News
How 500 bags of rice given to SSA to the president to share to PCPs reportedly ‘vanished’
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_8969-1000x600.jpeg&description=How 500 bags of rice given to SSA to the president to share to PCPs reportedly ‘vanished’', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_8969-1000x600.jpeg&description=How 500 bags of rice given to SSA to the president to share to PCPs reportedly ‘vanished’', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
“We did our findings and discovered that truly, it is an established fact yet to be confirmed by the Office of the Senior Special Assistant, that the said 500 bags of rice were sold at the rate of 31 million naira and sent to an account linked to the Office of the Senior Special Assistant to the President.”
The above quote were the words of Comrade Musa Mu’azu Musa, convener of the Disability Hub Africa, who has been at the forefront of the unraveling of the alleged misappropriation of 500 bags of rice handed over to the office of the Senior Special Assistant to the President (SSAP) on Special Needs and Equal Opportunities, Alhaji Mohammed Abba Isa, for distribution to persons with disabilities (PWDs) across the country.
Musa has alleged that the Office of the SSAP received 1000 bags of 50kg rice in May this year from the Nigeria Customs Service office in Lagos, to distribute to persons with disabilities across the six geopolitical zones of the country, but that even as at October this year, the said rice cannot be accounted for.
Musa further claimed that he received seven petitions from the different communities that make up the Consortium he chairs, and that they all claimed to have not received the rice released by the Customs to specifically alleviate the sufferings of persons with disabilities.
The Consortium, according to Musa, comprises disability communities such as the Southern Nigeria Persons with Disabilities Assembly, National Association of Persons with Disabilities (FCT/AMAC Chapter), and the Ohanaeze Ndigbo Organization of Persons with Disabilities.
Musa claimed that he and his co-executives swung into action and quickly wrote to the Nigeria Customs Service upon receiving the petitions, and that the feedback they received affirmed the release of the said bags of rice to Abba Isa. Musa added that the Customs did not only confirm that the bags of rice were released, but that they also promised to release clothes and other assistive items to the PWDs, to support their living conditions during these hard times.
“So, upon learning of that, we swung into action by writing to Customs, first and foremost, to ask if there was anything of such, and the Customs replied us and assured us that yes, it was not only rice that they promised the Office of the Senior Special Assistant to the President, but that they promised them clothes and other assistive devices.
“But that so far, because of the subsidy removal and its effects on Nigerians most especially persons with disabilities who either lost their sources of livelihood or do not have the strength and capacity to go out and fend for themselves, they have graciously decided to give out 1000 bags of rice to the Office of the Senior Special Assistant to the President to distribute to Nigerians with disabilities, and these 1000 bags are 50kg bags,” Musa stated.
He said that they later began their investigation and discovered that 500 bags out of the 1000 bags of rice released had been sold off and that the proceeds were paid into a Zenith Bank account linked to the Office of the SSAP, adding that the remaining 500 bags were rebagged into 10kg bags and distributed to some persons with disabilities.
In the heat of the allegations, the Nigeria Customs Public Relations Officer, Abdullahi Aliyu Maiwada, a Chief Superintendent of Customs, was contacted at his office to clear the air, and he stated emphatically that he had no knowledge of the release of rice to anyone. He maintained that the Nigeria Customs would never embark on such humanitarian services without involving the press and general public, and added that the Customs halted the direct distribution of rice and other commodities to vulnerable members of the society after one of such attempts led to a stampede. He however said that the new strategy adopted in distributing the commodities is to release them to churches, mosques and other organizations that interface directly with the people.
“We are not distributing rice. If we have the rice, we distribute it. I’m not aware of the Customs distributing rice to the Presidency. I don’t have that record. I’m not aware of that. It’s not to my knowledge, and I don’t know,” said Maiwada, in response to the poser on whether the Nigeria Customs Service officially or unofficially handed any bags of rice to the SSAP to distribute to PWDs.
To buttress the claims already made by Comrade Musa about the office of the SSAP receiving the said bags of rice, Donald Unanka, founder of the Potter’s Gallery and one of those who had accompanied Comrade Musa to the Customs Headquarters to enquire about the fate of the rice, insisted that the Customs did hand over 1000 bags of 50kg rice to Abba Isa, and that an Assistant Comptroller of Customs (ACG) whose name was not mentioned, came down to address them during their visit and affirmed to them that the bags of rice were actually handed over to Abba Isa.
“I represented my own organization during our visit to the Customs Headquarters in Abuja. So when we got to the Customs, one of the ACGs had to come down to us because the office was not accessible to us, it was upstairs. So the man came down and confirmed to us that Abba Isa got a release of 1000 bags of 50kg foreign rice. Yes! And that there is one other thing that they promised which they had not fulfilled which is clothes.
“They also promised him some consignment of clothes, but that the papers they released to him carried 1000 bags of rice. And the man asked us why we were asking for that information, and we said it was for the purpose of accountability, to know how we can track the distribution of the rice,” disclosed Unanka
In a bid to find out from Abba Isa if the allegations leveled against him were true, several calls were put across to him through his private MTN line, but he did not pick any of them, neither did he respond to the text message sent to him. Then at about 9:00pm of the same day that the calls were made to him, he called back this journalist and insulted the living day light out of him. He even threatened to destroy the journalist and dared him to go ahead with the publishing of the “unfounded allegations.”
“You are stupid! You want to tarnish the image of a man in the Presidency? You call me to tell me this rubbish? I will destroy you! I will arrest you,” was all that Abba Isa had to say in response to the question asked him about the veracity or otherwise of the allegations leveled against him.
Alhaji Mohammed Abba Isa, Senior Special Assistant to the President on Special Needs and Equal Opportunities
Alhaji Mohammed Abba Isa, Senior Special Assistant to the President on Special Needs and Equal Opportunities
He afterwards sent a text message to this journalist in Hausa language which read, “Kachi durun uwarka,” translated in English to mean, “Go and f*ck your mother!”
In a further attempt to give Abba Isa and his office an opportunity to say his own side of the story, Abba Isa’s Chief of Staff, Barrister Yusuf Iyodo, was contacted, and he affirmed through a Whatsapp message that the Office of the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Special Needs and Equal Opportunities received the said 1000 bags of rice and that the distribution of the rice had already commenced.
He denied the allegations that 500 bags of the rice were sold to some rice merchant, but claimed that 87 bags were destroyed by water. When asked to produce evidence to support his claim that some of the bags of rice got damaged, he said:
“Please disregard that information, it is not important for you. No need. That information does not exist because it does not concern you. I only said that to you by the way. We are not making case with it.”
Meanwhile, Comrade Musa had earlier alleged that 60 out of the 1000 bags of rice had initially been handed over to a senior aide to Abba Isa as his own share of the booty, an allegation that was also denied by Barr. Iyodo.
“We learnt that a top aide to the SSAP was also allocated 60 bags from the said rice. That is something that we are still investigating. But graciously, some staff of the Office of the SSAP tried to justify the selling of part of the rice which there are no figures attached to, like how much was each one sold? What was the reason for it being sold? And again, the main issue is ‘why are other zones not being given?’” stated Musa.
Musa further disclosed that Barrister Iyodo had claimed, during their interrogation and investigation, that an undisclosed number of bags of rice were sold off to cover logistical and security costs as some police escorts were attached to the trailer that transported the rice from Lagos to Abuja.
Musa then asked why the portions of rice meant for the disability communities in the South-West, South-East and South-South regions were not at once removed from the 1000 bags in Lagos and distributed to them since those regions are closer to Lagos than Abuja.
“What is mind-boggling and laughable is when a response from the office of the SSAP came and said that they sold some of the bags of rice to pay certain bills of conveying the rice from Lagos to Abuja, that they paid the security personnel that would protect the rice from Lagos.
“So, one wonders ‘if the rice is from Lagos, why wouldn’t the portion meant for the South-West be removed and given to them there? Why wouldn’t the SSAP’s office find it right to remove the portion of the South-South and given to them? Why didn’t the SSAP’s office remove the portion that was meant for the South-East and given to them?” queried Musa.
Musa’s grievance is majorly premised on the fact that Abba Isa, who is himself a person with disability, and who was supposed to be sympathetic to the plights and sufferings of his fellow persons with disabilities, decided to cheat his co-comrades.
“Part of the reason they are agitating is, if one of them who is said to be representing them in government could do this to them, one can only wonder ‘what about those that are not persons with disabilities?’ One wonders if he is happy to see persons with disabilities begging for cups of rice to eat,” said Musa in a rather hysterical tone.
Musa and his co-agitators have expressed their utter resolve to pursue their investigation to a logical conclusion and petition the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Inspector General of Police at the end of their fact-finding mission.
Asked if they are not scared of legal action being taken against them by the man they are accusing, Donald Unanka said:
“Let him go to court! If he says that he did not sell the rice, he will also prove to us that he did not sell it. He is a public officer. Even if he lies, his account for that month will not lie. For the purpose of public investigation, even if he lies, his account statement will not lie.
“So, it’s good he goes to court. In fact, if he goes to court, it makes the matter very easy. Let the engagement be formal. If he has enough courage, let him go to court.”
Now, another major allegations being pushed by Comrade Musa and his co-agitators is that the remaining bags of rice that were not sold were rebagged into 10kg bags and distributed to pockets of persons in the Federal Capital Territory and Nasarawa State. The 10kg bags that were used for the rebagging were branded with images of President Bola Tinubu, a move that Comrade Musa thinks is politically-motivated and intended to impress the president.
The 10kg bags of rice said to have been rebagged by Abba Isa
The 10kg bags of rice said to have been rebagged by Abba Isa
Musa further alleged that all the bags of rice distributed so far by Abba Isa in the FCT and Nasarawa do not amount to even a hundred, and queried the authenticity of Abba Isa’s claim of distributing bags of rice to hundreds of persons with disabilities in the two states mentioned. He stated that the Office of the SSAP claimed to be distributing bags of rice to the North-Central states but ended up handing bags of rice to only a very few persons.
“It was in Karu local government area of Nasarawa State where it was said that they’ll distribute bags of rice to the North-Central states, but I couldn’t find the representatives of Plateau State, I couldn’t find representatives of Benue State, I couldn’t find representatives of Kwara State, I couldn’t find representatives of Kogi State, and I couldn’t find representatives of Niger State.
“I saw only one person from Nasarawa who was not given even up to three bags of the 10kg rice. So, he couldn’t have been given the entire Nasarawa State portion of the rice,” said Musa.
But in an attempt to debunk Comrade Musa’s claim that only a handful of persons with disabilities were handed the 10kg bags of rice, Barr. Iyodo insisted that the rebagged rice was distributed to 1000 beneficiaries at the Airport Road in Abuja, and that 1000 beneficiaries also received 10kg bags of rice at Karu, in Nasarawa State.
To further buttress his claims that the rice was widely distributed to thousands of beneficiaries across the country, Barr. Iyodo provided some photographs of the widely-publicized distribution of 10kg bags of rice to persons with disabilities in Yobe State. He claimed that the number of persons who received the bags of rice at Yobe was 1000, and that apart from the rice, they also got cartons of noodles and some cash to cover their transport fares.
Again, Iyodo claimed that his boss and three other members of his team had to fly to Lagos at least twice while negotiating for the release of the rice, and that so much money was spent to cover the costs of flight, accommodation and feeding for the four of them. But to Iyodo’s claims, Comrade Musa has continued to ask if it was just for covering the costs of air tickets, feeding and accommodation that 500 whole bags of 50kg rice were sold. Musa insists that the 31 million naira that was realized from the sale of the 500 bags of rice couldn’t have all been expended for the above-mentioned purposes, that there was more to the entire story.
Again, Barr. Iyodo insisted that there were other additional costs incurred while still transporting the rice to Abuja from Lagos, such as the payments made to labourers to load the rice into the trailer at Lagos and to offload them at Abuja, and the costs of renting a warehouse for the storage of the rice, and hiring local security men to watch over the rice when the trailer conveying it broke down at Ilorin. He added that the local security men spent 9 straight days guarding the rice at the spot where the trailer broke down, and that they were adequately rewarded for their job. He declined providing any evidence to support all the claims he made above.
At the moment, Comrade Musa and his co-agitators are already gearing up to petition the EFCC and the IGP on the said allegations, and they intend to get to the root of the matter for the sole reason of fighting corruption and holding political office-holders accountable for their stewardship.
Asked if he has any interests in all of this, Comrade Musa stated that ironically, he even shares a cordial relationship with the accused, but that that will not deter him from pursuing what he considers as a just cause.
As it stands now, Comrade Musa has brought forward three questions that he insists the SSAP must answer to completely exonerate himself from the allegations leveled against him, and the three questions are: (1) Was 31 million naira, proceeds of the sale of 500 bags of the 50kg rice handed to the SSAP to distribute to persons with disabilities across the country, paid into the Zenith Bank account of the SSAP or not? (2) Were 60 bags out of the 1000 bags of 50kg rice given to a top aide of the SSAP as his own share of the booty or not? And (3) Were certain zones of the country shortchanged in the distribution of the rice or not?
Comrade Musa has maintained that unless the above questions are answered, he and his co-agitators will not stay silent, but will continue to agitate until justice is served to whomever deserves it.
SAHARA REPORTERS
News
PenCom scraps pre-approval for pension adverts by PFAs
The National Pension Commission (PenCom) has abolished the requirement for Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs) to obtain prior written approval before releasing advertisements and marketing campaign materials.
The new directive was contained in a circular dated May 8, 2026, and signed by the Director of the Surveillance Department, Abdulrahman Saleem.
According to the Commission, the policy takes immediate effect and replaces Section 6.3.1 of the Guidelines for the Operations of Pension Fund Administrators, which previously required PFAs to secure written approval before advertising or promoting their products and services.
PenCom said the decision was aimed at promoting operational efficiency, reducing bureaucratic delays and enabling quicker dissemination of information to potential clients.
The Commission stated that although prior approval is no longer mandatory, PFAs are still required to notify PenCom before deploying advertisements across broadcast, print, digital and outdoor media platforms.
“In furtherance of the Commission’s commitment to promoting operational efficiency, reduce bureaucratic delays, and quicker dissemination of information by PFAs to their potential clients, the Commission deems it necessary to allow PFAs to henceforth release their advertisement and media campaign materials without the prior approval of the Commission,” the circular stated.
PenCom, however, outlined strict compliance conditions that operators must meet before releasing promotional materials.
Under the new framework, PFAs are required to disclose the duration and timelines of advertisements and submit copies of creative materials before publication.
The Commission also directed operators to clearly define the target audience for each campaign and provide evidence of internal clearance from their Legal and Compliance departments.
It further stated that pension products or services being advertised must already have PenCom’s approval before they can be promoted to the public.
Despite relaxing the approval process, PenCom stressed that regulatory oversight remains fully in force.
The Commission warned that all advertising materials must be factual, verifiable and compliant with the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 as well as the Pension Reform Act 2014.
PenCom also prohibited the use of lotteries, prize draws and other inducements in pension advertisements.
In addition, the Commission banned misleading claims, unaudited financial references and deceptive fee disclosures in promotional campaigns.
PFAs were equally warned against using government symbols, public figures or institutional assets without proper authorisation.
The circular further directed pension operators to register slogans, taglines and promotional phrases with the national Trademarks Registry before deployment.
PenCom maintained that PFAs would remain fully responsible for all advertising content, including campaigns handled by third-party consultants, media agencies and digital influencers.
Industry stakeholders believe the latest move is part of broader reforms by the Commission aimed at streamlining pension administration and reducing delays within Nigeria’s Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS).
Last year, PenCom also eliminated the pre-approval requirement for several categories of retirement benefit payments, allowing PFAs to process and approve requests without seeking prior clearance from the Commission.
The reform, which took effect on June 1, 2025, was introduced to fast-track pension payments and improve service delivery to Retirement Savings Account holders.
News
Anambra Assembly confirms Soludo’s 18 commissioners
Anambra State House of Assembly has confirmed the 18 commissioner nominees earlier sent by Governor Chukwuma Soludo on May 4, 2026.
The list comprised second timers like the former commissioner for Information, Dr Law Mefor, to be in charge of Information and Value Reformation, former commissioner for Health, Dr Afam Obidike and Commissioner for Lands, Prof Offonze Amuchiazu, SAN
The others confirmed during plenary on Wednesday are Chief Ugoji Amedu for Culture, Entertainment and Tourism and Dr Clem Aguiyi for Environment
Others include ;
Agriculture — Dr. Ben Chuks Odoemena
Budget and Economic Planning— Mr Chukwukadibia Okoye
Education — Dr. Ekene Ogugua
Finance — Mr Izuchukwu M. Okafor.
Justice and Attorney-General — Barr. Tobechukwu Nweke, SAN
Local Government and Community Affairs— Barr. Vin Ezeaka
Petroleum and Mineral Resources — Prof. Charles Ofoegbu
Physical Planning and Urban Development — Barr. Chijioke Oseloka Ojukwu
Power — Engr. Casmir Chinenye Agummadu
Works and Infrastructure — Arc. Okey Ezeobi
Transport — Hon. Eddy Ibuzo
Women Affairs and Social Development — Mrs Esther Chinyere Onyekesi and
Youth Development and Sports — Mr. Patrick Agha Mba
They were confirmed exactly 3.38 pm by the Lawmakers, after the report presented by the screening committee, led by Hon Noble Igwe,(Ogbaru 1) constituency
Before discharging the new commissioners from the plenary, the speaker, Hon Somtochukwu Udeze, charged them to be prudent in the discharge of their duties.
“If Anambra is to be a destination, I want all of us to work together. It is a new beginning from today in the state. Leadership is a responsibility; as you assume office, it is on the table.
“Every decision you make, you must answer the question, ‘ How does it improve the lives of the people? You have to always make yourselves accessible to the people,” Udeze said.
Responding on behalf of other commissioners, Dr Law Mefor, thanked the Lawmakers and commended the governor, Prof Chukwuma Soludo, for finding them worthy of the positions.
He assured that they would not disappoint the people of the state in their new positions.
Meanwhile, Prof Soludo has sent a second batch of a new list to the Assembly for confirmation
The additional Commissioner-nominees are Arc. Henry Arinze – Commissioner Designate For Housing; Mr Nonso Chukwuma Ebonwu – Commissioner Designate for Commerce, and Dr. Ezeaka Augustine Uwaeme – Executive Secretary, Anambra State Health Insurance Agency (ASHIA)
The new names were read by the speaker, Hon Somtochukwu Udeze, during Wednesday’s plenary and referred the new list to the Committee on Screening and Election Matters.
News
NBA rejects mandatory robing of civilian lawyers before courts martial
The National Executive Council (NEC) of the Nigerian Bar Association has rejected the directive mandating civilian legal practitioners appearing before Courts Martial to wear legal robes, insisting that such a requirement has no legal backing under existing Nigerian laws.
The position was adopted unanimously during the NEC meeting, following deliberations on a recent Convening Order establishing a Court Martial to try officers and soldiers accused of plotting a coup against the Federal Government.
Earlier, the President of NBA, Afam Osigwe, wrote a letter dated April 27, 2026, to the Chief of Army Staff over the controversial directive requiring civilian lawyers to appear robed before the military tribunal.
In its resolution, the Council maintained that the mandatory robing requirement amounts to an unlawful extension of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners.
According to NEC, Rule 79 of the Rules of Procedure (Army) 1972 merely outlines the categories of persons qualified to appear before a Court Martial and does not prescribe any dress code for counsel appearing before such tribunals.
The Council further argued that the regulation of the conduct and appearance of legal practitioners in Nigeria falls exclusively within the authority of the General Council of the Bar pursuant to the Legal Practitioners Act and the Rules of Professional Conduct.
NEC emphasized that Rule 45 of the Rules of Professional Conduct specifically identifies the courts before which lawyers are required to appear robed, namely the High Courts, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
It stated that the deliberate mention of those courts excludes tribunals and quasi-judicial bodies not expressly listed, including Courts Martial.
The Council also noted that legal practitioners do not appear robed before several constitutionally recognised tribunals and quasi-judicial bodies, adding that there was therefore no legal basis for extending the requirement to military courts.
While acknowledging that Courts Martial are recognised courts established under the Armed Forces Act, NEC maintained that such recognition does not automatically import the ceremonial and procedural rules applicable to superior courts of record under the Constitution.
The NBA NEC consequently called on the Nigerian Army to immediately review and withdraw the aspect of the Convening Order compelling civilian lawyers appearing before Courts Martial to wear robes.
-
News22 hours agoWATCH: This is Karu, Abuja express road now(Video)
-
News15 hours agoJust in: EFCC Nabs Tinubu’s Aide Over Alleged N500Bn Fraud
-
Entertainment15 hours agoAlexx Ekubo: Family Finally speaks, issues statement
-
Entertainment20 hours agoAll you need to know about popular movie star, Alexx Ekubo
-
Sports6 hours agoCAF Introduce New Rules After Controversial AFCON 2025 Final
-
Politics6 hours agoNWC approves PDP 2026 gubernatorial aspirants screening C’ttee (List attached)
-
Economy6 hours agoNo delay at ports, Apapa Customs comptroller warns officers
-
Sports6 hours agoLaLiga: Mourinho’s Return To Real Madrid ‘In Final Stages’

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login