Connect with us

News

ASUU faults Education Minister over implementation of signed agreement

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) on Monday warned that a fresh strike could be imminent in the nation’s university system over the alleged incomplete implementation of the December 2025 FG/ASUU agreement.

The warning was issued by the ASUU Abuja Zone at a press conference held at the Nasarawa State University, Keffi.

Speaking on behalf of the union, the Zonal Coordinator, Comrade Adamu Abdullahi, said ASUU disagreed with Education Minister that the agreement had been fully implemented.

The union insisted that several key provisions and outstanding welfare issues affecting lecturers remain unresolved.

Advertisement

The ASUU leader said that the momentum generated by the deal was already fading.

He said ASUU’s concerns were driven by what it described as the Federal Government’s failure to inaugurate the Implementation Monitoring Committee (IMC), which was expected to ensure proper execution of the agreement and shield it from bureaucratic delays.

According to him, the absence of the committee had resulted in what the union called “distorted implementation,” leaving universities to interpret and apply provisions of the agreement independently.

Abdullahi said: “It was only five months since the fanfare that accompanied the signing of the FG/ASUU agreement after a protracted negotiation spanning eight years.

Advertisement

“What has been witnessed so far is a distorted implementation of the agreement that is obviously anchored on a memorandum transmitted from the Honourable Minister of Education to Councils of Federal Universities in February 2026.”

He alleged that instead of a coordinated implementation framework, universities were now “picking and choosing” what to pay under various allowances, including the Consolidated Academic Tools Allowance (CATA), Earned Academic Allowance (EAA), and Professorial Allowance (PA), instead of integrating them properly into salary structures.

Abdullahi also expressed concern that some state governments, despite participating in the negotiation process, had allegedly failed to implement key aspects of the agreement in their universities.

Beyond implementation issues, he listed several outstanding welfare concerns affecting its members, including arrears of the 25–35 per cent salary award, promotion arrears, unpaid third-party deductions such as check-off dues and cooperative contributions, salary shortfalls linked to the Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System (IPPIS), and the withheld three-and-half months’ salaries arising from the 2022 industrial action.

Advertisement

Abdullahi criticised the continued application of the “no work, no pay” policy, describing it as unfair to academic staff.

“No country can progress when the welfare issues of academics are left unattended. Reducing scholars to menial workers whose livelihood is tied strictly to physical presence at work does not reflect the realities of academic work, where research and community service continue even during strike periods,” Abdullahi stated.

He added that affected lecturers had already made sacrifices by forfeiting leave periods to make up for lost academic time, noting that students affected by previous strikes had since graduated, while academic calendars had remained stable for three consecutive years.

Abdullahi also raised concerns over the welfare of retired lecturers, particularly in some state universities, where pension arrears were reportedly outstanding for years.

Advertisement

He also decried delays in pension harmonisation by the National Pension Commission (PenCom), as well as the absence of functional pension schemes in some institutions.

On university governance, Abdullahi condemned what he described as irregular appointments and administrative practices, alleging that some Vice Chancellors had introduced questionable titles such as “Professor of Practice” and “Diaspora Professors” without proper approval from university statutory bodies.

Abdullahi said such practices had opened the door to abuse, allowing individuals with questionable academic credentials to be absorbed into the system and, in some cases, rise to leadership positions.

He urged the Federal and State Governments to urgently address all outstanding issues in the agreement, warning that failure to do so could destabilise the university system.

Advertisement

“We strongly condemn the distorted or non-implementation of the December 2025 FG/ASUU Agreement by both Federal and State Governments.

“Government must urgently resolve all outstanding issues to avoid a breakdown of industrial harmony in our universities,”,” Abdullahi added.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Tinubu set to commission newly constructed Arterial Rd N5 Obafemi Awolowo Way today

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Today, June 10th 2026, President Tinubu will commission the newly constructed Arterial Road N5 (Obafemi Awolowo Way) from Life Camp Junction to RR III, Dape District section.

#FCTProjects2026
#RenewedHopeFCT

Continue Reading

News

Obi drags former political acolyte Okonkwo to court over alleged defamatory bribery claims

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The presidential candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has started legal action against his former political acolyte and kinsman, Kenneth Okonkwo, over allegations that he and other party leaders collected bribes from aspirants seeking elective positions.

The lawsuit marks a significant escalation in the public fallout between the two political associates, whose relationship has deteriorated in recent months following disagreements over political developments and party affairs.Politics

According to court documents filed by Obi’s legal team, the former Anambra State governor is challenging a series of statements allegedly made by Okonkwo during a public broadcast, in which he accused Obi and leaders of the NDC in the South-East of demanding illicit payments from aspirants seeking tickets to contest for seats in the House of Representatives.

The suit, dated June 9, 2026, was filed by Chief Alex Ejesieme (SAN) of Alex Ejesieme (SAN) & Co. (Madiba Chambers), who described the allegations as false, malicious, and highly damaging to Obi’s reputation.

Advertisement

According to the legal filing, Okonkwo allegedly claimed that House of Representatives aspirants were required to pay an additional ₦10 million to party leaders after paying the official expression of interest and nomination fees.

The suit quoted Okonkwo as alleging that Obi and South-East leaders of the NDC informed aspirants that payment of the additional sum was necessary to secure consideration within the party.

Obi’s lawyers further stated that Okonkwo claimed documentary evidence existed to support the allegation and that receipts had allegedly been issued for the payments.

The actor-turned-politician was also accused of alleging that Obi personally compiled the list of party candidates from a hotel room and manipulated the candidate selection process.

Advertisement

Among other assertions attributed to Okonkwo were claims that Obi travelled abroad to collect money from individuals and that he, alongside other NDC leaders in the South-East, was involved in activities amounting to criminal conduct.

Obi Describes Allegations as False and Defamatory

In the legal action, Obi’s lawyers strongly rejected the allegations, insisting that the statements were entirely fabricated and intended to tarnish the former governor’s image.

The legal team argued that the claims portrayed their client as a dishonest political figure involved in bribery, extortion, fraud, and criminal conspiracy.

Advertisement

According to the suit, the statements were capable of exposing Obi to public hatred, ridicule, contempt, and distrust among members of society.

“The above statements, in their natural and ordinary meaning and by necessary implication, falsely and maliciously represent our client as a person who demands, solicits, organises and collects bribes; who extorts, defrauds and swindles political aspirants of their money; who is a fraudster, a scammer and a dishonest political actor,” the legal team stated.

The lawyers further argued that the allegations struck directly at Obi’s reputation as a public servant and political leader.

They described the remarks as reckless and unsupported by any credible evidence.

Advertisement

Concern Over Social Media Amplification

Obi’s legal representatives also expressed concern over the manner in which the statements were allegedly disseminated.

According to the law firm, the comments were made during a live television appearance before being widely circulated across social media platforms and online channels, thereby increasing their reach and potential impact.

The legal team maintained that while freedom of expression remains a constitutional right, it does not extend to publishing statements capable of damaging another person’s reputation without factual basis.

Advertisement

They argued that the remarks went beyond the limits of political criticism and fair comment.

“Your words were not mere political commentary. They crossed the permissible bounds of fair comment and constituted a direct assault on our client’s person, integrity, image and reputation,” the lawyers stated.

Obi Demands Retraction, Apology and Compensation

As part of the reliefs sought, Obi’s legal team is demanding that Okonkwo immediately withdraw the statements in their entirety and issue a public apology.

Advertisement

The proposed apology, according to the lawyers, must be clear, unconditional, and given the same level of prominence as the original allegations.

They further requested that the apology be published across all major social media platforms, including X, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.

In addition, the legal team is seeking a written undertaking from Okonkwo, committing him to refrain from making further defamatory statements against their client.

The suit also includes a demand for financial compensation for the alleged damage caused to Obi’s reputation and public standing.

Advertisement

The legal battle comes amid ongoing political realignments and public disagreements involving former allies within Nigeria’s opposition landscape, with the dispute expected to attract significant public and political attention in the coming weeks.

Continue Reading

News

NCC: Telecom operators to deploy 12,000 new sites as 75m subscribers get compensation

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

NCC moves to stop big telcos from crushing small players
The Nigerian Communications Commission, NCC, says mobile network operators will deploy over 12,000 new coverage and capacity sites nationwide, with more than 5,000 already completed, to improve service quality and expand infrastructure.

This was contained in a communiqué issued after the NCC’s 109th Board Meeting held on May 25, 2026, where the Governing Board reviewed sector developments and outlined regulatory priorities.

The commission said operators have also extended fibre connectivity to more than 700 sites, while colocation and infrastructure-sharing companies have upgraded equipment at over 2,000 Base Transceiver Stations, BTS, to strengthen network resilience and quality of service.

It noted that the ongoing expansion reflects the industry’s commitment to improving coverage, capacity, and customer experience nationwide.

Advertisement

–75m subscribers compensated–

In a major consumer protection move, the NCC revealed that more than 75 million subscribers have been compensated following its directive requiring operators to provide redress for poor quality of service in areas where standards were not met.

The commission described operators’ compliance level as substantial, adding that it is independently validating claims to ensure all eligible subscribers receive due compensation.

However, the NCC expressed concern over partial compliance by Tower Companies, TowerCos, with directives to reinvest regulatory fines into infrastructure upgrades through escrow accounts. It stressed that full compliance is needed for sustainable network improvements.

Advertisement

–Fibre growth, security challenges–

The commission also reviewed data consumption trends and noted that rising demand for broadband continues to pressure existing infrastructure.

Fibre-to-the-Home, FTTH, subscriptions rose from 84,141 in Q4 2025 to 210,065 by the end of the following quarter, reflecting growing adoption of fixed broadband.

The NCC said expanding fibre infrastructure remains critical to reducing pressure on mobile networks, lowering connectivity costs, and improving service quality.

Advertisement

The commission also raised concerns over persistent vandalism of telecom infrastructure despite its designation as Critical National Information Infrastructure, CNII. To address this, it said it is exploring a Communications Industry Security Trust Fund and stronger stakeholder collaboration.

The NCC reaffirmed its commitment to building a sustainable, resilient, and inclusive communications sector that supports Nigeria’s digital transformation and the federal government’s $1 trillion economy goal.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News