertisement

The White House said on Monday that USAID would temporarily be put under Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s control.

It is not clear when Musk received the special government employee designation, which allows him to work for the federal government for 130 days over a year without having to publicly disclose his finances. Former President Joe Biden utilized the same authority to hire a top aide during his administration.

-usatoday

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Taraba FMC refutes claims of severe drug shortage

Published

on

By Francesca Hangeior

The management of the Federal Medical Centre, Jalingo, Taraba State, has dismissed recent media reports alleging a severe drug shortage at the hospital.

In a statement signed on Tuesday by Haruna Abubakar of the hospital’s Press and Protocol Department, the FMC management reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring the availability of drugs and the delivery of quality healthcare services.

Abubakar acknowledged that while the hospital has faced some supply chain challenges, the situation was not as dire as portrayed in certain media reports.

Advertisement

“When this administration took over nearly five years ago, we inherited a significant debt related to drug supplies. Since then, we have remained proactive in settling outstanding payments to ensure uninterrupted drug availability for our patients.

“Our budget has been submitted to the Federal Ministry of Finance, and we anticipate a resolution to these challenges by the end of March 2025,” the statement read.

The hospital management also reassured the public of its strong working relationship with pharmaceutical vendors, despite alleged attempts to undermine its efforts.

It added that the hospital is actively engaging with the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to improve access to medications for enrollees.

Advertisement

“We are fully operational, with essential medications available. We urge members of the public, journalists, and stakeholders to visit the hospital’s pharmacy and wards, including the Accident and Emergency unit, to independently verify the facts,” the statement added.

While noting that no hospital globally can guarantee the availability of all drugs at all times, the management assured patients that necessary medications are stocked.

Where certain drugs are unavailable, patients are advised to source them externally, which it described as a standard practice worldwide.

“FMC Jalingo is not in the business of providing free drugs but remains committed to ensuring affordable and accessible medications for all patients.

Advertisement

“NHIS enrollees continue to receive prescribed drugs within the coverage framework, and we take pride in maintaining the highest standards of medical service delivery,” it stated.

The hospital management urged the public to be wary of sensationalised reports that do not reflect the true situation at FMC Jalingo, stressing that its top priority remains the well-being of patients.

Continue Reading

News

President Tinubu Declines Assent To Federal University of Education Bill

Published

on

 

By Gloria Ikibah
President Bola Tinubu has declined assent to the Federal University of Education Numan, Adamawa State (Establishment) Bill, 2024.
The President in a letter transmitted to the House of Representatives and read by the Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu, on Tuesday at plenary.
The bill sponsored by Senator Binos Yaroe, lawmaker representing Adamawa South Senatorial District, was passed by the National Assembly in 2024 and transmitted to the President for assent.
In the letter, President Tinubu raised concerns over Section 22 of the bill, which grants the authority to dispose of land belonging to the federal institution to the Adamawa State Governor, and emphasised that the President has authourity on issues relating to Federal Government-owned property, especially federal-owned universities.
The letter read in part: “Pursuant to section 58(4) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended, I hereby convey to the House of Representatives my decision taken on December 23, 2024, to decline presidential assent to the Federal University of Education, Numan Establishment Bill 2024 recently passed by the National Assembly.
“I am declining assent to the bill as Section 22 of the bill confers the authority to the disposal of the land of the university on the governor and not the President as it ought to be in the case of land belonging to the federal government”.
At a stakeholders’ forum last week in Mayo-Belwa Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Senator Yaroe stated that President Tinubu did not reject the bill, and noted that he only pointed out clerical errors in the proposed legislation.
He explained, “The President pointed out certain errors in the bill that needed to comply with the constitution. For instance, we mistakenly assigned the power to grant land authority to the governor instead of the President, who is the rightful visitor for the institution. We will rectify this error by replacing the governor with the president in the bill”.
Continue Reading

News

Tinubu Snubs Suit Seeking His Removal, Says Court Has No Authority

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

President Bola Tinubu has asked the Federal High Court in Abuja to dismiss a suit seeking to compel the National Assembly to initiate impeachment proceedings against him over alleged rights violations.

The suit, filed by a legal practitioner, Mr. Olukoya Ogungbeje, alleged that President Tinubu’s administration had suppressed peaceful protests, which amounts to an impeachable offense.

However, President Tinubu and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, have challenged the suit, questioning the plaintiff’s legal right to institute the action. They argued that the plaintiff failed to disclose any reasonable cause of action and that the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the matter.

Advertisement

In a joint preliminary objection, the defendants listed 18 reasons why the case should be terminated. They claimed that the plaintiff filed the action on behalf of “faceless citizens” without disclosing the persons whose rights were allegedly violated.

According to the defendants, only the person whose right was breached has the right to file an action before the court to seek redress, as provided by Section 46 of the 1999 Constitution.

The defendants also argued that the plaintiff’s questions for determination were based on an alleged breach of the 1999 Constitution by President Tinubu, but failed to disclose any of his rights that were breached.

In a counter affidavit, a principal state counsel in the Federal Ministry of Justice, Gbemga Oladimeji, averred that President Tinubu’s administration has been a promoter of democratic tenets, allowing people to air their grievances and conduct peaceful protests.

Advertisement

“I know for a fact that the protest conducted between 1st August 2024 and 10th August 2024 was peaceful, as there was a court order limiting the protesters to demonstrate within a confined location,” he said.

Justice James Omotosho has adjourned the case till March 4 to enable the counsel representing the plaintiff to respond to the preliminary objection by President Tinubu and the AGF.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News