News
House Advances Bill to Shield Judicial Officers from Prosecution
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/house-of-rep.jpg&description=House Advances Bill to Shield Judicial Officers from Prosecution', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/house-of-rep.jpg&description=House Advances Bill to Shield Judicial Officers from Prosecution', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
By Gloria Ikibah
The House of Representatives has progressed a bill aimed at amending the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, ensuring that judicial officers cannot be prosecuted before being lawfully removed from office. The bill passed its second reading during Thursday’s plenary session.
The bill which was originally introduced on April 30, 2024, sponsored by Rep. Solomon Bob (PDP-Rivers), seeks to amend sections 20 and 24 of the existing Act.
According to Rep. Bob, these amendments will safeguard judicial officers from arbitrary legal actions and premature removal.
A key provision in the bill stipulates that no judicial officer shall face prosecution before the tribunal unless they have been officially removed under Section 292 (1) of the Constitution.
Explaining the bill’s objectives, Rep. Bob emphasised the need to reinforce judicial independence by ensuring that disciplinary measures follow due process. He highlighted proposed modifications to Section 20, stating that the Code of Conduct Tribunal should be recognized as a superior court of record with exclusive jurisdiction over offences under the Act.
Additionally, amendments to Section 24 introduce new subsections (5 and 6) to further strengthen judicial protections.
He said: “Nothing in this Act shall permit the commencement of any action against a Judicial Officer before the Tribunal unless such Judicial Officer has been validly removed from office under section 292 (1) of the Constitution.
“Any action seeking to prosecute any Judicial Officer in contravention of sub-section (5) of this section shall not be entertained by the Tribunal.
“It is axiomatic that in a presidential system the three arms of government are separate and independent of one another; each with its powers constitutionally determined. Under our constitution, their powers are created by sections 4, 5, & 6 for the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary respectively.
“The constitution evinces that each arm of government will discharge its responsibilities without interference from the other arms.
He explained further that: “The Code of Conduct Tribunal which is the crux of this bill is a body with statutory judicial powers to try and sanction public office holders found to be in breach of the Code of Conduct Bureau Act. The powers of the Tribunal are pursuant to section 24 of the Principal Act – The Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act.
“The constitution has made very clear provisions for removal of elected officials including judicial officers. The obvious intention is to obviate the threat of arbitrary removal from office, thereby safeguarding the sanctity of the office and affording the office holders the necessary leeway to discharge the functions of their office without fear of being victimized.
“For Judicial officers, the procedure or process for their removal from office is as enunciated in section 292 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. Section 292(1) requires that the removal of a Head of Court by the President or the Governor, as the case may be, must be upon an address by the relevant Legislative House. And in any other case (i.e. Judicial officers other than Heads of Court) by the President or Governor, as the case may be, acting on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council. It is pertinent to note that in both cases, the bases of such removal are incapacity (whether arising from infirmity of mind or body), misconduct or contravention of the code of conduct.
“For ease of reference, section 292(1) of the Constitution is reproduced hereunder: “A judicial officer shall not be removed from his office or appointment before his age of retirement except in the following circumstances.
“Mr. Speaker, Honourable Colleagues, this proposed amendment aims at securing the sanctity of the office of judicial officers, their tenure, freedom from arbitrary interference and harassment, and to ensure that no judicial officer is put on trial except after having been lawfully removed from office in strict compliance with section 292 of the Constitution.
“This Bill will enhance the rule of law and invariably deepen our democracy. I, therefore, with utmost respect, urge it upon you my very dear colleagues”.
Lawmakers engaged in a heated debate over the bill, while some argued for maximum protection, others questioned why immunity is granted to the executive but not the judiciary.
Rep. Peter Ifeanyi supported stronger safeguards for judicial officers but cautioned against granting blanket protection to those who might abuse their positions. He clarified that the term “immunity” was causing confusion and suggested a more precise definition.
Rep. Kalejaye Paul, however, expressed concerns that the bill contradicts constitutional provisions. He argued that rebranding “immunity” as “protection” does not change the bill’s underlying intent. Stressing the Code of Conduct Tribunal’s role in holding public officials accountable, he warned that altering constitutional processes could create loopholes for other sectors to seek similar privileges.
Rep. Sada Soli pointed out that Section 292 of the Constitution already provides safeguards for judicial officers in the performance of their duties. He criticized the trial of a former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) at the Code of Conduct Tribunal without first passing through the National Judicial Council (NJC), calling it a breach of due process. According to him, the bill simply aims to establish a proper legal framework for handling disciplinary actions against judicial officers.
Presiding over the session, Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu noted that Rep. Soli’s explanation had clarified the bill’s intent, allowing members to make informed decisions. The bill was subsequently put to a vote, approved for second reading, and referred to the House Committees on Anti-Corruption and Justice for further consideration.
News
Bill against same-sex marriage passes second reading in Cross River Assembly
The Cross River State House of Assembly has passed for second reading a bill seeking to prohibit same-sex marriage and civil unions in the state.
The proposed legislation, sponsored by the member representing Boki II State Constituency, Hilary Ekpang Bisong, with the support of 10 other lawmakers, also seeks to bar the recognition of same-sex marriages contracted outside Cross River State or Nigeria.
Titled, ‘A Bill for a Law to Prohibit Contract of Marriage or Civil Union Entered into Between Persons of Same Sex, Solemnization of Same, Whether Cultural or in Accordance with Any Statute in Existence, and for Matters Connected Therewith, 2026’, the proposed legislation prescribes that only marriages between a man and a woman shall be recognised as valid in the state.
It further proposes sanctions against persons who contract, facilitate, promote or assist same-sex marriages or civil unions.
During debate on the bill on Tuesday, members of the Assembly unanimously endorsed its general principles, saying the legislation is intended to protect the state’s cultural, moral and family values.
Speaker of the House, Elvert Ayambem, said the legislature has a constitutional and moral obligation to safeguard the institution of marriage in accordance with the customs, traditions and laws of Cross River State.
According to him, the Assembly would continue to uphold marriage as a union between a man and a woman and would not support practices it considers contrary to the state’s cultural and religious values.
“As representatives of the people, we have a duty to preserve the moral fabric of our society and enact laws that reflect the collective values of our citizens.
“Cross River State has always upheld marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and this House will continue to defend that position,” Ayambem stated.
News
Fake Agency: PFIPC Never Recognised by FG – Foreign Ministry
…as House committee invite NSA, insist Ambassador Odumegwu-Ojukwu must appear
By Gloria Ikibah
The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu has told the House of Representatives that the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC) and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council (PEAC), allegedly headed by Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, were never recognised by the Federal Government.
The minister also revealed that the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) had, in November 2025, officially confirmed that both the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF) and the Chief of Staff to the President had no knowledge of either the council or its self-acclaimed Director-General.
The disclosure was made on Tuesday during the resumed investigative hearing of the House Ad-hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the existence and operations of the controversial council.
Naijablitznews.com recalled that the committee was set up following concerns that the body allegedly operated under the guise of a presidential institution, participated in government processes and sought official recognition despite questions over its legal status. Lawmakers are investigating how the council allegedly secured access to public institutions and whether due process was followed.
Representing the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, the Permanent Secretary of the ministry, Ambassador Dunoma Umar Ahmed, said Prince Adeyemi wrote to the ministry on three separate occasions seeking collaboration and endorsement to host a World Investment Summit in Nigeria.
According to him, the ministry declined all the requests after identifying inconsistencies in the correspondence and initiated its own verification process.
He said: “I have the honour to most respectfully refer to your letter addressed to the Honourable Minister of Foreign Affairs Ref. No. NASS/HR/68/7/2026/012 dated 14th July, 2026 on the above subject and to invite the kind attention of the Honourable Chairman to note that, in line with available records, Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, the self-acclaimed Director-General of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PEAC/PFIDC), has approached the Ministry on three (3) different occasions, requesting for the Ministry’s collaboration and endorsement to enable him host World Investment Summit in Nigeria, both in 2025 and 2026.
“Specifically, the Ministry received the first, second and third requests on 26th June, 2025, 5th August, 2025 and 5th June, 2026 respectively,” he said.
Ahmed explained that the ministry deliberately withheld approval because it was obliged to carry out due diligence before granting any official endorsement.
“Guided by extant rules and regulations as well as the necessity of carrying out due diligence before obliging any request, the Ministry, however, did not take any action on the requests.
“The Ministry’s refusal to oblige the requests was further necessitated by some of the discrepancies observed in the letters submitted by Prince Adeyemi and the ongoing investigation on the legitimacy of the PFIPC and the personality of its alleged Director-General,” he added.
He further disclosed that after noticing the inconsistencies, the ministry formally sought clarification from the Office of the National Security Adviser.
“Furthermore, it is pertinent to state that having discovered the discrepancies on the requests submitted by Prince Adeyemi, the Ministry, on 16th October, 2025, wrote a letter to the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), requesting clarification on the status of Prince Adeyemi Adeniyi Matthew as Director-General of the PFIPC.
“In response, the ONSA reverted to the Ministry on 26th November, 2025, indicating that the responses it received from the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF) and Chief of Staff (CoS) to Mr President revealed that Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew is unknown to any office of the Federal Government,” he stated.
The Permanent Secretary told lawmakers that the ministry had no official dealings whatsoever with the council.
“The Ministry did not participate in any diplomatic engagement, bilateral and multilateral discussions held by the PFIPC; the PFIPC did not facilitate or receive any foreign investors, partners and delegations through the Ministry.
“According to the available records in the Ministry, there is no document, Memorandum of Understanding or agreement signed with foreign governments by the Council. The Ministry did not play any role with the Council in promoting Nigeria’s investment abroad.
“No Nigerian Mission had interaction with the PFIPC, since they did not receive any directive from the Ministry in that regard, in line with the Ministry’s extant procedures and line of communication, and the Ministry does not have any other document linked to the PFIPC apart from the ones indicated above.
“Flowing from the above, I wish to respectfully conclude by saying that the Ministry has never had any official interaction or engagement with the PFIPC or its alleged Director-General,” Ahmed said.
Following the presentation, the committee directed the National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, to appear before it on Thursday to explain what actions his office took after confirming that the council was not recognised by the Federal Government.
The committee also insisted that the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Odumegwu-Ojukwu, must personally appear before lawmakers to clarify outstanding issues.
Chairman of the committee, Rep. Yusuf Gagdi, said the testimony presented by the ministry raised important questions that only the Office of the National Security Adviser can answer.
“It is now the duty of the Committee to move further and invite the Office of the National Security Adviser to come and answer the very important question raised by Honourable Abubakar Fulata that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs received a letter from this agency under investigation, whether it exists or it doesn’t exist.
“What have you done as an office that have the power and capacity to make an investigation, further investigation in respect to this? He is to appear before this Committee, based on the fact that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs received correspondence from the suspended DG and they suspected foul play, discrepancies.
“NSA responded that it is an illegal agency. What has the Office of NSA done as a security office in forbearance to investigating? If they discovered that the agency does not exist, I think they should take action. So, they should tell us the action they have taken,” Gagdi said.
The committee is expected to continue its investigation as it seeks to establish how the controversial council allegedly operated within government circles despite repeated indications from key federal institutions that it had no legal recognition.
News
All You Need To Know About Kwara ADC Deputy Guber Candidate, Olawuyi Julius Olayide
Elder Olawuyi Julius Olayide was announced as Kwara State ADC deputy governorship candidate by the state chairman of the party Hon. Babatunde Mohammed after presiding over a strategic meeting in Ilorin on Monday.
The meeting was attended by the party’s governorship, senate, House of Representatives and House of Assembly candidates, and members of the State Working Committee.
The party in a statement made available to Team@orientactualmags.com by Dr. Kabir Abubakar Basambo presents the profile of the deputy governorship candidate.
‘Elder Olawuyi Julius Olayide was born in Offa, Offa Local Government, Kwara State, on January 20, 1960.
A proud son of Offa, a devout Christian, a respected family man, and a passionate community leader, he is happily married and blessed with children.
A distinguished educationist, Elder Olawuyi dedicated more than 34 years of his life to shaping the future of young people through quality education, exemplary leadership, and selfless service. He obtained his Nigeria Certificate in Education (N.C.E.) in Economics/Social Studies from the College of Education, Oro in 1984 and later earned a Bachelor of Arts in Education (B.A.Ed.) in Social Studies from the University of Ilorin in 1991.
Throughout his remarkable teaching career, he served with diligence and distinction in several reputable schools across Offa. He taught at Ansar ud-Deen College, Offa (1986–2005), Offa Community Secondary School (2005–2006), and Nawar-Ud-Deen College, Offa (2006–2011). He subsequently served as Vice Principal of Moremi High School, Offa (2011–2020), where he mentored, inspired, and positively impacted the lives of countless students before his retirement on 20th January 2020.
Widely admired for his integrity, humility, wisdom, and unwavering commitment to educational excellence and community development, Elder Olawuyi has earned the respect of colleagues, students, parents, and community leaders alike.
His wealth of experience in education, administration, and grassroots leadership makes him an outstanding public servant.
Today, as the Deputy Governorship Candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Kwara State, Elder Olawuyi Julius Olayide stands alongside Rt. Hon. Zakari Muhammed with a shared vision of building a prosperous, secure, and inclusive Kwara.
Together, they are committed to delivering people-oriented leadership, revitalizing education, empowering youths and women, strengthening the economy, and ensuring sustainable development for every community across the state.
-
News22 hours agoFour Police officers facing trial for collecting N53k ‘egunje’ from ICPC chairman at checkpoint
-
News22 hours agoHeavy trouble for NBA as court asked to stop swearing in of President-elect, others
-
News19 hours agoReps Probe Alleged Fake Presidential Council as Head of Civil Service Confirms Budget Participation, Approval for 314 Posts
-
News22 hours agoAtiku demands answers from Tinubu over suspicious N12.8trn service-wide vote
-
News21 hours agoCourt sentences pastor to death for killing daughter over witchcraft claim
-
News12 hours agoTinubu Appoints former Ekiti Governor Ayo Fayose, 25 Other Nigerians into Federal Agencies
-
News22 hours agoSix dead, 15 rescued as canoe capsizes in Jigawa
-
Economy12 hours agoOyedele exonerates TInubu, tells Senate TInubu did not borrow N82trn debt

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login