Connect with us

News

Justice Omotosho’s Ruling Stands as Sole Valid Judgment on Rivers Assembly Members – Rep Solomon Bob

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
…say Falana’s assertion is baseless, lacks merit
By Gloria Ikibah

Rep. Solomon Bob, representing Abua/Odual and Ahoada East Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, has stated that Justice Omotosho’s judgment, along with the affirmed appeals, remains the only valid court decision on the status of the 27 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

In a statement issued in Abuja on Friday in response to Human Rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN),  Rep. Bob dismissed his claims suggesting the lawmakers had lost their seats, and said “Mr. Falana’s assertion is baseless and lacks legal merit”.

Naijablitznews.com recalls that on January 10, 2025, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal by Governor Siminilayi Fubara against the Court of Appeal’s ruling, which had previously upheld Justice Joseph Omotosho’s decision in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1613/2023.

Speaking on the judgement the Rivers lawmaker stated that “Justice Omotosho’s judgment, which was delivered on 22nd January 2024, touched on the entirety of the issues at the centre of the crisis, including:
(a) leadership and membership of the Rivers State House of Assembly and
(b) presentation of the 2024 appropriation law or any presentations to the House of Assembly.
“One of the judgment orders declares that:
“AN ORDER is hereby made restraining the 11th Defendant (Governor Fubara) from howsoever or in whatsoever manner making any request, presentation, or nomination in the Rivers State House of Assembly except to the House of Assembly under the leadership of the 2nd Plaintiff” (Speaker Martin Amaewhule).
“Clearly, the judgment does not address question of the 2024 budget presentation alone, but all subsequent presentations (including that of 2025), requests, or nominations before the Rivers State House of Assembly.
“However, the ink on the Supreme Court’s dismissal had hardly dried up when Mr. Femi Falana SAN appeared on a television programme to proffer yet another misleading interpretation.
“In his presentation, Mr Falana claimed that the dismissed appeal related only to the 2024 appropriation law and, therefore, merely academic.
“As the above order shows, Mr. Falana was wrong. He was also downplaying the dire ramifications of spending without an appropriation law.
“He also claimed that the dismissed appeal did not touch on the question of membership of the Rivers State House of Assembly.
“Indeed, virtually all the reliefs sought and granted by the Federal High Court and the decision of the Court of Appeal affirm the subsisting membership of the House of Assembly by the 27 legislators.
“By reason of section 272(3) of the constitution, only the Federal High Court is vested with jurisdiction on any question of vacancy in the seats of a House of Assembly”, he added.
According to Rep. Bob, contrary to Falana’s “vaunted opinion”, section 109(1)(g) of the constitution is not self-executory. “And realistically, under a constitutional democracy, no law is. Because every constitutional provision is ultimately subject to judicial interpretation. To suggest otherwise is to deny the imperative of judicial review”.
He expressed concerns by “Mr. Falana’s consistent penchant for misleading the public with respect to the Rivers crisis”.
“Often presenting his brief to the appotheosizing lay public as public interest advocacy, Mr. Falana eagerly justifies dangerous out-of-control behaviour and egregious constitutional abuse in Rivers State; the type he would certainly not accept in his native Ekiti.
“Nigeria’s recent history is regrettably replete with instances of defections right across state (and federal) legislatures. Mr. Falana has not been straining at the leash to make the same case in other instances.
“In his many public appearances on the Rivers crisis, he has employed self-serving sophistry and hollow whataboutism to justify every illegality and absurdity, including that 3 members can constitute the legal quorum in a House of as yet 30 members!
“Mr. Falana should separate his animus towards an individual from his exposition of the law and have the humility to admit that he is not the law.
“Because no matter how much legal knowledge he professes, his opinion remains his personal opinion and can not approximate to the law. As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once famously said, the law is “The prophecies of what the courts will do in fact…”
“As Rivers State reels under Fubara’s unexampled and deliquent misrule, and the courts undo his myriad criminal misdeeds, a lawyer of Mr. Falana’s prominence should at least respect their decision, not mislead the public”, Rep Bob asserted.

News

BREAKING: TInubu nominates Eyesan as NUPRC CEO as Farouk resigns from NMPRDA

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

 

President Tinubu has nominated Oritsemeyiwa Amanorisewo Eyesan as CEO of NUPRC and Engineer Saidu Aliyu Mohammed as CEO of NMDPRA.

The nominations follow the resignations of Farouk Ahmed as the CEO of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) and Gbenga Komolafe as the CEO of the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC).

Details shortly….

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Reps Begin Work on New Electoral Act Amid Heated Debates

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives has begun deliberations on a new Electoral Act intended to guide the conduct of the 2027 general elections.

Proceedings were tense and disorderly for much of the session, with lawmakers frequently attempting to speak at the same time and repeatedly raising points of order, creating a noisy and charged atmosphere on the floor of the House.

At the outset, members spent considerable time arguing over which sections of the bill should be examined and which should be set aside.

Advertisement

The deadlock was eventually resolved when the House agreed to focus on provisions recommended by the Committee on Electoral Matters.

One of the key decisions approved was that all pre-election disputes must be handled exclusively by the Federal High Court located in the state where the matter arises.

The chairman of the committee explained that the amendment is aimed at stopping the practice of transferring pre-election cases from their states of origin to the Federal Capital Territory or other states without proper jurisdiction.

However, sharp divisions emerged over a proposal seeking to disqualify any candidate found to have supplied false information regarding constitutional eligibility, along with the candidate’s political party. The provision sparked intense debate and strong opposition from several members, signalling further contention as deliberations continue.

Advertisement

Many of the lawmakers insisted that rather than disqualify the candidate and his party, and declaring the candidate with the next highest votes cast after the election as winner, INEC should be asked to conduct a fresh election excluding the candidate and his party.

Others insisted that the recommendations was apt as it makes it mandatory for the political parties to do due diligence before presenting any candidate for any election.

The also approved a jail term of five years for any returning officer who declare false results at an election and a ten year jail term for failing to record election results in a proscribed form, but went ahead to announce such result, while prescribing a two year jail term for a Resident Electoral Commissioners who fail to release Certified True Copies of election results.

The House however defered consideration of the report till Thursday for continuation.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Reps Vow To Probe Treaties, Protocols and Agreement Signed by Nigeria

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives has commenced investigation into all Treaties Protocols and agreement signed by Nigeria and other countries.

The Chairman House Committee on Treaties, Protocols & Agreements, Rep. Rabiu Yusuf, made the disclosure on Wednesday at a press briefing in Abuja.

He said the House of Representatives has authorised the Committee to undertake one of the most important national reviews in recent history.

Advertisement

Yusuf noted that the review is not political but patriotic, constitutional, and essential for Nigeria’s sovereignty, debt sustainability, and economic security.

He said: “Our mandate is clear: to examine all bilateral and multilateral treaties, protocols, agreements, and foreign-funded contracts Nigeria has entered into and determine whether they protect or endanger the national interest”.

The Chairman explained that over the years, Nigeria has signed numerous treaties, MoUs, and agreements, many without adequate oversight, domestication, or monitoring.

“Some agreements contain hidden obligations, sovereignty waivers, unfavourable arbitration clauses, or financial risks unknown to Nigerians. Several foreign-funded infrastructure contracts, especially those involving foreign companies, require deeper scrutiny for: Value-for-money, Loan exposure, Local content compliance, Contract performance, Environmental and labour compliance.

Advertisement

” Nigeria cannot afford treaties that weaken our legal authority, compromise national assets, or burden future generations with unsustainable liabilities”, he added.

Yusuf assured that the committee will ensure that all international agreements comply with Section 12 of the 1999 Constitution as amended.

“Ensure Nigeria’s sovereignty is never compromised in foreign dealings. Protect the country from harmful financial exposure, poor contract terms, and non-performing obligations.

“Establish full transparency around treaties and major contracts. Strengthen Nigeria’s negotiation power going forward. Recommend a national framework for Treaty Oversight & Digital Tracking to
prevent future lapses”, he said.

Advertisement

The Chairman said that the investigation was important because treaties affect everyday life, job creation, trade, taxes, infrastructure, and foreign investment.

He noted that poorly negotiated agreements can weaken Nigeria’s economy, increase debt, or even threaten strategic national assets.

“This Committee’s work will help ensure Nigerians benefit from partnerships, not become victims of them. Our goal is simple: Nigeria must never sign what it cannot defend”, he said.

He said that letters requesting all relevant documents will be dispatched to: Federal Ministries, MDAs, Regulatory bodies, State governments, Chinese companies and other foreign contractors, Diplomatic missions, Banks and financial institutions.

Advertisement

Rep. Yusuf further emphasised that the committee expects full cooperation and transparency in documentation, submission of complete agreements, annexes, side letters, payment records,
project reports, and compliance documents.

He also said that Nigeria deserves agreements that uplift, not undermine her.

“This investigation will be thorough, professional, non-partisan, and guided strictly by evidence.

“This Committee will work transparently, responsibly, and with the highest national interest. We are determined to deliver a report that will strengthen Nigeria’s sovereignty,
protect public resources, and reform how treaties are negotiated in the future.

Advertisement

“Nigeria will no longer sign unfavourable agreements in darkness. This Committee will shine the light, protect our sovereignty, and ensure every treaty reflects the dignity and future of our nation”., Yusuf added.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News