Connect with us

News

Appeal Court Strikes Out Akpabio’s Motions, Orders Senate President To Pay Natasha ₦100,000

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has struck out two motions filed by Senate President Godswill Akpabio against a Federal High Court judgment that barred the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions from conducting disciplinary proceedings against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

The motions, dated March 20 and March 25, 2025, respectively, sought permission to appeal the March 10, 2025, decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division, delivered by Justice Obiora Egwuatu.

Justice Egwuatu’s ruling, in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Clerk of the National Assembly & 3 Others, granted an injunction restraining the Senate Committee from proceeding with the disciplinary action against Akpoti-Uduaghan. The decision followed an ex parte application by her counsel.

Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents the Kogi Central Senatorial District, had been summoned by the Senate Committee following an altercation with Akpabio on February 20, 2025.

Advertisement

The two motions were subsequently struck out after Akpabio’s legal team filed applications to withdraw them.

According to the document, the Kogi senator prayed that the court grant an order restraining the Senate and its ethics committee from “proceeding with the purported investigation” against her.

Akpoti-Uduaghan asked the court to grant an order “declaring that any action taken during the pendency of this suit is null, void, and of no effect whatsoever”.

The presiding judge ruled that the defendants should come and show cause within 72 hours, upon the service of the order, why an interlocutory injunction should not be issued against them.

Advertisement

Not satisfied with the decisions of the court, Senator Akpabio appealed against the order through his Counsel, Deborah D. Anyanwu.

The Appellant sought among others, “AN ORDER of this Honourable Court enlarging the time within which the Appellant/Applicant may seek leave to appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Natasha Akpoti- Uduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria & 3 Ors. (Coram: Honourable Justice Obiora Atuegwu Egwuatu) delivered on 10th March 2025 on grounds of mixed law and fact as contained in the proposed Notice of Appeal attached as Exhibit B.

“AN ORDER of this Honourable Court granting leave to the Appellant/Applicant to appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria & 3 Ors. (Coram: Honourable Justice Obiora Atuegwu Egwuatu) delivered on 10th March 2025 on grounds of mixed law and fact as contained in the proposed Notice of Appeal attached as Exhibit B.

“AN ORDER of this Honourable Court enlarging the time within which the Appellant/Applicant may file their Notice of appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria & 3 Ors. (Coram: Honourable Justice Obiora Atuegwu Egwuatu) delivered on 10th March 2025.

Advertisement

“AN ORDER of this Honourable Court staying further proceeding in Suit No: FCH/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Natasha Akpoti- Uduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria & 3 Ors. (Coram: Honourable Justice Obiora Atuegwu Egwuatu), pending the hearing and determination of the Appellant/Applicant’s appeal before this Honourable Court.”

Ruling on the motions, which were identical in content but filed on different dates, the Court of Appeal struck them out following an application by Akpabio’s legal team to withdraw them.

In the decision delivered on May 21, 2025, the three-member panel of Justices, led by Justice Hamma A. Barka, also ordered Senate President Akpabio to pay ₦100,000 in costs to the 1st Respondent, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

The court’s enrolled order, signed by Deputy Chief Registrar Josephine J. Ekperobe, confirmed that the application to withdraw the motions was granted, and the motions were accordingly struck out.

Advertisement

Additionally, the court directed that Appeal No: CA/ABJ/PRE/ROA/CV/395M/2025 be deleted from its records.

Justice Barka delivered the lead judgment, with Justices Adebukunola A. Banjoko and Okon E. Abang concurring.

The court decisions partly read: “This Court, Wednesday the 21st day of May, 2025, upon reading the Motion on Notice filed on the 20/3/2025 and 25/3/2025 together with the Affidavit in support deposed to by Toyo Jimmy.

“And after hearing, Deborah D. Anyanwu for the Appellant. Peter Erviwode with Daniel Akpoviroro, A. Ε. Imadegbelo and Y. M. Zakari for the 1st Respondent. Arnold Ubua for the 3rd Respondent.

Advertisement

“It is hereby ordered that: “Application seeking to withdraw the two Motions dated and filed on the 20/3/2025 and 25/3/2025 is granted and same struck out.

“Cost of N100,000 awarded to the 1st Respondent. Appeal No: CA/ABJ/PRE/ROA/CV/395M/2025 to be deleted.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Reps Move to End Rejection of NYSC Members by Government Agencies

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…say the practice undermines National Service Scheme, waste public funds

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives has taken steps to address the growing rejection of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members by government institutions across the country, warning that the trend is undermining the objectives of the national service scheme and depriving young graduates of valuable work experience.

The move followed the consideration of a motion sponsored by Rep. Rodney Ambaiowei, who raised concerns over what he described as the increasing refusal of Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) to accept corps members posted to them for their mandatory one-year national service.

Advertisement

Presenting the motion, Ambaiowei reminded lawmakers that the NYSC was established as a critical component of Nigeria’s post-civil war reconciliation and nation-building efforts.

He stated: “The National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) scheme was established as part of the post-civil war reconstruction of Nigeria with the specific aims of fostering national unity, reconciliation, and reconstruction by engaging young graduates in community service and promoting a sense of shared national identity and purpose. The scheme came into effect vide Decree No. 24 of 1973 (now the National Youth Service Corps Act, Cap. N84, LFN, 2004) promulgated by the General Yakubu Gowon administration.”

The lawmaker noted that for more than five decades, the scheme has played a significant role in promoting national integration by deploying graduates to states outside their regions of origin and residence.

Ambaiowei further highlighted the positive contributions of the programme over the years, including community development, business growth and social integration.

Advertisement

According to him, “Since its inception, the scheme has fostered national cohesion and healing, as a mandatory national scheme, graduates of universities and polytechnics from different regions of the country converge to render compulsory one-year national service in locations other than their states of origin and residence.

“The scheme has recorded positive impacts in credible service delivery, marriages contracted during service year, successful business development in places of primary assignment, and integration of corps members in their host communities, among other benefits”.

Despite these achievements, the lawmaker expressed concern that many government establishments now routinely reject corps members posted to them, leaving graduates without meaningful opportunities to contribute or gain practical experience.

Ambaiowei also cautioned that the practice amounts to a waste of public resources, as the government continues to pay allowances to corps members who are left without structured engagements.

Advertisement

“The scheme, which is designed to provide willing workforce to the public and private sectors, is currently facing setbacks as Government establishments are rejecting NYSC corps members, denying them service opportunities and experience. This has left many graduates vulnerable to exploitation by private firms and crime, while wasting the scheme’s intended workforce for public and private sectors.

“The rejecting corps members wastes public funds since the government still pays stipends for no economic contribution, without a clear engagement plan, the NYSC scheme loses value and discourages future graduates from participating.

“Proper deployment and utilisation of this young Corps Members’ energy in government offices during service year will enhance valuable experience, prepare them for rewarding careers in the public and private sectors, and boost national productivity and economic growth”, he added.

Following deliberations, the House resolved to urge all Ministries, Departments and Agencies of government, including the National Assembly, to stop rejecting corps members and instead create work structures that accommodate and effectively engage them.

Advertisement

Lawmakers also mandated the House Committee on Youth Development to liaise with the Director-General of the NYSC with a view to developing a comprehensive framework for deploying and harnessing the potential of corps members throughout their service year.

The resolution is expected to strengthen the implementation of the NYSC scheme and ensure that young graduates are given meaningful opportunities to contribute to national development while acquiring practical workplace experience.

Continue Reading

News

Reps Order FCTA, Works Ministry to Urgently Cleanup Blocked Waterways,Sewage Systems in Abuja

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives has directed the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Ministry of Works and Housing to immediately clear blocked drains and repair damaged drainage infrastructure in parts of Abuja plagued by flooding and sewage-related challenges.

The directive affects key locations including Shehu Shagari Way, LaSalle Junction, Alvan Ikoku Way and other flood-prone areas across the Federal Capital Territory.

The House also called on the FCTA to develop and implement a comprehensive sewage evacuation and drainage maintenance programme, while engaging urban planning and environmental experts to design sustainable solutions to recurring sewage blockages and drainage failures across the capital city.

Advertisement

The resolutions followed the adoption of a motion titled “Need to Clear Blocked Waterways and Sewages in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja”, sponsored by Rep. Blessing Onuh during Thursday’s plenary.

Moving the motion, Onuh warned that neglected drainage channels and blocked sewage systems had become a major public health and environmental concern, contributing to repeated flooding in several parts of Abuja.

She noted that some of the worst-hit locations include Shehu Shagari Way, LaSalle Junction and Alvan Ikoku Way at Minister Hill, as well as communities within the Area Councils of the FCT.

She said: “These problems stem from poor drainage maintenance and blocked channels resulting in stagnant water that emits foul odors and poses serious health and environmental hazards to residents and commuters.

Advertisement

“Worried that the resulting unhygienic conditions from stagnant water and blocked drains increases the risk of waterborne diseases and affect the quality of life within the FCT.

“Also worried that despite repeated public complaints, the response from relevant authorities has remained inadequate, with insufficient proactive measures”.

The lawmaker stressed that proper maintenance of drainage and sewage systems was essential to preventing hazardous overflows and protecting public infrastructure, health and the environment.

The House unanimously adopted the motion, expressing concern over the recurring flooding incidents and the growing risks posed by poorly maintained waterways and drainage channels.
The House mandated its Committee on the Federal Capital Territory and the Committee on Legislative Compliance to monitor implementation and ensure that the relevant authorities comply with the resolutions.

Advertisement

The latest intervention comes amid growing concerns over flooding and sanitation challenges in parts of Abuja, particularly during the rainy season when blocked drains often worsen traffic congestion, damage infrastructure and expose residents to health risks.

Continue Reading

News

G-60 Fires Back at Agbese, Insists No Signature Was Forged in Ugochinyere’s Minority Leader Bid

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…group claim CCTV footage show lawmaker signing endorsement document

By Gloria Ikibah

The G-60 Minority Caucus in the House of Representatives has dismissed allegations that signatures on the nomination document endorsing Rep. Ikenga Ugochinyere for the position of Minority Leader were forged, insisting that all lawmakers who signed the document did so voluntarily.

The group’s response comes barely hours after a dramatic session on the floor of the House in which Deputy House Spokesperson, Rep. Philip Agbese, alleged that his signature had been forged on a list endorsing Ugochinyere’s emergence as Minority Leader.

Advertisement

The dispute is the latest twist in the battle for the leadership of the minority caucus following the resignation of former Minority Leader, Rep. Kingsley Chinda.

In a statement signed by Rep. Mukhtar Umar and Rep. Seyi Sowunmi on behalf of the G-60 Minority Caucus, lawmakers maintained that the endorsement process was transparent and enjoyed overwhelming support among opposition members.

“There is no forgery or fake signature in the nomination of Hon. Ikenga Ugochinyere of the Action People’s Party (APP) for the position of Minority Leader.

“Contrary to claims made by the Deputy Spokesperson of the House, Hon. Philip Agbese at the plenary today, all signatures appended to the nomination document were voluntarily provided by the lawmakers concerned. Out of the 81 members that constitute the Minority Caucus, 61 lawmakers willingly signed in support of Hon. Ikenga Ugochinyere’s nomination to fill the vacancy created by the exit of Hon. Kingsley Chinda following his defection to the All Progressives Congress (APC) and his subsequent emergence as the party’s governorship candidate in Rivers State”, the caucus said.

Advertisement

The lawmakers directly challenged Agbese’s claim that his signature was forged, describing the allegation as inaccurate and misleading.

The group said the controversy should not be allowed to undermine what it described as a democratic and transparent process carried out by members of the opposition caucus.

According to the caucus, “We note with concern the allegation by Hon. Philip Agbese that his signature was forged on the endorsement list. This claim is false and misleading. To establish the facts and dispel any misinformation, video evidence exists showing Hon. Agbese personally signing the nomination document and it will be sent out with this statement in the interest of transparency and accountability.

“We remain committed to due process, unity, and the collective interest of opposition lawmakers in the House of Representatives. Attempts to discredit a transparent and democratic process through unfounded allegations should be discouraged. We urge members of the public and the media to disregard claims of forgery and rely on verifiable facts regarding the nomination process.”

Advertisement

The latest development is expected to intensify the ongoing contest over the leadership of the minority bloc, with the House leadership already moving to engage opposition lawmakers in consultations aimed at resolving the dispute.

At the centre of the controversy is Ugochinyere’s claim that 61 of the 81 minority lawmakers have endorsed his nomination for Minority Leader, a development that has exposed deep divisions within the opposition caucus and triggered competing claims over the legitimacy of the process.

With both sides standing firmly by their positions and fresh evidence now being cited by the G-60 group, attention is likely to shift to any formal investigation by the House leadership into the allegations and counter-allegations surrounding the minority leadership contest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News