Connect with us

News

Just in: PDP angry over deliberate misrepresentation of court judgements, wants defaulters severely punished

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…..declares the Court of Appeal did not nullify the constitutionality or legality of the Caretaker Committe

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has demanded for stiff sanctions against deliberate misrepresentation of court judgements insisting it’s time to wield the big stick.

This was contained in a statement issued and signed by Hon. Jungudo Haruna Mohammed
National Publicity Secretary stating that

Advertisement

The major opposition in Nigeria in the statement said, “is deeply disturbed by the persistent and deliberate distortion of judicial pronouncements by a group of individuals falsely parading themselves as the Interim National Working Committee of the Party.

” The latest instance is contained in a press statement issued by one Comrade Ini Ememobong, a legal practitioner, on June 3, 2026, on behalf of the said group. Of particular concern are paragraphs three and four of the statement, which contain claims, conclusions, and interpretations that are not only misleading but are entirely inconsistent with the clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal contents of the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

” The Party considers this development a dangerous assault on the integrity of the judiciary and the administration of justice. It is particularly disturbing that individuals who are members of the legal profession, including a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, would engage in the distortion and misrepresentation of a clear judicial pronouncement for partisan political purposes.

“The PDP states unequivocally that the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the ruling of the Court of Appeal delivered by Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam on Wednesday, June 3, 2026, and certified on Friday, June 5, 2026, speaks for itself and leaves no room for the false narratives currently being circulated across the media and social media platforms.

Advertisement

The publicity scribe further stressed that: “It is therefore shocking that legal practitioners would seek to attribute statements, conclusions, and declarations to the Court that are completely absent from the judgment itself.

” Such conduct amounts to an attempt to mislead the public, create confusion, and undermine confidence in the judicial process. This constitutes contempt of court and must be treated as such.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the Court of Appeal did not nullify the constitutionality or legality of the Caretaker Committee of the Party from which the present National Working Committee emerged. Rather, the Court dismissed the appeal on the grounds that it constituted an academic exercise and an attempt to relitigate issues that had already been conclusively determined by both the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. Consequently, the judgment of the Federal High Court, Ibadan, delivered on January 30, 2026, remains valid, subsisting, binding, and fully enforceable.

” The Party wishes to place on record that at no point from the first page to the last page of the ruling did the Court of Appeal make any pronouncement concerning Mr. A. K. Ajibade, SAN, or Senator Samuel N. Anyanwu, as falsely claimed by those promoting misleading interpretations of the judgment.

Advertisement

“Any attempt to suggest otherwise amounts to a deliberate distortion of the clear and unambiguous decision of the Court. Such conduct is considered misleading, irresponsible, and calculated to deceive the public, undermine confidence in the judiciary, create confusion, and heighten political tension.

“Even more disturbing is the circulation on social media of purported excerpts of the Court of Appeal ruling, with portions highlighted in green ink and presented as part of the Court’s decision.

” A careful examination of the authentic Certified True Copy of the ruling reveals that several of the highlighted portions being circulated neither emanated from nor formed part of the judgment delivered by the Court.

“The Party considers this development extremely serious and calls on the relevant security and regulatory authorities to immediately investigate the source and purpose of such materials and take appropriate action in accordance with the law.

Advertisement

“The Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) and the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) are urged to rise to the occasion by investigating the conduct of legal practitioners who deliberately misrepresent court judgments and use their professional standing to promote falsehoods capable of bringing the legal profession into disrepute.

“The Party further reminds all media organizations of their responsibility to uphold the highest standards of professionalism. Media houses are urged to seek proper legal guidance and verify the contents of court judgments before disseminating interpretations that may mislead the public or inflame political tensions.

” The judiciary remains the last hope of the common man. Its decisions must be respected, faithfully represented, and protected from manipulation by individuals seeking political advantage. The deliberate misrepresentation of court judgments constitutes a grave threat to the rule of law and the credibility of democratic institutions.

“The PDP therefore calls for immediate action against all persons found to have knowingly distorted the judgment of the Court. Failure to act decisively will only embolden those who seek to weaponize misinformation against the judiciary and weaken public confidence in the administration of justice.

Advertisement

“Politics should never descend to the level where judicial pronouncements are fraudulently twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented to serve narrow partisan interests. This is politics taken too far.

“The sanctity of the judiciary must be protected. The truth must prevail, and those who seek to undermine the authority of the courts through deliberate misrepresentation must be held accountable in accordance with the law.

“The relevant security and regulatory agencies are further urged to urgently investigate these developments and take all necessary actions within the ambit of the law. No individual, regardless of status or professional standing, should be permitted to misrepresent the decisions of a court of competent jurisdiction without consequence.

“Finally, the PDP urges members of the public, media organizations, party members, and stakeholders to disregard in its entirety the false and misleading narratives suggesting that the Court of Appeal has invalidated the present National Working Committee of the Party.

Advertisement

” The Party further appeals for continued support for the leadership of Hon. Abdulrahman Mohammed and Senator Samuel N. Anyanwu in their commitment to providing a viable and credible alternative political direction for Nigeria.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Troops Intercept Arms Courier, Recover Over 1,000 Ammunition in Zamfara Operation

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Troops of the Joint Task Force, Operation FANSAN YAMMA, have intercepted a suspected arms courier and recovered a large cache of ammunition, while also foiling a cattle rustling operation in separate missions across Nigeria’s North-West region.

In a statement issued on Friday, the task force said troops of Sector 2, deployed at a checkpoint in Kaura Namoda, Zamfara State, intercepted a civilian vehicle heading towards Shinkafi Local Government Area on 5 June 2026.

A search of the vehicle led to the discovery of a locally fabricated pistol, a magazine and over 1,000 rounds of ammunition concealed in a sack containing millet.

The suspect, identified as 42-year-old Mustapha Abubakar, was arrested at the scene. According to the task force, he is believed to be involved in the illegal transportation of arms and ammunition to criminal elements operating in the region.

Advertisement

In a related operation, troops of Sector 1 on 3 June 2026 foiled an attempted cattle rustling incident in Chikun Local Government Area of Kaduna State.

The troops responded to a distress call from a herder whose cattle had been stolen by armed men.

Continue Reading

News

Meta Is Sending US Facebook Users Bonus Payments In $725m Settlement

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Facebook users who previously received compensation under Meta’s $725 million privacy settlement are set to receive additional payments after administrators found that funds remained available following the initial distribution.

Although the extra payments are tied to the settlement of a class-action lawsuit that accused Facebook of improperly sharing users’ personal data with third parties, including political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica.

A New York Post report states that the political consulting firm had harvested data from as many as 87 million Facebook users without their consent, and therefore used it to build voter profiles for targeted political ads.

According to Angeion, the settlement administrator handling the payout said that approximately 28 million claims were filed in a class action in the United States.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Meta agreed to the $725 million settlement in 2022 without admitting wrongdoing.

The settlement administrators have begun issuing supplementary payments to eligible claimants because fewer valid claims were approved than originally anticipated, leaving part of the settlement fund undistributed.

The original settlement covered Facebook users in the United States who maintained an account between May 24, 2007, and December 22, 2022, and submitted claims before the deadline set by the court.

Payment amounts were initially determined by factors including the length of time users maintained their Facebook accounts during the covered period. So, the latest round of payments will be sent through the same channels used in the original distribution, including direct deposits and digital payment platforms.

Advertisement

Also, the lawsuit stemmed from allegations that Facebook failed to adequately safeguard user information and allowed third parties access to personal data without sufficient oversight.

The controversy gained international attention following disclosures about Cambridge Analytica’s use of Facebook user data.

Troy Aikman’s And His Lover Whom You’ll Easily Recognize
Dermatologist: The #1 Peptide You Need To Erase All Wrinkles
Olavita | Sponsored
Dermatologist: The #1 Peptide You Need To Erase All Wrinkles
credit icon
Meta has since implemented a series of privacy and security measures aimed at strengthening data protection across its platforms, while continuing to deny any wrongdoing in relation to the settlement.

(New York Post)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Lady Drags Husband To Court For Hiring Out Her Bedroom

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

A middle aged house wife, Umma Bashir, has dragged her husband, Bashir Ibrahim, to Sharia Court ll at Magajin Gari, Kaduna State for renting out her bedroom without her knowledge.

The complainant told the court that her husband had provided two rooms for her and her two children but decided to rent out the bedroom without her consent.

She said, “I returned home from a journey to discover that my bedroom was locked and my belongings moved to the sitting room.

“When I confronted my husband, he told me that it was his room and he has the right to do whatever he wishes with it.”

Advertisement

Umma, who had left for her parents house for five days, told the court that she won’t return to her matrimonial home until her husband provide good shelter for her.

She also disclosed that her two co-wives were living in a two bedroom apartment each with their children but she was left with one room to manage.

According to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), the defendant agreed to have rented the room out but denied his wife’s claim of not being informed.

He said “I informed her that I will rent out one of the rooms out to be able to renovate an apartment I am planning to relocate her to.”

Advertisement

Ibrahim added that he promised his wife that he would use the rent money he got from the tenant to renovate the proposed apartment.

The judge, Malam Musa Sa’ad, after listening to both parties, emphasised the importance of shelter in marriage.

He said it was the responsibility of the husband to provide shelter for the family, stressing that “it was wrong for husband and wife to live in one room with two teenagers.”

The judge adjourned the case so that the court could inspect the house and assess its condition.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News