News
Atiku And Other Northern Muslims Reject INEC 2027 Elections Dates
The announcement by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) fixing dates for the 2027 general elections has sparked widespread criticism, particularly among northern Muslim leaders and political figures who argue that the schedule coincides with the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has demanded an immediate change of the date released by the Independent National Electoral Commission for the 2027 general elections, stating it falls within the Ramadan period.
“The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) must urgently reconsider the February 20, 2027 date it has announced for the general elections,” Mr Abubakar said in a statement on Friday. “That date falls squarely within the Ramadan period (February 7 – March 8, 2027), a sacred season of fasting, reflection, and spiritual devotion for millions of Nigerian Muslims.”
INEC had earlier released the official elections timetable, outlining dates for campaigns, voters’ registration, political parties’ primary elections and general elections.
However, Mr Abubakar blasted INEC for fixing the elections within the holy month of Ramadan, accusing the electoral umpire of poor judgement and insensitivity to the country’s socio-religious realities.
“Elections are not mere administrative rituals; they are national exercises that demand maximum participation, physical endurance, and collective focus. Fixing such a critical civic exercise in the middle of a major religious observance reflects poor judgment and a troubling lack of sensitivity to the nation’s socio-religious realities,” the ADC chieftain said.
While noting that inclusive planning was fundamental, the former vice president said INEC’s poor handling of election timing casts doubt on the capacity of the body to deliver free and fair elections to Nigerians.
“In a diverse country like Nigeria, inclusive planning is not optional, it is fundamental. Something as basic as choosing a broadly acceptable date should not be mishandled. It speaks to competence, foresight, and respect for citizens.
“If INEC struggles with getting a simple matter of timing right, Nigerians are justified in asking: what assurance do we have that it will competently deliver free, fair, and credible elections in 2027?” Mr Abubakar stated.
We have recently deactivated our website’s comment provider in favour of other channels of distribution and commentary. We encourage you to join the conversation on our stories via our Facebook, Twitter and other social media pages.
Ramadan is a sacred period in Islam marked by fasting from dawn to sunset, increased prayers, and spiritual reflection. For many Muslims, the month involves physical restraint, heightened devotion, and communal religious activities that can be physically demanding.
Critics argue that conducting national elections during this period could suppress voter turnout, especially in predominantly Muslim regions of northern Nigeria. They maintain that elections require physical endurance, long hours at polling units, and active participation in vote protection and monitoring — activities that may prove challenging while fasting.
A statement circulating online described the move as “a troubling lack of sensitivity to Nigeria’s socio-religious realities,” emphasizing that election planning in a diverse country must take religious observances into account.
In Nigeria, where religion plays a significant role in public life, stakeholders insist that inclusive planning is not optional but fundamental to democratic credibility.
Atiku and Other Northern Voices React
Another northern commentator, Hamma Hayatu, declared confidently on social media that “the date for elections 2027 just released shall be changed,” reflecting a growing sentiment among critics that public pressure may force a review.
Several social media users echoed similar concerns, with one post reading: “There’s no way the Muslim majority will participate in the casting and protection of votes during Ramadan.”
Questions About Consultation and Planning
Observers say the controversy raises broader questions about the consultative process that preceded the announcement.
In past election cycles, INEC has often engaged political parties, civil society organizations, and security agencies in discussions around logistics and scheduling. However, critics argue that the Ramadan overlap suggests either insufficient consultation with religious and community leaders or an oversight in evaluating the socio-cultural implications of the dates.
Some commentators have framed the issue as a test of INEC’s foresight and administrative competence.
“If INEC struggles with getting a simple matter of timing right, Nigerians are justified in asking what assurance we have that it will competently deliver free, fair, and credible elections in 2027,” one political analyst wrote.
The concern is not merely symbolic. Analysts warn that even a marginal decline in voter turnout in key regions could influence electoral outcomes and fuel post-election disputes.
Risks to Voter Participation and Credibility
The primary fear expressed by critics is the potential suppression of voter turnout among Muslims observing the fast. During Ramadan, many adherents limit strenuous activities, especially under the hot sun, which characterizes much of Nigeria’s dry season in February and March.
Long queues at polling units, delays in accreditation, and potential security challenges could further discourage participation.
Election observers also note that reduced turnout in certain demographics may affect perceptions of legitimacy. In a country already grappling with concerns about voter apathy and trust in electoral institutions, any factor that appears to limit participation could undermine public confidence.
Moreover, Ramadan evenings are often dedicated to special prayers known as Taraweeh, meaning extended polling delays could clash with religious commitments.
Broader Political Implications
Beyond religious considerations, the controversy comes at a politically sensitive time as parties begin early maneuvering ahead of the 2027 race.
The northern region remains a crucial voting bloc in presidential elections. Any perception that its predominantly Muslim population is disadvantaged could become a major campaign issue.
Political strategists suggest that opposition parties may seize on the controversy to question INEC’s neutrality or competence, potentially escalating tensions.
At the same time, some voices have urged calm, noting that Ramadan does not automatically preclude civic participation and that Muslims in other countries have voted during the holy month. However, they acknowledge that Nigeria’s logistical and climatic realities differ significantly.
Pressure Mounts on INEC
As criticism intensifies, pressure is mounting on INEC to review the announced dates. Civil society groups and commentators argue that adjusting the calendar now would demonstrate responsiveness and strengthen public trust.
So far, INEC has not issued a formal statement addressing the Ramadan concerns. The Commission’s leadership may face increasing calls to clarify whether alternative dates were considered and what consultations informed the decision.
Election experts emphasize that revising the schedule at this early stage would not pose significant logistical challenges, given that 2027 is still over a year away.
A Test of Inclusivity
Ultimately, the debate over the 2027 election dates underscores Nigeria’s delicate balance of religion, politics, and democracy.
In a multi-ethnic, multi-religious society, national institutions are expected to demonstrate sensitivity to diverse realities. Critics insist that something as fundamental as election timing should reflect inclusive planning.
Whether INEC will reconsider its decision remains to be seen. However, the immediate public outcry signals that the issue resonates deeply, particularly among northern Muslim communities.
As the 2027 elections approach, the controversy serves as an early reminder that beyond logistics and ballots, the credibility of Nigeria’s democracy rests heavily on public trust — and that trust often begins with decisions that show respect for the nation’s diversity.
By Gloria Ikibah
The House of Representatives has intensified its investigation into the troubled Anchor Borrowers Programme, turning its spotlight on insurance providers linked to the scheme amid concerns over weak coverage and alleged fund mismanagement.
At a hearing convened by the House Committee on Nutrition and Food Security, lawmakers began scrutinising the role of the Nigerian Agricultural Insurance Corporation alongside private insurers in a programme valued at over N1.12 trillion.
The session forms part of a broader inquiry into how funds earmarked for agricultural support were handled, including allegations of diversion by government agencies and questions surrounding disbursement by participating financial institutions.
Representing the Managing Director of the Nigerian Agricultural Insurance Corporation, Dayo Babaronti told the committee that the agency insured just over 200,000 farmers, covering about N109 billion under the scheme.
He revealed that the Central Bank deviated from the original framework, which designated the corporation as the sole insurer, by bringing in additional firms, including Veritas Kapital Insurance and Leadway Insurance. Neither company was present at the hearing.
According to him, the corporation’s involvement amounted to only a small fraction of the overall programme, leaving significant gaps in coverage.
He also outlined the corporation’s limited role in other agricultural financing initiatives, including support for smallholder farmers and specific crop programmes, where insurance backing fell far short of funding allocations. In some cases, he noted, the corporation was excluded entirely despite policy provisions.
Tge Committee Chairman, Rep. Chike Okafor, signalled that further hearings would follow, noting that the panel had received numerous complaints from farmers and industry groups regarding inadequate insurance protection.
He explained that the committee will recall the agency for additional questioning, particularly as its submission arrived late, leaving little time for proper review.
Rep. Okafor maintained that the investigation is aimed at uncovering the root causes behind the programme’s shortcomings and ensuring accountability across all institutions involved.
He pointed to early findings suggesting that key stakeholders, especially farmers and commodity associations, were largely excluded from the design and implementation of the intervention, a factor believed to have contributed to its underperformance.
He stressed the committee’s determination to get to the bottom of the issues, stating, “The reason why we are here is because the programmes did not succeed 100%. If they had succeeded 100%, we will not be here.”
By Gloria Ikibah
The House of Representatives Public Accounts Committee has approved sweeping financial reliefs and a long-term debt restructuring plan for three electricity distribution companies, in a move aimed at stabilising Nigeria’s troubled power sector.
The decision grants Kano, Jos and Ikeja DisCos a 10-year window to restructure liabilities running into hundreds of billions of naira, following mounting concerns over the sector’s financial sustainability.
At the heart of the intervention is a combined debt burden of over N248 billion, made up of more than N120 billion in historical obligations and about N128 billion in accumulated interest spanning a decade.
The resolution followed the adoption of a technical subcommittee report linked to findings from the Auditor-General, which highlighted rising debts across eleven distribution companies and growing pressure on the electricity market.
Chairman of the Technical subcommittee, Rep, Mark Chidi Obetta, said the move is part of broader legislative efforts to restore stability and address legacy financial challenges within the industry. He noted that the liabilities of the affected companies form a significant portion of the sector’s overall debt profile.
According to the report, total indebtedness across the eleven DisCos climbed from roughly N1 trillion at the end of 2024 to about N1.3 trillion by September 2025, driven largely by accumulating interest and unpaid obligations.
The committee said its investigation sought to verify these figures, establish the true extent of the debts and understand why the companies have struggled to meet payment commitments.
It confirmed that the liabilities had surged due to continued accruals, while also identifying disputes over interest charges as a major sticking point, particularly among the affected DisCos.
In response, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission NERC,, directed that interest should not be applied to outstanding invoices between 2015 and 2020, while allowing such charges from 2021 onwards. It also instructed that interest linked to delays involving a financial intermediary be excluded.
As part of the restructuring framework, the report stated, “Based on appearance, submissions and request, the Committee established that Jos and Kano Electricity Distribution Companies remain significantly indebted to NBET. The interest component and accrued debt during government receivership period form a substantial part of Kano Disco’s liabilities.”
It further recommended that, “NBET and NERC should allow Kano Electricity Distribution company (KEDCO), Jos Electricity Distribution Company and Ikeja Electricity Distribution company, with significant legacy obligations to restructure and repay their historical debts totaling N120,061,898,737… over an extended period of not more than 10 years.”
The report also proposed that certain liabilities incurred during periods of government intervention be transferred to a designated liability management body, while calling for a waiver of all accrued interest within the specified period.
Explaining the rationale, it added that the current market structure limits the ability of DisCos to recover costs, noting that revenue collection arrangements prioritise settlement of market obligations before operational expenses are released.
The committee stressed the need for discipline going forward, stating that, “All DisCos should ensure strict compliance with their current market obligations going forward to prevent further accumulation of liabilities.”
Chairman of the committee, Bamidele Salam, cautioned that without decisive restructuring and stronger regulatory oversight, the long-term viability of Nigeria’s electricity distribution system could remain under serious threat.
By Gloria Ikibah
Nigeria’s Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Benjamin Kalu, has played a leading role in securing the adoption of a major international framework aimed at strengthening post-conflict recovery and peacebuilding efforts.
The resolution was endorsed at the 152nd Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union in Istanbul, placing legislatures at the heart of efforts to rebuild societies and sustain long-term peace after conflict.
Kalu, who served as co-rapporteur alongside delegates from Jordan and the Netherlands, presented the draft document, which outlines a comprehensive approach to managing post-conflict transitions and restoring stability.
The move reflects a growing global shift towards recognising the central role of parliaments in ensuring accountability, inclusiveness and durability in peace processes.
The newly adopted framework is built around five key pillars, including institutional strengthening, fair economic recovery, social cohesion, inclusive governance and continued international support.
It also places strong emphasis on human and collective security as essential foundations for achieving lasting peace, while encouraging preventive strategies that address the root causes of conflict and promote resilience.
Central to the framework is the principle of national ownership, with countries expected to lead their own recovery efforts through inclusive systems that guide reconstruction, legal reforms and institutional rebuilding.
The approach also stresses that external support must align with national priorities and remain subject to democratic oversight, ensuring that recovery processes are both accountable and sustainable.
Kalu said: “The 152nd Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union urges Parliaments in countries affected by or emerging from conflict to ensure strong national ownership of peace and recovery processes by leading inclusive nationwide consultations, defining priorities through democratic deliberation and legislation, and ensuring that any external support is adapted to local needs, constitutional frameworks and international human rights obligations.
“Parliaments responsible for implementing peace agreements are called upon to give full legal effect to their provisions by incorporating them into national legislation, establishing clear implementation requirements, and creating permanent, cross-party mechanisms to regularly review progress. These should include hearings with relevant actors, such as women and youth groups and representatives of affected communities, to coordinate parliamentary follow-up, ensure continuity, identify gaps early, and uphold commitments across political cycles.
“When addressing the legacies of conflict, parliaments are also urged to establish national transitional justice frameworks by adopting legislation that enables truth-seeking processes, victim-centred reparations, and fair and transparent vetting or amnesty procedures, as well as effective cooperation with national and international accountability mechanisms. This ensures that justice, recognition of past harms and institutional reform form an integral part of sustainable peace.”
Beyond that, the resolution charges parliaments in countries affected by or emerging from conflict to lead inclusive nationwide consultations and ensure external support adapts to local needs, constitutional frameworks, and international human rights obligations.
Through the IPU resolution, Kalu also urged parliaments to establish national transitional justice frameworks that enable truth-seeking processes, victim-centred reparations, and fair vetting or amnesty procedures, while encouraging the use of human security approaches in legislative, oversight, budgetary, and representation functions.
The document also encourages parliaments to rebalance national and international budgetary priorities in favour of peacebuilding and prevention, prioritize conflict-affected populations in reconstruction and financing, and strengthen transparency and anti-corruption safeguards in recovery funds.
It further charges parliaments to support national and community-level reconciliation through inclusive dialogue and trauma-informed initiatives, promote local dialogue processes that bring together communities and former adversaries, and institutionalize the full, equal, and meaningful participation of women and youth across all peace and dialogue processes in line with UN Security Council resolutions 1325 and 2250.
The resolution also asked parliaments to strengthen inclusive political participation by ensuring all affected communities are represented in legislative deliberations, foster constructive political dialogue through cross-party platforms, and work with governments, regional organizations, the IPU, and the United Nations to strengthen international support and funding for peace agreements.
It likewise proposes that parliaments consider lawful mechanisms to facilitate reparations for victims and mobilize resources for reconstruction, including the use of frozen or otherwise immobilized assets where lawful.
The resolution requests that the IPU provide targeted technical assistance to parliaments engaged in post-conflict recovery, including advisory missions, capacity-building, peer-learning, and support in mediation and conflict prevention.
Reps Open Fresh Probe into N1.12tn Farm Scheme, Summon Insurers Over Gaps
Reps Back N248bn Lifeline for Power Firms, Unveil Debt Shake-Up Plan
Kalu Drives Global Backing for New Post-Conflict Peace Blueprint at IPU Assembly
-
Opinion20 hours agoWhy PDP Should Pick Dr Olotu Akpodiete as Candidate for Ughelli North, South and Udu Federal Constituency
-
Foreign20 hours agoSecond Tragedy in Two Days: Student Gunman Kills Four at Middle School
-
Economy19 hours agoNDIC moves to wind down 89 failed banks
-
News19 hours agoCourt bars FCCPC from enforcing digital lending regulations
-
News11 hours agoPDP approved appointment of Wike as minister – APC
-
News20 hours agoSenate summons NNPCL leadership over N210tr audit queries
-
News19 hours agoMalami, son face new terrorism-linked firearms charges
-
News11 hours agoSee Black Market Dollar To Naira Exchange Rate Today 16th April 2026