Connect with us

News

RIVERS CRISIS: Reps Mandate Sole Administrator to Report to NASS, Not FEC

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

 

…review, approve state of emergency
By Gloria Ikibah

A total of 243 members of the House of Representatives have endorsed President Bola Tinubu’s request for a state of emergency in Rivers State. As part of the decision, Governor Similayi Fubara, his deputy, and the state assembly have been suspended, while a sole administrator has been appointed for an initial six-month period.

The lawmakers emphasised that the appointed sole administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas, will report directly to the National Assembly rather than the Federal Executive Council.

The approval followed a voice vote during Thursday plenary session, conducted in line with House Standing Order 1, 2 (1), which outlines that members may vote via voice, signature in a register, or electronic voting.

Advertisement

Naijablitznews.com reports that the House, upon resumption of plenary, went into an executive session to deliberate on the government’s official gazette declaring the emergency in Rivers State.

According to Order 16 (3) of the House Standing Rules, the Speaker is required to brief members on the circumstances leading to the emergency declaration and provide necessary documents. Following this briefing, Speaker Tajudeen Abbas read the President’s letter on the House floor, after which it swiftly passed the first and second readings.

During a session of the Committee of the Whole, the House made three key recommendations:

  1. A national reconciliation committee should be established to restore peace in Rivers State.
  2. The National Assembly should assume legislative functions of the Rivers State Assembly for the duration of the emergency.
  3. The President retains the discretion to lift the emergency at any point within the six-month period.

Leading the debate, House Leader Julius Ihonvbere criticized South-South leaders for failing to intervene early in the crisis. He argued that their inaction contributed to the situation’s escalation, stressing that lawmakers must prioritize stability in the region.

Ihonvbere also defended the President’s decision, stating that the intervention aims to create a framework for Rivers State’s progress while safeguarding the interests of its people.

Advertisement
He said: “We stand on the precipice of history.There is no doubting the fact that we have our definitions of democracy, of social, state of emergency.
“We have our own biases, I have mine. But on this issue, let us all step on the precipice and assist them to have a better population. let’s begin to work from the ground up to create the processes, the conversations, the negotiations that are necessary. To bring sustainable, credible, lasting, inclusive peace to Rivers state.
He called for constructive conversations and negotiations, encouraging fellow leaders to work towards sustainable and lasting peace.
“Let us all step on the precipice and assist them to have a better population.
Also speaking on the letter, former Deputy Speaker of the House, Idris Wase said “if I am to speak my mind, I am not going to disobey this very, very decisive decision. I want to believe that Nigeria must move forward.
Rep. Fredrick Agbedi, member representing Sagbaama/Ekeremor federal constituency of Bayelsa State, urged the speaker to announce the number present to  form a quorum and ensure that the proceedings be carried out with integrity according to the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended.
“Our constitution has prescribed what and what to do. It is in the integrity and interest of this house, Mr. Speaker, for you to announce the quorum as we are sitting.So that Nigerians will know that we are not circumventing the constitution.
“So Mr. Speaker, honorable colleagues, this is not about either supporting or opposing what Mr. President has said. But because of your impeccable leadership, the kind of leadership you have given to us in this house, and the kind of leadership that Nigerians have come to believe in, Mr. Speaker, it is good enough and I urge you that we comply strictly with the constitution by first transparently announcing the quorum as it is now for us to go into this debate”, he said.
In response to their request, the Speaker, Rep Tajudeen Abbas who presided over plenary insisted that there was an attendance register which will be used to determine number of members present on the floor.
Former Deputy Speaker, Rep. Idris Wase, encouraged members to support the request.
“If I am to speak my mind, I am not going to disobey this very, very decisive decision. I want to believe that Nigeria must move forward.We are not yet at the point of voting. So the point of voting, we are already being raised, but we get to the point of voting. That’s the way it was made”.
Speaking also Rep. Philip Agbese,(APC- Benue) noted that the ongoing crisis in River State, acknowledging that the declaration of a state of emergency was necessary.
He noted that the Nigerian parliament has a history of providing solutions to national challenges, particularly during times of crisis.
 Agbese therefore recommended the that a national committee comprising executive members, parliamentarians, and eminent leaders be constitution to ensure peace and prevent future conflict in the state.
He said “One of our major achievements in this house has always been to provide solutions to problems as far as the continent is concerned. We are all aware of the challenges that face us today, the state of our democracy, and we are here as a people, as representatives of Nigerians, to provide solutions and ensure that our democracy works.
“Recommendations made in the proclamation by Mr. President that in the wake of this house, that we play with it in a way and manner that will help to build our democracy and make Nigeria a better place.
“My recommendation is that, as we have seen in time past, when this country was at a point of crisis, when national committees were settled, and we have also seen in time past even when there was no constitutional provision, the doctrine of decency was invoked to give life back to the country.
“It is in that way that he says that the emergency has been declared in the state, not because Mr. President hates any of the groups involved, but because Mr. President wants something better for our country. So,  I want to recommend that a national committee be settled to comprise of the executive, members of the parliament, and eminent leaders, like we have seen in the past”, he stated.
Rep. Etanabene Benedict, member representing Okpe/Sapele federal constituency, stated that the ultimate goal must be to restore peace in Rivers State. He supported President Tinubu’s decision, but expressed concerns over certain constitutional provisions.
He said: “Section 305 of the Constitution cannot be read in isolation of Section 11, subsection 4, he argued that the sole administrator appointed in River State should report to the National Assembly rather than the Federal Executive Council.
“The ultimate goal is to have peace in River State.We must embrace that idea of the government and indeed as pushed forward by Mr. President. However, Section 305 of the Constitution of the United States I do not want to go into academic debates on what Section 305 is about.
“However, Section 305 cannot be read in isolation of Section 11, subsection 4 of the Constitution. And that deals with, if you permit me to read, that at any time when any House of Assembly of a State is unable to perform its function, by reason of the situation prevailing in that State, the National Assembly may make such laws for the peace, order and good government of that State with respect to matters in which a House of Assembly may make laws as may appear to the National Assembly on and on.
“But the bottom line here is listen to Mr. President’s proclamation where he said that the sole administrator will be reporting to the Federal Executive Council. I disagree with that position and insist that the provision of Section 11.4 of the Constitution should take precedence over that”.
The lawmakers through a voice vote adopted and approved the requests and recommendations made.
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Obi drags former political acolyte Okonkwo to court over alleged defamatory bribery claims

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The presidential candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has started legal action against his former political acolyte and kinsman, Kenneth Okonkwo, over allegations that he and other party leaders collected bribes from aspirants seeking elective positions.

The lawsuit marks a significant escalation in the public fallout between the two political associates, whose relationship has deteriorated in recent months following disagreements over political developments and party affairs.Politics

According to court documents filed by Obi’s legal team, the former Anambra State governor is challenging a series of statements allegedly made by Okonkwo during a public broadcast, in which he accused Obi and leaders of the NDC in the South-East of demanding illicit payments from aspirants seeking tickets to contest for seats in the House of Representatives.

The suit, dated June 9, 2026, was filed by Chief Alex Ejesieme (SAN) of Alex Ejesieme (SAN) & Co. (Madiba Chambers), who described the allegations as false, malicious, and highly damaging to Obi’s reputation.

Advertisement

According to the legal filing, Okonkwo allegedly claimed that House of Representatives aspirants were required to pay an additional ₦10 million to party leaders after paying the official expression of interest and nomination fees.

The suit quoted Okonkwo as alleging that Obi and South-East leaders of the NDC informed aspirants that payment of the additional sum was necessary to secure consideration within the party.

Obi’s lawyers further stated that Okonkwo claimed documentary evidence existed to support the allegation and that receipts had allegedly been issued for the payments.

The actor-turned-politician was also accused of alleging that Obi personally compiled the list of party candidates from a hotel room and manipulated the candidate selection process.

Advertisement

Among other assertions attributed to Okonkwo were claims that Obi travelled abroad to collect money from individuals and that he, alongside other NDC leaders in the South-East, was involved in activities amounting to criminal conduct.

Obi Describes Allegations as False and Defamatory

In the legal action, Obi’s lawyers strongly rejected the allegations, insisting that the statements were entirely fabricated and intended to tarnish the former governor’s image.

The legal team argued that the claims portrayed their client as a dishonest political figure involved in bribery, extortion, fraud, and criminal conspiracy.

Advertisement

According to the suit, the statements were capable of exposing Obi to public hatred, ridicule, contempt, and distrust among members of society.

“The above statements, in their natural and ordinary meaning and by necessary implication, falsely and maliciously represent our client as a person who demands, solicits, organises and collects bribes; who extorts, defrauds and swindles political aspirants of their money; who is a fraudster, a scammer and a dishonest political actor,” the legal team stated.

The lawyers further argued that the allegations struck directly at Obi’s reputation as a public servant and political leader.

They described the remarks as reckless and unsupported by any credible evidence.

Advertisement

Concern Over Social Media Amplification

Obi’s legal representatives also expressed concern over the manner in which the statements were allegedly disseminated.

According to the law firm, the comments were made during a live television appearance before being widely circulated across social media platforms and online channels, thereby increasing their reach and potential impact.

The legal team maintained that while freedom of expression remains a constitutional right, it does not extend to publishing statements capable of damaging another person’s reputation without factual basis.

Advertisement

They argued that the remarks went beyond the limits of political criticism and fair comment.

“Your words were not mere political commentary. They crossed the permissible bounds of fair comment and constituted a direct assault on our client’s person, integrity, image and reputation,” the lawyers stated.

Obi Demands Retraction, Apology and Compensation

As part of the reliefs sought, Obi’s legal team is demanding that Okonkwo immediately withdraw the statements in their entirety and issue a public apology.

Advertisement

The proposed apology, according to the lawyers, must be clear, unconditional, and given the same level of prominence as the original allegations.

They further requested that the apology be published across all major social media platforms, including X, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.

In addition, the legal team is seeking a written undertaking from Okonkwo, committing him to refrain from making further defamatory statements against their client.

The suit also includes a demand for financial compensation for the alleged damage caused to Obi’s reputation and public standing.

Advertisement

The legal battle comes amid ongoing political realignments and public disagreements involving former allies within Nigeria’s opposition landscape, with the dispute expected to attract significant public and political attention in the coming weeks.

Continue Reading

News

NCC: Telecom operators to deploy 12,000 new sites as 75m subscribers get compensation

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

NCC moves to stop big telcos from crushing small players
The Nigerian Communications Commission, NCC, says mobile network operators will deploy over 12,000 new coverage and capacity sites nationwide, with more than 5,000 already completed, to improve service quality and expand infrastructure.

This was contained in a communiqué issued after the NCC’s 109th Board Meeting held on May 25, 2026, where the Governing Board reviewed sector developments and outlined regulatory priorities.

The commission said operators have also extended fibre connectivity to more than 700 sites, while colocation and infrastructure-sharing companies have upgraded equipment at over 2,000 Base Transceiver Stations, BTS, to strengthen network resilience and quality of service.

It noted that the ongoing expansion reflects the industry’s commitment to improving coverage, capacity, and customer experience nationwide.

Advertisement

–75m subscribers compensated–

In a major consumer protection move, the NCC revealed that more than 75 million subscribers have been compensated following its directive requiring operators to provide redress for poor quality of service in areas where standards were not met.

The commission described operators’ compliance level as substantial, adding that it is independently validating claims to ensure all eligible subscribers receive due compensation.

However, the NCC expressed concern over partial compliance by Tower Companies, TowerCos, with directives to reinvest regulatory fines into infrastructure upgrades through escrow accounts. It stressed that full compliance is needed for sustainable network improvements.

Advertisement

–Fibre growth, security challenges–

The commission also reviewed data consumption trends and noted that rising demand for broadband continues to pressure existing infrastructure.

Fibre-to-the-Home, FTTH, subscriptions rose from 84,141 in Q4 2025 to 210,065 by the end of the following quarter, reflecting growing adoption of fixed broadband.

The NCC said expanding fibre infrastructure remains critical to reducing pressure on mobile networks, lowering connectivity costs, and improving service quality.

Advertisement

The commission also raised concerns over persistent vandalism of telecom infrastructure despite its designation as Critical National Information Infrastructure, CNII. To address this, it said it is exploring a Communications Industry Security Trust Fund and stronger stakeholder collaboration.

The NCC reaffirmed its commitment to building a sustainable, resilient, and inclusive communications sector that supports Nigeria’s digital transformation and the federal government’s $1 trillion economy goal.

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu orders urgent diplomatic action to bring back 300 Nigerians jailed in Ethiopia after inmates die in custody

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has ordered immediate diplomatic action aimed at securing the return of hundreds of Nigerians currently serving prison sentences in Ethiopia, following growing concerns over their welfare and reports that several inmates have died while in custody.

The move is expected to pave the way for the transfer of nearly 300 Nigerian prisoners from Ethiopian correctional facilities to Nigeria, where they would complete the remainder of their jail terms under an international prisoner-transfer arrangement.

To facilitate the process, a high-powered Nigerian delegation comprising senior government officials is set to travel to Addis Ababa to finalise negotiations with Ethiopian authorities. Members of the delegation include the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, and the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi.

Presidency had disclosed that Tinubu directed the officials to expedite discussions and conclude a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Ethiopian government that would provide the legal framework for transferring the inmates to Nigeria.

Advertisement

The intervention comes amid mounting concerns over the conditions faced by Nigerian prisoners at Ethiopia’s Kaliti Prison, where many of the inmates are reportedly serving lengthy sentences for drug-related offences.
Government sources indicated that reports of deteriorating living conditions, inadequate healthcare services, and overcrowding within the prison facility played a major role in prompting the President’s decision.

According to available estimates, close to 300 Nigerians are currently incarcerated in Ethiopian prisons, with a significant number convicted for offences linked to narcotics trafficking. However, families, advocacy groups, and legal rights organisations have repeatedly expressed concerns over the treatment of the inmates, citing poor feeding conditions, limited access to medical attention, and overcrowded detention facilities.

The issue has remained a sensitive diplomatic matter between Nigeria and Ethiopia for years, attracting growing attention from civil society groups and concerned relatives.

Calls for government intervention intensified after reports emerged that several Nigerian inmates had died while serving their sentences. The deaths sparked renewed appeals for authorities to activate an inmate-transfer agreement that would allow the prisoners to complete their sentences closer to home.

Advertisement

Families of the affected inmates have argued that relocation to Nigeria would improve access to healthcare, family support, and rehabilitation opportunities.

The matter also attracted judicial attention after a Federal High Court in Abuja reportedly directed relevant government agencies to take steps toward facilitating the inmates’ return, citing humanitarian concerns surrounding their continued detention abroad.

Prior to Tinubu’s latest directive, Nigerian and Ethiopian officials had engaged in multiple rounds of discussions over the proposed transfer arrangement. Nigerian authorities maintained that necessary domestic procedures had largely been completed and that the process was awaiting final approvals from the Ethiopian government.

Diplomatic engagements reportedly continued throughout 2025, with both countries expressing willingness to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

Advertisement

Observers say the President’s latest intervention represents the most decisive effort yet to resolve the long-running issue and bring closure to concerns raised by families and advocacy groups.

If successfully concluded, the agreement would enable the affected prisoners to serve the remainder of their sentences in Nigerian correctional facilities while remaining subject to the terms of their original convictions.

Such prisoner-transfer arrangements are widely recognised under international law and are commonly used by countries seeking to promote rehabilitation, maintain family ties, and improve the welfare of convicted citizens serving sentences abroad.

Many of the Nigerians currently detained in Ethiopia were reportedly arrested while transiting through Addis Ababa’s international airport, one of Africa’s busiest aviation hubs. Although several were convicted on drug-trafficking charges, some advocacy groups continue to argue that certain individuals may have unknowingly been used as drug couriers and deserve further review of their cases.

Advertisement

The outcome of the planned negotiations in Addis Ababa is expected to determine when and how the transfer process will begin, offering hope to many inmates and their families who have long awaited a resolution to the issue.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News