News
ADC alleges plot to cripple opposition, thumbs down court deregistration order
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ADC.jpg&description=ADC alleges plot to cripple opposition, thumbs down court deregistration order', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ADC.jpg&description=ADC alleges plot to cripple opposition, thumbs down court deregistration order', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has rejected a Federal High Court ruling directing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the party and four others, describing the judgment as an attempt to use the judiciary to undermine Nigeria’s democratic process.
Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Accord Party, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance and Zenith Labour Party for allegedly failing to satisfy constitutional and electoral requirements outlined in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Electoral Act 2022.
The judgment followed a suit instituted by the National Forum of Former Legislators, which sought a declaration that INEC was obligated to remove political parties that failed to meet prescribed electoral performance benchmarks. These include securing at least 25 per cent of votes in any state during a presidential election or winning at least one elective position.
Responding in a statement posted on X and signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the party condemned the ruling as unconstitutional and deeply troubling.
According to the ADC, the decision runs contrary to established legal precedents and even conflicts with positions previously advanced by INEC on the issue of political party deregistration.
“The African Democratic Congress (ADC) wishes to warn, in the strongest possible terms, against any attempt to use the judiciary as an instrument to undermine democracy and plunge Nigeria into a major political crisis.
“We are deeply alarmed by the judgment reportedly delivered by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, in a case filed by the so-called National Forum of Former Legislators seeking the de-registration of the ADC and four other political parties. This judgment stands in direct conflict with constitutional principles and all known judicial processes and procedures.”
The ADC maintained that INEC had expressly defended the party’s status before the court, arguing that it remained fully compliant with all constitutional and statutory requirements for political parties.
According to the party, the electoral commission clearly informed the court that the ADC had neither breached any registration condition nor failed to meet any constitutionally prescribed electoral-performance benchmark that could justify its deregistration.
The party quoted INEC as insisting that political parties could only be deregistered on grounds recognised by law, stressing that such decisions must not be influenced by political interests, public sentiment or pressure from vested groups.
Beyond challenging the substance of the judgment, the ADC also questioned the procedure that led to the ruling. It alleged that the Federal High Court proceeded with the matter despite an existing order of the Court of Appeal issued on May 22, 2026, directing that proceedings be stayed.
The party described the development as a violation of established judicial procedure and a disregard for the hierarchy of courts.
We are therefore left in no doubt that this latest development is a continuation of the ruling party’s persistent efforts to undermine the opposition, especially the ADC,” the statement said.
The ADC also raised concerns about the timing of the judgment, noting that it came shortly after the party concluded its primaries and began preparations for the 2027 general elections, including the presidential race.
It warned that attempts to remove a major opposition platform through what it termed judicial manipulation posed a serious threat to democratic stability.
“Any attempt to eliminate the country’s major opposition party through judicial manoeuvring… is a direct invitation to anarchy,” the party stated.
Describing the ruling as “reckless, provocative, and even incendiary,” the ADC argued that efforts to use state institutions to restrict political competition amounted to tampering with the foundations of Nigeria’s democracy.
The party said the case had grown beyond a dispute over party registration and now touched on a broader national question — whether Nigerians would be presented with genuine political alternatives in the 2027 elections.
“Let it be clearly stated: the ADC will not stand by while the democratic rights of millions of Nigerians are threatened. We reject any and all attempts to intimidate, suppress, deregister, or politically extinguish our party and other opposition parties through means that offend both the spirit and the letter of the Constitution.”
Reaffirming its confidence in the rule of law, the party said it would challenge the judgment through all available legal and constitutional avenues. It also pledged to engage democratic stakeholders across the country while continuing to protect the interests of its candidates, members and supporters.
The ADC further alleged that the ruling formed part of a wider effort to weaken opposition parties ahead of the next election cycle.
“Make no mistake, this is another act of desperation by the ruling party and the government to hand President Tinubu a second term without contest. This will not work,” it said.
The party warned that any attempt to create what it described as a “civilian dictatorship” could have far-reaching implications for national stability, adding that those responsible should be held accountable for any tensions arising from such actions.
It also announced plans to petition the National Judicial Council, accusing the trial judge of misconduct and conduct capable of bringing the judiciary into disrepute.
While calling on its members, supporters and coalition partners to remain peaceful, the ADC urged them to stay alert and committed to the democratic process.
The party declared that, “Whatever it takes, the ADC will be on the ballot so long as the 2027 election is to hold.”
The ADC and other opposition parties have repeatedly accused Tinubu and the APC of attempting to dominate the political space and steer the country toward a one-party system.
However, the President and his party have also repeatedly dismissed claims that Nigeria is drifting towards a one-party state, insisting that a strong and credible opposition remains essential for democratic growth.
News
BREAKING: Tinubu Govt Tightens Foreign Travel Rules, Ministers, Security Chiefs Need SGF Clearance
The Federal Government has introduced stricter controls on official foreign trips by ministers, security chiefs, heads of government agencies and other political appointees, making prior clearance from the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF) mandatory.
Under the new directive, government appointees will not be permitted to embark on official foreign trips without obtaining the required approval from the OSGF, except where an exemption is provided by law or through a specific presidential directive.
The directive, issued by Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, takes immediate effect.
In a circular titled “Non-Compliance by Government Appointees with the Requirement for OSGF Approval for Official Foreign Trips and the Mandatory Inclusion of OSGF Approval in the Processing of Official Visas,” the SGF expressed concern over continued violations of existing rules governing official travels outside Nigeria.
The government said the renewed enforcement was necessary to strengthen accountability, fiscal discipline, transparency and coordination of official government engagements abroad.
The circular noted that several directives had previously been issued to regulate foreign travel by ministers, heads of ministries, departments and agencies, boards, committees and other senior public officials.
Among the directives cited were the September 18, 2023 guidelines on official travels by cabinet members, agency heads and public officials, as well as earlier circulars issued in 2012, 2015, 2017 and 2018 aimed at controlling foreign trips and reducing unnecessary government expenditure.
Despite these measures, the SGF said non-compliance had continued.
The government warned that unauthorised foreign trips could undermine efforts to ensure prudent management of public funds and effective monitoring of official engagements undertaken on behalf of Nigeria.
Foreign Affairs Ministry Gets New Role
As part of the new enforcement mechanism, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been directed to demand proof of valid OSGF approval before processing official travel documentation for government appointees.
The ministry is to make evidence of OSGF clearance a mandatory supporting document, where applicable, for requests involving official Notes Verbales, diplomatic facilitation and applications for official, diplomatic or service visas.
The ministry has also been instructed to formally notify foreign missions and embassies accredited to Nigeria of the new requirement.
According to the directive, applications for official, diplomatic or service visas by government appointees should, where applicable, be accompanied by duly issued OSGF travel approval.
Auditor-General to Track Compliance
The Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation has also been empowered to monitor compliance.
Government appointees who undertake official foreign trips at public expense will be required to produce evidence of the requisite OSGF approval during audit exercises.
The directive further places responsibility on accounting officers, permanent secretaries, chief executives and heads of government agencies to ensure that public funds are not released for unauthorised foreign travel.
They have been directed not to process expenditure relating to an official foreign trip until the required OSGF approval has been obtained.
The SGF said the directive was designed to reinforce due process, centralised coordination of government business and prudent management of public resources, in line with existing public service and financial regulations.
Who Is Affected?
The directive applies to ministers and ministers of state, permanent secretaries, accounting officers, heads of ministries, departments and agencies, security chiefs, political appointees and senior government officials.
Those specifically addressed include the Chief of Staff to the President, Deputy Chief of Staff to the Vice President, Nati
Lawyers representing former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, have demanded ₦10 billion in damages from Defence Minister, General Christopher Musa (retd.), over alleged defamatory statements made against their client.
The demand was contained in a letter before action dated September 7, 2026, and addressed to Musa at the Federal Ministry of Defence in Abuja.
The legal threat followed the minister’s appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today on September 3, where he discussed insecurity in Kaduna State and made allegations involving the former governor.
According to El-Rufai’s lawyers, Musa accused the former governor of deliberately planning the killing of people in Southern Kaduna and paying bandits.
The lawyers further alleged that the minister claimed El-Rufai ordered the demolition of houses as a means of victimising political opponents.
El-Rufai’s legal team, Akpan Ubong Chambers, rejected the allegations as false, describing them as defamatory and damaging to their client’s reputation.
They argued that the statements portrayed the former governor as a murderer, criminal and sponsor of banditry.
The lawyers demanded that Musa publicly retract the allegations, apologise to El-Rufai and pay ₦10 billion in damages.
They also specifically denied the allegation that El-Rufai paid bandits, insisting that the former governor had consistently maintained that he would neither negotiate with nor financially support bandits.
On the controversial demolitions carried out during El-Rufai’s tenure, the lawyers said the exercises were conducted in accordance with the law and in pursuit of legitimate public purposes.
They also rejected claims that the former governor’s administration deliberately divided Kaduna State along ethnic or religious lines, insisting that his government pursued policies aimed at promoting unity and development.
The legal team maintained that the allegations against El-Rufai had not been established before any court of competent jurisdiction and challenged Musa to provide evidence to substantiate them.
Family Issues Separate Seven-Day Ultimatum
The latest legal demand comes amid a separate challenge issued by El-Rufai’s family over the same allegation.
In a statement issued Monday and signed by Honourable Mohammed Bello El-Rufai on behalf of the family, the claim that the former governor planned killings in Southern Kaduna was described as “grave” and unsupported by evidence.
The family acknowledged Musa’s right to express his views but insisted that such a serious allegation must be backed by credible evidence.
It gave the minister seven days to either produce evidence supporting the allegation or issue a full public retraction and apology through the same medium in which the claim was made.
The family warned that failure to comply would leave it with no option but to pursue available legal remedies.
The development has now escalated the dispute between the former governor’s camp and the Defence Minister, with El-Rufai’s lawyers seeking financial damages while his family separately presses for evidence, retraction and an apology.
News
Sad! Newborn Reportedly Dies After Mom Allegedly Refuses Breastfeeding Over Unfulfilled ‘Push Gift’
A newborn baby has reportedly died just days after birth following an alleged dispute between the child’s parents over a “push gift” promised to the mother.
According to reports circulating online, the mother allegedly refused to breastfeed or adequately feed the baby after her husband failed to buy her a car as a gift following the delivery.
The newborn was reportedly left without sufficient nourishment as the disagreement between the couple continued.
Tragically, the baby is said to have died only days after birth.
The disturbing allegation has triggered outrage online, with many questioning how a dispute over a material gift could allegedly escalate to a situation with such devastating consequences for a newborn.
However, details surrounding the reported death remain unclear, and the allegation has not been independently verified. It is also not yet clear whether authorities or medical professionals have confirmed the cause of death.
The report has nevertheless renewed concerns about the vulnerability of newborns and the critical importance of ensuring that babies receive adequate feeding and medical attention, particularly in the first days of life.
It has also sparked wider conversations about postpartum support, communication between couples and the need to prioritise a newborn’s health and safety during periods of marital disagreement.
As questions continue to surround the circumstances of the reported death, calls are growing for the facts to be established and any claims of neglect to be properly investigated.
BREAKING: Tinubu Govt Tightens Foreign Travel Rules, Ministers, Security Chiefs Need SGF Clearance
Alleged defamation: El-Rufai’s lawyers demand ₦10bn from Defence minister, Musa
Sad! Newborn Reportedly Dies After Mom Allegedly Refuses Breastfeeding Over Unfulfilled ‘Push Gift’
-
News22 hours agoABU Alumnus Lawal Garba Shares Success Lessons With Students
-
Politics22 hours agoJUST IN: APC drags Gov. Adeleke to court over August 15 Osun guber election result
-
News9 hours agoTunji-Ojo: No Extra Charges For Special Passport Intervention In UK
-
News21 hours ago2027: Defend Your Votes From Polling Unit To Final Results, Obi Begs Supporters
-
News9 hours ago7 Things Parents and Students Should Know About FG’s New Learner Identification Number (LIN)
-
Entertainment9 hours agoBBN: Nomy Kicked Out Of Big Brother House, Her Participation Revoked
-
News9 hours agoOsun: APC Legal Team Rejects Petition Challenging Adeleke’s Victory
-
News8 hours agoMan Who Returned to Nigeria for His Wedding Beaten to Death