Opinion
Underserved connectivity and the government’s 4,000 Towers initiative
By Sonny Aragba-Akpore
Worried by the growing insecurity in the country and poor connectivity in underserved communities, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) recently approved 4,000 Towers to boost communications. Although details of the implementation and distribution of the 4,000 towers were sketchy, the Information and National Orientation Minister, Mr Mohammed Idris, said the FEC approved the 4,000 towers to boost connectivity and security across the nation.
Announcing the decision, Idris said, “The Federal Executive Council took a decision that 4,000 of such towers be established or erected in these very underserved communities across this country. “Indeed, this will also help in fighting insecurity and enhancing commerce and economic activity amongst the people of those communities,” Idris explained that the programme, 4,000 towers will be erected in underserved communities to boost public communications.
He said the decision followed
“A presentation of the Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Mr Bosun Tijani, indicating that no fewer than 23 million Nigerians are currently underserved, meaning that they are unable to do any form of communication due to the absence of some of these towers. “The rollout is expected to significantly improve rural connectivity, stimulate commerce and enhance security surveillance in areas currently lacking network coverage.” Beautiful as the initiative seems, the Minister did not mention how much will be involved in the project and under which conditions and procedures will be followed to execute the project implementation.
Apart from the infrastructure interventions of the Universal Service Provision Fund (USPF) an organ of telecommunications regulator, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) that erects BTS and towers to boost connectivity in black spots and underserved areas, it is not clear how FEC intends to proceed with the erection of these towers to happen more so since no budget provision was announced in that regard. Building a tower is not a tea party, as huge expenditure goes into actualising one. Besides the capital outlay on erecting towers, such towers don’t come cheaply. Other costs follow, including security and the hydra-headed Right of Way fees charged by state and local council governments. Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) have had to contend with multiple taxes to sustain and maintain the towers that accommodate the Base Transceiver Stations (BTS).
Will the government build the towers in collaboration with network providers? So many questions are hanging as no details of the implementation are available as we write this. Yes, if actualised, communication will improve, but the process of delivering this remains unknown.
The NCC data show that the number of base stations deployed by mobile network operators since 2001, when Global System of Mobile Communications (GSM) began, stood at 137,992 by end-of-2023.
But industry-analysis sources claim that by 2024 (or very recently), the total may have reached ~145,141 base stations nationwide.
The breakdown of recent data (2022–2025) on BTS/towers indicates that approximate distribution by operator / tower-company, and what is (and isn’t) publicly available. However, as of December 2022, the total BTS across Nigeria were 127,294. By end-2023, the total BTS rose to 137,992.
And by December 2024, the total number of base stations reported was 145,141.
Also, by end-2024, there were roughly 39,880 telecom towers in Nigeria (that is, physical mast/tower structures), reflecting both “macro towers” and collocated sites, including infrastructure-sharing arrangements.
The 4,000 towers being proposed will increase the number to about 44,000.
Sensing the high cost of building base stations and maintenance of the same, many mobile network operators (MNOs) lease rather than own the physical tower infrastructure. Thus, there is now a separation between “base stations/BTS” (active radio equipment) and “tower structures.”
This is typical worldwide and increasingly common in Nigeria now to reduce the costs of putting up one.
Apart from that, the NCC introduced infrastructure sharing many years ago to cushion the cost of individual companies erecting and maintaining the same.
Analysts state that as of 2023, the bulk of towers in Nigeria were owned/managed by tower companies (“Tower Cos”), and not directly by MNOs.
The main tower companies and their approximate holdings (as reported in a 2023 “industry infrastructure” breakdown) include:
IHS Towers — about 18,925 towers
ATC Nigeria (subsidiary of American Tower Corporation) — about 8,270 towers
Globacom — directly owns and manages towers (unlike MNOs that lease towers from TowerCos) . Several smaller “TowerCo” operators (e.g. Pan-African Tower, East Castle, ColoPlus, others) — cumulatively adding to tens of thousands of towers. MNOs themselves directly manage only a small fraction of the total towers. For example, as of 2024, the majority of towers (~30,597 out of 39,880) are under TowerCos, while MNOs own about 9,283 towers.
Because of the lease / infrastructure-sharing model, each tower may host equipment from multiple operators — allowing multiple BTS per tower (or multiple MNOs sharing the same site) and making the mapping between “towers” and “BTS / base stations” non-trivial.
BTS is the electronic equipment used in mobile networks, including 2G/3G/4G/ and 5G.
BTS sends and receives radio signals to/from mobile phones
, performing encoding, modulation, and signal processing by connecting to a Base Station Controller (BSC) or directly to a core network (in 4G/5G)
BTS components include Radios (RRUs), Baseband unit (BBU), Power supply and backup batteries. There are also Antenna systems, Radio Frequency and fibre connections. BTSs are often installed at the base or inside a shelter near the tower.
The tower houses the BTS and can hours many more hours by global best practices.
While there are an estimated 145,000 BTSs, a little over 40,000 towers housover 145,000 BTS.
If the government can add 4,000 towers, the number will increase to about 44,000, although the NCC projects that for the country to enjoy robust telecommunication services, a minimum number of 80,000 towers is needed.
The 4,000-tower initiative is the second by the government to bridge the digital divide.
Earlier in the year 2025, the government announced the 90,000-fibre optic project in the country.
Known as Project Bridge, it is currently the largest digital fibre backbone investment in any developing nation.
The bold and strategic effort is to lay a 90,000km wholesale, open-access fibre network across the country,” Minister Tijanni said in an update on his X handle recently.He is quoted as saying: “It is designed to deliver high-speed, resilient, and equitable broadband connectivity to every corner of Nigeria – from major urban hubs to remote communities.”
The minister said the project marks a major step forward in the Federal Government’s mission to build an inclusive and future-ready digital economy for Nigerians. The project is a central part of Nigeria’s National Broadband Plan (2020-2025), which aims to boost internet penetration to 70 per cent by the end of 2025 and 80 per cent for underserved populations by 2027.
Project Bridge, which is expected to create more jobs, will operate under a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) to ensure efficiency and accountability.
The connectivity project is expected to cost the government $2 billion, and it is being funded by Direct Foreign Investment (DFI) loans and private equity, with the government holding a minority stake of 25–49 per cent in an independently run SPV.
The project targets 20,000 direct and 150,000 indirect jobs, and 1.5 per cent GDP growth. It aims to contribute from $472.6 billion to $502 billion GDP in four years.
According to the digital economy minister, Project Bridge is structured to support the needs of both large and small Internet Service Producers, ISPs. It offers scalable access through core, metropolitan, and middle-mile layers.
He promised that the digital fibre optic will accelerate fixed broadband growth nationwide by enabling healthy competition and network sharing.
The project will add 90,000km to the existing 35,000km network of fibre optic cables, thereby deepening the country’s digital backbone.
He promised that the digital fibre optic will accelerate fixed broadband growth nationwide by enabling healthy competition and network sharing.
The project design possesses seven regional backbone rings, which interconnect Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones and Lagos.
These rings will form a resilient national framework of 125,000km of fibre that ensures redundancy, minimises latency, and supports seamless data flow across the country.
Tijani is quoted as saying that the structure is critical to meeting growing national demand for high-capacity digital infrastructure.
He further explained that each region is covered by a dedicated fibre ring to connect urban centres and enhance regional connectivity.
“Each region is covered by a dedicated fibre ring (Lagos, South West, South South, South East, North Central, North East, and North West), strategically planned to connect urban centres and enhance regional interconnectivity. This regional design supports economic activity, governance, education, and digital access across all zones,” he stated.
Opinion
A Hall Where No One Listens: Can the UN Still Keep the Peace?
By Dr Idahosa Oshamanze
Walkouts, open contempt and a Security Council frozen in 1945 are turning the world’s peace forum into a talk shop.
Reform must begin with the powerful — and with learning to listen.By Osamhanze IdahosaOn Thursday, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approached the rostrum of the 81st United Nations General Assembly in New York, scores of delegates rose and filed out of the hall, answering a call by the Palestinian mission for a collective walkout. Those who remained heard him dismiss the departed as “moral cowards.” Whatever one thinks of the war in Gaza — and there is a great deal the world must think hard about — the scene captured something deeply troubling about the state of the world’s foremost forum for dialogue: very few people came to listen.
The walkout has become a General Assembly ritual. It happened when the same leader spoke at the 80th session last year, and delegations have staged it against other speakers before him. As a form of protest, it is legitimate. But we must ask what it achieves. The delegates who leave register their disapproval; the speaker gets a defiant clip for his audience at home; and the hall is emptied of the one thing the United Nations exists to supply — a room in which adversaries are obliged to hear one another out.The UN was not built for friendsFriends do not need a United Nations.
The organisation was founded in 1945, from the ashes of a world war, precisely so that nations who distrust and even despise one another would have a place to talk before they fight, and a place to keep talking while they fight. Czech President Petr Pavel put it well this week when he described the UN as indispensable, above all as a forum for dialogue between adversaries. When that forum becomes a theatre of avoidance, where leaders deliver speeches written for domestic audiences and walk out on everyone else’s, it is fair to ask whether the institution can still do the job for which it was created.Contempt from the topThe disrespect is not limited to empty seats. From the same podium, Argentina’s President Javier Milei accused the UN of failing to guarantee collective security. The United States, the organisation’s host and historically its largest funder, has paid only part of the nearly $4 billion it owes; its August payment of $725 million was reportedly calculated to be just enough to keep its vote in the General Assembly. Across several capitals, UN organs — from human rights bodies to international courts — are spoken of with open scorn whenever their findings prove inconvenient.When powerful nations treat the UN with contempt, they send a clear message to everyone else: the rules are for the weak. An institution draws its authority from the respect of those with the power to ignore it. Once that respect is withdrawn, its resolutions become mere suggestions, and its annual gathering becomes exactly what cynics have long called it — a talk shop and a diplomatic jamboree.Seek first to understandStephen Covey, in his seminal book The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, offered counsel that world leaders would do well to heed. His fifth habit is simple to state and difficult to practise: seek first to understand, then to be understood. Covey observed that most people listen to reply, not to understand. That is precisely the disease of modern diplomacy.Every conflict has at its heart a set of grievances, fears and interests that each side experiences as real, whether or not the other side accepts them. No negotiation can resolve what it refuses to hear. Listening is not endorsement. Staying in the hall to hear an adversary’s case is not agreeing with it; it is gathering the information without which no settlement is possible. Walking out costs nothing. Listening is costly, uncomfortable and humbling — which is exactly why it is the beginning of peace. Until we hear ourselves out, mutual understanding of the issues at the heart of each conflict will remain out of reach.A 1945 structure in a 2026 worldIt would be unfair, however, to blame manners alone. The UN’s structure itself breeds the frustration that plays out in the Assembly hall. The Security Council, the only organ whose decisions bind member states, still has five permanent, veto-wielding members that reflect the victors of 1945. In his final address to the General Assembly as Secretary-General this week, António Guterres said plainly that this arrangement no longer represents the world, and he pointed to Africa — largely under colonial rule when the UN was founded — which still has no permanent seat. African leaders, including Kenya’s President William Ruto, pressed the same case again this week, as they have year after year.Meanwhile, talks on Council reform have been rolled over session after session — for the seventeenth time last year.
A Council that can be frozen by a single veto on Gaza, on Ukraine, or on the war between the United States and Iran cannot credibly claim to maintain international peace and security. Small wonder that frustrated nations take their protest to the one place where they can still be seen: the floor of the General Assembly, where they vote with their feet.What reform must look likeThe UN needs serious reform to restore dignity and respect to global institutions. That means enlarging the Security Council to give Africa permanent representation and the Global South a fair voice. It means restraining the veto, beginning with a commitment by the permanent members not to use it in situations of mass atrocity, and building on the Assembly’s existing requirement that any veto be explained before the full membership. It means paying dues fully and on time, so the organisation is not held hostage by its own funders. It also means giving General Assembly resolutions real follow-up mechanisms, so the world’s collective voice is not simply recorded and forgotten.The onus is on the powerfulHere lies the uncomfortable truth: reform is a gift only the powerful can give. Under Article 108 of the UN Charter, any amendment must be ratified by two-thirds of member states, including all five permanent members of the Security Council. The framework for reform, inclusivity and the democratisation of the UN and its organs must therefore be set by the very nations that benefit most from the present arrangement.They should do so not out of charity, but out of self-interest. A UN seen as illegitimate serves no one — not even the powerful. The alternative to a reformed multilateral order is not a world run by the strong; it is a world of rival blocs, unchecked wars and crises that no single nation, however mighty, can contain alone.The United Nations can still fulfil its purpose. But it will do so only when its members, great and small, return to the room, stay in their seats and do the hardest thing in diplomacy: listen. Peace has never been made by people who refused to hear each other out.Osamhanze Idahosa, Vice President, Africa Development Studies Center (ADSC).
Opinion
STOP DIALING AROUND US IN THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Nigeria Is Hospitable, Not Helpless
By Ambassador Sola Enikanolaiye
In diplomacy, process is as important as substance.
It is in this spirit that I wish to draw attention to a growing practice in Abuja which, though often well-intentioned, runs contrary to established diplomatic procedure and the spirit of mutual respect that guides our relations.
It has become increasingly common for some Embassy officials, rather than transmitting a Note Verbale to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as required by international law and custom, they reach out directly by telephone to the State House, Honourable Ministers, or heads of agencies to pursue official matters, thereby bypassing the Ministry entirely.
At a recent meeting where I praised the ASEAN nations in Nigeria for upholding diplomatic protocol in this regard, I noted that adherence to proper channels strengthens, rather than hinders, partnershipI stressed: “Going forward, strict compliance with diplomatic channels will be expected…”
This was shortly before the important interactive session we had with the Diplomatic Community on Thursday 17th September 2026, when the Honourable Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, convened her first formal briefing with the Corps since assuming office as substantive Minister.
Her message was clear, candid and timely. I associate myself fully with it: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is your diplomatic home. Our doors and appropriate channels remain open, but established diplomatic channels must be respected.
Government has simplified our diplomatic operations
It is important to acknowledge that the Federal Government has significantly simplified diplomatic operations in Nigeria to make the work of missions easier and to avoid any vacuum in representation.
Today, a newly appointed Ambassador or High Commissioner is allowed to commence official functions and operate fully as soon as he or she submits the copie d’usage_ — the working copy of Letters of Credence — to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, without waiting for the formal presentation to Mr. President.
The new envoy is therefore at liberty to perform his or her duties, engage Ministries, Departments and Agencies and conduct bilateral matters, save only for events and ceremonies that would bring such envoy before Mr. President, until after the formal presentation of Letters of Credence.*
This facilitation was granted in good faith and in trust. That trust should be reciprocated with strict adherence to protocol.
The Vienna Convention Is Clear
As custodians of diplomacy, we are all bound by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961):
Article 41(1):“…it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State. They also have a duty not to interfere in the internal affairs of that State.”
Article 41(2):“All official business with the receiving State, entrusted to the mission by the sending State, shall be conducted with or through the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the receiving State or such other ministry as may be agreed.”
There is no exception for influence, familiarity, or access. To bypass the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is to violate a treaty we all signed.
The Ministry As A Bridge, Not An Obstacle
As the Honourable Minister emphasized during her briefing, and I reiterate:
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs remains the official channel of communication between Diplomatic Missions and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, including the Presidency, Federal Ministries, Departments and Agencies and other Government institutions.*
Missions must ensure that official communications and requests intended for these institutions are routed through the Ministry. This is not intended to impede access or create unnecessary bureaucracy. Rather, it ensures proper coordination, consistency and effective follow-up. The Ministry provides the institutional memory, diplomatic expertise and policy context necessary to support such engagements.
Bypassing established channels risks conflicting information, duplication and avoidable misunderstandings.
There is also an important principle of reciprocity. Just as Nigerian Missions abroad are expected to respect the diplomatic channels of their host governments, we expect the same consideration for Nigeria’s institutions.
As Amb. Bianca aptly put it: “The Ministry is not an obstacle between you and the Nigerian Government; we are your bridge to the Nigerian Government.”
The Abuse of Diplomatic Plates Must End
Equally worrisome is the increasing use of diplomatic number plates by unauthorized individuals who are not entitled to them under the Convention. This is a clear breach of Article 41(1).
Diplomatic plates are issued in trust by the receiving State to facilitate legitimate mission functions, not as a means to evade traffic regulations or law enforcement. This abuse creates security risks and brings the diplomatic corps into disrepute. It must stop.
Why This Backdoor Diplomacy Is Dangerous
Respect is reciprocal. If you want Nigeria’s diplomats to respect protocol in your capitals, you should respect protocol in ours.
1. Not doing so undermines the President: When embassies lobby the State House behind the MFA’s back, they deny the President the benefit of vetted, professional foreign policy advice.
2. It creates policy confusion: If a mission secures a phone promise from an MDA while the MFA’s official position differs, which one stands? The result is embarrassment for everyone.
3. It is a national security threat: Bypassing the MFA means bypassing security vetting. Sensitive requests slip through informal calls.
4. It breeds corruption of process: Backdoor calls are used to push positions and interests that would not survive transparency and glinteragency scrutiny.
_5. It insults our national institutions:The MFA is not a post office. It is the sole legal gateway for state-to-state communication.
_6. It destroys reciprocity:The precedent we allow in Abuja becomes the treatment our envoys will receive abroad. If we accept bypassing the MFA to lobby the Villa in Abuja, should Nigeria expect to bypass the Presidency and Palaces of other sovereigns? The answer, in every capital, is No.
7. It erodes trust: When backdoor promises collapse — as they often do — missions blame Nigeria for “not keeping its words,” when no official word was ever given.
8. It exposes senior officials to manipulation: A direct call presents only one side of the story, without history, legal context, or institutional memory. The MFA exists to provide that balance.
Nigeria’s Foreign Policy Direction and Our Commitment
As Amb Bianca Ojukwu outlined, the foreign policy direction of the Administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, is anchored on the four Ds: Demography, Development, Democracy and Diaspora.*
Through Demography, we seek to harness the potential of our youthful population through education, technology, innovation, entrepreneurship and skills development. Development places economic diplomacy at the heart of our international engagement, with emphasis on trade, investment, infrastructure, agriculture, energy and technology. Democracy reflects our commitment to constitutional governance, strong institutions and the peaceful resolution of political differences, while Diaspora recognizes Nigerians abroad as important partners and assets in investment, knowledge transfer and national development.
These pillars place Nigeria and Nigerians at the center of our foreign policy.
Our approach is therefore Nigeria-centered, Africa-conscious and globally engaged.* We remain committed to our neighbours, ECOWAS and Africa, while engaging constructively with the wider international community.
Nigeria will equally continue to exercise strategic autonomy in its international relations. We seek friendship and cooperation with all nations, but our positions and partnerships will be guided by our national interest, mutual respect, reciprocity and our international obligations. Strategic autonomy does not mean isolation; it means preserving Nigeria’s sovereign right to determine the relationships and positions that best serve our people, Amb Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu pointed out.
In the same manner she noted that the Ministry is also paying renewed attention to outstanding Joint Commissions and Bi-national Commissions*, some of which have remained inactive due to administrative and logistical challenges. We intend to work with Missions to revitalize these mechanisms and use them more effectively to advance cooperation in trade, investment, security, education, technology, health, agriculture and other areas of mutual interest.
Ultimately, the strength of our diplomatic relationships should be measured not only by the warmth of our engagements, or the number of visits by Heads of State to Nigeria but by the tangible benefits our engagement ms produce for our people.
Nigeria Is Hospitable, Not Helpless
Nigeria is warm, generous, and open for partnership. But our hospitality must not be mistaken for weakness. Nigeria remains a willing, capable and strategic partner.
Do not bypass the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to lobby the Villa.
My Ministry’s job is to make your work easy. Use us.
The proper channel remains: Embassy → Note Verbale → MFA → MDA/Presidency → MFA → Embassy.
Under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, Nigeria is open for business. But openness requires order.
Drop the phone. Pick up the pen. Write the Note Verbale.
Ambassador Sola Enikanolaiye
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Federal Republic of Nigeria
Opinion
OF TEEJAY YUSUF, KOGI WEST SENATORIAL DISTRICT, AND RESPONSIVE SERVANTHOOD
BY BOLAJI AFOLABI
Irrespective of religion or whatsoever belief, human beings, daily ask the Creator for guidance and direction before leaving their respective homes. For many people, given the realities of accentuating poverty, pervading hunger, corrosive hardship, disabling unemployment, and economic squalor that is sweeping the country, this request has become must-do.
A few months back, the writer was in Kubwa, at the instance of a senior friend for a prospective discussion. Kubwa, by the way is unarguably, the biggest and most populated satellite town in Abuja. Referred to as “Abuja Substitute” because many of those who work in the capital city live in Kubwa; a very heterogenous town populated by civil servants, the middle-class, businessmen, entrepreneurs, artisans, and those in the informal and semi-formal sectors.
The writer had a personal experience which confirmed the potency of this silent wish. Driving through the early-afternoon rain, after about 20 minutes, one was welcomed into the Mart View Lounge; venue of the meeting by the host. Impressed by the ambience, facilities, and services, the host beckoned on one of the senior staff members to lead us on a guided tour of the resort. The Lounge, in many ways can compete with a few of those in Gwarimpa, Jabi, Wuse, Garki, and Wuse 2 Districts. Towards the end of about an hour’s discussion, one’s attention drifted to a table not far off as four middle-aged men were engrossed in a hearty and engaging political talk.
A few minutes later, the name of the topic of this treatise featured prominently in their discourse.
Like a newshound who sniffed a potential scoop, one had to take a few, quick steps and joined the quartet to hear more. Shocked by the intrusion, the writer had to do a brief introduction, which proved useful after all. Convinced that “one of us” – though more of a local diasporan – had joined the “platform” they resumed discussions. With renewed enthusiasm, they rolled out reasons for being in the mood. Exuding confidence, they projected that TeeJay Yusuf would be voted as the next Senator for Kogi West in the January 2027 general elections.
One decided to play the devil’s advocate to ascertain their understanding of politics, particularly in Kogi West, extrapolate the antecedents and past achievements of Yusuf vis-a-vis his chances. Taking these as challenges, the four-men; like brilliant students in an exam acquitted themselves creditably.
In great measures, reports and observations confirmed the opinions and comments by the quartet. In his tour of duty as the representative of Kabba-Bunu/Ijumu Federal Constituency, between 2011 and 2023, Yusuf, confirmed the words of Stephen Covey that, “what you do has far greater impact than what you say.” This, he started early. One recalls that at an event held in Abuja – a few weeks before the 2011 general elections, he made some bold statements, which many described as the usual melody by politicians.
Yusuf declared, “by the Grace of God, I am going to hit the ground running after winning the elections,” and pledged to begin “an immediate education initiative for secondary school students.” Finally, he promised, “I will bring a new phase of responsiveness, resourcefulness, and responsibility to representation. I will be different.”
Barely a month after Inauguration as a Member of the 7th House of Representatives, Yusuf organized a four-week summer school studies for students, called “Back-To-School” in seven centres spread across the constituency. He confirmed Abraham Lincoln’s counsel that, “commitment is what transforms a promise to reality,” as he sustained and improved the curriculum, structure, and benefits of the initiative for 12 years.
The centres were increased to over a dozen for more coverage; participation increased from the initial 2,000+ to over 10,000 – including students from other communities and states holidaying in Kabba-Bunu/Ijumu Federal Constituency; scholarship and other incentives were increased. To enhance the intelligence quotient, confidence, and capacity of students, the annual “TeeJay Yusuf/NTA Kabba Quiz Competition” was added.
At a function, Yusuf confessed that his passion and bias for education is borne out of the realization that, “it is the bedrock for personal growth, community development, and national transformation.”
From records, Yusuf eminently discharged his responsibilities as the representative of his constituency. For 12 years, he excelled in each of the three primary duties of a Legislator; Law-Making, Oversight, and Representation. He moved about 100 Motions, and 20 Bills; that are people-focused, development-driven, targeted at good governance, and the development of public institutions.
At every point of legislative work, either at plenary sessions, committees discourse, or oversight engagements, Yusuf’s commitment and contributions were visibly evident. Never a back-bencher, seat-warmer, or one to go “deaf and dumb” when national issues were discussed and debated, he canvasses his points with detailed analysis, unmistakable patriotism, and resolute conviction. A senior journalist who craved anonymity confirmed that, “TeeJay Yusuf was one of the brilliant minds that made the 7th House the delight of many people. He is fearless, bold, intelligent, and takes position on issues not minding if he is alone.”
In representation, which involves constituency development, Yusuf’s style was different and unique. Deploying his social crusader and negotiation skills, acquired as a student unionist and former Secretary-General of the National Association of Nigerian Students, (NANS), he collaborated with public servants, colleagues, and other like minds – some are from his constituency, Kogi West, and Kogi State. For him, attracting projects and programmes to the people is not, and can never be a “one-man show.” Yusuf declared that, “though the Legislator will be the anchor, the efforts and input of others is necessary.” The results of this and his commitment to development crystallized to numerous projects, programmes, and initiatives across the 30 Wards of Kabba-Bunu/Ijumu Federal Constituency. For 12 years, his footprints in education, healthcare, power, water, roads, agriculture, skills development, employment generation, and some other sectors were visible in many towns and communities within the constituency; and even beyond.
Over the years, conscious of the enormous natural endowments and human resources in Kogi West, Yusuf has always reached out to communities and people outside his constituency. At every point, he builds enduring bridges of relationships and interactions with different people; irrespective of age, tribe, religion, and political affinities. To underscore the importance of unity as a strategic ingredient for development, he pioneered the “Interactive Dinner For Public Servants And Others” in 2013. The initiative which ran for about a decade, became a veritable platform for connectivity, networking, unity, and community development. Mr. Ola Fatoye, a retired federal bureaucrat confessed that, “unknown to the Initiator, many of us leveraged on the platform for career progression. Some of the friends I made at the yearly event contributed massively to my career till I retired, and even now. Sadly, none of our legislators are doing a similar programme.”
With his emergence as a candidate for the Kogi West Senatorial elections scheduled for January 2027, many people – including supporters, political associates, and some other groups – are optimistic that the time is now.
Recall that he made an unsuccessful bid for the same position in 2023. However, many people argue that having had 12 unbroken years in the House, where he acquitted himself as a consummate and committed legislator who was (and still) readily accessible and available to the people, prioritizing their needs and desires in the course of being their voice and solicitor, 2027 is the most appropriate time to promote him to the Red Chamber.
Some others affirmed that, in and out of public office, he has refused to be individualistic, preferring rather, to work and seek for the good of his people. It is generally believed that, if successful, he will do the same for the contiguous catchments across the sprawling sub-country of Kogi West, which stretches from Chikara, abutting the Federal Capital Territory, (FCT), onwards to Egbe in Yagba West LGA. They are confident that with the enormous legislative experience in his pouch, the entire 85 wards, in the 7 LGAs constituting the Senatorial District will be the ultimate beneficiary, if he is entrusted with the collective electoral franchise of the people.
* BOLAJI AFOLABI, a Development Communications specialist was with the Office of Public Affairs, The Presidency, Abuja.
-
News8 hours agoPope Leo XIV Warns Against AI Risks, Urges World to Protect Human Dignity
-
News7 hours agoNigeria @66: Tinubu Urges Citizens to Keep Faith, Says ‘Light At End of Tunnel
-
Opinion10 hours agoA Hall Where No One Listens: Can the UN Still Keep the Peace?
-
Politics9 hours ago2027: Wike to lead campaign team for Tinubu’s re-election in FCT, Rivers
-
News9 hours ago184.5kg cocaine bust: NDLEA docks KC Luxury, 2 accomplices, remanded in custody ( Photos)
-
News7 hours agoAregbesola Missing From Atiku’s 2027 Campaign Council Amid Reported ADC Rift
