News
President Tinubu’s IDP Law ‘Puts Humanity First’ – Deputy Speaker
…as states set to follow suit
By Gloria Ikibah
The Deputy Speaker House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Benjamin Kalu, has hailed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for signing the Kampala Convention Domestication Act into law, calling it a decisive move to restore the dignity and rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs).
KKalu stated this in Abuja on Tuesday while receiving a delegation from the International Committee of the Red Cross, led by Doris El Doueihy, who were on a courtesy visit to commend Nigeria’s adoption of the convention.
The Deputy Speaker, who co-sponsored the bill alongside six lawmakers, also acknowledged the role played by the Attorney General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi, in steering the process to completion.
He stressed that the law would not stop at the federal level, revealing plans to ensure its domestication across all states for effective implementation.
Kalu said: “You can sign bills that have to do with electoral act, you will benefit from it. You can sign bills that have to do with maybe the environment, you benefit from it. But when you sign a bill that has to do with people who may not give you back anything, then it means that you are wearing the face of humanity in your leadership. And for that, I want to congratulate the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria for being selfless, for setting the right step forward for other African countries who are still sitting on the fence to hop in. And you know, they were waiting for us.
“I must thank the Attorney General of the Federation. I have thanked him privately, and I want to thank him publicly, because the President also pushed it to him to do his analysis of my proposition with regards to this domestication happening, and how healthy is it going to be for the country. And that is how the President operates. He doesn’t just put his signature on bills. He goes through the whole nine yards of scrutiny. And you need to read the wordings of the letter of the Attorney General of the Federation, who is a seasoned lawyer himself and his words brought me comfort that the nation is actually interested in the leadership that has a human face.”
According to Kalu, Nigeria’s move is likely to spur other African nations into action.
“Most African countries have been waiting for Nigeria to have a buy-in into this, and now that we have done that, I can assure you that a lot of African countries will come on board to embrace this shield.
“We have given a legal shield for the rights, for the dignity, for the welfare of these people, because they are persons, even though they are displaced, they are citizens, even though they are displaced. And so when you visit the camp and see what they go through, you begin to question. They didn’t bring this upon themselves. What is their protection? That was the reason for Kambala convention, and now that we have domesticated it, the law has become alive in our country for them to be protected in their rights, in their dignity and in their welfare.
“And when you talk about this, domestication is not going to end at the federal level. We are setting up mechanisms to make sure that the States will domesticate this particular convention in their various codified laws”.
He urged government institutions to back the law with real action, particularly through budgeting and oversight.
“But is it going to stop here? What next? The next is implementation. We don’t want the wordings of this particular domestication of this convention to be dead words on the shelves. I don’t want it to be something lying on the shelf. So we are going to give it wheels. It should be impact driven. So, one is to domesticate it. Another one is to give it wheels.
“And the parliament has what it takes through our oversight responsibility that is found in Section 88, 89 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, to ensure that we call the various agencies of government, refugee Commission, the Budget Office, Appropriation Committee of the Parliament, the Finance Ministry, to make sure that their budget reflects this domesticated convention in terms of its implementation, which will cover the needs analysis of the IDPs.
“If we have done the needs analysis of these camps, you will find out that they have health issues. They have early pregnancies, teenage pregnancies. They have insecurity problem”, he said.
Kalu also made clear that the long-term goal is to end displacement altogether, not merely manage it.
“It is not our intention to have the IDPs remain displaced persons forever, so there is a provision on how to also get them back home. We don’t want people to be in the IDP camps and stay there and have generation one, generation two, generation three. So, the ability also to make sure that we end whatever that has displaced them and reintroduce them back to their natural place of habitation, their native land is there. We have set up mechanism that will help us partner with the Executive to make sure that that happens”, he said.
Earlier, El Doueihy praised Nigeria’s progress, singling out Kalu’s role in pushing the legislation through.
“We are here to celebrate with you but we started celebrating a while ago. I have been in Nigeria over a year. This has been ongoing for years. Since I arrived I heard that you’re the main driver on the efforts to reach domestication. Thank you so much.
“Nigeria is on the right track and this is an example for other countries to follow and do the same.
Displacement is major problem any population is facing. We are here today on behalf of ICRC and the delegation of Nigeria to thank you for the great effort and reaching this great outcome of domestication of Kampala Convention”, she said.
Troops of the Joint Task Force North West, Operation FANSAN YAMMA, have rescued 31 abductees and neutralized two terrorists, including a suspected kingpin, during separate operations in Katsina and Kebbi states.
The military also arrested two suspected terrorists and recovered ammunition, a motorcycle, camouflage clothing and other items during the operations conducted on September 14 and 15, 2026.
The Media Information Officer of the Joint Task Force North West, Lieutenant Colonel Aliyu Danja, disclosed this in a statement issued on Wednesday, September 16.
According to the statement, troops in Katsina rescued 10 kidnap victims, comprising three males and seven females, after responding to distress reports from Unguwan Daudu and Unguwan Chibauna communities in Funtua Local Government Area.
The troops reportedly launched a hot pursuit of the fleeing terrorists and engaged them in a gun battle, forcing them to abandon the victims.
Among those rescued was an infant.
The victims were subsequently taken into military custody for necessary assistance and further action.
21 Victims Rescued in Kebbi
Also on September 14, troops operating in Kebbi State responded to a distress call following the abduction of civilians from Fafala Village in Kangiwa Local Government Area.
Acting on intelligence, the troops launched a fighting patrol towards Fafala and Dandikwa, where they reportedly engaged the terrorists in a heavy exchange of gunfire.
The terrorists were forced to withdraw from the area, allowing the troops to continue their operation and rescue 21 kidnapped victims.
The rescued civilians were later reunited with their families.
Terrorist Kingpin Killed in Katsina
The following day, September 15, troops in Katsina reportedly foiled an attempted terrorist attack on communities in Matazu and Kankara local government areas.
Acting on intelligence, the troops moved towards a suspected terrorist hideout and engaged the group with superior firepower.
The military said two terrorists were killed during the encounter, including Abbah Alhassan, whom it identified as a known terrorist kingpin.
Other terrorists reportedly escaped into the surrounding bush.
Troops recovered 10 rounds of ammunition, a motorcycle, a cutlass, camouflage clothing and suspected Indian hemp from the area.
Two Suspects Arrested
In another operation on September 15, troops arrested two suspected terrorists around the Yantumaki general area of Dan Musa Local Government Area of Katsina State.
Preliminary interrogation reportedly indicated that the suspects were associated with a suspected terrorist kingpin identified as Mannori.
The suspects remain in military custody while investigations continue.
The Joint Task Force said the operations demonstrate its continued efforts to rescue kidnapped civilians, disrupt terrorist networks and restrict the movement and operational freedom of armed groups across its area of responsibility.
The task force also commended residents for providing security-related information and urged members of the public to remain vigilant and promptly report suspicious movements and activities to the nearest security agency.
By Gloria Ikibah
The National Assembly has transmitted the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026 to the Houses of Assembly of the 36 states for consideration and approval.
The transmission, carried out on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, marks the next stage in the ongoing constitutional alteration process and was undertaken pursuant to a directive from the leadership of the National Assembly.
The Clerk to the National Assembly, Kamoru Ogunlana, Esq., said the Bill was transmitted to the state legislatures in compliance with the provisions of Section 9 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.
Under Section 9, a bill seeking to alter the Constitution cannot be passed by either chamber of the National Assembly unless it is approved by resolutions of not less than two-thirds of the Houses of Assembly of the 36 states.
The state legislatures are therefore required to consider the proposed constitutional amendments in accordance with their respective legislative procedures and communicate their resolutions to the National Assembly after completing their deliberations.
Although the Constitution does not stipulate a specific timeframe within which state Houses of Assembly must respond to a constitutional alteration bill, the National Assembly said the state legislatures are expected to communicate their decisions within 30 days of receiving the Bill.
The National Assembly, however, stressed that the 30-day period is an administrative timeframe and not a constitutional deadline.
According to the Clerk, the timeframe is intended to promote an orderly, coordinated and timely conclusion of the constitutional amendment process while respecting the constitutional independence of the state legislatures.
What the Constitution Requires
Nigeria’s Constitution sets a deliberately high threshold for constitutional amendments because changes to the country’s supreme law require approval beyond the National Assembly alone.
In addition to the required approval by at least two-thirds of the state Houses of Assembly, Section 9 prescribes other legislative requirements depending on the particular constitutional provisions being altered.
The process generally involves the introduction and passage of the alteration Bill by the National Assembly before it is transmitted to the state legislatures for consideration. The resolutions of the state assemblies are subsequently communicated to the National Assembly for the next stage of the process.
The requirement for state-level approval gives the 36 Houses of Assembly a constitutionally recognised role in determining whether proposed amendments can proceed.
The National Assembly said it recognises this responsibility and respects the independence of the state legislatures in considering the Bill.
National Assembly Seeks Coordinated Process
In the statement, the Clerk said the transmission was intended to facilitate the orderly discharge of the state assemblies’ constitutional responsibilities rather than interfere with their legislative processes.
“The National Assembly remains committed to ensuring that the constitutional alteration process is conducted in strict compliance with the Constitution,” the statement said.
It added that the process would be guided by due process, institutional cooperation and respect for the legislative responsibilities of all tiers of the legislature.
The National Assembly will await the resolutions of the 36 state Houses of Assembly before taking the subsequent steps required under the Constitution.
The transmission of the Sixth Alteration Bill comes amid continued efforts to amend aspects of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution, a process that requires cooperation between the federal and state legislatures because of the constitutional threshold for altering the nation’s supreme law.
The statement was signed by Kamoru Ogunlana, Esq., Clerk to the National Assembly.
News
REVEALED: 11 Nigerian-Born Lawyers Hit by U.S. Disciplinary Actions Over Professional Violations
At least 11 Nigerian-born lawyers practising or based in the United States have faced suspension or other disciplinary measures over alleged or established professional violations, according to disciplinary records cited in a report by The Peoples Gazette.
The cases span several years and involve different jurisdictions and regulatory bodies, including state bar authorities, U.S. immigration authorities and the Board of Immigration Appeals.
The disciplinary matters range from unauthorised practice of law and failure to meet professional obligations to alleged misrepresentation, neglect of clients’ cases and mishandling of client funds.
The sanctions are not identical, and the grounds for disciplinary action vary from one case to another. Some of the lawyers have also reportedly been reinstated, while others remain suspended or have not been reinstated.
Below is a summary of the lawyers and the disciplinary actions reported against them.
1. Aloysius O. Ejimakor
Aloysius O. Ejimakor was suspended from practising law in New York for nine months in 2004 following disciplinary proceedings over alleged false claims concerning his professional qualifications.
According to a U.S. Department of Justice document, the Office of General Counsel for the Executive Office for Immigration Review commenced proceedings against him in July 2003.
The proceedings alleged that Ejimakor violated federal regulations by making false statements concerning his qualifications.
The report states that he had not been reinstated following the suspension.
2. Abiola O. Adesioye
Abiola O. Adesioye, based in the District of Columbia, was suspended in July 2025 by the Board of Immigration Appeals from practising before the board, U.S. immigration courts and the Department of Homeland Security.
The suspension followed an order issued by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals on March 25, 2025.
According to the report, disciplinary counsel for the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the Department of Homeland Security jointly petitioned for her immediate suspension under applicable federal regulations.
The Board of Immigration Appeals granted the petition pending the final resolution of the disciplinary proceedings.
3. Emelike Nwosuocha
Emelike Nwosuocha, who died on July 21, 2024, aged 64, faced disciplinary proceedings before his death.
According to the report, he was posthumously suspended for three years in 2024 over professional misconduct.
The disciplinary matter included an alleged failure to provide an affidavit required under an earlier suspension and failure to pay attorney fees owed to a defendant in a medical negligence lawsuit.
In 2023, Nwosuocha had reportedly received a six-month suspension after failing to respond to a disciplinary grievance.
The relevant disciplinary authorities subsequently affirmed the suspension.
4. Michael Ozulumba
Michael Ozulumba, who is based in Massachusetts, was reportedly suspended from practising before the Internal Revenue Service and the Executive Office for Immigration Review for two years.
The reported disciplinary findings involved professional misconduct, neglect of client cases and misrepresentations.
However, the supplied material contains a reference to a 2027 board decision. Since that date is still in the future as of September 16, 2026, that portion requires independent verification and has therefore not been treated here as an established past event.
5. Michael Imevbore Ojo
Michael Imevbore Ojo, based in Houston, Texas, was suspended from practising law for 12 months by the Evidentiary Panel of the District 4C05 Grievance Committee of the State Bar of Texas.
The disciplinary action reportedly involved alleged violations of Texas professional conduct rules, including neglect, failure to communicate with clients and failure to cooperate with a State Bar investigation.
Troops rescue 31 abductees, neutralize terrorist kingpin in Katsina, Kebbi
NASS Transmits 2026 Constitution Amendment Bill to 36 State Assemblies
REVEALED: 11 Nigerian-Born Lawyers Hit by U.S. Disciplinary Actions Over Professional Violations
-
Metro18 hours agoNigerian Army Speaks of Possible Attacks on Churches, Schools
-
News18 hours agoSuspected Fulani Militias K!ll Christian Leader In Plateau
-
News15 hours agoPDP Warns APC Governors: ‘Ignore Wike at Your Own Peril’
-
News14 hours agoObi: Wike Was Happier, Healthier When We Worked Together
-
Economy18 hours agoNigeria’s inflation falls to 15.39% as food inflation slows – NBS
-
Opinion15 hours agoSurging Energy demands and challenges of Ai