Connect with us

News

Bill to Strengthen Local Government Administration Passes Second Reading In House

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

A proposed amendment to Nigeria’s Constitution aimed at improving governance, efficiency, and accountability in local government administration has passed its second reading in the House of Representatives on Wednesday at plenary.The bill, one of 42 considered during Wednesday’s plenary, is sponsored by Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu and eight other lawmakers.According to its explanatory memorandum, the bill seeks to restructure the legal and administrative framework governing local councils. Its goal is to establish a stronger system that enhances local government operations, ensures efficient service delivery, and promotes transparency and democratic values at the grassroots level.

A copy of the draft indicates that Section 7 of the Constitution will be revised, replacing the existing provision with a new framework to support these objectives., “There shall be for each Local Government a democratically elected Chairman and a Vice-Chairman, who shall be qualified for election if he is an indigene of the local government; has attained the age of 25 years; and has been educated up to at least the first degree certificates or its equivalent.

“(2) A person elected to the Office of Chairman shall not begin to perform the functions of that Office until he has declared his assets and liabilities as prescribed in this Constitution and has subsequently taken and subscribed, before the Chief Judge of the State or his nominee, the Oath of Allegiance and the Oath of Office as prescribed in the Seventh Schedule to this Constitution.”

Advertisement

Election of Chairman

The bill provides in Section 7 (1b) that “An election to the Office of Chairman shall be held on a date to be appointed by the responsible electoral body which shall be held on a date not earlier than 150 days and not later than 30 days before the expiration of the term of Office of the last holder of that Office.

“(2) A candidate for election to the Office of Chairman shall be deemed to have been duly elected where the candidate is the only person whose name was submitted to the electoral body for election; and there is more than one candidate, the candidate with the majority valid votes cast at the election.

Tenure

Advertisement

The tenure of the Chairman, Vice-Chairman and the Council shall be four years, and they may be eligible for a second term of four years and no more, as the bill provides in Section 7C.

Procedure for removal of Chairman and Vice-Chairman from Office

In Section 7D, the bill provides that “The Chairman or Vice-Chairman of a Local Government may be removed from office in accordance with the provisions of this Clause.

“(2) Whenever a notice of any allegation in writing signed by not less than one-third of the members of the Local Government Legislative Council, is presented to the Speaker of the Local Government Legislative Council, stating that the holder of such office is guilty of gross misconduct in the performance of the functions of his office, detailed particulars of which shall be specified.

Advertisement

“The Speaker of the Local Government Legislative Council shall within seven days of the receipt of the notice, cause a copy of the notice to be served on the holder of the office and on each member of the Local Government Legislative Council, and shall also cause any statement made in reply to the allegations by the holder of the office to be served on each member of the Local Government Legislative Council.”

“(3) Within 14 days of the presentation of the notice to the Speaker of the Local Government Legislative Council (whether or not any statement made by the holder of the office in reply to the allegation contained in the notice), the Local Government Legislative Council shall resolve by motion without any debate whether or not the allegation shall be investigated.

“(4) A motion of the Local Government Legislative Council that the allegation be investigated shall not be declared as having been passed unless it is supported by the votes of not less than two-thirds majority of all the members of the Local Government Council.

“(5) Within seven days of the passing of a motion under the foregoing provisions, the Chief Judge of the State shall at the request of the Speaker of the Local Government Legislative Council appoint a panel of seven persons who in his opinion are of unquestionable integrity, not being members of any public service, legislative house or political party, to investigate the allegation as provided in this clause.

Advertisement

“(6) The holder of an office whose conduct is being investigated under this Clause shall have the right to defend himself in person or be represented before the Panel by a legal practitioner of his own choice.”

“(7) A panel appointed under this clause shall have such powers and exercise its functions in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed by the Local Government Legislative Council; and within three months of its appointment, report its findings to the Local Government Legislative Council.

“(8) Where the panel reports to the Local Government Legislative Council that the allegation has not been proved, no further proceedings shall be taken in respect of the matter.

“(9) Where the report of the panel is that the allegation against the holder of the office has been proved, then, within 14 days of the receipt of the report, the Local Government Legislative Council shall consider the report and if by a resolution of the Local Government Legislative Council supported by not less than two-thirds majority of all its members, the report of the panel is adopted, then the holder of the office shall stand removed from office as from the date of the adoption of the report.”

Advertisement

Permanent incapacity of Chairman and Vice-Chairman

The Chairman or Vice-Chairman shall cease to hold Office if, “By a resolution passed by a two-thirds majority of all the members of the Local Government Legislative Council, it is declared that the Chairman or the Vice-Chairman is incapable of discharging the functions of his Office; and the declaration is verified, after such medical examination as may be necessary, by a medical panel established under this part of the Constitution.”

“(2) The panel shall be appointed by the Speaker of the Local Government Legislative Council and shall comprise three medical practitioners in Nigeria, one of whom may be a medical practitioner of the choice of the concerned Chairman or Vice-Chairman and two other medical practitioners.

“(3) Where the medical panel certifies in its report that in its opinion, the Chairman or Vice-Chairman is suffering from such infirmity of body or mind which renders him permanently incapable of discharging the functions of his office, a notice thereof signed by the Speaker of the Local Government Legislative Council shall be published in a Journal of the Local Government.

Advertisement

“(4) The Chairman or Vice-Chairman shall cease to hold office from the date of publication of the notice of the medical report.

“(5) Where the office of the Chairman becomes vacancy by reason of death or removal, the Vice-Chairman of the Local Government Council shall hold the Office of Chairman and in the absence of the Vice-Chairman, the Speaker of the Council shall hold office for a period of not more than 3 months, during which there shall be an election of a new Chairman, who shall hold Office in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.

“(6) Where the office of Vice-Chairman becomes vacant by reason of death or resignation or removal or for any other reason, the Chairman shall nominate a candidate to the Local Government Legislative Council and upon the confirmation by two-thirds all the Members of the Local Government Legislative Council, such candidate shall take office as the Vice-Chairman to complete the unexpired term of office.”

Death of Chairman-Elect before Oath of Office

Advertisement

In 7G, the bill provides that “If a person duly elected as Chairman dies or withdraws before taking and subscribing to the Oath of Allegiance and the Oath of Office, the person elected with him as Vice-Chairman shall be sworn in as Chairman who shall then nominate, and with the approval of a majority of the members of the Local Government Legislative Council, appoint a new Vice-Chairman.”

Recall

“A member of a Local Government Legislative Council may be recalled if there is presented to the electoral body a petition on that behalf signed by more than one-half of the persons registered to vote in that member’s constituency alleging their loss of confidence in that member, and the petition is thereafter approved in a referendum conducted by the electoral body within 90 days of the date of the receipt of the petition.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Tinubu Commissions Abuja Court of Appeal Complex, Says Rule of Law Must Operate From A Befitting Home (Photos)

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Ojomah Austin.

 

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Monday reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to strengthening Nigeria’s judiciary, declaring that the rule of law must be supported by modern infrastructure, improved welfare and institutional reforms capable of deepening democracy and enhancing access to justice.

Represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima at the commissioning of the Court of Appeal Abuja Division Building Complex in Dakibiyu, Abuja, Tinubu described the new edifice as a landmark achievement under the Renewed Hope Agenda and a clear demonstration of government’s determination to restore the dignity of key democratic institutions.

Advertisement

The building has two big courtrooms, eight small courtrooms, library, 10 judges suites, three conference halls, administrative offices with ancillary facilities, among others.

“This is not just a building. This is a statement. A statement that under the Renewed Hope Agenda, the rule of law will have a befitting home,” the President said.

He recalled that the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal had for years operated from a cramped temporary facility, a situation he described as unacceptable for an institution entrusted with dispensing justice.

“A nation that seeks justice must respect the temple of justice. When I visited and saw the condition, I gave a simple instruction: fix it. Today, we have fixed it,” he stated.

Advertisement

Tinubu praised the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Barr. Nyesom Wike, for delivering the project within record time, describing him as “Mr. Project.”

“When I appointed you as Minister of the FCT, I knew you would not sleep. You promised 16 months. You delivered in record time. No excuses. No variation. Just results. Nigerians can see the difference,” he said.

According to the President, the world-class complex, which comprises two large courtrooms, eight smaller courtrooms and modern support facilities, would accelerate the administration of justice, reduce congestion in correctional centres and strengthen democratic governance.

“This is how you honour the judiciary. This is how you strengthen democracy,” he added.

Advertisement

Tinubu noted that the project aligns with the administration’s commitment to judicial reforms, increased funding for the judiciary and the promotion of a just, rule-based society. He also commended the FCT Administration for building additional courts, constructing residences for judicial officers, digitising judicial processes and supporting legal education.

Addressing judicial officers, the President acknowledged the enormous responsibilities borne by the Court of Appeal, particularly in election petitions and constitutional matters.

“You deserve an environment that matches the weight of your responsibility. This complex is not a favour. It is your right. And we will do more,” he assured.

He further commended Visible Construction Limited for delivering the project, saying the accomplishment demonstrated the capacity of indigenous firms to execute world-class infrastructure projects.

Advertisement

“This magnificent edifice shows that local companies have the capacity to deliver high-quality projects on time. This is the Nigeria we are building,” he said.

The President urged judges and justices to ensure justice remains swift, fair and blind to status, ethnicity or wealth.

“Let justice be swift. Let it be fair. Let it be blind to status, tribe or purse. Let the common man feel that this court is truly his last hope,” he stated.

Earlier, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), described the commissioning as a historic moment for Nigeria’s judiciary and democracy, noting that it coincided with the 50th anniversary of the Court of Appeal.

Advertisement

“This is not merely the unveiling of a significant judicial edifice. It is a powerful statement of this administration’s unwavering commitment to the rule of law, judicial independence and the strengthening of institutions that safeguard our constitutional democracy,” he said.

Fagbemi said President Tinubu had demonstrated unprecedented support for the judiciary through concrete reforms, investments and welfare improvements.

“Indeed, no administration in Nigeria’s recent history has provided the level of support to the judiciary that we have witnessed under the leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu,” he stated.

According to him, one of the administration’s most notable achievements was the historic review of judicial officers’ remuneration, resulting in an increase of more than 300 per cent.

Advertisement

“This was the first major upward review in decades and represented a bold response to long-standing concerns regarding the welfare and dignity of judicial officers,” he said.

The AGF added that beyond welfare reforms, the administration had embarked on one of the most ambitious judicial infrastructure development programmes in Nigeria’s history, including the construction of residences for Court of Appeal justices, Federal High Court judges and FCT High Court judges.

He further highlighted efforts to strengthen judicial capacity through the appointment and confirmation of qualified judicial officers, ensuring the Supreme Court attained its full constitutional complement of justices.

“The critical intervention has enhanced the apex court’s capacity, improved its ability to manage its caseload and significantly reduced delays in adjudicating matters of national importance,” he said.

Advertisement

In his remarks, FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike revealed that the project was conceived after concerns were raised about the poor state of the Abuja Division and the inadequate accommodation available to judicial officers.

“When I informed Mr. President of the condition of the Court of Appeal, he immediately directed that we should not only provide a befitting complex but also decent accommodation for judges and justices,” Wike said.

He disclosed that the FCT Administration had completed or was nearing completion of housing projects for judicial officers across several courts.

“Tomorrow, we are going to hand over the residences for the Court of Appeal judges, on Wednesday, we will hand over those of the Federal High Court judges, and on July 17, we will hand over those for the FCT High Court. We are also flagging off housing projects for the Industrial Court and the Code of Conduct Tribunal,” he announced.

Advertisement

The minister argued that judicial independence could not be achieved without adequate infrastructure and conducive working conditions.

“You cannot talk about the independence of the judiciary when the judiciary does not have a befitting environment where they can carry out their functions,” he said.

Wike also used the occasion to call on residents to fulfil their civic obligations, particularly the payment of ground rents and tenement rates.

“Development means funding. You cannot have development when there is no money. We are celebrating today, but we must ask where the money comes from. Citizens must also play their part,” he said.

Advertisement

President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, described the new complex as a transformative intervention that would significantly improve the administration of justice.

“The impact of the newly constructed court complex on the administration of justice cannot be overstated. The physical environment in which justice is delivered is a decisive factor that affects the quality, speed and public confidence in judicial outcomes,” she said.

Justice Dongban-Mensem explained that the Abuja Division had long struggled with only two courtrooms and limited administrative space despite handling one of the heaviest caseloads in the country.

“The lack of infrastructure has continuously slowed down the timely administration of justice. Even when multiple panels are constituted to reduce backlog, we often have to rely on courtrooms provided by sister courts,” she noted.

Advertisement

She expressed appreciation to the Federal High Court, National Industrial Court, FCT High Court and Customary Court of Appeal for accommodating the Court of Appeal over the years.

“Sometimes they suspended their own sittings to accommodate us. I am happy to say that from today, they are relieved of that burden,” she said.

In a vote of thanks, the Minister of State for the FCT expressed appreciation to President Tinubu for his visionary leadership and commitment to strengthening the judiciary through strategic infrastructure investments. She also commended Barr. Nyesom Wike for delivering transformative projects across the Federal Capital Territory and thanked members of the judiciary, legislature, media and other stakeholders for their support.

Also speaking, the Managing Director of Visible Construction Limited, Mr. Olalekan Adebiyi, said the project underscored the capacity of indigenous firms to deliver critical national infrastructure. He described the complex as a significant contribution to improving the working environment of judicial officers and commended President Tinubu and Barr. Nyesom Wike for their leadership and support in ensuring the successful completion of the project.

Advertisement

The commissioning of the Court of Appeal Abuja Division Building Complex formed part of activities marking the third anniversary of the Tinubu administration and the golden jubilee of the Court of Appeal, highlighting what officials described as a renewed commitment to judicial reform, institutional strengthening and improved access to justice for Nigerians.

Continue Reading

News

Ugochinyere Slams Party Deregistration Verdict, Demands Probe of Judge

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…say ruling against ADC, APP and others undermines democracy

…insists superior court decisions have already settled the matter

By Gloria Ikibah

The National Leader of the Action Peoples Party (APP) and member representing Ideato North/Ideato South Federal Constituency of Imo State, Rep. Ikenga Ugochinyere, has strongly criticised a Federal High Court judgment ordering the deregistration of five political parties, describing the decision as a direct threat to Nigeria’s democratic system and the rule of law.

Advertisement

Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja had ordered the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Action Alliance (AA), Action Peoples Party (APP), Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP), following a suit filed by the National Forum of Former Legislators seeking their removal from the register of political parties maintained by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Reacting to the ruling in Abuja on Monday, Ugochinyere argued that the judgment was inconsistent with existing judicial precedents and warned that its implementation could have far-reaching consequences for democratic participation in the country.

The lawmaker maintained that the affected parties remained legally recognised political platforms and would continue to participate in Nigeria’s electoral process. According to him, several court decisions, including judgments of the Federal High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, had already clarified the constitutional conditions under which political parties could retain their registration.

He contended that parties which had won elective offices at various levels of government had met the requirements stipulated under Section 225A of the Constitution and could not be lawfully deregistered.

Advertisement

Ugochinyere further alleged that INEC itself had informed the court that the affected parties had secured electoral victories sufficient to satisfy constitutional thresholds.

“Our nation cannot be allowed to degenerate to that level. This judgment is an invitation to anarchy. Political parties cannot simply be wiped out in a democracy because that is not what democracy represents.

“INEC itself told the court that these parties met the constitutional requirements. Yet the judgment proceeded regardless. That is why many Nigerians are worried about the implications for democracy and the rule of law,” he stated.
The APP leader also accused the trial judge of proceeding with the matter despite the existence of a Court of Appeal order staying proceedings pending the determination of an appeal connected to the case.

According to him, legal representatives were notified at short notice for the delivery of judgment even though appellate proceedings were still ongoing.

Advertisement

Describing the development as troubling, Ugochinyere called on the National Judicial Council (NJC) to urgently investigate the circumstances surrounding the judgment and determine whether disciplinary measures were warranted.

He also urged the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to intervene in defence of judicial integrity, warning that public confidence in the courts could be weakened if allegations of disregard for superior court rulings were not properly addressed.

“The judiciary remains the last hope of the common man. If judgments of superior courts can be ignored, then we are endangering one of the most important institutions of our democracy,” he said.

The federal lawmaker insisted that neither APP nor the other affected political parties would suspend their political activities as a result of the judgment. Rather, he said, they would continue preparations for future elections while pursuing all available legal remedies.

Advertisement

He also warned against efforts to shrink Nigeria’s political space ahead of the 2027 general election, arguing that voters should be allowed to choose freely from a wide range of political alternatives.

“Let all political parties participate and let Nigerians decide who they want. Democracy is about participation and competition, not exclusion,” he said.

Ugochinyere added that Nigeria’s democratic history had been shaped by sustained struggles against authoritarian tendencies and cautioned against actions capable of reopening old political wounds or undermining confidence in democratic institutions.

He called on judicial authorities, members of the legal profession and other democratic stakeholders to act swiftly to protect the credibility of the electoral process and preserve public trust in the nation’s constitutional order.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Ogene Fires Back at Oshiomhole Over Obi Security Claims, Calls Remarks ‘Revisionist Comedy’

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

A fresh war of words has erupted over the security record of former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi, with the Leader of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) Caucus in the House of Representatives, Afam Victor Ogene, launching a scathing rebuttal to recent comments made by former Edo State Governor and Senator, Adams Oshiomhole.

The controversy followed remarks by Oshiomhole during a podcast interview in which he reportedly questioned Obi’s performance on security while serving as governor of Anambra State, arguing that the former presidential candidate lacked the credentials to tackle Nigeria’s current security challenges.

Responding in a statement, Ogene described Oshiomhole’s assertions as inaccurate and politically motivated, insisting that Obi’s security record remained a matter of public record.

Advertisement

“Senator Oshiomhole’s revisionist attempt to rewrite history is both laughable and insulting to Nigerians who know the facts. The data on security under Obi’s tenure in Anambra remains public record, and no amount of political grandstanding can erase it,” Ogene declared.

The lawmaker accused the former Edo governor of distorting historical facts in a bid to undermine Obi’s reputation, while also taking aim at Oshiomhole’s frequent interventions in national political debates.

Ogene further argued that Oshiomhole’s comments overlooked key events in Anambra’s political history, particularly the administrations that preceded Obi’s tenure.

“Oshiomhole has now officially joined the growing league of self-appointed press secretaries to President Tinubu. His trademark loquaciousness routinely puts him at odds with his own colleagues in the Senate, and he invariably ends up issuing humiliating apologies.

Advertisement

“In his latest desperate bid for ranking status among presidential attack dogs, Oshiomhole has again flown off tangent, mangling basic facts that even secondary school students know. What revisionist history would Oshiomhole teach Nigerian children when he can not accurately situate simple national events?”, he said.

Addressing references to the Bakassi Boys vigilante group, Ogene maintained that Oshiomhole had wrongly linked the group to Obi’s administration.

He also challenged Oshiomhole’s claims regarding efforts to dismantle criminal hideouts in Anambra State, insisting that the policy predated the administration of former Governor Willie Obiano.

“For the record: the Bakassi Boys operated under the four-year administration of the late Dr. Chinwoke Mbadinuju. Yet in his haste to smear Obi, Oshiomhole conveniently erased the three-year tenure of Dr. Chris Ngige before Obi’s assumption of office in 2006.

Advertisement

“Not done with his comedy of fallacies, Oshiomhole went further to claim that the demolition of kidnappers’ dens began under former Governor Obiano. False. That deterrence policy was introduced and executed by Obi”, he added.

The NDC caucus leader went on to contrast the leadership styles of both former governors, arguing that Obi’s administration focused on institutional reforms and security initiatives.

Ogene also pointed to security measures introduced during Obi’s administration, including community-based policing initiatives, which he said laid the foundation for a state-wide security framework.

“It is pitiable that a man who governed Edo State during Obi’s tenure would be so consumed by envy that he deliberately forgets basic facts. This is the same Oshiomhole who, while Obi was bringing civility and due process to governance in Anambra, was busy demolishing the houses of political opponents in Edo.

Advertisement

“In deed, for a man who pioneered the current attempt at evolving a state police structure, through the recruitment, training, kitting, and provision of security vehicles to each of Anambra’s 177 communities, it is uncharitable for Senator Oshiomhole to begin now to promote a contrary narrative”, he voted.

According to Ogene, Obi’s tenure was recognised through several security-related awards, and he argued that independent testimonies from senior law enforcement officials further supported the former governor’s record.

“Despite several security-related awards garned by Obi as governor, Oshiomhole’s desperate revisionism collapses under the weight of verifiable testimony. Philemon Leha, who served as Commissioner of Police in Anambra State during Mr. Peter Obi’s tenure has put the record straight.

“As I undertook my assignment in the state, I was greatly encouraged by the commitment and determined focus of Governor Obi. Security was on his priority list, and he always offered us logistics and other support on a scale I had not witnessed elsewhere.

Advertisement

“This is firsthand evidence from the man who ran security operations on the ground. While Oshiomhole peddles fallacies from a podcast chair, those who actually secured Anambra credit Obi’s leadership, logistics, and political will. Facts always triumph propaganda. 

“The unprovoked and coordinated attacks on Mr. Peter Obi’s person and political aspiration, by hirelings across both the ruling party and the opposition, are unprecedented. They point to only one thing: Obi is the real issue in the conversation for the 2027 general elections. 

“Yet, Obi has committed no crime by aspiring to lead. He has not barred anyone from contesting for the presidency. So it is both strange and uncharitable that many now want him muscled out of the race out of sheer jealousy and palpable fear of his rising popularity. 

“Like every other Nigerian, Obi is entitled to exercise his fundamental rights. Oshiomhole, and any one else, is free to run for the highest office if they so desire. No amount of sponsored smear campaigns,therefore, can deny Obi of that same democratic rights,” Ogene stated. 

Advertisement

The exchange adds to the growing political debate surrounding the records of leading political figures as discussions ahead of future electoral contests continue to gather momentum.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News