Connect with us

News

Stakeholders Divided Over Plan For New Oil Decommissioning Body, Point To Existing System

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
By Gloria Ikibah 
 
Industry players in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector have expressed reservations about a proposal to create a new regulatory body focused solely on the decommissioning and abandonment of oil production sites. 
 
The stakeholders maintain that the current agencies are sufficiently capable of handling these responsibilities.

At an interactive session of lawmakers and key players in the sector, representatives from the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) and other stakeholders emphasised that establishing another commission would lead to overlapping duties and increased bureaucratic complexity.

The session, led by Chairman House Committee on Petroleum Resources Upstream, Rep. Alhassan Ado Doguwa, included participants from the Ministry of Petroleum Resources (MPR), Ministry of Environment (FME), NUPRC, National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA), and the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA).

In his opening remarks, Doguwa underscored the significance of the proposed commission, describing the NC-DOGI Bill as a “landmark legislative proposal aimed at establishing a dedicated commission to coordinate all decommissioning efforts in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector.”
 
“This Bill is not just another legislative initiative—it is a leadership Bill.
 
“It is designed to ensure Nigeria meets globally accepted standards of decommissioning, while protecting host communities and the environment from the harmful effects of improper facility abandonment,” he said.
 
Despite the Chairman’s optimistic framing, the proposal faced strong opposition from industry regulators and stakeholders, who insisted that Nigeria already has an effective framework under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) and other regulatory instruments to handle decommissioning and abandonment.
 
The Director of Production and Development of the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), Mark Emmanuel argued that the obligations for decommissioning are embedded in current licensing frameworks and are strictly enforced under the supervision of the commission.
 
“The PIA under Sections 232 and 3 already makes elaborate arrangements for decommissioning and abandonment
 
“It is the legal obligation of the licensee or lessee to fund, plan, and carry out decommissioning at the end of an oil field’s life cycle. The funds set aside for this purpose are not government revenue but are controlled by the operators under the NUPRC’s supervision.”
 
He further cautioned that setting up a new agency would be premature and wasteful, noting that most oil fields in Nigeria are still productive and far from their decommissioning phase.
 
“If you create a standalone commission now, it will be idle for the foreseeable future. Unlike the North Sea, where decommissioning is active, Nigeria is still in a growth phase. More investments are being made to expand production, not shut it down,” he added.
 
The Director, environmental assessment department, Ministry of Environment Mrs Rofikat Odetoro, echoed the sentiments, warning against creating redundant structures. 
 
“This is already embedded in the Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) and current regulations. Instead of creating a new agency, let’s empower NOSDRA and the relevant existing institutions,” she said.
 
During the discussions, attention was drawn to the gap between official policies and the actual situation on the ground—especially in the Niger Delta, where local communities continue to bear the impact of pollution and damage caused by neglected oil facilities.

Rep. Doguwa wrapped up the session by stressing the committee’s dedication to making decisions that are both inclusive and well-informed.

“We will collect all documentary submissions and review every perspective. If these agencies do not return for further dialogue, we will go to the field and meet them there. Your guidance is crucial as we shape this legislative framework,” he noted.
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Court orders unconditional release of Okuama leaders

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Federal High Court sitting in Warri, Delta State, on Wednesday ordered the unconditional release of Prof. Arthur Ekpekpo and other detained leaders of Okuama community in Ughelli South Local Government Area.

Delivering judgment in a fundamental rights enforcement application, Justice Hyeladzira Nganjiwa granted the order while ruling on a motion filed on May 4, 2026.

The case, Suit No. FHC/WR/CS/42/2024: Prof. Arthur Ekpekpo & Ors v. Federal Government of Nigeria & Ors, also has July 13, 2026, fixed for continuation of hearing on the substantive matter.

The court had earlier ordered that the detained persons be produced before it, a directive which was reportedly not complied with by the military authorities.

Advertisement

Counsel to the applicants, Dr. Jonathan Ekperusi, appeared alongside Andrew Ubido, Esq., while Magdalene Irorere held brief for the 3rd and 5th respondents during the proceedings.

Following the ruling, members of the Okuama community expressed relief and joy over the court’s decision.

Victor Akemor, speaking on behalf of some community members, described the ruling as a welcome development.

“This is great news. Finally, we have reason to celebrate. The court is indeed the hope of the common man,” he said.

Advertisement

He also called on the Delta State Government to assist in facilitating the implementation of the court order and commended community leaders and legal representatives for their efforts.

The detained individuals, including Prof. Arthur Ekpekpo, President General of Ewu Kingdom; Chief Belvis Adogbo; Dennis Malaka; and Mabel Owhemu, have been in custody for nearly two years.

One of the detainees, Pa James Oghoroko, reportedly died while in detention.

The Okuama leaders were arrested by military personnel between August 18 and 19, 2024, following the killing of 17 soldiers near the community.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

FG, Ethiopia Finalise Deal To Transfer Over 100 Nigerian Prisoners

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

More than 100 Nigerians serving jail terms in Ethiopia may soon be transferred to Nigeria as both countries conclude arrangements for a prisoner transfer agreement.

Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, arrived in Addis Ababa for the signing of the pact alongside the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi.

The Nigerian delegation was received by Ethiopia’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and the country’s Chief of Protocol.

According to Odumegwu-Ojukwu, the agreement is scheduled to be signed on Wednesday.

Advertisement

She disclosed that four Nigerian inmates died during the lengthy process of negotiations, judicial reviews and ratification of the agreement.

“We cannot afford to lose any more precious lives. We are determined to bring home the living,” she stated in a post on her X handle.

The minister identified Kaliti Prison and Aba Samuel Prison as the facilities where the affected Nigerians are being held.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu described the agreement as a product of the longstanding relationship between Nigeria and Ethiopia, anchored on humanitarian considerations, justice and bilateral cooperation.

Advertisement

She said that while the Nigerian government continues to urge its citizens abroad to obey the laws of their host countries and protect the nation’s image, it remains committed to ensuring that Nigerians facing legal challenges overseas are treated fairly and in accordance with established legal frameworks.

The minister added that the welfare and protection of Nigerians abroad remain a key priority of President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

She also expressed appreciation to the Ethiopian government for its cooperation in bringing the agreement to fruition.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

N33.8b fraud: Court summons ex-minister Mamman’s lawyer over alleged false claim

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

A Federal High Court in Abuja yesterday rescheduled further hearing for June 24 in the post-conviction proceedings being conducted in the N33.8 bilion case involving former Power Minister Saleh Mamman.

By the court’s schedule, a lawyer to Mamman, Mohammed Ahmed, is to appear to explain some aspects of an affidavit he filed, in which he made some allegations against the trial judge.

Yesterday’s adjournment was informed by the claim by another lawyer, Suleiman Yakubu that Ahmed was indisposed.

The court had on May 7 convicted Mamman on all 12-count charged on which he was prosecuted and sentenced him to 75 years imprisonment in absentia.

Advertisement

Upon an order for his arrest and production, the prosecuting agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) apprehended him somewhere in Kaduna and presented him before the court on May 26.

The court directed that he should be committed to the Kuje prison where he is must serve his sentence.

Also on May 26, the prosecution informed the court about its motion for the forfeiture of some recently discovered assets allegedly acquired unlawfully by Mamman.

But, before the application could be heard, lawyer to the defendant exited the court without the notice, a development that informed an adjournment till June 8.

Advertisement

The recently discovered assets, according to court documents filed by the EFCC, include: Walijam Apartments, located on No.43, Plot 435 Lobito Crescent, Wuse 2, Abuja and Bloom Luxury Suites Nigeria Limited, located at No 5, Amana Crescent, New Estate Unguwan Rimi, Kaduna State.

They include a mansion on No 11, Misratah Street, Wuse 2, Abuja; a mansion on No 13, Misratah Street, Wuse 2, Abuja and A.U.A. Plaza, situated on Plot 734, Kade Street, Wuse 2, Abuja.

On June 8, lawyer to the prosecution, Rotimi Oyedepo, (SAN) reminded the court that the business of the day for hearing of the prosecution’s motion for consequential order to forfeit some properties belonging to the convict (Mamman).

The trial judge, Justice James Omotosho drew Oyedepo’s attention to a counter affidavit filed for the defendant, but which was deposed to by his other lawyer,  Ahmed, who, in the affidavit, allegedly claimed that the judgment delivered on May 7 was done when the judge “became enraged.”

Advertisement

Oyedepo claimed not to have been served with the affidavit, following which Justice Omotosho ordered, who Yakubu, who appeared for Mamman, to give a copy to the prosecuting lawyer.

Justice Omotosho directed Ahmed, who deposed to the affidavit, should appear before his court on May 10 to provide explanation in relation to some of his averments in the affidavit he deposed to.

Ahmed was absent on May 10. Yakubu, who also appeared for the defendant, claimed Ahmed was ill.

Yakubu, who apologised for the manner he left the court on the previous date, claimed that Ahmed has been ill for some time, saying: “He has been coughing, and we don’t know if it is tuberculosis because the cough has defiled all drugs.”

Advertisement

He further claimed that Ahmed has gone to his village for treatment and urged the court to adjourn further hearing till the following week.

At that point, Justice Omotosho sought to know how Yakubu came to the conclusion that Ahmed suffered from tuberculosis.

Responding, Yabuku said it was because Ahmed had taken drugs and his ailments persisted, a response, that prompted prosecuting lawyer to express disappointment with the attitude of the defence lawyers.

Oyedepo said: “This is what we kept complaining about. We are counsel in the temple of justice my Lord. I don’t know when I started experiencing a bitter part of my colleagues in this matter.

Advertisement

“I don’t think this is proper. As it stands now, our motion is ripe for hearing.”

Oyedepo, who accused the defendant of deploying dilatory tactics, said: “these tactics will not work,” following which he agreed to an adjournment.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News