News
Reps Advance Tax Reform Bills Amid Unanimous Support
…as legislators overcome initial opposition to move key revenue laws forward
…weigh concerns over VAT, multiple taxation, Economic Impact
The House of Representatives on Wednesday passed through second reading the four tax reform bills submitted by the President, with no opposition from lawmakers.
The proposed laws include the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill, the Nigeria Tax Bill, the Nigeria Tax Administration Bill, and the Joint Revenue Board (Establishment) Bill.
Originally introduced on October 8, 2024, deliberations on the bills were delayed due to concerns raised by northern leaders and the Nigerian Governors Forum, particularly over the Nigeria Tax Administration Bill, but Speaker Tajudeen Abbas had urged members to consult widely with their constituents before debating the proposals.
Naijablitznews.com reports that ahead of plenary on Wednesday, the four bills were merged into a single document for debate. Despite highlighting potential conflicts with certain constitutional provisions and a few contentious clauses, lawmakers overwhelmingly supported moving the bills forward.
House Minority Leader, Rep. Kingsley Chinda (PDP Rivers, representing minority voices, acknowledged broad support for the reforms but pointed out concerns regarding specific provisions. He emphasized that while the bills aim to restructure the tax system for better revenue generation, the interpretation of certain provisions requires careful review.
The House of Representatives, on Wednesday, continued deliberations on the tax reform bills, with lawmakers expressing mixed reactions to various provisions, including proposed changes to Value Added Tax (VAT) and streamlining of multiple taxes.
Leade of the House, Rep. Julius Ihonvbere commended the President for initiating the reforms, and stated that the bills aim to modernize Nigeria’s tax system, eliminate multiple taxation, enhance revenue collection, and boost economic diversification. He acknowledged opposition to the bills but noted that differing perspectives had strengthened the final proposals.
Ihonvbere highlighted key benefits, including incentives for small businesses, improved revenue generation, and the reduction of tax burdens on low-income earners. He revealed that the reform would consolidate over 60 different taxes into just nine, ensuring quicker resolution of tax disputes within 14 days.
Minority Whip, Rep. Ali Isa (PDP, Gombe) raised concerns over Clause 146 of the Nigeria Tax Bill, which proposes a gradual VAT increase from 7.5% to 10% and later 15%, and cautioned that higher VAT could worsen economic hardship and urged the House to address areas requiring adjustments.
Chairman House Committee on Public Accounts, Rep. Bamidele Salam (PDP, Osun), emphasised that while tax reforms can be challenging, they are necessary for national development. He criticized Nigeria’s complex and duplicative tax laws, arguing that they deter investors and hinder economic growth.
Rep. Stanley Olajide (PDP, Oyo) pointed out that the House regularly establishes new agencies that require funding, making tax reform essential for sustaining government institutions.
Deputy Chief Whip, Rep. Isiaka Ibrahim Ayokunle (APC, Ogun) described the bills as a major step toward tax harmonization but stressed the need for penalties not only for taxpayers who default but also for government agencies failing to implement tax laws effectively.
In his submission, Rep. Sada Soli (APC, Katsina) raised constitutional concerns, particularly regarding Section 141 of the Tax Administration Law, which he said conflicts with existing legislation and creates jurisdictional overlaps. He also criticized ambiguities in VAT and fiscal policies that could overburden taxpayers.
Rep. Babajimi Benson (APC, Lagos) praised the bills for promoting fairness and increasing revenue for states. He also backed the decision to retain key agencies like TETFund, NITDA, and NASENI, stating, “I commend the President for having the guts to push these reforms now.”
Rep. Gboyega Nasiru Isiaka (APC, Ogun) reinforced the House’s commitment to reforms, stating, “From day one, we promised Nigerians a tax overhaul. Our system is outdated, and this is the change we need.”
The debate, which lasted over three hours, showcased a broad consensus on the need for tax reform while highlighting critical areas requiring fine-tuning before the final passage.
During deliberations on the tax reform bills, Rep. Marian Onuoha (APC, Imo) emphasized that the proposed laws aim to create a fairer tax system by placing a heavier burden on high-income earners.
Rep. Abubakar Hassan Fulata raised concerns over the absence of an interpretation clause in three of the four bills, warning that without clear definitions, the laws could be misapplied or exploited by those enforcing them.
Rep. Ademorin Kuye (APC, Lagos) stressed that Nigeria must reform its tax laws to remain globally competitive, while Rep. Leke Abejide (ADP, Kogi) praised President Tinubu for taking decisive steps to rescue the economy from collapse.
Addressing the derivation principle, which had been a contentious issue, Rep. Ahmed Jaha (APC, Borno) insisted that the law must clearly define the specific type of derivation it refers to in order to avoid ambiguity.
Rep. Donald Ojogo (APC, Ondo) highlighted the importance of integrating modern technology into tax administration to curb revenue leakages and boost collection efficiency.
Former House Leader, Rep. Alhassan Ado Doguwa commended lawmakers for their patriotism and Speaker Abbas Tajudeen for allowing thorough consultations before proceeding with the bills. He also praised the President for respecting the legislative process, particularly in retaining key government agencies.
Former Deputy Speaker Rep. Ahmed Idris Wase recalled how the tax reform debate initially caused divisions within the House but credited the Speaker’s diplomacy for maintaining unity. He welcomed the retention of TETFund, arguing that removing it would have harmed the education sector.
In a unanimous decision, the House passed the bills for second reading via a resounding voice vote, with no opposition. The bills have now been referred to the House Committee on Finance, which will conduct a public hearing for further scrutiny and stakeholder engagement.
Troops of the Joint Task Force North West, Operation FANSAN YAMMA, have rescued 31 abductees and neutralized two terrorists, including a suspected kingpin, during separate operations in Katsina and Kebbi states.
The military also arrested two suspected terrorists and recovered ammunition, a motorcycle, camouflage clothing and other items during the operations conducted on September 14 and 15, 2026.
The Media Information Officer of the Joint Task Force North West, Lieutenant Colonel Aliyu Danja, disclosed this in a statement issued on Wednesday, September 16.
According to the statement, troops in Katsina rescued 10 kidnap victims, comprising three males and seven females, after responding to distress reports from Unguwan Daudu and Unguwan Chibauna communities in Funtua Local Government Area.
The troops reportedly launched a hot pursuit of the fleeing terrorists and engaged them in a gun battle, forcing them to abandon the victims.
Among those rescued was an infant.
The victims were subsequently taken into military custody for necessary assistance and further action.
21 Victims Rescued in Kebbi
Also on September 14, troops operating in Kebbi State responded to a distress call following the abduction of civilians from Fafala Village in Kangiwa Local Government Area.
Acting on intelligence, the troops launched a fighting patrol towards Fafala and Dandikwa, where they reportedly engaged the terrorists in a heavy exchange of gunfire.
The terrorists were forced to withdraw from the area, allowing the troops to continue their operation and rescue 21 kidnapped victims.
The rescued civilians were later reunited with their families.
Terrorist Kingpin Killed in Katsina
The following day, September 15, troops in Katsina reportedly foiled an attempted terrorist attack on communities in Matazu and Kankara local government areas.
Acting on intelligence, the troops moved towards a suspected terrorist hideout and engaged the group with superior firepower.
The military said two terrorists were killed during the encounter, including Abbah Alhassan, whom it identified as a known terrorist kingpin.
Other terrorists reportedly escaped into the surrounding bush.
Troops recovered 10 rounds of ammunition, a motorcycle, a cutlass, camouflage clothing and suspected Indian hemp from the area.
Two Suspects Arrested
In another operation on September 15, troops arrested two suspected terrorists around the Yantumaki general area of Dan Musa Local Government Area of Katsina State.
Preliminary interrogation reportedly indicated that the suspects were associated with a suspected terrorist kingpin identified as Mannori.
The suspects remain in military custody while investigations continue.
The Joint Task Force said the operations demonstrate its continued efforts to rescue kidnapped civilians, disrupt terrorist networks and restrict the movement and operational freedom of armed groups across its area of responsibility.
The task force also commended residents for providing security-related information and urged members of the public to remain vigilant and promptly report suspicious movements and activities to the nearest security agency.
By Gloria Ikibah
The National Assembly has transmitted the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026 to the Houses of Assembly of the 36 states for consideration and approval.
The transmission, carried out on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, marks the next stage in the ongoing constitutional alteration process and was undertaken pursuant to a directive from the leadership of the National Assembly.
The Clerk to the National Assembly, Kamoru Ogunlana, Esq., said the Bill was transmitted to the state legislatures in compliance with the provisions of Section 9 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.
Under Section 9, a bill seeking to alter the Constitution cannot be passed by either chamber of the National Assembly unless it is approved by resolutions of not less than two-thirds of the Houses of Assembly of the 36 states.
The state legislatures are therefore required to consider the proposed constitutional amendments in accordance with their respective legislative procedures and communicate their resolutions to the National Assembly after completing their deliberations.
Although the Constitution does not stipulate a specific timeframe within which state Houses of Assembly must respond to a constitutional alteration bill, the National Assembly said the state legislatures are expected to communicate their decisions within 30 days of receiving the Bill.
The National Assembly, however, stressed that the 30-day period is an administrative timeframe and not a constitutional deadline.
According to the Clerk, the timeframe is intended to promote an orderly, coordinated and timely conclusion of the constitutional amendment process while respecting the constitutional independence of the state legislatures.
What the Constitution Requires
Nigeria’s Constitution sets a deliberately high threshold for constitutional amendments because changes to the country’s supreme law require approval beyond the National Assembly alone.
In addition to the required approval by at least two-thirds of the state Houses of Assembly, Section 9 prescribes other legislative requirements depending on the particular constitutional provisions being altered.
The process generally involves the introduction and passage of the alteration Bill by the National Assembly before it is transmitted to the state legislatures for consideration. The resolutions of the state assemblies are subsequently communicated to the National Assembly for the next stage of the process.
The requirement for state-level approval gives the 36 Houses of Assembly a constitutionally recognised role in determining whether proposed amendments can proceed.
The National Assembly said it recognises this responsibility and respects the independence of the state legislatures in considering the Bill.
National Assembly Seeks Coordinated Process
In the statement, the Clerk said the transmission was intended to facilitate the orderly discharge of the state assemblies’ constitutional responsibilities rather than interfere with their legislative processes.
“The National Assembly remains committed to ensuring that the constitutional alteration process is conducted in strict compliance with the Constitution,” the statement said.
It added that the process would be guided by due process, institutional cooperation and respect for the legislative responsibilities of all tiers of the legislature.
The National Assembly will await the resolutions of the 36 state Houses of Assembly before taking the subsequent steps required under the Constitution.
The transmission of the Sixth Alteration Bill comes amid continued efforts to amend aspects of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution, a process that requires cooperation between the federal and state legislatures because of the constitutional threshold for altering the nation’s supreme law.
The statement was signed by Kamoru Ogunlana, Esq., Clerk to the National Assembly.
News
REVEALED: 11 Nigerian-Born Lawyers Hit by U.S. Disciplinary Actions Over Professional Violations
At least 11 Nigerian-born lawyers practising or based in the United States have faced suspension or other disciplinary measures over alleged or established professional violations, according to disciplinary records cited in a report by The Peoples Gazette.
The cases span several years and involve different jurisdictions and regulatory bodies, including state bar authorities, U.S. immigration authorities and the Board of Immigration Appeals.
The disciplinary matters range from unauthorised practice of law and failure to meet professional obligations to alleged misrepresentation, neglect of clients’ cases and mishandling of client funds.
The sanctions are not identical, and the grounds for disciplinary action vary from one case to another. Some of the lawyers have also reportedly been reinstated, while others remain suspended or have not been reinstated.
Below is a summary of the lawyers and the disciplinary actions reported against them.
1. Aloysius O. Ejimakor
Aloysius O. Ejimakor was suspended from practising law in New York for nine months in 2004 following disciplinary proceedings over alleged false claims concerning his professional qualifications.
According to a U.S. Department of Justice document, the Office of General Counsel for the Executive Office for Immigration Review commenced proceedings against him in July 2003.
The proceedings alleged that Ejimakor violated federal regulations by making false statements concerning his qualifications.
The report states that he had not been reinstated following the suspension.
2. Abiola O. Adesioye
Abiola O. Adesioye, based in the District of Columbia, was suspended in July 2025 by the Board of Immigration Appeals from practising before the board, U.S. immigration courts and the Department of Homeland Security.
The suspension followed an order issued by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals on March 25, 2025.
According to the report, disciplinary counsel for the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the Department of Homeland Security jointly petitioned for her immediate suspension under applicable federal regulations.
The Board of Immigration Appeals granted the petition pending the final resolution of the disciplinary proceedings.
3. Emelike Nwosuocha
Emelike Nwosuocha, who died on July 21, 2024, aged 64, faced disciplinary proceedings before his death.
According to the report, he was posthumously suspended for three years in 2024 over professional misconduct.
The disciplinary matter included an alleged failure to provide an affidavit required under an earlier suspension and failure to pay attorney fees owed to a defendant in a medical negligence lawsuit.
In 2023, Nwosuocha had reportedly received a six-month suspension after failing to respond to a disciplinary grievance.
The relevant disciplinary authorities subsequently affirmed the suspension.
4. Michael Ozulumba
Michael Ozulumba, who is based in Massachusetts, was reportedly suspended from practising before the Internal Revenue Service and the Executive Office for Immigration Review for two years.
The reported disciplinary findings involved professional misconduct, neglect of client cases and misrepresentations.
However, the supplied material contains a reference to a 2027 board decision. Since that date is still in the future as of September 16, 2026, that portion requires independent verification and has therefore not been treated here as an established past event.
5. Michael Imevbore Ojo
Michael Imevbore Ojo, based in Houston, Texas, was suspended from practising law for 12 months by the Evidentiary Panel of the District 4C05 Grievance Committee of the State Bar of Texas.
The disciplinary action reportedly involved alleged violations of Texas professional conduct rules, including neglect, failure to communicate with clients and failure to cooperate with a State Bar investigation.
Troops rescue 31 abductees, neutralize terrorist kingpin in Katsina, Kebbi
NASS Transmits 2026 Constitution Amendment Bill to 36 State Assemblies
REVEALED: 11 Nigerian-Born Lawyers Hit by U.S. Disciplinary Actions Over Professional Violations
-
Metro23 hours agoNigerian Army Speaks of Possible Attacks on Churches, Schools
-
News23 hours agoSuspected Fulani Militias K!ll Christian Leader In Plateau
-
News20 hours agoPDP Warns APC Governors: ‘Ignore Wike at Your Own Peril’
-
News19 hours agoObi: Wike Was Happier, Healthier When We Worked Together
-
Opinion20 hours agoSurging Energy demands and challenges of Ai
-
Economy22 hours agoNigeria’s inflation falls to 15.39% as food inflation slows – NBS
Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login