News
ADC alleges plot to cripple opposition, thumbs down court deregistration order
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ADC.jpg&description=ADC alleges plot to cripple opposition, thumbs down court deregistration order', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ADC.jpg&description=ADC alleges plot to cripple opposition, thumbs down court deregistration order', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has rejected a Federal High Court ruling directing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the party and four others, describing the judgment as an attempt to use the judiciary to undermine Nigeria’s democratic process.
Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Accord Party, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance and Zenith Labour Party for allegedly failing to satisfy constitutional and electoral requirements outlined in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Electoral Act 2022.
The judgment followed a suit instituted by the National Forum of Former Legislators, which sought a declaration that INEC was obligated to remove political parties that failed to meet prescribed electoral performance benchmarks. These include securing at least 25 per cent of votes in any state during a presidential election or winning at least one elective position.
Responding in a statement posted on X and signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the party condemned the ruling as unconstitutional and deeply troubling.
According to the ADC, the decision runs contrary to established legal precedents and even conflicts with positions previously advanced by INEC on the issue of political party deregistration.
“The African Democratic Congress (ADC) wishes to warn, in the strongest possible terms, against any attempt to use the judiciary as an instrument to undermine democracy and plunge Nigeria into a major political crisis.
“We are deeply alarmed by the judgment reportedly delivered by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, in a case filed by the so-called National Forum of Former Legislators seeking the de-registration of the ADC and four other political parties. This judgment stands in direct conflict with constitutional principles and all known judicial processes and procedures.”
The ADC maintained that INEC had expressly defended the party’s status before the court, arguing that it remained fully compliant with all constitutional and statutory requirements for political parties.
According to the party, the electoral commission clearly informed the court that the ADC had neither breached any registration condition nor failed to meet any constitutionally prescribed electoral-performance benchmark that could justify its deregistration.
The party quoted INEC as insisting that political parties could only be deregistered on grounds recognised by law, stressing that such decisions must not be influenced by political interests, public sentiment or pressure from vested groups.
Beyond challenging the substance of the judgment, the ADC also questioned the procedure that led to the ruling. It alleged that the Federal High Court proceeded with the matter despite an existing order of the Court of Appeal issued on May 22, 2026, directing that proceedings be stayed.
The party described the development as a violation of established judicial procedure and a disregard for the hierarchy of courts.
We are therefore left in no doubt that this latest development is a continuation of the ruling party’s persistent efforts to undermine the opposition, especially the ADC,” the statement said.
The ADC also raised concerns about the timing of the judgment, noting that it came shortly after the party concluded its primaries and began preparations for the 2027 general elections, including the presidential race.
It warned that attempts to remove a major opposition platform through what it termed judicial manipulation posed a serious threat to democratic stability.
“Any attempt to eliminate the country’s major opposition party through judicial manoeuvring… is a direct invitation to anarchy,” the party stated.
Describing the ruling as “reckless, provocative, and even incendiary,” the ADC argued that efforts to use state institutions to restrict political competition amounted to tampering with the foundations of Nigeria’s democracy.
The party said the case had grown beyond a dispute over party registration and now touched on a broader national question — whether Nigerians would be presented with genuine political alternatives in the 2027 elections.
“Let it be clearly stated: the ADC will not stand by while the democratic rights of millions of Nigerians are threatened. We reject any and all attempts to intimidate, suppress, deregister, or politically extinguish our party and other opposition parties through means that offend both the spirit and the letter of the Constitution.”
Reaffirming its confidence in the rule of law, the party said it would challenge the judgment through all available legal and constitutional avenues. It also pledged to engage democratic stakeholders across the country while continuing to protect the interests of its candidates, members and supporters.
The ADC further alleged that the ruling formed part of a wider effort to weaken opposition parties ahead of the next election cycle.
“Make no mistake, this is another act of desperation by the ruling party and the government to hand President Tinubu a second term without contest. This will not work,” it said.
The party warned that any attempt to create what it described as a “civilian dictatorship” could have far-reaching implications for national stability, adding that those responsible should be held accountable for any tensions arising from such actions.
It also announced plans to petition the National Judicial Council, accusing the trial judge of misconduct and conduct capable of bringing the judiciary into disrepute.
While calling on its members, supporters and coalition partners to remain peaceful, the ADC urged them to stay alert and committed to the democratic process.
The party declared that, “Whatever it takes, the ADC will be on the ballot so long as the 2027 election is to hold.”
The ADC and other opposition parties have repeatedly accused Tinubu and the APC of attempting to dominate the political space and steer the country toward a one-party system.
However, the President and his party have also repeatedly dismissed claims that Nigeria is drifting towards a one-party state, insisting that a strong and credible opposition remains essential for democratic growth.
News
10th Reps Boast Record Lawmaking with 2,747 Bills in Threen three years
…363 bills passed as lawmakers defend productivity
By Gloria Ikibah
The House of Representatives has defended the performance of the 10th National Assembly, revealing that lawmakers introduced 2,747 bills and passed 363 within the first three years of its tenure, describing the figures as proof of an active legislature focused on delivering reforms that directly affect Nigerians.
Chairman House Committee on Rules and Business, Rep. Francis Waive, disclosed the figures on Monday during a media briefing in Abuja to mark the close of the third legislative session.
According to Rep. Waive, the bills introduced since June 2023 comprise 57 executive bills, 95 Senate concurrence bills and 2,595 private member bills.
He said the House passed 89 bills during its first legislative session, 148 in the second and 126 in the just-concluded third session, bringing the total to 363.
Breaking down activities for the third session, the Chairman said lawmakers introduced 484 bills, made up of 31 executive bills, 391 private member bills and 62 Senate concurrence bills.
He added that the House also considered 220 motions, referring 192 to standing committees and 28 to adhoc committees, while 121 were admitted as matters of urgent public importance. Lawmakers also deliberated on 48 public petitions.
Among the major legislative milestones recorded during the session, Waive listed the passage of the 2026 Appropriation Bill, the Electoral Act 2026, constitutional amendment proposals to pave the way for state police, tax reform legislation and the Minimum Wage Act.
He said the measures were aimed at strengthening governance and improving the welfare of Nigerians.
“We are sharing this data with Nigerians because the House of Representatives is working. This is the scorecard for the session”, he stated.
Also speaking, the Spokesperson of the House, Rep. Akin Rotimi said the impact of several laws passed by the House was already being felt across the country.
He cited the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) as one example, noting that the scheme, which was established through legislation initiated by the House, had already supported more than 1.6 million Nigerians, with over N303 billion disbursed in student loans.
Rotimi explained that the number of bills eventually passed should not be compared directly with the number introduced because many separate proposals are often harmonised into a single piece of legislation during the legislative process.
He also revealed that more than 300 constitutional amendment bills were currently undergoing consideration.
Looking ahead, the House Spokesperson said lawmakers were already reviewing priorities for the fourth legislative session.
“We’ve covered a lot of ground, but there is still a lot more to do. We are reviewing our legislative agenda internally to ensure that key promises made to Nigerians are delivered before the end of this Assembly”, he added.
Responding to questions from journalists, Waive said the Committee on Rules and Business does not keep records of bills that have received presidential assent, explaining that such information is maintained by the Clerk to the National Assembly and the Presidency.
He also addressed concerns over concurrence bills awaiting action in the Senate, saying the House fulfils its responsibility once passed bills are transmitted through the Clerk of the National Assembly.
On the growing number of establishment bills creating new federal institutions, Waive defended the trend, arguing that many had translated into tangible projects, including several Federal Medical Centres now serving communities across the country.
The lawmakers also dismissed allegations that members paid money to have bills listed for consideration. Waive said comments previously attributed to one lawmaker had been misconstrued.
According to him, the member was referring to the political effort, consultations and lobbying required to build support for legislation rather than the payment of bribes.
Rotimi, who disclosed that he had personally sponsored more than 40 bills, also rejected the allegation.
He maintained that every bill passes through established constitutional and parliamentary procedures before it can be scheduled for first reading.
On the proposed establishment of State Police, Waive clarified that the constitutional amendment approved by the House merely provides the legal foundation for the initiative.
He explained that the operational structure and relationship between federal and state police formations would be addressed through separate amendments to the Police Act.
Rotimi added that the House intends to vote on about 40 constitutional amendment bills during the fourth legislative session, including proposals for reserved seats for women and other governance reforms, which he described as critical to strengthening Nigeria’s democratic institutions.
News
Customs Beat 2025 Revenue Target, Seek Reps’ Nod For N11.27tn 2026 Budget
By Gloria Ikibah
The Nigeria Customs Service has surpassed its 2025 revenue target by more than 10 per cent, raking in N7.277 trillion against a target of N6.584 trillion, even as it sought the approval of the House of Representatives for its proposed N11.274 trillion revenue and expenditure framework for the 2026 fiscal year.
The Comptroller-General of Customs, Bashir Adewale Adeniyi, disclosed this on Monday while defending the agency’s 2026 budget estimates before the House Committee on Customs and Excise in Abuja.
Opening the session, the Committee Chairman, Rep. Leke Abejide, said the exercise was part of the National Assembly’s constitutional oversight responsibility.
He said: “It is not a long speech day. It is simply a day to carry out what Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution mandate us to do, which is to scrutinise your budget proposal.”
Reps. Abejide added that after the committee concluded its review, its recommendations will be presented to the House for consideration and approval.
Presenting the agency’s performance, Adeniyi said Customs generated N7.277 trillion between January and December 2025, exceeding its revenue target by 10.24 per cent despite a series of government fiscal incentives that reduced potential earnings.
He explained that duty waivers on healthcare products, compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles, electric vehicles and import duty exemption certificates all affected revenue collections.
According to him, the suspension of excise duties on telecommunications services and other tax relief measures also impacted earnings of theService.
Adeniyi further revealed that although the National Assembly approved an expenditure budget of N1.132 trillion for Customs in 2025, the agency received only N808.86 billion, representing about 71.4 per cent of the approved amount.
He attributed the shortfall to delays in implementing the funding provisions contained in the Nigeria Customs Service Act.
“The variance between what was approved and what we received resulted from the delayed implementation of the new funding structure”, he noted.
He further explained that the Service continued to operate under the former seven per cent cost-of-collection model until August 2025 before transitioning to the new four per cent Free-on-Board (FOB) funding framework introduced by the Act.
The Comptroller-General also clarified that concessionary fees, previously paid through the Comprehensive Import Supervision Scheme account managed by the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank of Nigeria, are now settled directly by the Customs Service under the new legal framework.
During the budget defence, lawmakers sought explanations on the disparity between the approved budget, actual releases and expenditure, as well as details surrounding concessionary fees.
In response, the Chairman reminded the lawmakers that while the National Assembly approved N1.132 trillion, only N808.86 billion was eventually released, urging the Service to account for how the available funds were utilised.
Looking ahead, Adeniyi said Customs had set an ambitious revenue target of N11.274 trillion for 2026.
He explained that the projection comprises N5.542 trillion from Federation Account collections, N1.495 trillion from non-Federation revenue, N2.973 trillion from import Value Added Tax and N1.264 trillion from the four per cent FOB collection.
According to him, the Service intends to achieve the target through technology-driven reforms, including the full deployment of the Unified Customs Management System, stronger post-clearance audit processes, improved trade facilitation and closer engagement with stakeholders.
Adeniyi also announced reductions in import levies on vehicles under the 2026 fiscal policy.
He said the levy on used vehicles had been reduced from 15 per cent to five per cent, while that on new vehicles had been cut from 20 per cent to 10 per cent.
The announcement drew praise from lawmakers, with Abejide urging the Customs Service to publicise the development.
“I want the general public to know that the government is doing something good for them”, the Chairman said.
Adeniyi acknowledged that while the reductions would provide relief to importers and consumers, they would inevitably affect Customs revenue.
He said the measures formed part of broader fiscal policies coordinated by the Federal Ministry of Finance to support national priorities, including improved healthcare, transportation through the CNG initiative and other strategic government interventions.
For the 2026 fiscal year, the Customs Service proposed N421.7 billion for personnel costs, N307.77 billion for overheads and more than ₦620 billion for capital expenditure.
According to the Comptroller-General, priority would be given to completing ongoing projects, expanding infrastructure, improving staff welfare and enhancing operational efficiency.
He appealed to lawmakers to approve the proposal, expressing confidence that the budget would strengthen the Service’s capacity to boost revenue generation, facilitate legitimate trade and contribute more effectively to Nigeria’s economic growth.
News
Just in: Tinubu Orders Probe Against Google, Facebook, X, AI Platforms Over Use of Nigerian Content
Just in: Tinubu Orders Probe Against Google, Facebook, X, AI Platforms Over Use of Nigerian Content companies and Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) platforms over allegations of anti-competitive practices and the unlawful use of content belonging to Nigerian media organisations.
The directive follows a joint petition submitted to the Presidency by the Nigerian Press Organisation (NPO), comprising the Newspaper Proprietors’ Association of Nigeria (NPAN), the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), the Broadcasting Organisations of Nigeria (BON), and the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP).
In a statement issued on Monday, the FCCPC’s Director of Corporate Affairs, Ondaje Ijagwu, said the investigation would cover major technology companies, including Meta, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, X (formerly Twitter), as well as Generative AI platforms operating in Nigeria.
According to the commission, the probe is aimed at examining allegations that the companies engage in anti-competitive practices, unlawfully exploit news content, and operate in ways that may undermine fair competition within Nigeria’s digital media landscape.
“The big technology companies have come under the radar of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission following allegations of anti-competitive practices, unlawful exploitation of news content, and other potentially unfair market conduct,” the statement said. It added that the investigation was initiated following President Tinubu’s directive in response to concerns raised by Nigerian media organisations.
The media bodies argued that the activities of some global technology firms threaten the commercial sustainability of local news organisations and undermine the rights of publishers and content creators.
According to the FCCPC, the Nigerian media industry has become increasingly concerned about the growing influence of digital platforms on the country’s news ecosystem.
The commission noted that the petition specifically accused companies such as Meta, Alphabet, X, and certain AI platforms of engaging in practices capable of weakening competition, reducing revenue opportunities for publishers, and using copyrighted news content without adequate authorisation or compensation. FCCPC Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Tunji Bello, assured that the investigation would be conducted independently and based strictly on available evidence.
He said the commission recognises both the importance of a vibrant media industry to Nigeria’s democracy and the critical role technology plays in innovation and economic development. “Our responsibility is to objectively determine the facts and ensure that competition within the digital ecosystem remains fair, transparent, and consistent with Nigerian law,” Bello said.
He stressed that the inquiry should not be interpreted as an assumption of wrongdoing by any of the companies involved.
According to him, every organisation under investigation will be given a fair opportunity to present relevant information before any conclusions are reached.
The FCCPC said its investigation will focus on whether the conduct of the companies violates the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, allegations of market dominance and anti-competitive behaviour, the unauthorised extraction and commercial use of copyrighted news content for training AI models, and complaints that Nigerian publishers are being denied fair compensation for the value generated from their content.
The commission noted that the move aligns with similar regulatory actions in other countries. It cited South Africa, where Google agreed to pay news organisations about R688 million (approximately $40 million) annually to support the local news industry.
The investigation also comes months after the FCCPC imposed a $220 million penalty on Meta over alleged regulatory violations, a decision the technology company is currently challenging.
Through the latest probe, the Federal Government says it aims to ensure that international technology companies operating in Nigeria comply with local competition laws while guaranteeing that Nigerian media organisations receive fair value for the content they produce.
-
Entertainment22 hours agoVideo of Family of Bouncer Reportedly Killed in Sam Larry Crash Sparks Emotional Reactions Online
-
Politics22 hours agoSenator Ogoshi Onawo resigns from ADC over incessant legal battles
-
Opinion22 hours ago10TH Senate Takes on Nigeria’s Toughest Security Question: State Police
-
Metro22 hours agoNarrow escape for passengers as driver suffers seizure while driving
-
Sports22 hours agoOsaka shocks World number one seed Sabelanka in Wimbledon last 16
-
Sports22 hours agoCristiano Ronaldo Confirms 2026 World Cup Will Be His Final Appearance
-
Sports22 hours ago2026 World Cup: Brazil goes back home as Norway coasts into quarter finals
-
Politics22 hours ago2027: APC moves to beat INEC deadline, set to upload Tinubu, running mate this week
