Connect with us

News

SERAP sues INEC over alleged N800bn APC govs campaign fund

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has sued the Independent National Electoral Commission over alleged failure to investigate claims that governors elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress diverted N800bn for political and campaign activities.

SERAP, in the suit filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja, is asking the court to compel INEC to probe allegations that APC governors have been making monthly contributions from their Federation Account Allocation Committee allocations into a dedicated fund for President Bola Tinubu’s 2027 re-election campaign.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1426/2026, was filed by SERAP’s lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare and Kehinde Oyewumi.

The organisation is seeking an order of mandamus directing INEC to demand full disclosure from the governors and the APC on the alleged campaign fund, including the identities of contributors and the sources of the funds.

Advertisement

SERAP is also asking the court to compel the electoral body to investigate whether political parties and candidates are complying with the provisions of Section 91 of the Electoral Act on campaign finance limits and transparency.

According to SERAP, the allegations raised concerns about political finance accountability, electoral fairness and the ability of Nigerians to freely participate in the democratic process.

“Opaque political financing remains a major entry point for corruption and a threat to democratic legitimacy.

“Nigerians deserve to know who funds the candidates or political parties of their choice and the sources of any such funding,” SERAP said.

Advertisement

The organisation argued that the alleged use of public resources for political advantage could undermine confidence in Nigeria’s electoral system.

“The abuse of state resources for electoral advantage undermines democratic integrity and public trust. Fairness, transparency, and accountability in political or campaign finance are essential safeguards against corruption, state capture, and undue influence in democratic processes,” it stated.

SERAP maintained that INEC has a constitutional responsibility to monitor political financing and ensure that parties and candidates comply with campaign finance regulations.

“The commission has constitutional and statutory obligations to ensure that no individual or political party exceeds legally prescribed contribution limits, whether directly or indirectly, and to ensure full transparency regarding the origin and quantum of political funding,” the suit read.

Advertisement

The group said allegations involving large financial resources and possible misuse of public funds required urgent intervention by INEC to protect the credibility of the 2027 general elections.

“The allegations of diversion or opaque use of public funds pose a grave risk to the integrity of the 2027 general elections,” SERAP stated.

It argued that any deployment of public funds for political purposes could distort competition among candidates and political parties.

“Where public resources are allegedly diverted or deployed for political and campaign purposes, the result is not merely financial impropriety; it is a direct distortion of electoral competition,” the suit added.

Advertisement

SERAP also relied on provisions of the 1999 Constitution, the Electoral Act, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the United Nations Convention Against Corruption.

SERAP argued that Section 14(2)(c) of the Constitution, which guarantees citizens’ participation in government, places an obligation on institutions to protect the integrity of the democratic process.

“The provision also imposes a binding obligation on all institutions, including INEC, to safeguard the integrity of the democratic process.

“Section 15(5) of the Nigerian Constitution requires public institutions to abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power. Section 13 imposes a clear responsibility on INEC to conform to, observe and apply the provisions of Chapter 2 of the Constitution.

Advertisement

“Article 13 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights guarantees every citizen the right to participate freely in government. Similarly, Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights requires that elections reflect the free expression of the will of the electorate. Nigeria has ratified both treaties.

“Nigeria has made legally binding commitments under the UN Convention against Corruption to ensure accountability in the management of public resources. Articles 5 and 9 of the UN Convention against Corruption also impose legal obligations on the Commission to ensure proper management of public affairs and public funds.

“These commitments ought to be fully upheld and respected. Article 7(3) of the Convention requires institutions, including INEC, to ensure political finance transparency. The provisions aim to prevent corruption in and through elections,” the suit read.

It further stated that the alleged deployment of public resources for political purposes would not only amount to financial impropriety but could distort electoral competition.

Advertisement

“Where public resources are allegedly diverted or deployed for political and campaign purposes, the result is not merely financial impropriety; it is a direct distortion of electoral competition,” it added.

The group said any use of public funds for political advantage would constitute “a grave violation of national and international standards and a threat to electoral credibility.”

The organisation said these legal frameworks impose obligations on public institutions to promote transparency, accountability and fairness in electoral processes.

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Aviation labour bodies give airline operators 72hrs deadline over unionization, TSC

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

 

The National Union of Air Transport Employees (NUATE) and the Air Transport Services Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (ATSSSAN) have issued a three-day notice of strike to Nigeria’s domestic airlines, accusing the operators of blocking workers from unionising and non-remittance of ticket sales charges owed to the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA).

‎In a statement issued at the weekend, the unions said they were escalating the issue after the warning they gave on August 4, when the unions announced a notice of picketing and declared they were prepared to strike “at any time without further notice.”

Describing the latest move as a gesture of restraint, the unions said they were giving the airlines a further three days to address their grievances before industrial action begins. In the statement, the unions accused airlines of two major infractions.

They alleged that airlines have made it impossible for members of staff to join unions freely, despite repeated efforts by the aviation unions to secure that right.

Advertisement

They said workers are too afraid to even express interest in union membership for fear of discrimination.

The unions also accused the airlines of withholding a 5% charge on ticket sales that is meant to fund the operations of aviation agencies. According to the statement, the non-remittance of these funds has stalled the implementation of collective bargaining agreements already negotiated on behalf of union members.

The statement read: “In relaxing the notice of picketing, dated 4th August 2026 by our unions, with a statement that we were ready to strike at anytime without further notice, we hereby magnanimously issued a 3-day Notice of Strike upon the defaulting domestic airlines principally for the following infractions:

‎”Making unfettered unionization of staff in their organisation impossible after several efforts by the aviation unions. Their workers dare not even express the intention to belong to unions of their choices.

Advertisement

‎”Non-remittance of the already collected, but withheld 5% ticket sales charge, which is the operational fund of the aviation agencies, thereby rendering our members negotiated collective bargaining agreements at the aviation agencies nugatory so far. This continues to breed disgruntled air transport workers; the implication of which is an accident in the waiting!

“We want unequivocal declarations through circulars and other direct means of communication to their staff that they are free to join unions of their choices without fear of victimisation.

We want an immediate remittance of the seized operational funds of the aviation agencies to allow for the implementation of the conditions of service of our members in the various aviation agencies.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

NERC dissolves Kaduna Disco’s board over N456bn debt

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has assumed direct control of Kaduna Electricity Distribution Plc (Kaduna DisCo), dissolving the utility’s board and stripping its core investor of management authority over a N456 billion debt.

NERC said in an order dated August 10 that Kaduna Electricity, known as Kaduna DisCo, is in a “grave situation” marked by prolonged default, weak commercial performance and a balance sheet where liabilities have outrun assets.

The regulator invoked its intervention powers under sections 75 to 79 of the Electricity Act 2023, the strongest tool available to it short of revoking the company’s license outright.

“The commission therefore is obliged to act in the public interest and to safeguard continuity of distribution services in KAEDC’s network area,” the order states, citing the risk that further delay could trigger an unplanned collapse of service and expose Nigeria’s electricity market to systemic risk.

Advertisement

Kaduna DisCo’s cumulative market debt had climbed to roughly N456.5 billion as of May, split between N415.5 billion owed to the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Plc and N41 billion owed to the system operator, according to the order.

The utility has also built up N14.26 billion in other statutory and third-party obligations, and has racked up more than N118.6 billion in additional market debt since ASI Engineering Limited took over operations in June 2024.

Kaduna DisCo paid just 41.93 percent of its adjusted market invoices in the year through December, leaving a shortfall of about N46.71 billion, the regulator’s data show.

That underperformance tracked losses across the network; aggregate technical, commercial and collection losses averaged 71.88 percent for the year, meaning the utility billed for barely more than a quarter of the power it received.

Advertisement

Capital investment lagged even further behind commitments. Actual spending in 2025 came to about N2.48 billion against a required minimum of N24.51 billion, a shortfall the regulator pinned largely on the commission’s own forbearance rather than any acceleration by the investor.

Meter coverage, meanwhile, stayed below 36 percent of customers throughout the year despite repeated industry-wide pushes to close the metering gap.

NERC had conditionally cleared ASI’s plan to acquire 60 percent of Kaduna DisCo in January 2024, working alongside a technical partner, Akanksha Power and Infrastructure Limited.

That approval carried a list of conditions, proof of the partner’s operating capacity, a compliance roadmap, bank guarantees to the market operator and trading company, and management vetting, among others, that the regulator said were never fully satisfied even after ASI assumed day-to-day control.

Advertisement

In a letter dated August 25, 2025, ASI told the commission it had met and was sustaining the approval conditions, pointing to restructured technical teams, loss-reduction and metering projects, and efforts to arrange equity and debt financing. Regulators found the supporting evidence insufficient. “The supporting submissions… did not provide adequate evidence of compliance with the conditions,” the order says, adding that documentation for planned infrastructure and technical-advisory work was missing.

Talks came to a head after the commission warned Kaduna DisCo’s shareholders and the Africa Export-Import Bank in a formal notice that an intervention was imminent unless a credible financial rescue plan materialised.

Representatives of the investor group met regulators, the Bureau of Public Enterprises, Afrexim and Fidelity Bank at Afrexim’s offices on June 11. All parties agreed at that meeting that ASI had not met the original takeover conditions or separate requirements set by the Bureau of Public Enterprises for finalising the share sale.

ASI asked for as much as 24 months more to stabilise cash flow and reach full market remittance. The commission, working with the Bureau of Public Enterprises and Afrexim, rejected the request, concluding that a further extension of similar length was not justified given the continuing risk to customers and the market, and that ASI had failed to back the request with a credible plan.

Advertisement

Under the order, KAEDC’s board is dissolved and its directors removed, with a seven-member interim board of special directors, chaired by Abdullahi Garba and including a representative from the Bureau of Public Enterprises, installed for an initial six-month term.

The utility’s incumbent managing director, Abubakar Umar Hashidu, has been retained as administrator to run day-to-day operations, while background-clearance approvals for the wider management team have been withdrawn pending revalidation.

Afrexim will lead a competitive process, coordinated with the regulator, to find a replacement core investor within 12 months, with interim milestones for transaction documents, bidder shortlists and financing terms due at 60, 180 and 270 days. Prospective bidders will need to show working capital, a five-year turnaround plan and bank guarantees covering at least three months of market invoices.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Visa processing shift won’t affect Abuja embassy operations – US

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The United States Mission in Nigeria has clarified that the ongoing realignment of routine visa processing in Africa will not affect the operational status of the US Embassy in Abuja.

The clarification followed the United States Department of State’s announcement that routine visa services in Abuja would be realigned to a regional visa hub with effect from August 1, 2026.

The US Mission Nigeria, in a post on its official X handle on Monday, said the change was limited to routine visa processing and would not result in the closure of the embassy.

“The realignment of routine visa processing does not change the operating status of any of the embassies and consulates or the important work they continue to conduct on behalf of the American people,” the mission said.

Advertisement

The Department of State had, in a notice published on its website on July 15, said it was realigning visa operations in Africa to regional hubs as part of efforts to strengthen national security, improve efficiency and promote more uniform screening, vetting and adjudication standards.

It said the measure was part of a long-standing practice and that similar realignments had previously been implemented in several African countries and in Europe.

“Effective August 1, 2026, the Department of State will realign routine visa services in Antananarivo, Abuja, Asmara, Bamako, Banjul, Brazzaville, Bujumbura, Conakry, Cotonou, Durban, Freetown, Gaborone, Harare, Juba, Libreville, Lilongwe, Lusaka, Maputo, Maseru, Mbabane, N’Djamena, Niamey, Nouakchott, Ouagadougou, and Windhoek to a regional visa hub,” the department said.

Under the new arrangement, citizens and residents of affected countries seeking US visas on or after August 1 are required to schedule appointments and pay the applicable visa fees at designated nonimmigrant or immigrant visa locations.

Advertisement

For Nigeria, Lagos is listed among the US posts that will serve as a regional visa hub.

The State Department listed Abidjan, Accra, Addis Ababa, Cape Town, Dakar, Dar es Salaam, Djibouti, Johannesburg, Kampala, Kigali, Kinshasa, Lagos, Lomé, Luanda, Malabo, Monrovia, Nairobi, Port Louis, Praia and Yaoundé as the regional visa hubs for routine visa services.

It explained that all routine visa services were affected by the realignment, covering both nonimmigrant and immigrant visas.

“These include tourist and business-related nonimmigrant visas, as well as petition-based nonimmigrant visas,” the department said.

Advertisement

It added that immigrant visa services being realigned include immediate relative, family preference and employment-based categories, as well as fiancée/fiancé visas, adoptions, Diversity Visas and follow-to-join asylee and refugee cases.

The department, however, said the realignment would not affect existing valid visas.

“This does not affect any currently valid visas,” it said.

It also advised applicants who already have appointments scheduled at posts where routine visa services are being discontinued to check their email for specific guidance.

Advertisement

The department said applicants who had paid the Machine Readable Visa fee at a post where only limited nonimmigrant visa services would remain should schedule their appointment by July 31.

“By July 31, you should schedule an appointment at the post where you paid the fee,” it said.

The Mission added that the fees would not be refunded if applicants failed to schedule an appointment by the deadline.

The US also said affected immigrant visa applicants could undertake their mandatory medical examinations in their home countries where panel physicians were available or at their designated regional visa hubs.

Advertisement

The department stressed that visa suspensions under Presidential Proclamation 10998, visa bond requirements and immigrant visa pauses affecting certain nationalities remained in force.

The clarification by the US Mission Nigeria means that while routine visa processing is being moved from Abuja to the designated regional hub in Lagos, the US Embassy in Abuja will continue to operate and provide other diplomatic and consular functions.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News