Connect with us

News

Green card applicants married to U.S. citizens face new uncertainty amid arrests

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Trump administration says they were detained because they had overstayed their visas, but longtime attorneys say that has never been an issue previously for spouses of U.S. citizens.

A British mother holding an infant, a Ukrainian refugee, the wife of a Navy veteran, a German man about to celebrate his first wedding anniversary. These are some of the spouses of U.S. citizens who were recently detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement at what they thought were going to be routine green card interviews.

There have been several dozen known cases out of San Diego alone, but cases have also been reported in New York City, Cleveland and Utah, according to attorneys and local news reports.

Immigration attorneys told NBC News that this marks an “unprecedented” break in decadeslong practice policy, and that their clients are panicked they could be detained even when they are eligible to become legal permanent residents by law and have no criminal histories.

Advertisement

Jan Joseph Bejar, an immigration attorney in San Diego who recently had a client detained, said if the arrests spread around the country, “It’d be huge. It would be really devastating.”

The detentions are one of the latest tactics in President Donald Trump’s policies targeting legal pathways for immigration and increasing scrutiny of green card applicants.

The Trump administration has said in multiple cases that people were detained because they had fallen out of status by overstaying their visas, but longtime attorneys say this has never been an issue and spouses of U.S. citizens looking to obtain green cards were granted exceptions by Congress. The law says that immediate relatives, such as spouses, of U.S. citizens are eligible for green cards even if they were in unlawful immigration status at the time they filed to become legal permanent residents.

“There was a carve-out that was intended for immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, including spouses. This was or is the legal path for them to adjust their status. This is going about doing things ‘the right way,’” said Julia Gelatt, the associate director of the U.S. immigration policy program at the Migration Policy Institute.

Advertisement

She added that because it can take well over a year to go through the entire process, people “could very easily fall out of status right in the process of waiting for that green card through their marriage.”

The British woman was released almost a week later and her green card approved, according to NBC San Diego. The Navy veteran’s wife was released on bond, according to the outlet, and must now pursue her case in immigration court. The status of the German man and the Ukrainian refugee are currently unclear. All four had fallen out of status because of visa overstays but were still eligible to become green card holders, according to their attorneys.

Attorneys said the exact number of people affected would be difficult to quantify, but all said many spouses of U.S. citizens seeking green cards could fall into the category of overstaying their visas. There are currently at least hundreds of thousands of people who are at some stage of the green card application process, according to United States Citizenship and Immigration Service data.

Once a green card applicant is detained by ICE, their case goes through the immigration court system, where a prosecutor will argue against the applicant receiving legal status, Bejar said. Because of the yearslong backlog that immigration courts are facing, this will extend valid green card applicants’ cases and come at a cost to taxpayers, he said.

Advertisement

USCIS spokesman Matthew J. Tragesser said in a statement to NBC News that apprehensions at its offices “may occur if individuals are identified as having outstanding warrants; being subject to court-issued removal orders; or having committed fraud, crimes, or other violations of immigration law while in the United States.”

“The Trump administration has been abundantly clear: aliens must respect our laws or face the consequences,” he said. “Overstaying a visa is an immigration law violation that can result in deportation.”

ICE said in a statement to NBC San Diego in late November that the agency “is committed to enforcing federal immigration laws through targeted operations that prioritize national security, public safety, and border security.”

“Individuals unlawfully present in the United States, including those out of status at federal sites such as USCIS offices, may face arrest, detention, and removal in accordance with U.S. immigration law,” its statement said.

Advertisement

Bejar said he had a client married to a U.S. citizen who was detained at a San Diego USCIS office two days before Thanksgiving.

The Mexican immigrant was at the USCIS office with his wife for an interview as part of the green card process. Bejar said the interview had been going well and the officer said he would approve the first part of the couple’s petition. Then ICE agents came and took his client away.

The attorney said his client was brought from Mexico as a young teenager and his parents had overstayed their visa. Now in his early 20s, he recently married a U.S. citizen and sought to adjust his immigration status. As the immediate relative of a U.S. citizen who does not have a criminal record, the man was still eligible for a green card even if he overstayed his visa, according to his attorney.

“When people go in for a green card interview, it’s because they’ve complied with everything else and they’re at the end of the line. In other words, you’re almost there. You’ve gone through the sacrifices of paying for the government fees, for your legal fees,” Bejar said.

Advertisement

Bejar said he and other attorneys have been going through their cases to warn applicants in the San Diego area, but their options are limited.

“While there’s nothing in particular that says ICE can’t detain them during that time, it’s always been viewed as a waste of resources, because they are eligible for the benefit of a green card,” said Shev Dalal-Dheini, the senior director of government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association. “Why would you waste enforcement resources or detention resources on those individuals?”

“Instead of actually picking up violent criminals, like they say they’re doing, they’re picking up people who are following the rules that have been in place for decades,” she said.

Courtney Koski, a senior attorney with the Costas Law Firm in the Cleveland, Ohio, area, said she and other attorneys in the Cleveland area have noticed a change in USCIS agents where they are “finding officers scrutinizing and nitpicking every aspect of the case, looking for reasons to deny.”

Advertisement

Koski said she recently had a client detained at an interview Nov. 24 as part of the spousal petition process, the step before applying for a green card, even though she was eligible for the benefit and had no criminal history.

The Mexican woman had been in the U.S. for 25 years. Koski said her client had a removal order connected to what she called “a government mistake” where a court scheduled an immigration hearing for the client’s family in July 2004 and then “rescheduled their hearing for April of 2004 without sending my client any type of notice whatsoever.”

“This is the reason why my client has a removal order, because the government made a mistake and did not notify her of her hearing date,” she said. NBC News could not independently verify the circumstances related to the hearing date.

Her client married a U.S. citizen and was eligible to apply for a green card. Koski said she planned to file to reopen her client’s case once the spousal petition was approved since the approval could help strengthen their case.

Advertisement

“Under the previous administration, people who were being detained generally were considered a threat to national security or threat to public safety, so someone with no criminal history would not have been expected to be detained in an interview like this,” she said.

Jeremy Lawer, 33, the woman’s husband, said “the interview was going pretty well, and ICE agents came anyway. We were incredibly shocked.”

“She was understandably nervous. But you know, I was like there’s no reason they’re going to deny us. We’ve been living together. We bought a house together,” he said.

Lawer said he feels he and his wife have been caught in the “political football” under the Trump administration.

Advertisement

The same day that his wife was detained, he got a letter saying the spousal petition was approved.

Koski has filed to reopen the case and, in the meantime, her client has been moved around to multiple detention centers.

“From my perspective, this all feels kind of like a setup,” Lawer said. “Like they had always been intending to arrest her that day.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

FG, states, LGAs share ₦2.551trn as June 2026 revenue

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

 

The Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC), at its July 2026 meeting chaired by the Honourable Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, has shared a total of ₦2.551 trillion among the Federal Government, the 36 States and 774 Local Government Councils as Federation Account revenue for June 2026.

The meeting, held in Abuja, was attended by the Accountant General of the Federation, State Commissioners of Finance and other members of the Committee.

The amount distributed comprised ₦1.810 trillion in Statutory Revenue and ₦740.724 billion from Value Added Tax (VAT).

Advertisement

From the Statutory Revenue, the Federal Government received ₦849.366 billion, the State Governments ₦430.810 billion, while the Local Government Councils received ₦332.136 billion. The oil producing States also received ₦197.610 billion as 13 per cent derivation.

The VAT distribution saw the Federal Government receive ₦74.072 billion, the State Governments ₦407.398 billion, while the Local Government Councils received ₦259.253 billion.

In all, the Federal Government received ₦923.438 billion, the State Governments ₦838.208 billion, the Local Government Councils ₦591.390 billion, while ₦197.610 billion was shared as 13 per cent derivation to the oil producing States.

FAAC noted that gross revenue available in June 2026 stood at ₦4.501 trillion, comprising ₦3.701 trillion in statutory revenue and ₦799.746 billion in gross VAT collections.

Advertisement

The Committee observed a strong improvement in revenue performance during the month.

Gross statutory revenue increased by ₦1.049 trillion over the figure recorded in May 2026.

The growth was driven largely by higher receipts from Companies Income Tax, Value Added Tax, Import Duty, Customs Excise Tariff Levies, Petroleum Royalties, Gas Flared Penalties, Rental Income and Miscellaneous Oil Revenue.

However, collections from Petroleum Profit Tax, Hydrocarbon Tax, Mineral Royalties and Fees recorded declines.

Advertisement

VAT collections also recorded positive growth.

Gross VAT revenue rose from ₦743.668 billion in May to ₦799.746 billion in June, representing an increase of ₦56.078 billion.

Continue Reading

News

Senator Ikpea Thumbs Down Reintegration of Repentant Boko Haram Members

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Chairman of the Senate Committee on Drugs and Narcotics, and the senator representing Edo Central, Senator Joseph Ikpea, has thumbed down the rehabilitation and reintegration of repentant Boko Haram members into society, insisting that individuals involved in terrorism should face the full weight of the law rather than be returned to civilian life.

Speaking with journalists after the inaugural meeting of the Senate Committee on Drugs and Narcotics at the National Assembly on Wednesday, Ikpea described the policy of reintegrating former insurgents as “unreasonable,” arguing that it undermines the sacrifices of security personnel and victims of terrorism.

According to him, insurgents responsible for the killing of innocent Nigerians and members of the armed forces should not be rehabilitated or reintegrated into society.

“I don’t understand the rationale behind reintegrating Boko Haram members into society. Our gallant soldiers have lost their lives protecting the country from these terrorists. If someone has committed acts of terrorism and is apprehended, such a person should face the consequences of the law,” he said.

Advertisement

The senator maintained that Boko Haram and other terrorist groups remain enemies of every Nigerian, irrespective of religion or ethnicity, noting that they target Christians, Muslims, civilians and security personnel alike.

Ikpea also alleged that some recent kidnapping incidents across the country could have political undertones, suggesting that certain actors may be exploiting insecurity to undermine the government ahead of future elections.

On the issue of drug control, the committee chairman disclosed that the Senate Committee on Drugs and Narcotics would review the proposed bill seeking to impose the death penalty for drug-related offences after a thorough examination of the legislation.

He explained that he was not a member of the Senate when the bill was previously debated and therefore could not comment on its current status.

Advertisement

“I have no idea about that bill because I was not a senator when it came up on the floor. My committee will look at it and advise accordingly. For now, I cannot say much about it,” he said.

Ikpea noted that the committee’s inaugural meeting was convened to outline its legislative agenda and oversight responsibilities.

He said one of its immediate priorities would be strengthening oversight of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) and inspecting rehabilitation centres across the country to ensure they comply with approved operational standards.

“We are planning to visit rehabilitation centres to ensure they meet the required standards. You cannot just establish a rehabilitation centre without complying with the necessary regulations. We want to ensure they are operating properly and delivering quality services,” he said.

Advertisement

Speaking on the proposed death penalty for drug traffickers, the senator declined to take a firm position, saying punishment for offences should be proportionate to the crimes committed and that the final decision rests with the National Assembly and the Federal Government.

“Every offence should attract punishment commensurate with its severity. Different countries have different laws on drug trafficking. Whatever the Senate and the Federal Government eventually decide will be respected,” he stated.

Ikpea further raised concern over the growing prevalence of drug abuse among Nigerian youths, warning that the trend poses a serious threat to the nation’s future.

Citing estimates that about 14 million Nigerians are affected by drug abuse, he advocated the introduction of drug education into school curricula from the primary level to discourage substance abuse from an early age.

Advertisement

“The youth are the leaders of tomorrow. If we fail to educate them on the dangers of drug abuse, the nation’s future will be in jeopardy. We are looking at introducing drug education into school curricula so children understand the consequences from an early age,” he said.

Continue Reading

News

UK Backs National Assembly Security Dialogue as Push for State Policing Gathers Momentum

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

UK Backs National Assembly Security Dialogue as Push for State Policing Gathers Momentum

By Gloria Ikibah

The UK Government-funded Strengthening Peace and Resilience in Nigeria (SPRiNG) Programme has thrown its weight behind the National Assembly Security Roundtable, describing the initiative as a timely platform to advance security sector reforms, strengthen institutional accountability and accelerate discussions on state policing.

In a statement issued ahead of the roundtable, scheduled for Wednesday as part of the National Assembly Open Week 2026, it said that the engagement will bring together Nigeria’s top security chiefs, lawmakers and governors to review the country’s security challenges and identify the legislative and budgetary measures needed to improve the nation’s security architecture.

Advertisement

The meeting, to be held at the Conference Hall of the National Assembly Library Trust Fund, is expected to examine the support required by security agencies while also advancing constitutional reforms relating to state policing.

Among those expected at the event are the National Security Adviser, Chief of Defence Staff, Inspector-General of Police,  Ministers of Defence, Interior and Police Affairs, as well as the governors of Kaduna, Katsina, Plateau and Benue — the four focal states of the SPRiNG Programme — alongside their counterparts from Kwara, Zamfara, Niger and Borno states.

Speaking on the significance of the dialogue, the Head of Development Cooperation at the British High Commission in Abuja, Cynthia Rowe, said lasting security can only be achieved through strong and accountable institutions.

She said: “Sustainable security requires strong, accountable institutions that are responsive to the needs of the people. The UK Government remains committed to supporting Nigeria’s legislative frameworks to ensure that security interventions are transparent, well-resourced, and firmly rooted in respect for human rights. This roundtable is a commendable step towards codifying reforms that will protect vulnerable communities and foster long-term stability.”

Advertisement

According to the statement, the roundtable’s agenda aligns closely with the SPRiNG Programme’s security sector reform objectives, with discussions expected to focus on banditry, kidnapping, farmer-herder conflicts, inter-agency collaboration, technology-driven security operations and modern approaches to community engagement.

The Team Leader of the SPRiNG Programme, Ukoha Ukiwo, said experience from the programme’s work across participating states had shown that peacebuilding efforts require solid legal backing to succeed.

“Our work across our state compacts has continually highlighted that operational peacebuilding must be backed by robust legal frameworks. The focus of this roundtable on state policing, security funding, and accountability is incredibly timely. By bridging the gap between grassroots realities and legislative action, we can ensure that informal and formal security architectures work cohesively to build formidable resilience in communities across Nigeria”, he said.

The meeting is expected to produce a comprehensive communiqué outlining priority security reforms, including recommendations on the implementation of state policing and other public safety initiatives.

Advertisement

It added that the SPRiNG Programme would continue to support engagements with relevant stakeholders to ensure that resolutions reached at the dialogue are translated into concrete policy actions.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News