News
‘It’s Abominable For Individual To Interfere In Age-long Customary Arbitration’ – BTC Cautions Obaseki Over suspended Enigie
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Screenshot_20240522-225041.png&description=‘It’s Abominable For Individual To Interfere In Age-long Customary Arbitration’ – BTC Cautions Obaseki Over suspended Enigie', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Screenshot_20240522-225041.png&description=‘It’s Abominable For Individual To Interfere In Age-long Customary Arbitration’ – BTC Cautions Obaseki Over suspended Enigie', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
Benin Traditional Council (BTC) has cautioned Governor Godwin Obaseki of Edo State to stir clear on his acclaimed move to resolve the misunderstanding between Oba of Benin and some suspended enigie (dukes).
Recall that some enigie had dragged the Oba of Benin, Omo N’Oba N’Edo Uku Akpolokpolo, Ewuare II and the state government to court over their suspension.
The Enigie argument is that the Oba does not have the power to suspend them without the consent of the state executive council and Governor Obaseki.
Obaseki, in one of visits to one of the suspended enigie in the crisis, Professor Gregory Akenzua, said he would visit the Iyase (Prime Minister) of Benin to initiate the reconciliation process.
But the BTC in a strong-worded statement dated May 22, 2024, said it was an abomination for any individual to seek to interfere with the age-long and well-established process of customary arbitration of the kingdom which they expected those involved to explore.
The statement was signed by prominent Benin chiefs including: Osuma of Benin, Chief Norense Ozigbo-Esere; Oliha of Benin, Chief Edionwe Oliha; Aiwerioghene of Benin, Chief Henry Osato Bazuaye; Uwangue of Benin, Chief Ekhoerovbiye Oviasogie and Eribo of Benin, Chief Ada Igbinovia.
Others are Esere of Benin, Chief Stanley Obamwonyi; Obazelu of Benin, Chief Osaro Idah; Ine of Benin, Chief Okuonghae Edomwandagbon and Obahiagbon of Benin, Chief David Aibiokun Ehondor.
The statement reads: “Our attention has been drawn to the reported plan by the Governor of Edo State, His Excellency,Mr. Godwin Obaseki, to initiate dispute resolution of the suit filed by two suspended Enigie against His Royal Majesty, Omo N’Oba N’Edo, Uku Akpolokpolo,Oba of Benin.
“Our attention has also been drawn to a Press Statement credited to the Honourable Commissioner for Communication and Orientation, Edo State, Mr. Chris Nehikhare in which he claims that the suit filed by the Enigie is a family dispute within the Benin Royal Family
“We wish to state for the avoidance of doubt that the Benin Traditional Institution has a well-established and fully functional process of customary arbitration under the authority of His Royal Majesty, The Oba of Benin. This process of customary arbitration is well-known to all Benin traditional chiefs, including the suspended Enigie. Any traditional chief who has any genuine cause to be aggrieved is at liberty to explore this customary arbitration process. It is therefore an abomination for any individual to seek to interfere with this age-long and well-established process of customary arbitration.
“We also wish to emphasize that His Royal Majesty, The Oba of Benin reigns over the Benin Kingdom as the spiritual and royal father of the Benin people irrespective of family status, age and office.
“Consequently, it is an affront for anyone to suggest that His Royal Majesty, The Oba of Benin is in dispute with those over whom he reigns, including members of the Royal Family.
“We admonish members of the general public to be wary of the abominable efforts to undermine the Benin Traditional Institution through deliberate acts and utterances which are calculated to create confusion.
“We appeal to members of the general public to remain law-abiding, and pray for peace to continue to reign in the Benin Kingdom.”
News
Nigeria, Cameroon sign MoU to strengthen border security
Nigeria and Cameroon have signed a Memorandum of Understanding on bilateral defence cooperation, with a focus on securing their shared southern border and strengthening maritime security in the Gulf of Guinea.
The agreement was signed in Yaoundé on Wednesday by Nigeria’s Minister of Defence, Gen Christopher Musa (retd), and Cameroon’s Minister Delegate at the Presidency in Charge of Defence, Mr Joseph Assomo, following two days of deliberations by defence and security experts from both countries.
According to a statement on Wednesday by Musa’s media aide, Leah Katung-Babatunde, the MoU establishes a framework for cooperation across terrestrial and maritime domains and covers intelligence sharing, operational coordination, logistics support, joint military training, personnel exchange programmes, and collective response mechanisms to emerging security threats.
“In a major step toward regional stability, the Honourable Minister of Defence of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, General Christopher Musa (retd) OFR, today signed a MoU with the Minister Delegate at the Presidency in Charge of Defence of the Republic of Cameroon, Mr Joseph Assomo, to deepen bilateral defence cooperation and secure their shared southern border.
“The signing ceremony in Yaoundé concluded two days of intensive deliberations by defence and security experts from both nations.
“The agreement establishes a modernised framework to counter emerging threats across both terrestrial and maritime domains.
“The Memorandum of Understanding establishes a renewed framework for cooperation in securing the terrestrial and maritime domains along the Nigeria–Cameroon southern border and reinforces the long-standing defence relationship between both nations.
“Key areas highlighted during the engagements included enhanced operational coordination, intelligence sharing, logistics support, joint military training, personnel exchange programmes, and strengthened mechanisms for collective response to emerging security challenges,” the statement read.
Speaking at the signing ceremony, Musa said the agreement “would henceforth provide a structured framework for military cooperation and operations between both countries and further institutionalise collaboration in addressing common security concerns.”
Both sides also discussed the operationalisation of the Combined Maritime Joint Task Force, described as a strategic platform for enhancing maritime security and safeguarding economic interests within the Gulf of Guinea, where Nigeria and Cameroon are key stakeholders.
On defence industry cooperation, Musa noted that “one of the enduring challenges confronting African defence capability development has been limited indigenous production of military hardware,” stressing the need for stronger regional industrial partnerships.
He highlighted opportunities under Nigeria’s Defence Industries Corporation framework and reaffirmed Nigeria’s openness to collaboration in defence manufacturing, technology transfer, research, and innovation.
Assomo, in response, expressed interest in advancing cooperation in defence technology and confirmed that a formal proposal framework is being finalised to concretise bilateral arrangements in that area.
The signing marks what both governments described as a pivotal milestone in Nigeria–Cameroon relations, reinforcing their shared commitment to regional peace and sovereignty.
The signing comes days after armed Cameroonian soldiers invaded the Danare community in the Boki Local Government Area of Cross River State, causing widespread panic.
News
Kwara drags Saraki to court over alleged defamation
The Kwara State Government has filed a criminal defamation suit against former Senate President, Bukola Saraki, accusing him of making false claims about the educational background of Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq.
The case, instituted before the Kwara State High Court in Ilorin, was filed by the state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Senior Ibrahim, alongside the Director of Public Prosecutions, Ayoola Akande, and Assistant Chief State Counsel, B.L. Abdulsalam.
The matter came up on Wednesday before Justice M.O. Folorunso.
According to court documents, the government alleged that Saraki, on April 17, 2026, published and circulated statements through social media and newspaper platforms claiming that AbdulRazaq did not attain secondary school education.
The prosecution argued that the publication was false, malicious and intended to bring the governor and the state government into disrepute.
It further alleged that the statements contained insulting and abusive expressions capable of provoking public unrest and disturbing public peace, contrary to Section 399 of the Penal Code, Cap. P4, Laws of Kwara State, 2006.
At the proceedings, prosecuting counsel, R.O. Balogun, urged the court to issue a bench warrant against Saraki, arguing that the former Senate president failed to appear despite being served with the court processes.
“The defendant was duly served but failed to appear before the court. We, therefore, urge Your Lordship to issue a bench warrant to compel his attendance,” Balogun submitted.
He also opposed an application for adjournment filed by the defence, maintaining that the prosecution was ready to proceed with the case.
However, Saraki’s lawyer, Jimoh Mumini (SAN), challenged both the jurisdiction of the court and the validity of the service of the processes on his client.
“This matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court. In addition, the defendant was not properly served with the processes relied upon by the prosecution,” Mumini argued.
After hearing submissions from both sides and standing down the matter for about two hours, Justice Folorunso ruled that the defendant was entitled to seek an adjournment and fixed July 3, 2026, for the hearing of the preliminary objection and possible arraignment.
The PUNCH reports that the latest suit deepens the legal confrontation between the AbdulRazaq administration and Saraki.
Earlier on April 9, the state government filed a separate 20-count charge against Saraki, former Kwara State Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed, and two former aides over allegations relating to the arming of suspects convicted in connection with the 2018 Offa robbery attacks.
The other defendants in that case are Yusuf Abdulwahab, a former Chief of Staff to Ahmed, and Alabi Olalekan.
Responding to the earlier charges, Saraki denied any link to armed robbery or other criminal activities and insisted that previous investigations had cleared him of wrongdoing.
“I have nothing to do directly or indirectly with any case of armed robbery or any criminal matter,” Saraki said in a statement he personally signed.
The former Senate President maintained that he had been exonerated by both the police and the Director of Public Prosecutions in the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation, describing the prosecution as politically motivated.
In a statement issued on Wednesday by his media office, Saraki said his lawyers, led by Mumini (SAN), appeared before the Kwara State High Court in Ilorin to challenge the suit filed over a social media post he made on April 17, 2026, in response to an earlier statement by the state government.
The case arose from allegations that Saraki’s comments on Facebook and X questioned the educational qualifications of Governor AbdulRazaq and amounted to criminal defamation and cyberbullying.
According to the statement issued by the Press Officer on Local Matters, Abubakar Bukola Saraki Media Office, Abdulkadir Abdulganiy, Saraki’s legal team, led by Mumini, maintained that the social media posts in question constituted a legitimate exercise of freedom of expression and a right of reply.
“Dr Saraki’s post on Facebook and X being complained of were mere exercises of his freedom of speech and right of reply, as the leader of the opposition to Governor Abdulrazaq’s political party,” the statement said.
It wondered why Saraki’s social media post could constitute criminal defamation and cyberbullying against the governor.
The statement noted, “We note that it is a recurring decimal for the Kwara governor to seek to use the courts to harass and intimidate the leaders of opposition in the state any time they make any comment against the policies and actions of his administration.
“We believe that, like his earlier efforts to abuse the judicial process to silence the opposition, this case will fall like a pack of badly arranged cards.
“We note that the Kwara State government believes the alleged defamatory social media post deserves more attention than the issue of acute insecurity plaguing the state, in which two of the three senatorial districts in the state have become a den of kidnappers, bandits, and insurgents.
“Also, the case of 176 people kidnapped from the Woro community in the northern part of the state who have been in captivity since early February is taking a back seat behind the issue of a social media post, which the governor’s handlers believed was unpleasant to him.
“Today, we noticed that the governor and his handlers mobilised the media and their supporters to the court premises. We believe the energy and resources deployed to achieve that could have been better utilised as part of the resources to secure the release of the captives in the kidnappers’ den across the state.
“We have mentioned these more sensitive alternatives that require the attention of Governor AbdulRazaq and his government instead of dissipating resources on the impact of words that he exchanged with the opposition leader in the state to demonstrate that the court case is just another diversionary tactic.”
It added, “Dr Saraki continues to retain his confidence in the Nigerian judiciary and its ability to do justice to all parties, in all cases and situations.
“That is why his lawyers will also continue to defend his position and strongly put forward his case before the court on all matters, including this case arising from a social media post.”
The former Senate President appealed to his supporters across the state and beyond to remain calm and law-abiding.
He assured them that all the oppressive tactics aimed at intimidating and silencing him would come to nought.
News
Yahaya Bello trial: EFCC witness details alleged kickback scheme
A prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello, on Wednesday, told the Federal Capital Territory High Court, Maitama, Abuja, that he paid between 50 and 60 per cent of commissions earned by his company from consultancy services to officials of the Kogi State Internal Revenue Service.
The witness, who testified as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission 18th prosecution witness (PW18), made the disclosure before Justice Maryanne Anineh while being led in evidence by EFCC lead counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN.
The EFCC is prosecuting Bello alongside Umar Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu on a 16-count charge bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering involving N110.4bn.
The witness told the court that his company, involved in information technology, software development and tax automation services, was engaged by KSIRS for consultancy work.
“My company had business dealings with the Kogi State Internal Revenue Service. It was in connection with that that my company was invited,” he said.
He explained that the initial agreement provided for a 15 per cent commission on tax collections above N350m, later reviewed downward to five per cent.
“The agreement was to receive 15 per cent commission on transactions above N350m. The agreement was later reviewed downward to five per cent because the internally generated revenue had grown significantly,” he said.
The witness identified former KSIRS Chairman, Yakubu Oseni, as one of the officials he dealt with during the arrangement, adding that payments from his firm’s commissions were shared with unidentified stakeholders.
“Between 50 and 60 per cent of the commissions were paid to certain stakeholders,” he told the court.
When asked if such payments were part of the consultancy agreement, he responded: “No.”
He added that payments were made through bank transfers and cash transactions based on directives allegedly routed through Oseni’s Personal Assistant, Yusuf Abdulmumuni, and later through his successor’s aide, Abdulwahab.
The witness also identified account statements of Bespoke Business Solution as exhibits before the court, noting that a nominee signatory, Jami’u Salihu, operated independently on the account.
“Jami’u Salihu signs independently from me,” he said.
Reviewing financial exhibits, he confirmed inflows from KSIRS, including N92.4m on August 9, 2017, and N261.8m on August 14, 2017, followed by withdrawals made by Salihu.
He also confirmed N70m in payments to Efab Properties, but stated he could not identify the purpose of the transaction.
“I wouldn’t know which property was paid for because it was not my transaction,” he said.
He further told the court that he was not aware of complaints from the Kogi State Government regarding the consultancy services.
“No,” he responded when asked if there were complaints.
During cross-examination by defence counsel, P.B. Daudu (SAN), the witness confirmed the identities of other shareholders in his company and maintained that the consultancy services were satisfactorily executed.
Another prosecution witness, PW19, Jamilu Abdullahi, a Bureau de Change operator, also testified, identifying several companies and accounts linked to his business dealings.
Earlier, PW17, Shenu Bello Bala, an estate agent, completed his testimony and was discharged after cross-examination.
Justice Maryanne Anineh adjourned the matter to October 14, 15, 27, and 28, 2026, for continuation of trial proceedings at the FCT High Court, Maitama, Abuja.
-
News22 hours agoFG Rubbishes Reports of New Telecoms, Fuel Taxes
-
News22 hours agoRay of hope as Oborevwori moves to restore power in Isoko, Ndokwa communities
-
News18 hours agoExperts Urge ECOWAS Lawmakers to See Electricity as an Economic Game-Changer
-
News2 hours agoAppeal Court Knocks Out NBC’s Bid To Revive Broadcast Fines
-
News20 hours agoPIGD Lauds Mutfwang’s Bold Push To Make Plateau Livestock Hub
-
News18 hours agoMinority Caucus Sounds Alarm Over Insecurity, Judiciary and 2027 Politics
-
News11 hours agoPhotos:Judges Quarters: We’re fortifying vital pillar of our democracy – Tinubu
-
News2 hours ago‘If You See Something, Say Something’ — Oborevwori Rallies Deltans Against Terror, Kidnapping at Security Summit

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login