Economy
NAICOM: No going back on 2026 recapitalisation deadline
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/NAICOM.jpg&description=NAICOM: No going back on 2026 recapitalisation deadline', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/NAICOM.jpg&description=NAICOM: No going back on 2026 recapitalisation deadline', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
The National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) has ruled out any possibility of extending the recapitalisation deadline for operators in the Nigerian insurance industry.
The insurance regulator is insisting that the timeline is rooted in law and cannot be shifted without a fresh legislative process.
The Deputy Commissioner for Insurance (Technical), Dr. Usman Jankara, who represented the Commissioner for Insurance and Chief Executive of NAICOM, Mr. Olusegun Omosehin, disclosed this during a seminar for reporters on the NIIRA 2025 framework in Abuja.
According to Dr. Jankara, the deadline is a statutory provision and not an administrative target that can be adjusted at will.
He stated that any attempt to alter the date would require going back to the National Assembly, securing an amendment to the Act, and obtaining presidential assent.
He said: “NAICOM does not intend to pursue extension. The deadline date is 30 July 2026.”
He explained that the Commission is confident that serious industry players will meet the statutory capital thresholds within the stipulated timeframe, adding that NAICOM expects a stronger, better-governed and more financially robust insurance sector after the recapitalisation exercise is concluded.
The minimum capital requirement now stands at N15 billion for non-life insurers, N10 billion for life insurance companies and N35 billion for reinsurance firms. Dr. Jankara described these figures as the basic operating benchmarks that every insurance entity must meet in order to operate in the market.
He noted that the new capital regime became necessary because inflation and the sharp depreciation of the naira had weakened the real value of the previous capital thresholds.
Jankara recalled that capital bases of N2 billion to N5 billion that appeared substantial during the last recapitalisation exercise are now comparatively insignificant in dollar terms.
He explained that the new capital programme is aimed at strengthening market stability, phasing out weak and marginal operators, encouraging mergers where necessary, and improving the ability of insurers to meet policyholder obligations.
“What we are going to see after this exercise are stronger, better-capitalised and more reliable insurers,” he said.
Providing an update on implementation, Dr. Jankara stated that the recapitalisation programme is already in full motion. An in-house recapitalisation committee has been set up within the Commission, guidelines on the new capital requirements have been issued, and companies are required to submit recapitalisation plans to NAICOM. He added that operators are also expected to provide monthly updates on the progress of these plans.
He explained that the current stage of the exercise is verification of claims by companies that assert they have met the new capital thresholds.
To ensure credibility and transparency, NAICOM has engaged the Big Four global auditing firms — KPMG, Deloitte, EY and PwC — to serve as external verifiers.
These firms are visiting companies, reviewing assets and investments, and authenticating capital positions, after which NAICOM carries out a secondary validation of their reports.
He stressed that, as of now, no company has been officially confirmed compliant. “Whether you are big or small, every operator must pass through the same compliance scanner,” he said.
Dr. Jankara also spoke extensively on the Insurance Policyholders Protection Fund (IPPF), which he described as a safety net created to protect policyholders in the event of the insolvency of an insurance company.
He said the fund operates in a similar manner to the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) in the banking sector, but with broader coverage, because it can intervene even when a company is still operating but in financial distress — thereby performing a dual function comparable to both NDIC and AMCON.
Jankara explained that any financial support granted to troubled insurers from the fund will be treated as a loan that must be repaid, while claims settled through the fund may be recovered from the liquidation proceeds of failed companies. “The fund is self-funding, has a governance committee, and has a sustainability mechanism,” he said.
On funding, he stated that insurance companies will contribute 0.25 per cent of their gross premium income annually to the fund, and contributions will accumulate over time.
Once the fund reaches 25 per cent of the industry’s gross premium, further contributions will be suspended until growth in industry premium resumes. He added that, where insolvency pressures exceed available funds, NAICOM is empowered to request additional contributions from insurers.
He stressed that the fund belongs to the industry and is not a NAICOM-controlled pool, noting that NAICOM is only a member of the management committee.
According to him, operators have largely accepted the levy because of its stabilising role and its capacity to restore confidence among policyholders.
He said the introduction of the fund is expected to address long-standing public mistrust arising from past instances where failed companies could not meet their obligations, thereby damaging the image of the sector.
“This mechanism will improve trust in insurance participation and give Nigerians greater assurance that their interests will be protected,” he stated.
On claims settlement obligations under NIIRA, Dr. Jankara explained that Section 210 of the Act provides clear penalties for failure or undue delay in the payment of legitimate claims.
These include fines payable to the regulator and the application of compound interest on delayed claims, calculated monthly at prevailing bank rates, on the outstanding amount due to policyholders.
He said this provision is designed to discourage unnecessary delays and to compel operators to treat claims settlement as a core responsibility.
The NAICOM executive also addressed the new sanctions regime for regulatory infractions, noting that the former Insurance Act prescribed fixed penalties that did not reflect the magnitude or financial gains associated with certain breaches.
The NIIRA framework, he said, introduces a more flexible and proportionate system that allows NAICOM to impose sanctions based on the severity of an infraction.
He explained that the Commission now applies the principle of disgorgement, which ensures that any financial benefit obtained through non-compliance is fully recovered, in addition to the imposition of further penalties to deter recurrence.
Jankara added that penalties affecting members of the public are expressly stated in the law, while those relating to regulated entities are determined in line with risk exposure and the gravity of the offence.
The Deputy Commissioner for Insurance expressed confidence that the recapitalisation drive and the protection mechanisms under NIIRA will collectively produce a stronger insurance sector that is better positioned to meet obligations, expand coverage and rebuild public trust in the Nigerian insurance industry.
Economy
IMF questions Nigeria’s $5bn borrowing structure
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has raised concerns over Nigeria’s plan to secure up to $5 billion in external financing through a derivatives-based arrangement with the First Abu Dhabi Bank in the United Arab Emirates.
The warning was issued by Christian Ebeke, the IMF’s resident representative in Nigeria, who told journalists that such financial structures are often complex and lack transparency in their terms.
According to him, similar transactions in other countries have raised red flags due to limited disclosure and difficulty in fully assessing the obligations involved.
“Our view is that the transaction in these types of structures carry risks. Usually they are opaque, so the terms are not always very transparent when we reviewed these instruments across countries,” Ebeke said.
He advised that Nigeria consider more conventional funding options, including Eurobonds or concessional loans, which he said tend to offer clearer terms and lower risk exposure for sovereign borrowers.
The development comes as Nigeria continues to ramp up external borrowing to finance its fiscal needs and infrastructure plans. On March 31, the National Assembly approved President Bola Tinubu’s request for $6 billion in external loans.
As part of the approval process, the president specifically sought backing for a structured Total Return Swap (TRS) arrangement of up to $5 billion with First Abu Dhabi Bank.
The federal government has argued that the funds would support budget implementation, infrastructure development, and the refinancing of more expensive domestic and external debts.
However, the IMF’s comments add to ongoing global scrutiny of complex sovereign financing arrangements, particularly those involving derivatives-based instruments that can obscure the true cost of borrowing.
Nigeria’s public debt stock currently stands at about $110.3 billion (approximately N159.2 trillion as of December 2025), underscoring concerns about debt sustainability as new borrowing plans expand.
Economy
OPEC+ approves fourth oil output increase since Hormuz closure
The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, also known as OPEC+, has approved the fourth oil output increase since the Hormuz closure crisis.
The decision followed renewed commitments by Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman to support market stability.
In a statement issued at the weekend, OPEC stated: “The seven OPEC+ countries, which previously announced additional voluntary adjustments in April and November 2023, namely Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman, met virtually on June 7, 2026, to review global market conditions and outlook.
“In their collective commitment to support oil market stability, the seven participating countries decided to implement a production adjustment of 188,000 barrels per day from the additional voluntary adjustments announced in April 2023.
“This adjustment will be implemented in July 2026. The additional voluntary adjustments announced in April 2023 may be returned in part or in full, subject to evolving market conditions and in a gradual manner.
“The countries will continue to closely monitor and assess market conditions and, in their continuous efforts to support market stability, reaffirmed the importance of adopting a cautious approach and retaining full flexibility to increase, pause or reverse the phase-out of the voluntary production adjustments, including reversing the previously implemented voluntary adjustments announced in November 2023.
“The seven OPEC+ countries also noted that this measure will provide an opportunity for the participating countries to accelerate their compensation.
“The seven countries reiterated their collective commitment to achieving full conformity with the Declaration of Cooperation, including the voluntary production adjustments, which will be monitored by the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee (JMMC).
“They also confirmed their intention to fully compensate for any overproduced volumes since January 2024. The compensation period will be extended until the end of December 2026.”
It added: “The seven OPEC+ countries will hold monthly meetings to review market conditions, conformity and compensation. The seven countries will meet on July 5, 2026.”
Economy
Naira depreciates to N1,397/$ in parallel market
The naira on Friday depreciated to N1,397 per dollar in the parallel market from N1,390 per dollar on Thursday.
Likewise, the naira depreciated to N1,365 per dollar in the Nigerian Foreign Exchange Market, NFEM.
Data from the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, showed that the indicative exchange rate for the market rose to N1,365 per dollar from N1,359.75 per dollar on Thursday, reflecting N5.25 depreciation for the naira.
Consequently, the margin between the parallel and official markets widened to N32 per dollar from N30.25 per dollar on Thursday.
The turnover in the interbank foreign exchange market recorded its fourth daily decline by 42.5 per cent to $73.6 million from $128.2 million on Thursday.
This week, the naira strengthened by N1 per dollar in the official market, with turnover in the interbank foreign exchange market climbing to N683.2 million, representing a 76.7 per cent rise compared to N386.54 million recorded the previous week.
However, the local currency weakened in the parallel by N2 against the greenback.
-
News14 hours agoSenate Orders Kyari’s Arrest Over Alleged ₦210 Trn NNPCL Financial Infractions
-
News18 hours agoKano Screens 720 Couples for State-Sponsored Mass Wedding Programme
-
News18 hours agoEx-NNPCL Boss Kyari Challenges Senate Over Arrest Warrant, N210trillion Probe, Cites Medical Trip Abroad
-
News18 hours agoAlleged N2bn scam: EFCC tells Court how Sirika hired Ethiopian Airlines aircraft for three-day exhibition
-
News18 hours agoPastor Kumuyi Explains Why None of His Sons Will Inherit Deeper Life Church
-
News18 hours agoNationwide protest to begin on Democracy Day as insecurity continue to escalate
-
Economy17 hours agoIMF questions Nigeria’s $5bn borrowing structure
-
News17 hours ago2027: INEC restores 22 State constituencies in kogi, Benue, Delta, Jigawa
