Connect with us

News

UK to ban ninja swords amid knife crime ‘crisis’

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Francesca Hangeior

Possessing a ninja sword is to be banned in the United Kingdom and carry a penalty of up to six months in jail, the British government said on Thursday.

According to the UK government, the development is in a bid to curb what it has called a “national” knife crime “crisis”.

The Home Office said most ninja swords had a blade of between 14 and 24 inches (36 and 61 centimetres), with one straight cutting edge and a tanto style — or sharply-angled — tip.

Advertisement

From August 1, anyone caught in possession of a ninja sword in private could face six months in prison. That is set to rise to two years under forthcoming legislation.

There is already a penalty of up to four years in prison for carrying any weapon in public.

The ninja sword ban is the final part of the so-called Ronan’s law, a raft of anti-knife crime measures introduced in parliament last month as part of the government’s crime and policing bill.

The measures include making retailers report bulk or suspicious sales to police and a rise in jail terms to two years for selling weapons to children.

Advertisement

The law is named after teenager Ronan Kanda, who was murdered with a ninja sword in 2022 by two other teenagers in a case of mistaken identity.

“Knife crime is destroying young lives as too many teenagers are being drawn into violence and it is far too easy for them to get hold of dangerous weapons,” Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said.

“Ronan Kanda was just 16 when he was ruthlessly killed by two boys only a year older than him.

“Today we are introducing the final part of Ronan’s law in his memory — banning the ninja swords that his killers should never have been able to use,” she added.

Advertisement

The ninja sword move follows a ban on “zombie” type knives and machetes introduced in September 2024.

Under that measure, knives with a blade more than eight inches long and those with a serrated cutting edge, which are often used by gangs, were banned.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has called knife crime a “national crisis”.

Ahead of the ninja sword ban there will be a month-long surrender scheme in July, the Home Office said.

Advertisement

Knife crime in England and Wales has been steadily rising since 2011, according to official government data.

Excluding the northern city of Manchester, in the year ending June 2024, there were 50,973 offences involving a sharp instrument compared to 36,000 in the year ending March 2011 — a 41-percent increase.

Figures for national deaths from stabbings are hard to find. But 10 teenagers died in stabbings in London last year and 18 in 2023, the Metropolitan Police said.
 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Deregistration crisis: NDC files appeal, moves to serve INEC

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Nigerian Democratic Congress on Monday confirmed that it had filed a notice of appeal against the Federal High Court judgment that set aside its registration, assuring members and supporters that the party remained legally recognised and would soon serve the Independent National Electoral Commission with the court processes.

The National Publicity Secretary of the party, Osa Director, disclosed this in an exclusive interview with The PUNCH, saying the party’s legal team successfully filed the appeal at the Court of Appeal in Lokoja, Kogi State.

“Yes, we succeeded in filing the appeal today. We are going to serve INEC very soon. Our legal team was in Lokoja, Kogi State, today,” he said.

Director dismissed reports suggesting that the party had been deregistered, insisting there was no cause for alarm.

Advertisement

“We are not in panic mode. Our candidates need not fear. The NDC is a registered party. This is still reflected on the portal of INEC,” he stated.

He also faulted media reports on the court judgment, arguing that the suit merely challenged the party’s logo and not its existence as a political party.

“The narrative in the media is not even right. The group only challenged the use of our logo in court. That does not mean we are deregistered.

“That is why we are thanking our members, supporters and Nigerians for their understanding and solidarity,” he added.

Advertisement

The appeal follows days of emergency strategy meetings involving the party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi; his running mate, Dr Rabiu Kwankwaso; NDC National Leader, Seriake Dickson, members of the National Working Committee and other key stakeholders.

A senior party official had earlier told The PUNCH that the leadership held marathon meetings over the weekend to fine-tune its legal strategy before approaching the Court of Appeal.

The development comes after the Federal High Court in Lokoja set aside its earlier judgment directing INEC to register the NDC, a decision the party has described as a legal setback it is determined to overturn.

The party has maintained that the judgment does not amount to its deregistration and has reassured its candidates and supporters that it remains a legally recognised political platform pending the outcome of the appeal.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

2027 Polls: Court orders INEC to register, grant access code to ADA wiithin 72 hours

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to register the All Democratic Alliance (ADA) as a political party.

The court, in a judgment delivered by Justice Peter Lifu, equally ordered the electoral body to release its access code to the Akin Ricketts-led leadership of the association within 72 hours.

It will be recalled that INEC had, in October 2025, revealed that ADA was among 14 pre-qualified associations that applied to be registered as political parties, having completed the upload of all required information and documentation.

Though the commission okayed the association and seven others for the next stage of the registration process, ADA approached the court alleging that its access code was wrongly released to one Umar Ardo, who is neither its Pro-tem National Chairman nor its Secretary.

Advertisement

It urged the court to compel INEC to issue to the plaintiff the access code to enable the association to upload the necessary information and documents for the registration of ADA as a political party.

The association also prayed the court to declare that INEC was in violation of the extant laws when it issued the access code to the second defendant, Ardo.

More so, the plaintiff urged the court to declare that the information uploaded onto INEC’s portal by the wrong person — Ardo — on behalf of ADA was in violation of the extant laws, as it was at variance with the information in the plaintiff’s letter of intent, and should therefore be declared illegal, unlawful, null and void and of no effect.

The plaintiff asked the court to order INEC to register its association as a political party and to issue a certificate of registration to it, as well as an order directing INEC to extend the deadlines of May 10, 2026, and May 30, 2026, for the submission of its digital register of members and the submission of candidates, respectively, to the electoral body.

Advertisement

While granting the reliefs, Justice Lifu faulted INEC for releasing its access code to Ardo, declaring the action illegal, wrongful, null and void.

He ordered INEC to open its portal for a period of one week to enable the plaintiff to upload necessary documents, including its membership register, as required by law.

Justice Lifu nullified all actions previously taken on behalf of the association by Ardo.

Although the plaintiff, Ricketts, requested 96 hours for INEC to generate and hand him the access code, Justice Lifu granted only 72 hours.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Student loan refunds: NELFUND moves against defaulting institutions

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Nigerian Education Loan Fund has moved against tertiary institutions accused of withholding refunds due to students under the Federal Government’s student loan scheme, warning that it is engaging affected schools and relevant authorities to ensure compliance.

NELFUND, in a public notice issued on Monday, also condemned reports of arbitrary increases in tuition and other institutional charges, describing such practices as contrary to the objectives of the student loan programme.

NELFUND said some institutions had delayed or outrightly refused to refund students who had paid their tuition before the Fund subsequently disbursed the same fees to the schools on their behalf.

“The Nigerian Education Loan Fund has noted with concern reports of some tertiary institutions delaying or refusing to refund students whose tuition fees had already been paid before NELFUND disbursements, as well as arbitrary increases in tuition and other institutional charges,” the statement read.

Advertisement

It said the Student Loan Scheme was designed to remove financial barriers to higher education and should not become an avenue for placing additional financial burdens on students.

“The Student Loan Scheme, an initiative of the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, was established to remove financial barriers to higher education, not to create additional burdens for Nigerian students,” the Fund stated.

To address the issue, NELFUND said it had commenced engagements with the affected institutions and relevant authorities to ensure that eligible students receive their refunds and that institutional charges remain fair and transparent.

“NELFUND is engaging the affected institutions and relevant authorities to ensure that due refunds are made to eligible students and that institutional charges remain fair, transparent, and consistent with the objectives of the Scheme,” it said.

Advertisement

The Fund reiterated its commitment to protecting students and preserving public confidence in what it described as a landmark national intervention.

“NELFUND remains committed to protecting the interests of students and preserving the integrity of this landmark national intervention,” the statement added.

The latest intervention follows growing complaints by beneficiaries of the student loan scheme that some tertiary institutions have failed to refund tuition fees they paid before NELFUND settled the same obligations directly with the schools.

Students have also raised concerns over delays in processing the refunds, despite confirmations that the institutions had received payments from the Fund.

Advertisement

The student loan scheme, a flagship education financing initiative of President Bola Tinubu’s administration, was introduced to improve access to higher education by providing interest-free loans to eligible students in public tertiary institutions.

Under the programme, NELFUND pays tuition directly to institutions while approved upkeep allowances are paid into beneficiaries’ bank accounts.

Since disbursements began, the Fund has consistently warned institutions that students who paid their fees before NELFUND’s intervention are entitled to full refunds once the Fund remits the tuition on their behalf.

Monday’s notice signals a tougher enforcement stance by the agency as it seeks to prevent abuses that could undermine confidence in the programme.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News