Connect with us

News

Justice Omotosho’s Ruling Stands as Sole Valid Judgment on Rivers Assembly Members – Rep Solomon Bob

Published

on

…say Falana’s assertion is baseless, lacks merit
By Gloria Ikibah

Rep. Solomon Bob, representing Abua/Odual and Ahoada East Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, has stated that Justice Omotosho’s judgment, along with the affirmed appeals, remains the only valid court decision on the status of the 27 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

In a statement issued in Abuja on Friday in response to Human Rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN),  Rep. Bob dismissed his claims suggesting the lawmakers had lost their seats, and said “Mr. Falana’s assertion is baseless and lacks legal merit”.

Naijablitznews.com recalls that on January 10, 2025, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal by Governor Siminilayi Fubara against the Court of Appeal’s ruling, which had previously upheld Justice Joseph Omotosho’s decision in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1613/2023.

Speaking on the judgement the Rivers lawmaker stated that “Justice Omotosho’s judgment, which was delivered on 22nd January 2024, touched on the entirety of the issues at the centre of the crisis, including:
(a) leadership and membership of the Rivers State House of Assembly and
(b) presentation of the 2024 appropriation law or any presentations to the House of Assembly.
“One of the judgment orders declares that:
“AN ORDER is hereby made restraining the 11th Defendant (Governor Fubara) from howsoever or in whatsoever manner making any request, presentation, or nomination in the Rivers State House of Assembly except to the House of Assembly under the leadership of the 2nd Plaintiff” (Speaker Martin Amaewhule).
“Clearly, the judgment does not address question of the 2024 budget presentation alone, but all subsequent presentations (including that of 2025), requests, or nominations before the Rivers State House of Assembly.
“However, the ink on the Supreme Court’s dismissal had hardly dried up when Mr. Femi Falana SAN appeared on a television programme to proffer yet another misleading interpretation.
“In his presentation, Mr Falana claimed that the dismissed appeal related only to the 2024 appropriation law and, therefore, merely academic.
“As the above order shows, Mr. Falana was wrong. He was also downplaying the dire ramifications of spending without an appropriation law.
“He also claimed that the dismissed appeal did not touch on the question of membership of the Rivers State House of Assembly.
“Indeed, virtually all the reliefs sought and granted by the Federal High Court and the decision of the Court of Appeal affirm the subsisting membership of the House of Assembly by the 27 legislators.
“By reason of section 272(3) of the constitution, only the Federal High Court is vested with jurisdiction on any question of vacancy in the seats of a House of Assembly”, he added.
According to Rep. Bob, contrary to Falana’s “vaunted opinion”, section 109(1)(g) of the constitution is not self-executory. “And realistically, under a constitutional democracy, no law is. Because every constitutional provision is ultimately subject to judicial interpretation. To suggest otherwise is to deny the imperative of judicial review”.
He expressed concerns by “Mr. Falana’s consistent penchant for misleading the public with respect to the Rivers crisis”.
“Often presenting his brief to the appotheosizing lay public as public interest advocacy, Mr. Falana eagerly justifies dangerous out-of-control behaviour and egregious constitutional abuse in Rivers State; the type he would certainly not accept in his native Ekiti.
“Nigeria’s recent history is regrettably replete with instances of defections right across state (and federal) legislatures. Mr. Falana has not been straining at the leash to make the same case in other instances.
“In his many public appearances on the Rivers crisis, he has employed self-serving sophistry and hollow whataboutism to justify every illegality and absurdity, including that 3 members can constitute the legal quorum in a House of as yet 30 members!
“Mr. Falana should separate his animus towards an individual from his exposition of the law and have the humility to admit that he is not the law.
“Because no matter how much legal knowledge he professes, his opinion remains his personal opinion and can not approximate to the law. As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once famously said, the law is “The prophecies of what the courts will do in fact…”
“As Rivers State reels under Fubara’s unexampled and deliquent misrule, and the courts undo his myriad criminal misdeeds, a lawyer of Mr. Falana’s prominence should at least respect their decision, not mislead the public”, Rep Bob asserted.
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PDP Leadership Tussle: S’Court sets March 10 for Anyanwu’s appeal against removal

Published

on

The Supreme Court has set March 10 for the hearing of Senator Samuel Anyanwu’s appeal contesting his ousting as the National Secretary of the People Democratic Party (PDP), as announced yesterday.

The decision was made by a five-member panel led by Justice Ibrahim Saulawa during the ruling on Anyanwu’s motion for expedited consideration.

Last December, the Court of Appeal sitting in Enugu upheld a High Court decision that sacked Samuel Anyanwu as PDP national secretary.

The lower court upheld Sunday Udeh-Okoye as the substantive national secretary of the opposition party.

Advertisement

In the lead judgment delivered by Justice Ridwan Abdullahi, the Court of Appeal held that Anyanwu‘s appeal was incompetent and lacking in merit.

The appellate court held that the appellant violated the PDP constitution by laying claim to the national secretary position, having contested and picked as the party’s candidate in the 2024 governorship election in Imo State.

Dissatisfied with the ruling, Anyanwu approached the apex court last month and asked the court to set aside the judgment of the two lower courts and recognise him as the authentic national secretary of the PDP.

He also filed a motion for accelerated hearing as well as an abridgment of time on grounds of the crucial role of the office of national secretary.

Advertisement

Delivering ruling in the motion, the Supreme Court  granted the relief sought and ordered service of the court processes on the respondent, Mr. Aniagu Emmanuel, who the court said, must file in his reply brief within three days of service.

Anyanwu, on the other hand was given two days to reply on point of law.

But the apex court did not hear Anyanwu’s motion for stay of execution of the judgment of the appellate court was not heard by the apex court.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Looted Benin Artefacts: Netherlands to repatriate 119  bronzes to Nigeria

Published

on

The Nigerian government is looking forward to the repatriation of 119 Benin bronzes from the Netherlands.

A formal request for the return of these artefacts, which were acquired during the British assault on the Benin Kingdom in 1897, has been made.

It has been reported that an agreement regarding their repatriation was signed yesterday by representatives of both countries.

Of the 119 objects being returned, 113 of them were among the Dutch State Collection, while the remaining six were returned by the Municipality of Rotterdam.

Advertisement

The signing ceremony took place at the Wereldmuseum in Leiden, the Netherlands, where the Benin bronzes were previously displayed.

Dutch Minister of Education, Culture and Science, Mr. Eppo Bruins, and the Director-General of the National Commission for Museums and Monuments (NCMM), Olugbile Holloway, signed for their countries.

A statement by Anneloes Hoff of the Embassy of the Kingdom of The Netherlands said the artefacts are expected to arrive later this year, according to the agreement.

The statement reads: “The Netherlands will return 119 Benin Bronzes to Nigeria, following a request from the Nigerian government. The transfer agreements were signed today by the Dutch Minister of Education, Culture and Science and the Director-General of the National Commission for Museums and Monuments (NCMM).

Advertisement

“The objects are expected to arrive in Nigeria later this year. The restitution underscores the strong partnership between The Netherlands and Nigeria.

The Netherlands is returning the Benin Bronzes unconditionally, recognising that the objects were looted during the British attack on Benin City in 1897 and should have never ended up in The Netherlands.

Continue Reading

News

Lagos Assembly: DSS writes TV stations, requests retraction, apology

Published

on

The Department of State Services (DSS) has accused two television stations, Africa Independent Television (AIT) of DAAR Communications Plc and Channels Television, of airing reports that are allegedly false, defamatory, and malicious in nature regarding its activities.

The agency indicated that these inaccurate reports were related to the presence of its personnel at the Lagos State House of Assembly on Monday.

Through its counsel, Chief Ayodeji Adedipe (SAN), the DSS has called for a retraction and a public apology to be issued within a period of seven days, threatening to pursue both criminal and civil actions against the television stations should they fail to comply.

In a letter, dated February 17, 2025, titled: “False, Defamatory and Malicious Publication Concerning the State Security Service (or DSS) Regarding Their Presence at the Lagos State House of Assembly on Monday February 17, 2025,” Adedipe said the DSS (SSS) denied allegations it invaded the Assembly and attempted to prevent the members of the Assembly and Speaker Mojisola Meranda from entering the chamber for plenary.

Advertisement

The secret police insisted that it was duly invited through a letter by the Deputy Clerk to support the security operatives attached to the Assembly in order to forestall an imminent breakdown of law and order.

“However, without any verification of the reason for the presence of our client’s officials at the Lagos State House of Assembly on February 17, 2025, your organisation maliciously and falsely broadcast, both on your news bulletin and print media, that our client had invaded/stormed the Lagos State House of Assembly with a view to preventing the members and speaker from entering the chamber for plenary.

“By this publication, our client, which is a highly responsible and respected organisation, was portrayed as an irresponsible and reckless organisation, which, in a Gestapo manner, invaded/stormed the Lagos State House of Assembly to support one of the feuding parties and to desecrate the hallowed chambers.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News