News
Just in: PDP angry over deliberate misrepresentation of court judgements, wants defaulters severely punished
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/download.png&description=Just in: PDP angry over deliberate misrepresentation of court judgements, wants defaulters severely punished', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/download.png&description=Just in: PDP angry over deliberate misrepresentation of court judgements, wants defaulters severely punished', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
…..declares the Court of Appeal did not nullify the constitutionality or legality of the Caretaker Committe
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has demanded for stiff sanctions against deliberate misrepresentation of court judgements insisting it’s time to wield the big stick.
This was contained in a statement issued and signed by Hon. Jungudo Haruna Mohammed
National Publicity Secretary stating that
The major opposition in Nigeria in the statement said, “is deeply disturbed by the persistent and deliberate distortion of judicial pronouncements by a group of individuals falsely parading themselves as the Interim National Working Committee of the Party.
” The latest instance is contained in a press statement issued by one Comrade Ini Ememobong, a legal practitioner, on June 3, 2026, on behalf of the said group. Of particular concern are paragraphs three and four of the statement, which contain claims, conclusions, and interpretations that are not only misleading but are entirely inconsistent with the clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal contents of the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
” The Party considers this development a dangerous assault on the integrity of the judiciary and the administration of justice. It is particularly disturbing that individuals who are members of the legal profession, including a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, would engage in the distortion and misrepresentation of a clear judicial pronouncement for partisan political purposes.
“The PDP states unequivocally that the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the ruling of the Court of Appeal delivered by Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam on Wednesday, June 3, 2026, and certified on Friday, June 5, 2026, speaks for itself and leaves no room for the false narratives currently being circulated across the media and social media platforms.
The publicity scribe further stressed that: “It is therefore shocking that legal practitioners would seek to attribute statements, conclusions, and declarations to the Court that are completely absent from the judgment itself.
” Such conduct amounts to an attempt to mislead the public, create confusion, and undermine confidence in the judicial process. This constitutes contempt of court and must be treated as such.
“For the avoidance of doubt, the Court of Appeal did not nullify the constitutionality or legality of the Caretaker Committee of the Party from which the present National Working Committee emerged. Rather, the Court dismissed the appeal on the grounds that it constituted an academic exercise and an attempt to relitigate issues that had already been conclusively determined by both the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. Consequently, the judgment of the Federal High Court, Ibadan, delivered on January 30, 2026, remains valid, subsisting, binding, and fully enforceable.
” The Party wishes to place on record that at no point from the first page to the last page of the ruling did the Court of Appeal make any pronouncement concerning Mr. A. K. Ajibade, SAN, or Senator Samuel N. Anyanwu, as falsely claimed by those promoting misleading interpretations of the judgment.
“Any attempt to suggest otherwise amounts to a deliberate distortion of the clear and unambiguous decision of the Court. Such conduct is considered misleading, irresponsible, and calculated to deceive the public, undermine confidence in the judiciary, create confusion, and heighten political tension.
“Even more disturbing is the circulation on social media of purported excerpts of the Court of Appeal ruling, with portions highlighted in green ink and presented as part of the Court’s decision.
” A careful examination of the authentic Certified True Copy of the ruling reveals that several of the highlighted portions being circulated neither emanated from nor formed part of the judgment delivered by the Court.
“The Party considers this development extremely serious and calls on the relevant security and regulatory authorities to immediately investigate the source and purpose of such materials and take appropriate action in accordance with the law.
“The Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) and the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) are urged to rise to the occasion by investigating the conduct of legal practitioners who deliberately misrepresent court judgments and use their professional standing to promote falsehoods capable of bringing the legal profession into disrepute.
“The Party further reminds all media organizations of their responsibility to uphold the highest standards of professionalism. Media houses are urged to seek proper legal guidance and verify the contents of court judgments before disseminating interpretations that may mislead the public or inflame political tensions.
” The judiciary remains the last hope of the common man. Its decisions must be respected, faithfully represented, and protected from manipulation by individuals seeking political advantage. The deliberate misrepresentation of court judgments constitutes a grave threat to the rule of law and the credibility of democratic institutions.
“The PDP therefore calls for immediate action against all persons found to have knowingly distorted the judgment of the Court. Failure to act decisively will only embolden those who seek to weaponize misinformation against the judiciary and weaken public confidence in the administration of justice.
“Politics should never descend to the level where judicial pronouncements are fraudulently twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented to serve narrow partisan interests. This is politics taken too far.
“The sanctity of the judiciary must be protected. The truth must prevail, and those who seek to undermine the authority of the courts through deliberate misrepresentation must be held accountable in accordance with the law.
“The relevant security and regulatory agencies are further urged to urgently investigate these developments and take all necessary actions within the ambit of the law. No individual, regardless of status or professional standing, should be permitted to misrepresent the decisions of a court of competent jurisdiction without consequence.
“Finally, the PDP urges members of the public, media organizations, party members, and stakeholders to disregard in its entirety the false and misleading narratives suggesting that the Court of Appeal has invalidated the present National Working Committee of the Party.
” The Party further appeals for continued support for the leadership of Hon. Abdulrahman Mohammed and Senator Samuel N. Anyanwu in their commitment to providing a viable and credible alternative political direction for Nigeria.
News
Troops Intercept Arms Courier, Recover Over 1,000 Ammunition in Zamfara Operation
Troops of the Joint Task Force, Operation FANSAN YAMMA, have intercepted a suspected arms courier and recovered a large cache of ammunition, while also foiling a cattle rustling operation in separate missions across Nigeria’s North-West region.
In a statement issued on Friday, the task force said troops of Sector 2, deployed at a checkpoint in Kaura Namoda, Zamfara State, intercepted a civilian vehicle heading towards Shinkafi Local Government Area on 5 June 2026.
A search of the vehicle led to the discovery of a locally fabricated pistol, a magazine and over 1,000 rounds of ammunition concealed in a sack containing millet.
The suspect, identified as 42-year-old Mustapha Abubakar, was arrested at the scene. According to the task force, he is believed to be involved in the illegal transportation of arms and ammunition to criminal elements operating in the region.
In a related operation, troops of Sector 1 on 3 June 2026 foiled an attempted cattle rustling incident in Chikun Local Government Area of Kaduna State.
The troops responded to a distress call from a herder whose cattle had been stolen by armed men.
News
Meta Is Sending US Facebook Users Bonus Payments In $725m Settlement
Facebook users who previously received compensation under Meta’s $725 million privacy settlement are set to receive additional payments after administrators found that funds remained available following the initial distribution.
Although the extra payments are tied to the settlement of a class-action lawsuit that accused Facebook of improperly sharing users’ personal data with third parties, including political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica.
A New York Post report states that the political consulting firm had harvested data from as many as 87 million Facebook users without their consent, and therefore used it to build voter profiles for targeted political ads.
According to Angeion, the settlement administrator handling the payout said that approximately 28 million claims were filed in a class action in the United States.
Meanwhile, Meta agreed to the $725 million settlement in 2022 without admitting wrongdoing.
The settlement administrators have begun issuing supplementary payments to eligible claimants because fewer valid claims were approved than originally anticipated, leaving part of the settlement fund undistributed.
The original settlement covered Facebook users in the United States who maintained an account between May 24, 2007, and December 22, 2022, and submitted claims before the deadline set by the court.
Payment amounts were initially determined by factors including the length of time users maintained their Facebook accounts during the covered period. So, the latest round of payments will be sent through the same channels used in the original distribution, including direct deposits and digital payment platforms.
Also, the lawsuit stemmed from allegations that Facebook failed to adequately safeguard user information and allowed third parties access to personal data without sufficient oversight.
The controversy gained international attention following disclosures about Cambridge Analytica’s use of Facebook user data.
Troy Aikman’s And His Lover Whom You’ll Easily Recognize
Dermatologist: The #1 Peptide You Need To Erase All Wrinkles
Olavita | Sponsored
Dermatologist: The #1 Peptide You Need To Erase All Wrinkles
credit icon
Meta has since implemented a series of privacy and security measures aimed at strengthening data protection across its platforms, while continuing to deny any wrongdoing in relation to the settlement.
(New York Post)
News
Lady Drags Husband To Court For Hiring Out Her Bedroom
A middle aged house wife, Umma Bashir, has dragged her husband, Bashir Ibrahim, to Sharia Court ll at Magajin Gari, Kaduna State for renting out her bedroom without her knowledge.
The complainant told the court that her husband had provided two rooms for her and her two children but decided to rent out the bedroom without her consent.
She said, “I returned home from a journey to discover that my bedroom was locked and my belongings moved to the sitting room.
“When I confronted my husband, he told me that it was his room and he has the right to do whatever he wishes with it.”
Umma, who had left for her parents house for five days, told the court that she won’t return to her matrimonial home until her husband provide good shelter for her.
She also disclosed that her two co-wives were living in a two bedroom apartment each with their children but she was left with one room to manage.
According to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), the defendant agreed to have rented the room out but denied his wife’s claim of not being informed.
He said “I informed her that I will rent out one of the rooms out to be able to renovate an apartment I am planning to relocate her to.”
Ibrahim added that he promised his wife that he would use the rent money he got from the tenant to renovate the proposed apartment.
The judge, Malam Musa Sa’ad, after listening to both parties, emphasised the importance of shelter in marriage.
He said it was the responsibility of the husband to provide shelter for the family, stressing that “it was wrong for husband and wife to live in one room with two teenagers.”
The judge adjourned the case so that the court could inspect the house and assess its condition.
-
Economy23 hours agoSee Dollar to Naira exchange rate today, June 5, 2026
-
News23 hours agoFBI announces fresh Top 10 list of scammers wanted for multibillion-dollar fraud
-
News23 hours agoJust in: Gov Soludo Drags 8 Anambra Pastors To Court Over Fake Miracles, Religious Scam
-
News23 hours agoLegal Education Council unveils updated list of 117 universities accredited to offer Law
-
News23 hours agoWASSCE candidates again write exams late in the night
-
News16 hours agoXenophobia: FG Set To Repatriate Over 1,000 Nationals From South Africa As Tensions Rise
-
News23 hours ago2027: INEC nullifies primaries held after May 30
-
News7 hours agoNigerians Outraged As Bandits Release Videos Of R@pe Of Female Victims
