Connect with us

News

Senate reverses controversial eligibility rule for presiding officers

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Senate yesterday rescinded controversial amendments to its Standing Orders relating to the election of its presiding officers, following mounting concerns over constitutional inconsistencies in the new provisions.

The Senate also passed for second reading a bill seeking to reform the handling of pre-election disputes by redefining the jurisdiction of courts in electoral matters, while separately approving the N2.285 trillion 2026 Federal Capital Territory (FCT) budget, with N1.741 trillion earmarked for capital projects aimed at accelerating infrastructure development in Abuja and satellite communities.

The reversal of the controversial amendments took place during plenary in the absence of Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, who reportedly arrived in the chamber after the motion had already been adopted.

The Senate had earlier amended its rules to provide that only senators who had served at least one four-year term would be eligible to contest for the offices of Senate President and Deputy Senate President.

Advertisement

The amended provision stated: “A Senator vying for the office of the President of the Senate and Deputy President of the Senate must have served at least one term of four (4) years in the Senate as a Senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

Another amendment had provided that senators could only participate in the election of presiding officers after being sworn in.

However, the Senate yesterday deleted the provisions after lawmakers raised concerns that they conflicted with the 1999 Constitution.

The motion for rescission was sponsored by Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, and seconded by Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe.

Advertisement

Presenting the motion, Bamidele said the amendments needed to be withdrawn to ensure conformity with constitutional provisions.

Citing Section 1(3) of the Constitution, he said: “If any other law is inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution, this Constitution shall prevail, and that other law, to the extent of its inconsistency, be void.”

He also referred to Section 52(1) of the Constitution, which allows lawmakers-elect to participate in the election of presiding officers before taking the oath of office.

“In other words, Mr President and distinguished colleagues, election of the officers will have to take place, as it had always been, before the swearing-in of senators,” he said.

Advertisement

The motion noted that the Senate Standing Orders had been amended on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, but that “upon further legislative and constitutional review, certain provisions introduced under Order 2(2) and Order 3(1) may give rise to constitutional inconsistencies and unintended tensions” with the Constitution.

It added that the Senate possessed the parliamentary authority to revisit and rescind previous decisions to preserve the integrity of its proceedings.

Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin, who presided over the session, put the motion to a voice vote without debate.

“I thank the Leader for being observant and up to the game as Leader of the Senate by making this observation. We don’t need any debate on this,” he said.

Advertisement

However, Senator Adams Oshiomhole raised a point of order, arguing that debate should have been allowed on the matter.

“So when we are making a law, we should accommodate diverse views. That way, what one person forgot, the other person will remember,” Oshiomhole said.

“The only point I want to make is that next time we should allow debate. That’s it.”

Responding, Bamidele defended the decision to dispense with debate, saying recent disagreements over the amendments had generated unnecessary controversy.

Advertisement

“Yesterday, I saw the kind of drama that went on. It was unnecessary,” he said.

“But the unfortunate thing about that drama was that, regardless of what was done in this hallowed chamber yesterday, what became the news out of this chamber was that unnecessary drama. And we are not going to allow this to continue.”

He added that any senator dissatisfied with previous decisions ought to bring a substantive motion before the chamber rather than disrupt proceedings.

“We cannot allow this kind of drama to go on in the Senate. We must put a stop to it,” Bamidele said.

Advertisement

Also, the Senate passed for second reading a bill seeking to amend the Electoral Act, 2026, with provisions aimed at redefining the jurisdiction of courts in pre-election disputes and streamlining the handling of electoral cases in the country.

The proposed legislation, sponsored by former Plateau State governor and Senator, Simon Bako Lalong, seeks to establish a clearer legal framework for the adjudication of electoral disputes and reduce conflicting court judgments, forum shopping and delays in litigation.

Under the bill, pre-election matters relating to National Assembly, governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections would originate at the Federal High Court, with appeals proceeding to the Court of Appeal.

Disputes involving presidential and vice-presidential elections, however, would commence directly at the Court of Appeal, which would exercise original jurisdiction, while final appeals would be determined by the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Leading debate on the bill during plenary, Lalong said the proposed amendment was designed to eliminate ambiguity in the existing legal framework, where overlapping interpretations of jurisdiction have resulted in conflicting judgments by courts of coordinate authority.

He said persistent uncertainty over jurisdiction in pre-election matters had contributed to delays, abuse of court processes and constitutional tensions within the judiciary.

According to him, although Section 285(14) of the 1999 Constitution recognises pre-election matters, inconsistencies in interpretation have continued to undermine efficiency in adjudication.

“Democracy thrives not merely on the conduct of elections, but also on the credibility, certainty and predictability of the legal processes that precede those elections,” he said.

Advertisement

Lalong explained that assigning original jurisdiction over presidential election disputes to the Court of Appeal would ensure faster resolution of sensitive national cases, while empowering the Federal High Court to handle other electoral disputes would promote specialisation and consistency.

The bill also seeks to curb the practice of filing multiple suits across different jurisdictions in search of favourable rulings, a trend lawmakers said has weakened public confidence in the electoral process.

It further proposes that no court should entertain pre-election matters outside the procedures outlined in the proposed new Section 29A of the Electoral Act.

Senators who supported the bill described it as timely and necessary for strengthening Nigeria’s democratic and judicial systems, noting that electoral disputes are time-sensitive and require prompt resolution to avoid constitutional uncertainty.

Advertisement

Following debate on its general principles, the Senate approved the bill for second reading, paving the way for further legislative consideration.

In another development, the Senate approved the N2.285 trillion 2026 Statutory Appropriation Bill for the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), with N1.741 trillion allocated to capital projects aimed at accelerating infrastructure development in Abuja and satellite communities.

The approval followed the adoption of the harmonised report of the Senate and House of Representatives Committees on the FCT during plenary.

Presenting the report on behalf of the Chairman of the Senate Committee on the FCT, Ibrahim Bomai, the committee’s Vice Chairman, Austin Akobundu, said the budget was based on a projected revenue framework of N2.385 trillion for the 2026 fiscal year.

Advertisement

According to him, N165.7 billion was allocated for personnel costs, N378.2 billion for overheads, while N1.741 trillion was earmarked for capital expenditure.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Perm Sec calls for stronger partnerships to advance Nigeria’s economic transformation

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Permanent Secretary, Special Duties, Federal Ministry of Finance, Mr. Mohammed Sanusi Danjuma, has called for deeper collaboration between government and professional institutions as Nigeria intensifies efforts to build a more resilient, competitive, and robust sustainable economy.

Speaking during a meeting with the leadership of the Nigerian Institute of Architects International Integrated Research for Development Conference Programmes (NIA IINFRADCO) in Abuja, Mr. Danjuma said the Federal Government recognises that achieving sustainable economic growth requires purposeful partnerships that harnesses professional expertise, innovation, and institutional capacity.

He noted that professional bodies have an important role to play in shaping policies, strengthening human capital, encouraging innovation, and supporting infrastructure development that delivers lasting value to Nigerians.

The Permanent Secretary described NIA IINFRADCO as a forward looking institution whose work in research, capacity development, and professional excellence aligns with the Federal Government’s drive to diversify the economy, improve productivity, and create opportunities for inclusive growth.

Advertisement

He stressed that the Ministry of Finance will continue to support meaningful engagement with institutions whose programmes contribute practical solutions to national development priorities.

Mr. Danjuma urged the Institute to sustain its commitment to innovation and professional development while strengthening collaboration with government and other stakeholders to unlock new opportunities for investment, enterprise, job creation, and sustainable infrastructure development.

He reaffirmed that strategic partnerships remain indispensable to building an economy that is stronger, more competitive, and better positioned to meet the aspirations of present and future generations.

Earlier, the Chairman of NIA IINFRADCO, Arc. M. B. Bello, said the Institute is committed to promoting professional excellence through research, capacity development, executive education, consultancy, and innovation to support sustainable national development.

Advertisement

He explained that the Institute seeks to bridge the gap between academic knowledge and professional practice while equipping architects and other built environment professionals with the skills needed to respond to emerging industry demands.

Adding that stronger collaboration between government, the private sector, academic institutions, and development partners is essential to achieving sustainable infrastructure and economic growth.

Arc. Bello noted that the Institute is positioning itself as a centre of excellence in architectural education, research, and professional development, with programmes focused on certification, policy advocacy, executive training, and consultancy to strengthen the built environment sector.

He expressed confidence that sustained collaboration with the Federal Government and other stakeholders would enhance innovation, improve infrastructure delivery, and contribute meaningfully to Nigeria’s long term economic development.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Sad: Ex-Nigerian Finance Minister, Ex-High Commissioner To UK, Alhaji Abubakar Alhaji Dies

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Ex- Nigerian Minister of Finance and Sardauna of Sokoto, Alhaji Abubakar Alhaji, has died at the age of 88.

According to Daily Trust, family sources confirmed that the elder statesman died on Thursday morning at a hospital in Abuja, Federal Capital Territory, after a brief illness.

Alhaji served as Minister of National Planning and later Minister of Finance during the military administration of General Ibrahim Babangida. In 1992, he was appointed Nigeria’s High Commissioner to the United Kingdom after leaving the Finance Ministry. He served in London until mid-1996, when the military government of General Sani Abacha replaced him with Ambassador Uche Okeke.

A direct descendant of Shehu Usmanu Danfodiyo, Alhaji began his public service career in 1964 as an Assistant Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Finance. By 1975, he had risen to the position of Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Trade before returning to the Ministry of Finance as Permanent Secretary in 1979.

Advertisement

As Permanent Secretary, he managed Nigeria’s relations with external creditors and served on the country’s negotiating team for the Lomé II Agreement. His reputation for administrative competence earned him appointment as Minister of State for Budget and Planning in 1988 under the Babangida administration.

He served as Minister of Finance between 1990 and 1991, a period marked by the implementation of structural adjustment policies and Nigeria’s engagement with international financial institutions.

Following his ministerial service, he represented Nigeria as High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, where he was widely regarded for his measured diplomatic approach.

Beyond public office, Alhaji held one of Northern Nigeria’s most prestigious traditional titles.

Advertisement

He was turbaned Sardauna of Sokoto in 1990, succeeding to the revered title once held by the late Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Premier of Northern Nigeria who was assassinated in 1966.

As Sardauna, he was regarded as a custodian of the values and heritage of the Sokoto Caliphate.

Continue Reading

News

Deregistration order: Judge Lifu’s conduct is a serious breach of judicial hierarchy-ADC Legal Adviser, Osunbor

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…confirms NJC has party’s petition already

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has said it has petitioned the National Judicial Council (NJC) against Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, over his handling of the suit in which he ordered the deregistration of the party and four others.

ADC National Legal Adviser and ex- Edo State Governor, Senator Oserheimen Osunbor, revealed this during an appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today on Wednesday, declaring that the judge’s conduct is a serious breach of judicial hierarchy.

“We had actually petitioned Justice Lifu to the NJC. We already have a petition against him, and we are pursuing it. This is even an additional reason for us to pursue it because it is incumbent on all of us to ensure that we have a sanitised judiciary in Nigeria,” Osunbor said.

Advertisement

The professor of law accused the judge of deliberately disregarding an order of the Court of Appeal directing him to stay proceedings in the matter.

“How flagrant can a violation be, more than what Lifu did? To say to the Court of Appeal, ‘Yes, I am aware; I have seen; I have received and acknowledged your stay of proceedings, but I will not obey it because you do not have any power to arrest my judgement.’ That is disturbing. For a lower court to completely disregard the order of a superior court is unprecedented. The rule of law thrives on obedience to court orders,” he added

Responding to questions about the possibility of further litigation, Osunbor expressed confidence that the Supreme Court would uphold the principle of obedience to court orders.

“The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that it will not tolerate the violation of court orders. No matter how perverse a court order may appear, it is not for anyone to disobey it. The court will come down very hard on anyone who violates a valid court order,” he said.
Osunbor also criticised recent moves to deregister opposition parties, noting that many Nigerians initially believed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) was working in concert with those seeking to weaken the opposition.

Advertisement

His remarks came a day after the Court of Appeal in Abuja nullified the Federal High Court judgement directing INEC to deregister the ADC, Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

In a unanimous judgement delivered on Tuesday, a three-member panel of the appellate court held that the June 15 decision of the Federal High Court was a nullity because it was founded on an incompetent suit filed by the National Forum of Former Legislators (NFFL), a body the court held lacked the legal capacity to institute the action.

Justice Abba Mohammed, who delivered the lead judgement, ruled that the trial court wrongly assumed jurisdiction and ignored evidence showing that the affected political parties had won elective positions in previous elections.

The appellate court also faulted Justice Lifu for proceeding with the case despite an earlier order directing him to stay proceedings pending the determination of an appeal.

Advertisement

The court described the trial judge’s action as “a form of judicial impertinence”, noting that the Supreme Court had previously held that a judge who disregards a superior court’s order could be considered “unfit for the bench”, describing such conduct as “judicial rascality.”

The appellate court consequently set aside the deregistration order, restored the legal status of the five political parties, and awarded costs against the NFFL, which had instituted the suit.

Justice Lifu had earlier ruled that the parties failed to satisfy the constitutional requirements for continued registration under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), citing their alleged poor electoral performance in the 2023 general elections and subsequent by-elections. He had also restrained INEC from recognising the parties or accepting candidates nominated by them for the 2027 general elections.
However, the Court of Appeal held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit and ruled that all the affected political parties remain duly registered.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News