News
World Cup: NFF says we’re still hopeful, no word from FIFA yet
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
Nigeria’s chances of qualifying for the 2026 FIFA World Cup are still open, the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has said, rejecting claims that the country has already been eliminated from the race.
The federation explained that it has not received any official message from FIFA concerning the dispute over the eligibility of some players who featured for the DR Congo national team.
Speaking on Wednesday, the Director of Communications of the NFF, Ademola Olajire, said the reports circulating online were based on an old FIFA publication and not a new decision regarding Nigeria’s complaint.
The NFF have not received any formal communication from FIFA whatsoever. No information can be shared with journalists without first coming to the federations involved,” Olajire said.
He added that the federation is still waiting for FIFA’s response on the matter.
“Yes, our wait is ongoing. We are still expecting formal communication from FIFA. Let those posting the old quotes continue posting them.”
Earlier reports had claimed that DR Congo had already secured Africa’s place in the inter-confederation play-offs, which would mean Nigeria no longer had a chance to qualify.
Those claims were based on a FIFA statement that read: “All of the six teams have now been decided, with Bolivia, Congo DR, Iraq, Jamaica, New Caledonia and Suriname confirmed as qualifiers.”
However, that statement was originally released on November 18, 2025, before Nigeria submitted its protest. It referred to the teams that had qualified at that time and did not address Nigeria’s complaint about the match.
The dispute began in November 2025 after DR Congo defeated Nigeria in the CAF play-off final. The match ended 1–1 before DR Congo won through a penalty shootout, earning Africa’s place in the inter-confederation play-offs.
Nigeria later filed a formal protest in December, claiming that DR Congo used players who were not eligible to represent the country. Among the players mentioned were Aaron Wan-Bissaka and Axel Tuanzebe, both of whom previously represented England at youth level.
At the time, NFF General Secretary Mohammed Sanusi explained why the federation raised the complaint.
“The Congolese rule says you cannot have dual nationality, but some of their players have European and French passports. Our contention is that FIFA was deceived into clearing them,” Sanusi said.
The Congolese Football Federation has denied the accusation. It described Nigeria’s protest as an attempt to “win via the back door.”
FIFA has confirmed that it received the complaint and that the matter is being examined. However, the football governing body has not announced when a final decision will be made.
The delay has increased tension as the inter-confederation play-offs approach. The competition will take place from March 26 to 31 in Guadalajara and Monterrey, Mexico. DR Congo are currently expected to face either Jamaica or New Caledonia.
Nigeria are hoping to avoid missing two consecutive World Cups after failing to qualify for the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar. The current Super Eagles squad includes notable players such as Victor Osimhen, Ademola Lookman and Alex Iwobi.
African football analyst Mamadou Gaye advised fans to remain calm while waiting for FIFA’s verdict.
“We should wait for FIFA to make the decision. Remember that Bafana Bafana had points taken away right at the last minute. Nigeria should remain calm and prepared,” he said on Soccer Africa.
News
BREAKING: Supreme Court restores Mark’s ADC leadership, voids status quo order
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
The Supreme Court on Thursday set aside a controversial “status quo ante bellum” order made in the protracted leadership crisis rocking the African Democratic Congress, holding that the preservative directive could not validly subsist after proceedings had been concluded.
In a lead judgment delivered by Justice Mohammed Garba, the apex court held that although courts possess inherent powers to make preservative orders to protect the subject matter of litigation, such orders cannot survive once proceedings have been “fully, conclusively and finally concluded.”
The court subsequently allowed the appeal and nullified the order sustaining the status quo ante bellum in the dispute involving rival factions of the ADC leadership.
The judgment arose from the legal battle over the party’s leadership structure, including the legitimacy of appointments and congresses conducted by opposing factions within the party.
Justice Garba, in the judgment, explained that the trial court’s directive maintaining the status quo ante bellum was essentially a preservative order intended to prevent parties from taking steps capable of foisting a fait accompli on the court while proceedings were ongoing.
The justice, however, held that such powers must be exercised only in relation to live proceedings.
According to him, once proceedings have been “fully, faithfully, conclusively and finally concluded,” there would be “nothing left for that court to preserve.”
The apex court also addressed the competence of the appeal filed in the matter and the constitutional basis relied upon by the appellants
Justice Garba held that Section 241(1)(f)(ii) of the 1999 Constitution, which provides for appeals as of right in certain interlocutory decisions relating to injunctions, did not apply in the circumstances of the case.
He held that the trial judge neither granted nor refused an application for injunction but merely issued procedural directives aimed at preserving the subject matter of the dispute pending hearing.
The court further held that because the grounds of appeal were not purely on points of law, leave of court was required before the appeal could validly be filed.
The justice stressed that obtaining leave in such circumstances was a “condition precedent” to the validity and competence of the appeal.
He added that the competence of a notice of appeal goes to the jurisdiction of the court and once defective, the entire appeal becomes incompetent.
Despite those findings, the apex court proceeded to examine the propriety of the preservative orders made by the lower courts and eventually held that sustaining the status quo ante bellum after the relevant proceedings had ended was unnecessary and legally unsustainable.
News
Supreme Court Has Ended PDP Factional Crisis, Confirmed Party’s Unity — Wike
The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, on Thursday declared that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has emerged united and free of internal factions following a decisive ruling by the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
Speaking at a press conference at his residence in Guzape, Abuja, Wike said the apex court judgment has finally laid to rest all disputes over parallel leadership structures within the party.
He dismissed insinuation that the Supreme Court affirmed the suspension of the PDP National Secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, saying there was no such issue for determination before the court.
“Today, the Supreme Court has brought to an end the so-called factions of the PDP. There is no more faction in the party. There is only one PDP,” he said.
The minister explained that the court dismissed appeals challenging earlier judgments from lower courts, thereby upholding the legitimacy of the party’s convention and its current leadership.
According to him, attempts by aggrieved groups to overturn the outcome of the convention failed at all judicial levels.
“The Supreme Court has validated our convention and set aside all claims to any parallel structure. What this means is that the PDP has come to stay as one united party,” Wike stated.
He stressed the need for political actors to operate strictly within the framework of the law, warning against actions capable of undermining party constitutions and electoral regulations.
“The fact that you are in a position does not mean you can act outside the law. There are rules guiding party activities, and those rules must be followed,” he added.
Wike also dismissed the relevance of some defectors who exited the party during the crisis, describing them as politically insignificant, while leaving the door open for others to return.
“Those who left are not electoral assets; they are liabilities. However, those who left out of uncertainty may reconsider and return now that the situation is clear,” he said.
On ongoing coalition talks among opposition figures, the minister ruled out participation in alliances that lack clear national interest or constructive engagement.
“We do not believe in opposition for opposition’s sake. Our approach is constructive, not destructive,” he said.
He further noted that recent judicial pronouncements in political matters reinforce the need for due process, urging aggrieved parties to always seek redress through the courts.
Wike maintained that the PDP remains Nigeria’s foremost opposition platform, expressing confidence in its readiness to provide credible alternatives in the country’s democratic process.
“The PDP is stable, united and ready to play its role effectively. What has happened today is a victory for the rule of law and internal democracy,” he added.
News
“New Foreign Affairs Leadership Must Deliver Respect, Access, and Global Value for Nigerians”-ADSC Boss Oluwafemi
… hails emergence of Ojukwu as Foreign Affairs minister
Sir Victor Walsh Oluwafemi,
International Development Consultant
Reputation Architecture Strategist
President, Africa Development Studies Centre (ADSC) has said New Foreign Affairs Leadership Must Deliver Respect, Access, and Global Value for Nigerians”
Oluwafemi in a signed statement issued on Thursday evening stated that:
“I extend my warm congratulations to Her Excellency Bianca Ojukwu on her appointment as Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, as well as to the Honourable Minister of State.
“This moment represents more than a routine transition. It is an opportunity to reset Nigeria’s diplomatic direction with clarity, intention, and measurable outcomes that directly impact the lives of Nigerians at home and abroad.
“At this critical time in our national journey, Nigeria’s reputation must be elevated to the very centre of foreign policy. Across parts of Africa and beyond, there has been a growing pattern of negative sentiment and perception about Nigerians, sometimes expressed in ways that undermine dignity and national pride.
“This reality calls for deliberate and coordinated action. Reputation is no longer an abstract concept in global relations. It is a strategic asset that influences how citizens are treated, how businesses are received, and how a nation is positioned in the global order. Nigeria must therefore take ownership of its narrative and actively shape how it is perceived through structured engagement, consistent communication, and firm diplomatic presence.
“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs must lead this repositioning effort by working closely with diaspora communities, international partners, and strategic institutions to project a confident, responsible, and forward-looking image of Nigeria.
” This is not merely about image-building. It is about restoring respect and ensuring that Nigerians are treated with dignity wherever they go. Others will inevitably define a nation that does not define itself, and often unfairly.
“Closely linked to this is the urgent need to expand global mobility for Nigerian citizens. The difficulty many Nigerians face in accessing visas to travel for business, education, tourism, or professional engagement is a matter that requires strong diplomatic attention.
“The ability of citizens to cross borders reflects a nation’s influence and bilateral strength. The new leadership must therefore be intentional in pursuing visa-free arrangements, visa-on-arrival frameworks, and simplified entry systems with key countries.
“Where visa-free access is not immediately achievable, there should be a clear push towards efficient e-visa systems and structured bilateral agreements that make travel less burdensome and more predictable for Nigerians. Improved mobility is not just a convenience. It is a driver of economic opportunity, global integration, and national pride.
“Equally important is the experience of Nigerians within Nigeria when interacting with foreign visa systems. It is deeply concerning that many citizens are subjected to undignified conditions while applying for visas, often standing for long hours under the sun or in the rain, with inadequate facilities and poor service structures.
“These processes, managed largely by third-party agencies on behalf of foreign missions, must be brought to a standard that reflects respect for Nigerian citizens.
” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has a critical role to play in engaging with foreign embassies and ensuring that minimum standards of service, organisation, and human dignity are upheld. Nigerians should not feel diminished in their own country simply because they are seeking access to another.
“There must be a clear principle of reciprocity in how nations engage. If Nigeria extends respect and structured processes to foreign nationals, then the same standard should be expected in return for Nigerians. This is not a confrontation. It is mutual respect, and it must be pursued with professionalism and firmness.
“Beyond these immediate concerns, this moment calls for a broader transformation in how the Ministry operates. Diplomacy must move from being largely ceremonial to being results-driven, data-informed, and aligned with national development priorities. Through structured frameworks such as Policy-as-a-Platform and Results-as-a-Service, the Ministry can begin tracking outcomes, measuring impact, and ensuring that every international engagement delivers tangible value for Nigeria. Embassies must become centres of opportunity, not just representation, actively driving trade, investment, and strategic partnerships that benefit the country.
He explained that: “This is a defining opportunity to shift from intention to execution. The expectation is clear. Nigerians want to be respected, to travel with dignity, and to see their country command influence and credibility on the global stage.
“Diplomacy, at its highest level, is not about protocol alone. It is about protection, access, and national advantage. This new leadership has the opportunity to deliver on all three and to set a new standard for Nigeria’s engagement with the world.
Signed:
Sir Victor Walsh Oluwafemi, KJW
International Development Consultant
Reputation Architecture Strategist
President, Africa Development Studies Centre (ADSC)
Member, Harvard Business Review Advisory Council
-
News14 hours ago2027: Ogbeide-Ihama Joins Edo South Senatorial Race, Says Upper Chamber Not For Neophytes(Photos)
-
News13 hours agoJUST IN: Tinubu Appoints Bianca Ojukwu Foreign Affairs Minister
-
News13 hours agoMay Day: FG Announces Public Holiday for All Nigerians
-
News11 hours agoReps probe $4.6bn health grants, demand stricter oversight
-
Sports13 hours agoArsenal Hold Atlético Madrid To 1-1 Draw In UCL Semi-Final
-
News22 hours agoPhotos: Appellate Court Advocacy Demands Precision, Discipline — Wike
-
News13 hours agoFG Raises Concern Over Fresh Xenophobic Attacks In South Africa
-
News8 hours agoLeaked threesome s*x tape: Sisi Alagbo cries out says “I’ve been having sleepless nights”
