Connect with us

News

OF DEMOCRACY COMPASS, 2027 ELECTIONS GAMBIT, AND GHANA’S CHALLENGE

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

BY BOLAJI AFOLABI

Concerned about the many uninspiring, and despairing postures, actions, comments, and positions of the political class to issues of nation building, cross-sectoral development, and national cohesion, the writer did a treatise which was published in the last few days of 2024. Conscious of encouraging political developments in a neighboring country, the piece; “Ghana, Raising The Bar of Democracy in Africa” was intended to challenge Nigerian politicians to change their approach to politics; and raise national issues beyond unnecessary politicking. Also, to attract some measures of citizens believability; ingeniously use politics as a veritable platform for national growth and development. As well as deploying politics as vehicle for the promotion of unity, peace, and tranquility amongst Nigerians irrespective of tribe, ethnicity, religion, and other categorization.

Given the flurry of reactions, comments, and requests by readers, at home and abroad, which by the way are humbling and inspiring , an encore to the earlier piece becomes inevitable. Moreso, a developing political matter between Leaders of some opposition parties has made this compelling.

As Nigerians were looking forward to welcoming the New Year; whilst bidding 2024 a timely exit with the numerous personal difficulties, tensions, and challenges people experienced, the political atmosphere was charged by one of the top politicians. Rabiu Musa Kwankwanso, presidential candidate of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) at the 2023 general elections made some daring allegations, and damning revelations. The Kano-born water engineer has traversed Nigeria’s politics, and public service occupying various juicy positions. At various times, he was Deputy Speaker, House of Representatives; Kano state Governor; Defence Minister; and Senator. Indeed, in his over three decades visibility in Nigeria’s political and governance landscape is among the few and privileged people to have both legislative and executive experiences.

Advertisement

Typical of his nature and style, Kwankwanso had a no-holds barred interview with the Hausa Service of the British Broadcasting Service (BBC). Described as bold, frank, and fearless by his admirers, he was audacious, unapologetic, and fiery in his responses. In the engaging, thought provoking, and revealing interview, Kwankwanso said inter alia, “I was terrified about the information that I got that the PDP are meeting clerics and other leaders and in their last meeting, which involved about 45 clerics, that we reached an agreement that Atiku (Abubakar) will serve one term, and myself will also serve one term and Peter Obi will serve two terms. This is a lie, I never took part in any agreement. This is completely false; such an agreement never existed.”

Not done yet, Kwankwanso in his staccato shots declared that, “I was deeply angered about the information. Elderly people aged 70 to 80 years will sit and lie, telling clerics and other leaders something that never happened. With this (these) lies, we can’t believe such people that they can only serve one term in office if you entrust them with leadership.” The two-terms Kano state Governor revealed that, “such lies and deceit are precisely why we left. Myself, Peter Obi, Wike, and others all left.” Confident of his position, he alluded that, “Iam still alive and healthy, there is no way you can assemble over 40 people without me having 2 or 3 among them that will inform me of what transpired. This is not good for personality to lie. In such incident, if a government is formed on the basis of lies, it’s like starting a foundation on a week structure.”

Perhaps unknown to Kwankwanso, these allegations are not only weighty but has opened the pandora box about what transpired between personalities, groups, and associations in the opposition ranks before the 2023 presidential election. Perhaps, it could be deliberate, or unintended, there are some uncompleted comments, missing gaps that will provoke further enquiries. One is confident that, some day, in the nearest future, the true-story of what happened before, during, and after the last presidential election will be unearth. Nigerians would be curious to know what led to the loss of opposition parties in an election that people believed the uninspiring performance of Muhammadu Buhari should profit them. Scholars, students, policy makers, and analysts would want to know reasons behind the exits of Kwankwanso, and Obi from the umbrella party, which opened the flanks of opposition such that they were painfully and pitiably divided into three parties; PDP, LP, NNPP before the elections.

Sadly, the Kwankwanso’s diatribe, cobwebbed shape of leading opposition parties, and undisguised desperation for power by some politicians when juxtaposed with the realities on ground, paints terribly low image of Nigeria’s politics. The PDP is patently and sharply divided to almost irredeemable position. With litany of cases over its neck, it appears the party swims in perpetual crisis. The Labour Party (LP) is no better as it has its own share of issues which bothers on leadership. A party that have three individuals laying claim to National Chairman cannot be taken seriously. That Governor Alex Otti of Abia state allegedly ensured the victory of Zenith Labour Party (ZLP) at the Local Government elections speaks volumes about the LP. Even Kwankwanso’s NNPP is experiencing it’s share of political turmoil. The unfolding crisis is sweeping through the party’s national working committee; national executive council; and national assembly. Indeed, other smaller political parties in the opposition ranks are bedeviled with varied degree of factionalisation.

Advertisement

Discerning Nigerians are saddened that few leaders in opposition parties are dissipating energies and resources towards gaining upper hand for the 2027 election, in a rudderless and unconscious manner. Apolitical minds conclude that the approach will further exacerbate crisis within the parties. Some analysts wonder why few leaders are eternally fixated on having their names feature on the ballot, that they have refused to see the imperative of resolution of crisis, consensus building, and realistic party growth as the critical issues of the moment. A school of thought argues that the resort to propaganda, misinformation, and falsehood by few leaders which is geared towards the hoodwink, blackmail, and submission of perceived political enemies, and opponents will boomerang. Another school of thought opines that since opposition parties have continually failed to elicit citizens confidence and believe, largely due to the craze, and penchant for “grab-it-all” and selfish, arrogant posturing of some leaders, the desire to win power remains a long ambition.

It is good to romanticize, and wish that the Ghana scenario happens in Nigeria. However, the focus, intent, and operations of politicking in Nigeria differs from what is obtained in Ghana. Pathetically, our political parties are only concerned about elections; participating and (likely) winning. Politicians pay little or no attention to party growth and development. Whereas in Ghana, politicians devote time, resources, and enablement into building, deepening, and nurturing political parties. Can the political class; especially opposition parties in Nigeria dedicatedly follow the template of Ghana’s leading opposition party, the National Democratic Congress (NDC)? Since it lost presidential and parliamentary elections to the National People’s Party (NPP) in 2016, the entire leadership, elders, and critical stakeholders in the party remained faithful. Unlike here where opposition lawmakers cross-carpet to the ruling party with the speed of light, such action is unheard of in Ghana. Rather than embark on ludicrous and irresponsible defections, Ghanaian politicians stay back, stay through, and resolutely determined in building opposition.

True, the 2027 general elections is not far away. Rather than engaging in theatrical positioning, and hysterical posturing in the quest for party-control, leaders of opposition should embark on sincere, and serious clean-up of selves, and by extension parties. They must relegate arrogance, personal ambitions, stubborn pursuit of power, and similar tendencies to the background. With the preponderance of socio-economic challenges in the country, the opposition parties must paper all the cracks, mend the bends, and resolve all issues towards playing it’s role effectively and efficiently. They must take enduring lessons from the NDC, who for years grew the party to the level at which Ghanaians chose it over and above the ruling NPP. They did not only mouth but worked assiduously for political power-change. However, it is instructive to note that in all these years, Ghanaian president-elect; John Mahama Dramani was the face of opposition in truth and deed.

* BOLAJI AFOLABI, a development communications specialist was with the Office of Public Affairs in The Presidency.

Advertisement

News

Ex-PDP Chairman Bamanga Tukur is dead

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Ex- National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and prominent Nigerian businessman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, has died at the age of 90.

Tukur’s family confirmed to TRT Afrika that he died on Saturday at his residence in Abuja after a prolonged illness.

His burial is expected to take place on Saturday at the Lamido of Adamawa’s Palace in Yola, Adamawa State.

The late politician and businessman is survived by 17 children.

Advertisement

Tukur served as governor of the former Gongola State, which was later divided into Adamawa and Taraba states, during Nigeria’s Second Republic.

He later served as Minister of Industries under the military administration of General Sani Abacha and also sought to contest the Nigerian presidency.

Tukur went on to become National Chairman of the PDP, playing a prominent role in the party’s leadership and Nigeria’s political affairs.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Natural Disasters Destroy Up to $800bn Infrastructure Annually, CDRI Warns

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

Natural disasters destroy between $700 billion and $800 billion worth of infrastructure globally every year, with the wider economic impact estimated to be about seven times higher.

The Director General of the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI), Amit Prothi, stated this while addressing international journalists covering the BRICS meetings in New Delhi, India.

Prothi called for stronger investment in disaster-resilient infrastructure as climate change increases the frequency and severity of extreme weather events.

Advertisement

He said. “On average, we lose about $700 to $800 billion of infrastructure every year. That’s only the direct damage. The economic cost of that damage is roughly seven times higher”.

He cited wildfires in Los Angeles, floods, earthquakes and cyclones in different parts of the world as examples of disasters causing increasingly severe damage to infrastructure and placing additional pressure on national economies.

According to him, governments need to have a clearer understanding of the risks facing critical infrastructure and ensure that resilience is incorporated into planning and construction before disasters occur.

Naijablitznews.com reports that CDRI was launched by India at the United Nations in New York in 2019 and has since grown from 24 founding members to 70 members, with the Philippines expected to become the 71st.

Advertisement

Its membership cuts across Africa, Asia, Europe, the Americas and the Pacific and includes multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and regional development banks.

“The coalition was created to bring practices, knowledge and experiences together so that countries can better understand and address the growing complexities of disaster risks,” Prothi said.

India remains the permanent co-chair of the coalition, while the second co-chair rotates every two years. Previous co-chairs have included the United Kingdom, the United States and France, while India and Brazil currently lead the organisation.

Prothi explained that CDRI does not directly finance infrastructure projects but works with governments to ensure that resilience is considered when infrastructure is planned and designed.

Advertisement

“We are the chilli in the soup,” he said, using an analogy to explain CDRI’s role.

“When countries build roads, power systems or telecommunications networks, we help them understand how those investments can withstand future risks from climate change and disasters”, he added.

He said changing climate patterns meant that governments can no longer rely solely on traditional infrastructure standards and building codes based on past experiences.

“You may not have experienced floods before, but patterns are changing. The question is how you prepare your infrastructure for those future risks,” he said.
Critical infrastructure at risk
Telecommunications, power and transport systems are among the key areas receiving attention from the coalition because of their importance during and after disasters.

Advertisement

Recalling his experience during Nepal’s devastating 2015 earthquake, Prothi said the failure of telecommunications infrastructure demonstrated how critical communication networks become when disasters strike.

“I was in Kathmandu during the earthquake and could send a brief message to my family. Others couldn’t contact their loved ones because telecommunications infrastructure had broken down.

“Communication is becoming increasingly critical during disasters,” he said.

CDRI is also working with governments to assess risks facing electricity networks and transport infrastructure and to incorporate risk data into infrastructure planning.

Advertisement

The coalition has increasingly become involved in major international discussions on disaster risk reduction, climate adaptation and resilient infrastructure, including the G20, BRICS, COP climate conferences and United Nations platforms.

During India’s G20 presidency, CDRI supported the establishment of a Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilient Infrastructure Working Group. The initiative continued under Brazil’s G20 presidency and has remained part of wider discussions on climate adaptation and resilience.

“As global conversations move increasingly toward adaptation and resilience, the relevance of disaster-resilient infrastructure is growing,” he said.

The CDRI DG, also stressed that resilience should not end with disaster preparedness and prevention, arguing that countries must have systems that allow them to recover quickly when disasters occur.

Advertisement

“The speed of recovery matters. The longer it takes countries to rebuild, the greater the impact on communities and national economies,” he said.

He said the coalition was exploring innovative financing options, including insurance and private-sector participation, to enable countries to mobilise funds for reconstruction more quickly after disasters.
CDRI turns to data, technology
The coalition has also developed a global risk database designed to estimate infrastructure losses across countries and identify vulnerabilities in different sectors.

Prothi said Brazil records average annual infrastructure losses of about $13 billion, while losses across Africa are estimated at a similar level.

The database enables governments to identify infrastructure vulnerabilities and develop resilience measures based on the specific risks facing different sectors.

Advertisement

“Different infrastructure sectors face different risks. Power transmission systems, for example, may be highly vulnerable to cyclones, while buildings may face greater risks from earthquakes,” he said.

Looking ahead, CDRI plans to develop dedicated programmes for Africa, small island developing states, mountain regions and cities, where the effects of climate change and natural disasters are becoming increasingly complex.

Prothi also identified artificial intelligence, satellite data and advanced modelling as emerging tools that could strengthen early warning systems and improve disaster preparedness.

“There is an incredible amount of work under way on using data and predictive models. This will be one of the most important conversations over the coming years,” he said.

Advertisement

He called for greater participation by ASEAN countries, noting that nations in the region had developed considerable experience in dealing with earthquakes, tsunamis, floods and other natural hazards.

“The expertise that countries such as those in ASEAN have developed can benefit the rest of the world, while they also gain from shared global experiences,” he said.

Prothi said stronger international cooperation would be essential as countries confront increasingly unpredictable climate and disaster risks, with resilient infrastructure becoming a critical part of efforts to protect lives, economies and essential services.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Niger unveils fresh Chief of Staff after botched coup

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Niger’s junta chief appointed a new chief of staff, state TV reported on Friday, after a thwarted army mutiny last month shook his grip on power.

Supporters of the military government put down the attempted uprising with the help of Russian mercenaries, but not before intense fighting in the capital.

Disgruntled soldiers attacked several sensitive sites in Niamey and hunkered down in a key military base at the airport.

“By a decree signed on September 11, 2026, General Abdourahamane Tiani has appointed Brigadier General Mamane Sani Kiaou as chief of staff of the armed forces,” state TV reported a statement as saying.

Advertisement

Kiaou, who previously served as army chief of staff, replaces General Moussa Salaou Barmou.

The statement did not say why Barmou had been dismissed.

Niger has been run by General Tiani since a coup in July 2023 that toppled the elected president Mohamed Bazoum, who has been detained ever since.

Tiani also appointed General Abdourahmane Abou Zataka to succeed Kiaou as army chief of staff, the statement added.

Advertisement

Described as a “seasoned field commander” by associates, Kiaou has led a fight against jihadist groups in Niger’s western Tillaberi region and in the southeastern Diffa area.

Nigerien state media reported that he recently concluded a tour of the country’s key military garrisons aimed at “restoring cohesion among the troops.”

Kiaou also led negotiations that resulted in the withdrawal of French and US forces from Niger following the July 2023 coup.

Tiani has moved the country closer to Russia and away from Western partners, notably former colonial power France.
State television had previously broadcast accusations that France was behind last month’s uprising.

Advertisement

AFP

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News