Connect with us

News

Tik Tok still swims against the tide in the USA

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Sonny Aragba-Akpore

President Donald Trump muted a ban on Tik Tok in 2020 in the dying days of his first White House residency but strangely after signing the Executive Order in his second coming on January 20,2025,to stay action on the enforcement of the Supreme Court ban,he was asked by a reporter why he’s had a change of heart since trying to ban TikTok in 2020, his response was “Because I got to use it.”

He floated the possibility of a joint venture running the company, saying he was seeking a 50-50 partnership between “the United States” and its Chinese owner ByteDance. But he did not give any further details on how that might work.

Trump also said he may impose new trade tariffs on China if a deal for the platform is not struck.

Advertisement

He was quoted as saying If Beijing rejected a deal “it would be somewhat of a hostile act”,

In the year 2020, Trump issued an executive order citing TikTok’s ability to capture vast amounts of user data as a significant national security threat. The order sought to prohibit certain transactions involving ByteDance but was blocked by federal courts.

Subsequently, the Trump Administration directed ByteDance to divest its U.S. TikTok operations and user data, but these efforts were stalled as negotiations with the president Joe Biden Administration aimed at a nondivestiture agreement failed to resolve the government’s concerns.

ByteDance’s proposed national security agreement was ultimately deemed insufficient to mitigate risks posed by Chinese control. Against this backdrop, Congress enacted the sale-or-ban law, further targeting TikTok and similar applications.

Advertisement

According to the Supreme Court’s finding, TikTok’s ultimate parent company, ByteDance, is a privately held company that has operations in China. ByteDance owns TikTok’s proprietary algorithm, which is developed and maintained in China.

The company is subject to Chinese laws that require it to assist or cooperate with the Chinese government’s intelligence work and to ensure that the Chinese government has the power to access and control private data that the company holds.

Underscored in the decision, TikTok’s extensive data collection from more than 170 million U.S. users could be exploited for surveillance, public influence campaigns or other harmful purposes that threaten national security. The Act and the holding reflect Congress’ and the Supreme Court’s efforts to address growing concerns over foreign adversary-controlled applications through the access to sensitive data of U.S. nationals and the resulting potential risks to U.S. national security.

With President Trump,s Executive Order to maintain the status quo on Tik Tok for 75 days,and the likely acquisition of 50% ownership in ByteDance,by Americans,Tik Tok still swims against the tide.

Advertisement

Tik Tok had gone to the Supreme Court to appeal against the April 24,2024 “Protecting Americans Against Foreign Adversary Controlled Application Act”but in a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 17, 2025, rejected TikTok’s appeal and upheld the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (Act).
The Act which was signed into law on April 24, 2024, gave ByteDance Ltd., the TikTok app’s Chinese parent company, nine months to divest the popular U.S. company or be banned from operating in the U.S.
ByteDance mounted a First Amendment challenge to the Act but was unsuccessful at the high court.
Starting on Jan. 19, 2025, one day before the inauguration of President Donald Trump, the Act effectively banned TikTok unless its U.S. operations are divested from ByteDance.

The platform went off air for 24 hours but after the Executive Order,it has 75 days to rejig its operations and determine the status of its operations in line with the subsisting Act.

In TikTok’s case, as established by the Supreme Court’s decision, the app is classified as a foreign adversary-controlled application due to its ownership and control by ByteDance.

Accordingly, the Act bans the distribution, maintenance or updates of TikTok in the U.S. unless ByteDance completes a qualified divestiture.

Advertisement

This divestiture would require ByteDance to relinquish all direct and indirect control over TikTok’s U.S. operations, ensuring its operational independence and preventing any future ties with ByteDance or other entities designated as foreign adversaries.

Should ByteDance refuse to divest its holdings in TikTok, the app would face a nationwide ban. The ban would not result in the immediate removal of the app from users’ devices. Instead, the ban would be enforced through penalties targeting companies that provide services to banned entities, such as internet hosting providers and app store operators such as Apple and Google.

These companies would be prohibited from distributing or updating TikTok on their platforms, leading to a gradual degradation of the app. Over time, without updates or maintenance, TikTok would likely become obsolete and unusable.

The Act prohibits any company from distributing, maintaining or updating an entity classified as a foreign adversary-controlled application within the U.S. Such an application is defined as one operated by a company that’s controlled by a foreign adversary and deemed by the president to pose a significant threat to U.S. national security. Violations of these restrictions can result in civil enforcement actions and significant monetary penalties.

Advertisement

The Act provides an exception for foreign adversary-controlled applications if they undergo a qualified divestiture. A qualified divestiture requires a presidential determination that the application is no longer under the control of a foreign adversary. Furthermore, the divestiture must ensure that no operational relationships remain between the U.S. operations of the application and any former entities affiliated with a foreign adversary.

The Act was signed with broad support from Republicans and Democrats.

Although some lawmakers had urged President Joe Biden to grant a reprieve to prevent TikTok from going dark in the U.S. as soon as Jan. 19,2025 ,the TikTok ban had already resulted in a number of “TikTok refugees” who moved to another Chinese app, RedNote, short for “Little Red Book.” RedNote became the most downloaded app in Apple’s app store in the U.S. the week leading up to the Supreme Court’s decision.

If this trend continues, this “migration” to a similarly situated app might defeat the purpose of the Act. The TikTok ban illustrates how U.S. regulatory actions are designed to mitigate potential threats posed by foreign adversaries, significantly increasing compliance requirements for cross-border investments and technology operations.

Advertisement

Particularly, the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the TikTok ban underlines the trend of intensifying scrutiny of foreign-controlled entities that collect or handle sensitive data in the U.S.

Although it’s not clear whether there will be a reprieve for Tik Tok,there are strong indications that the Trump administration needs more time to understand the situation and perhaps to be the one to implement the ban.
TikTok has 1,925 billion users globally, with 170 million monthly active users in the United States.
The average daily time spent on TikTok has more than doubled from 27 minutes in 2019 to 58 minutes in 2024.

The most popular categories on TikTok are Entertainment, Dance, and Pranks, with billions of views each.

Top influencers on TikTok include Charli D’Amelio, Khabane Lame, and Addison Rae, each with tens of millions of followers.
TikTok’s user base has grown exponentially from 133 million in 2018 to over 1,925 billion in 2024.

Advertisement

Daily active users on TikTok have skyrocketed into the millions, reflecting the platform’s ability to engage users on a daily basis.

News

Just in: Police finally handover 16-year-old Jennifer to parents after alleged forced conversion to Islam

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Bauchi State Police Command has released 16-year-old Jennifer Joseph, a Christian teenager from Adamawa State, to her parents following weeks of controversy over her custody and disputed religious identity.

Jennifer was released to her parents on Monday after extensive deliberations at the Bauchi State Police Command, SaharaReporters has learnt.

The development followed sustained public attention and extensive reporting by SaharaReporters on the circumstances surrounding the teenager, who became the centre of a dispute involving her parents, the Bishara Dole Christian Ministry and an Islamic Da’awah group in Bauchi.

Reverend Mohammed Mohammed of The Gospel of Christ Must Be Preach International Ministry, popularly known as Bishara Dole, confirmed Jennifer’s release to SaharaReporters on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Mohammed, however, disclosed that the police had detained Rev. Badamasi, a staff member of the Bishara Dole ministry, over an allegation that he molested Jennifer while transporting her from her family home in Adamawa State to the ministry in Bauchi.

He described the allegation as unfounded and “laughable,” while insisting that the matter should be investigated properly.

Jennifer’s release comes after a series of controversial developments that had left her parents stranded in Bauchi while seeking to regain custody of their daughter.

The latest development has now introduced another layer to the controversy following the detention of Rev. Badamasi.

Advertisement

According to Reverend Mohammed, the Bishara Dole staff member was detained over an allegation that he molested Jennifer while accompanying her from Adamawa to Bauchi in a commercial bus.

Mohammed rejected the allegation, describing it as “laughable” and insisting that the ministry would not be deterred by what he considered attempts to discredit its members.

SaharaReporters could not independently establish the circumstances surrounding Badamasi’s detention or the allegation against him.

The development is also significant because earlier reports had documented claims by Bishara Dole that allegations of child molestation had been made against the ministry as part of what Mohammed described as an attempt to discredit the Christian organisation.

Advertisement

The ministry had called for an independent investigation into all allegations rather than allowing competing religious interests to determine Jennifer’s custody.

With Jennifer now released to her parents, attention is expected to shift to the circumstances surrounding the teenager’s custody, the competing claims over her religious identity and the allegations that emerged during the dispute.

Continue Reading

News

To be defeated, drug barons must lose their wealth, Marwa declares at Cambridge

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

. Tells global audience of experts how NDLEA uses asset recovery strategy in fight against drug trafficking

The Chairman/Chief Executive of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), Brig. Gen. Mohamed Buba Marwa (Rtd), has told an international gathering of judges, law enforcement chiefs, financial intelligence experts and academics that the war against drug trafficking cannot be won by arrests alone, but must be matched by an equally aggressive pursuit of the proceeds of crime.
Marwa made this declaration while delivering a presentation titled “Criminal Property and the Criminal Process: How Can We Make It More Effective?” at the ongoing 43rd Cambridge International Symposium on Economic Crime, organised by the Centre for Geopolitics, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

According to him, the effectiveness of the criminal process should not be measured only by the number of convictions secured. It should also be measured by whether crime is made unprofitable. A trafficker who loses his liberty but retains his fortune has not truly been defeated. His wealth can finance another operation, support his associates and sustain the criminal enterprise.

“The ultimate objective must therefore be to deny criminals the proceeds of their crime, promptly, and lawfully while preserving the value of the property. Nigeria, through the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, will continue to strengthen this approach.”

Advertisement

Addressing the session chaired by the Honourable Judge Wendy Tien, the NDLEA boss said arresting a trafficker without dismantling his fortune was like “pruning a weed at the stem while leaving its roots undisturbed,” warning that such wealth simply resurfaces “under a different name, through a different front company, in a different jurisdiction.”
He outlined six practical strategies the NDLEA has deployed to strengthen asset recovery, anchored on the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act 2004, the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery and Management) Act 2022, and the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022.

He cited the forfeiture of the Hook Hotel, a property linked to a fugitive drug suspect, which was recovered through non-conviction-based forfeiture and sold for $4.2 million, with proceeds paid into the Federal Government’s forfeited assets account domiciled with the Central Bank of Nigeria; proof, he said, that a fugitive “cannot simply outrun the process and retain the benefit of his crime.”
Marwa also disclosed that NDLEA investigators and prosecutors are now embedded together from the inception of cases, a reform that has shortened the interval between arrest and the securing of restraint orders. He revealed that last month alone, the Agency froze bank accounts worth over $7 million and secured interim forfeiture orders covering multibillion-naira assets, including filling stations, multi-storey buildings and exotic vehicles linked to a fugitive methamphetamine syndicate.

On the landmark case of Nigerian billionaire and suspected drug baron Amadi Simon, arrested in Switzerland through a joint operation involving NDLEA, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and authorities in Switzerland, Greece and France, Marwa explained that three hotels linked to the suspect were placed under professional asset managers rather than shut down, to preserve their value as going concerns pending the outcome of trial.

He further highlighted the Agency’s use of provisions on unexplained wealth and living beyond one’s legitimate means as a powerful investigative trigger, and the interlocutory sale of perishable and depreciating assets to protect their value ahead of final judgment.
He noted that these efforts have now been institutionalised within Nigeria’s National Drug Control Master Plan 2026–2030, ensuring that financial disruption of drug cartels remains a sustained national priority rather than a series of isolated cases.
Distilling these experiences into three guiding principles: speed over sequence, preservation of value, and institutionalization, Marwa acknowledged that challenges remain, particularly around delays in mutual legal assistance, limited forensic accounting capacity, and the need to balance the rights of accused persons with the State’s duty to preserve assets pending trial. He called for faster international cooperation mechanisms and stronger cross-border recognition of non-conviction-based forfeiture orders.
He thanked the Centre for Geopolitics, the organisers of the Symposium, and Judge Tien for the platform, and reaffirmed NDLEA’s readiness to deepen partnerships with jurisdictions and institutions committed to dismantling the financial architecture of drug trafficking.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Sad! Catholic Priest Commits Su!cide Over Transfer To Another Parish

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

In Italy, a 75-year-old Roman Catholic priest took his own life after it was announced that he will be transferred from the parish where he had served for nearly 25 years.

On August 12, the body of 75-year-old Catholic priest Lino Zatelli was found in the Italian city of Trento.

Shortly before his de@th, he had learned of his transfer from the parish where he had served for nearly 25 years, reports Tribune Chrétienne.

That morning, the priest was supposed to celebrate Mass at the Church of San Carlo Borromeo, but he did not appear for the service. The sacristan then went to his home and discovered his body.

Advertisement

Shortly before the tragedy, Zatelli was informed that, as part of a diocesan reorganization, he was required to leave the parish to which he had devoted nearly a quarter of a century.

The priest was deeply distressed by this decision and openly told his parishioners: “I never asked to leave.”

A campaign was even organized to demand he stay at San Carlo, with a petition gathering several hundred signatures.

This tragedy also raises the question of the loneliness and suffering of elederly priests, in Italy as well as in France.

Advertisement

Catholic authors note that for a clergyman, leaving a parish after decades of service means not merely a change of ministry but a break the community that had actually become his family and primary social circle.

At the same time, the authors of the publication emphasize that it is impossible to definitively establish the transfer as the direct cause of the su!cide.

The tragedy has, however, once again drawn attention to the issues of isolation, emotional exhaustion, and lack of support among Catholic clergy.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News