ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Pastor David Ibiyeomie has sparked reactions with his remarks on the kind of message Christians should preach to Nigerians when trying to win souls for Christ.

Speaking about the effectiveness of preaching about hell, the pastor argued that many Nigerians are already going through severe hardship, making the threat of hell less effective in convincing them to accept Christ.

He said Nigerians need to hear messages of hope, love and transformation rather than messages that remind them of further suffering.

According to him: “You can imagine preaching hell to Nigerians. They are already in hell. There’s no way you preach hell to Nigerians and anybody will be born again.”

Instead, he urged pastors to focus on preaching about God’s love and His ability to transform people’s lives. “Just tell them God loves you. He can change your story. Then the man says, ‘Eh ehn,’ then you say, ‘Come to Jesus.’”

He further explained that constantly warning Nigerians about hell may not have the desired effect because many already feel that their present circumstances are hellish.

“But if you say you go to hell, the man will say, ‘Ah! The suffering, the suffering we are suffering now, what is it? Already the suffering is what?’ So That kind of message can’t convert one soul.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Borno State Commissioner for Youth and Sports Development, Sainna Buba, has come under criticism over comments in which he threatened political opponents with punishment if they refused to support the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

Buba, a known ally of Governor Babagana Umara Zulum, made the remarks at a campaign inauguration organised by the Tinubu City Boy Movement.

The City Boy Movement is a political support group and grassroots mobilization organization. It is dedicated to promoting the policies of President Bola Tinubu’s administration and securing his re-election.

The phrase “City Boy” is a popular political moniker originally given to Tinubu, from his time as the former Governor of Lagos, the commercial nerve centre of the country.

Speaking at the event, the commissioner said, “Whoever shows us a finger, we are ready to cut off his fingers.”

He further warned those who opposed the government, saying: “We are now playing politics. Whoever shows us a finger, we will show him a finger. Whoever dares to show us a finger again, we will break his finger. The government is our government. Those who follow us will enjoy the honey; if you refuse, then you will be flogged.”

The remarks have raised concerns over the language used by a serving government official, particularly amid allegations of intimidation, human rights abuses and the use of state institutions against young people in Borno State.

There have also been allegations that some youths were subjected to intimidation and prolonged detention through the justice system in Tandari. Other claims have alleged that executive powers were used against young people, with some reportedly fleeing the state and seeking refuge in Algeria.

The allegations have not been independently established and require proper investigation by the relevant authorities.

However, Buba’s comments have renewed questions about the treatment of political dissent and opposition in the state.

Critics argue that a government official threatening to “break” the fingers of those who oppose or challenge the government creates an atmosphere of intimidation and could undermine citizens’ constitutional rights.

According to critics, the remarks raise broader questions about whether political loyalty is becoming a condition for citizens to enjoy their rights and whether disagreement with those in power is being treated as an offence.

Electoral violence, inflammatory rhetoric and severe security threats have heavily characterised recent Nigerian elections.

The highly publicised incident involving Senator Francis Fadahunsi in Osun State is one example of the concerns surrounding the use of threatening language during election campaigns.

During the buildup to the Osun State Governorship Election, Fadahunsi, the All Progressives Congress (APC) lawmaker representing Osun East, became embroiled in controversy after a video emerged in which he appeared to instruct APC supporters to “kill” members of the rival Accord Party while addressing a campaign rally in Ilesa.

He also reportedly referred to the violent political crisis of 1983 in the former Western Region, including the burning of an opposition candidate’s family home.

The remarks generated widespread outrage and prompted the Osun State Police Command to summon the senator for questioning. In a letter signed by Samuel Erale, the Commissioner of Police for election duties, the police described the senator’s statements as “threatening, inciting, and intimidating in nature.”

Fadahunsi honoured the invitation and appeared at the State Criminal Investigation Department in Osogbo. He denied calling for physical violence, arguing that his words had been deliberately manipulated and that their meaning had been distorted because he spoke in Yoruba.

He maintained that when he said supporters should “kill Accord,” he meant they should defeat the party with their votes at the ballot box, not physically attack its members.

Despite the controversy and police invitation, there was no reported prosecution or punitive action against the senator beyond the questioning.

Civil society organisations, including ActionAid Nigeria, subsequently condemned what they described as the normalisation of impunity surrounding inflammatory electoral rhetoric.

The Fadahunsi controversy is part of a broader pattern of politically charged threats and inflammatory statements that have accompanied Nigerian elections, often with limited consequences for those responsible.

Ahead of the 2023 Lagos State governorship election, for instance, APC chieftain Musiliu ‘MC Oluomo’ Akinsanya was criticised after warning Igbo voters in a widely circulated video: “If you know you won’t vote for us, stay at home.”

The remarks attracted condemnation amid concerns about voter intimidation, but no significant legal action followed.

Similarly, ahead of the 2019 general elections, then-Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai warned foreign election observers on live television that anyone who came to interfere in Nigeria’s electoral process would “go back in body bags.”

El-Rufai later defended the statement as a warning against interference in Nigeria’s sovereignty, but it did not result in prosecution.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

The Department of State Services (DSS) is seeking to pause the ongoing alleged cyber-bullying case against African Action Congress (AAC) presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, until after the 2027 presidential election, in a move officials say is aimed at ensuring that the candidate is able to participate fully in the electoral process.

The development represents a significant shift in the handling of the case, which arose from social media posts in which Sowore referred to President Bola Tinubu as a “criminal.”

The DSS had approached the Federal High Court to determine whether it was lawful for Sowore to describe the President or any individual as a criminal, while also seeking judicial interpretation on related issues, including the legality of Professor Pat Utomi’s proposed “Shadow Government.

But with presidential campaigns now underway, the security agency has directed its private counsel, Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, to seek an adjournment of the Sowore case until after the January 16, 2027 presidential election.

A source close to the DSS legal team disclosed that the decision followed a meeting between the Director-General of the service, Tosin Ajayi, Kehinde and senior officers of the agency’s legal directorate on August 20, a day after the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) officially lifted the ban on campaigns.

According to the source, Ajayi told the legal team that it would be fair to allow Sowore to exercise his right to contest the presidential election without the pending case becoming an impediment to his campaign.

“The DSS boss reportedly told the Senior Advocate and his directorate of legal services that, with the commencement of presidential campaigns, it would only be fair to adjourn the court case in order to enable Sowore fully participate in the upcoming elections without let or hindrance,” the source said.

The position is particularly notable because the DSS had earlier pursued the matter after Sowore refused to remove the posts following a seven-day ultimatum issued by the agency.

The security service subsequently approached the court on September 16, 2025, after the expiration of the ultimatum, seeking adjudication on the matter.

The DSS had also stated in a September 6, 2025 letter to Meta, the parent company of Facebook, that its responsibility to protect the President extended beyond physical threats to what it described as psychological attacks.

However, nearly a year after the case was instituted, the agency now believes that continuing with the proceedings during the election campaign could unnecessarily interfere with Sowore’s participation in the poll.

The source said Ajayi was of the view that the case had already spent almost a year before the court and that delaying proceedings for a few additional months would not materially affect the matter.

“The DSS boss told the lawyers that, since the matter had been in court for nearly a year, suspending it for another few months wouldn’t make much difference,” the source said.

The development also appears to form part of a wider review by the DSS of cases involving candidates contesting elective positions in the 2027 elections.

The source said cases involving other candidates were being reviewed to determine whether similar considerations should apply.

The DSS is expected to formally approach the Federal High Court for the adjournment from September 14, 2026, when the court is scheduled to resume normal proceedings after the annual judicial vacation.

Kehinde, SAN, confirmed the development when contacted.

He said the proposed adjournment was consistent with what he described as the “civilised approach” of the current DSS Director-General, which, he said, was intended to ensure a level playing field and provide candidates with the opportunity to participate in the electoral process.

“We will seek the indulgence of the court for the adjournment,” he said.