Connect with us

News

Court bars Aiyedatiwa from seeking re-election in 2028

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Federal High Court in Akure, Ondo State, has barred governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa from contesting the 2028 governorship election in the state.

According to the court, allowing him to seek another term would violate the constitutional limit of eight years’ tenure.

The court, presided over by Justice Toyin Bolaji Adegoke, in a judgment delivered, held that the1999 Constitution (as amended) does not provide for a situation where an elected President, Vice President, Governor, or Deputy Governor would spend more than eight years in office.

Recall that Aiyedatiwa was sworn in on December 27, 2024, to complete the tenure of the late Governor Rotimi Akeredolu.

Advertisement

Aiyedatiwa was later sworn in again on February 24, 2025, after defeating Hon. Agboola Ajayi, the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), in the November 16, 2024 governorship election.

Justice Adegoke ruled that the suit is not speculative or academic, emphasising that it has inherent jurisdiction to interpret any section of the Constitution, being a creation of law and duty-bound to uphold it at all times.

Recall that a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr. Akin Egbuwalo, had dragged the governor, his deputy Dr. Olayide Adelami, and the ruling party to court over the eligibility of Aiyedatiwa to contest for another term in office.

Egbuwalo, through his counsel Chief Adeniyi Akintola (SAN), sought an interpretation of Section 137(3) of the 1999 Constitution regarding the qualification of Governor Aiyedatiwa to contest for a second term.

Advertisement

The suit filed by Egbuwalo listed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Governor Aiyedatiwa, the All Progressives Congress (APC), and the Deputy Governor, Dr. Olayide Adelami, as defendants.

Justice Adegoke had initially fixed January 28 to decide whether Aiyedatiwa was qualified to re-contest, having been sworn in twice as governor of the state.

However, the defendants stalled the judgment until the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja granted permission for its delivery.

Delivering judgement Justice Adegoke, held that the processes filed by the third to fifth defendants were deemed abandoned, having failed to participate during the hearing of the suit.

Advertisement

She noted that only the processes of the plaintiff, first defendant, and second defendant would be considered.

Consequently, the court dismissed the objection raised by the first defendant, ruling that the suit was neither speculative nor academic, as argued by the first and second defendants, but disclosed a valid cause of action.

The court further held that:“If the third defendant is allowed to contest and serve another four years, that will be against the position of the law in Marwa v. Nyako, where the Supreme Court held that a President or Governor cannot serve beyond eight years.”

Justice Adegoke also said that whenever a court is invited to interpret any provision of the Constitution, it has the inherent jurisdiction to hear and determine such a matter, since the court itself is a creation of law and must uphold the Constitution at all times.

Advertisement

She held that the plaintiff’s case had merit and consequently granted all the reliefs sought by the plaintiff.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Reps Gives MREIF Boss Final One-Week Reprieve Over Housing Fund Probe

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives Committee on Housing and Habitat has granted the management of the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund (MREIF) a one-week extension to appear before lawmakers as part of an ongoing investigation into the fund’s operations, performance and administration.

The committee had initially summoned MREIF Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Dr Armstrong Ume Takang, alongside members of the fund’s management team, to appear on Tuesday, 2 June 2026, for a comprehensive review of the initiative and several petitions submitted against it.

The Committee Chairman, Rep. Abdulmumin Jibrin, said the investigation was aimed at ensuring the fund was operating in line with the objectives set by President Bola Tinubu and delivering on its mandate.

Advertisement

According to him, the exercise seeks to determine whether the administration and performance of MREIF are meeting public expectations while also addressing concerns raised in petitions before the committee.

However, in a letter addressed to lawmakers, Dr Takang acknowledged receipt of the summons and expressed the fund’s willingness to cooperate fully with the National Assembly’s oversight responsibilities.

He explained that he was outside Abuja on an official engagement that had been scheduled before the committee’s invitation was received and requested a new date for the hearing.

The MREIF chief also assured lawmakers of the organisation’s readiness to engage constructively with the committee.

Advertisement

Responding to the request, Jibrin said the committee had agreed to postpone the hearing by one week in the interest of fairness and cooperation.

He stated that the session had now been rescheduled for Tuesday, 9 June 2026, stressing that the extension was granted specifically to allow the managing director to appear in person.

The committee maintained that Dr Takang’s personal appearance was crucial to its inquiry and could not be delegated.

Jibrin reiterated the committee’s determination to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into the management of the fund, which was established to expand access to affordable home ownership for Nigerians.

Advertisement

He said the committee remained committed to addressing all issues raised in the petitions before it while ensuring transparency, accountability and effective implementation of the housing initiative in line with the vision of the Tinubu administration.

The lawmaker further stated that the committee expects Dr Takang and the entire MREIF management team to appear before it on the new date without fail.

Continue Reading

News

FG stops three-month Pre-retirement leave for civil servants

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Federal Government abolished the three-month preretirement leave for civil servants.

This was contained in a circular titled “Correct Interpretation of Public Service Rule 120243 on Pre-Retirement Activities,” issued by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, and addressed to top government officials, including ministers, permanent secretaries, service chiefs, heads of agencies, and other senior public sector administrators.

According to the circular, FG directed Ministries, Departments, and Agencies to immediately discontinue the practice of placing civil servants on what is commonly referred to as a mandatory three-month preretirement leave.

Walson-Jack argued that such a provision does not exist in the Public Service Rules, adding that several MDAs had wrongly interpreted the retirement notice period as an automatic leave period, leading to the premature withdrawal of officers from active service.

Advertisement

The Public Service Rule, according to her, only requires officers due for retirement to give three months’ notice before their exit date, attend a one-month pre-retirement workshop or seminar, and use the remaining period to regularise service records and pension documentation.

Nigeria’s federal civil service retirement framework is governed by the Public Service Rules and the Pension Reform Act.

Under the rules, civil servants retire upon attaining 60 years of age or after 35 years in service, whichever comes first.

The Head of Service’s directive seeks to standardise the implementation of the Public Service Rules across government institutions and to prevent manpower losses resulting from the early disengagement of experienced officers

Advertisement

“The so-called ‘mandatory three-month pre-retirement leave’ has no basis in the Public Service Rules,” Walson-Jack stated.
She explained that Rule 120243 establishes three distinct requirements: a notice obligation, attendance at a pre-retirement seminar during the first month, and completion of retirement-related documentation during the remaining two months.
“A retiring officer must give three months’ notice before their effective date of retirement. This is a notice requirement, not a leave entitlement,” the circular stated.

Civil Service Commission

She stressed that retiring officers remain public servants throughout the notice period and are expected to continue performing their official duties unless they are attending approved retirement workshops or have been granted leave under existing regulations.

“PSR 120243 does not exempt retiring officers from official duties during the notice period, except where they are attending an approved pre-retirement workshop or seminar, or are otherwise authorised to be absent under extant leave rules,” the circular added.

Advertisement

In view of the above, all MDAs have been directed to stop compelling retiring officers to vacate their posts before their official retirement dates.

Under the new directive, ministries and agencies must ensure that retiring officers continue to discharge their responsibilities, participate in approved pre-retirement programmes, and complete all pension and service record reconciliations before leaving service.
The latest circular seeks to end that ambiguity by affirming that the three-month period is primarily a notice and administrative preparation window, rather than an automatic absence from duty.
The circular further instructed permanent secretaries, directors-general, executive secretaries, chairpersons of statutory agencies, and chief executives of government organisations to bring the directive to the attention of all staff and ensure strict compliance.

The government said it believes the measure could improve service delivery by ensuring that retiring officers continue contributing their expertise until their official exit dates while simultaneously completing documentation required for pension processing.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Six members of same family shot dead during domestic dispute in US

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Six people were killed in the US state of Iowa after a series of shootings that appeared to stem from a domestic dispute, police said.

The suspected shooter also was found dead with a self-inflicted gunshot wound, according to the Muscatine Police Department.

The victims are believed to be family members of the suspect, identified as Ryan Willis McFarland, 52, of Muscatine, the department said.

Muscatine Police Chief Anthony Kies called the shooting an “act of evil”.

Advertisement

The shootings took place on Monday at multiple locations within the city of Muscatine.

Police received a report of a shooting just after noon on Monday. When officers responded to a home, they found four people with gunshot wounds, police said.

All four victims were pronounced dead at the scene.

McFarland had left the residence before officers arrived, but officials found him shortly after on a riverfront trail near a pedestrian bridge.

Advertisement

He had a self‑inflicted gunshot wound, police said, and received medical aid, but was pronounced dead at the scene.

Detectives later found another man dead from an apparent gunshot wound in a different residence. A further search led officers to a business, where they found another victim, also dead of an apparent gunshot wound.

Online maps show a metal workshop at the address provided by police.

“Preliminary findings indicate the shootings stemmed from a domestic‑related dispute,” McFarland police said in a statement. “All victims are believed to be family members of the deceased suspect.”

Advertisement

Kies did not give the names or ages of the victims and noted that the investigation is ongoing.

He confirmed the suspect had an existing criminal record but did not share any further details.

Muscatine, in the southwest of Iowa, sits on the Mississippi River and has a population of approximately 23,500 people, according to US government data published last year.

Mayor Brad Bark wrote in a post on Facebook: “Our hearts are heavy tonight after the tragic shootings that claimed innocent lives.”

Advertisement

Source: BBC

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News