News
Canada deports more people, particularly those rejected for refugee status
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Screenshot_20250227-095701.jpg&description=Canada deports more people, particularly those rejected for refugee status', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Screenshot_20250227-095701.jpg&description=Canada deports more people, particularly those rejected for refugee status', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
Canada deported more people last year to hit its highest annual level of removals in about a decade, overwhelmingly deporting people whose refugee claims were rejected, data obtained by Reuters showed.
By late November, Canada’s removal numbers had reached their highest point since at least 2015, when the governing Liberals led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau came to power
The government has also budgeted more money for deportations this year.
Trudeau’s government, now in its final days, has sought to show Canadians it is getting tough on immigration amid a rising backlog of refugee claims and a backlash against immigrants over concerns that immigration is exacerbating a housing shortage.
Canada’s border agency said the spike in deportations is tied to a “significant increase” in the number of people applying for asylum since 2020, prompting it “to enforce removal orders in a more efficient and timely manner.”
Reuters requested border agency data on deportations, excluding people who left of their own accord and those sent back to the United States as part of a bilateral agreement under which would-be asylum-seekers are turned back.
The remaining total shows Canada deported 7,300 people between January 1 and November 19, 2024, an 8.4% increase over all of 2023 and a 95% increase over 2022.
The border agency did not provide equivalent figures for all of 2024. This week, it posted data online from 2019 to 2024 that do not break down deportations excluding returns to the US under that bilateral agreement. This data also showed an increase in the number of deportations.
About 79% of the 7,300 people deported in the first 11 months of last year were deported because their claim for refugee status had been rejected. That is up from about 75% in 2023 and 66% in 2022.
About 11% of the people deported last year through November 19 were removed for non-compliance with the conditions of their stay in Canada unrelated to a refugee claim, for example, for overstaying a visa. About 7% were deported because they had committed a crime either in Canada or elsewhere.
A spokesperson for Public Safety Minister David McGuinty did not immediately respond to questions about the deportations.
A spokesperson for the border agency said in an email that removal numbers fluctuate.
“The number of removals of those who received a negative asylum determination have increased each year since emerging from the pandemic,” wrote the spokesperson, Luke Reimer.
“These efforts are essential in maintaining the integrity of Canada’s asylum system.”
Canada has been dealing with record numbers of refugee claims, although the monthly totals dropped to 11,838 in January from 19,821 in July. There were 278,457 claims pending as of last month – the highest pending total in decades.
A campaign flag for US President Donald Trump flutters from a private residence between the Canada and US border in Mooers Forks, New York, US, Feb 4, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder
MORE MONEY FOR DEPORTATIONS
One concern with these removals, especially those targeting failed refugee claimants, is that people can be deported while still appealing decisions about the risk they face if returned to their home countries, said Aisling Bondy, president of the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers.
“They could be removed even if there is significant error in the risk determination,” she said, worrying people are being deported to places they will face persecution.
Reimer said in an email that the agency “only actions a removal order once all legal avenues of recourse that can stay a removal have been exhausted.”
The rise in refugee claimant deportations speaks to the government’s priorities, including a tough stance on migration, said University of Toronto law professor and Human Rights Chair Audrey Macklin.
“You can decide that you want to make a show of how many people you are deporting to show that you are effective at policing the border,” Macklin said. “Then you go with people who are easier to find and remove, and those are going to be, often, refugee claimants.”
he prospect of deportation could also deter would-be refugee claimants, she said.
Canada is on track to deport even more people in the coming years: Late last year, the government pledged C$30.5 million ($21.3 million) over three years to increase deportations.
Canada Border Services Agency spent C$65.8 million on removals in 2023-24, up from C$56 million the year before.
At the same time, Canada has pledged C$1.3 billion toward border security to appease US President Donald Trump as he threatens sweeping tariffs on Canadian imports.
The ranks of those eligible for deportation could grow.
Canada is slashing temporary and permanent immigrant numbers and part of its plan relies on more than 1.2 million temporary residents, including workers and students, leaving the country next year, and another 1.1 million leaving the following year, according to government figures.
Immigration Minister Marc Miller has said Canada will deport people who do not leave on their own.
“It is people’s choice not to leave, and if they don’t, they face the consequences – including, after due process, deportation,” he told Reuters last year.
News
NBC files fresh appeal, justifies N5m fine regime for broadcasters
The National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) has filed an application seeking the permission of the court of appeal to file a fresh appeal against the judgement of the federal high court in Abuja barring it from imposing N5 million fines on erring broadcast stations.
In the application filed at the court of appeal in Abuja by Dapo Akinosun, counsel to the NBC, the commission argued sanity in Nigeria’s broadcasting sector is under threat and that the public interest would be better served if the court grants the application.
In the application, the NBC urged the court to grant it leave to raise and argue a fresh issue on appeal relating to the legal capacity of MRA to institute and maintain the original suit before the lower court.
The commission argued that the defect in the earlier notice of appeal, which resulted in the dismissal of its appeal, arose “solely from an inadvertent misdescription” of its name by its lawyer.
The NBC told the court that the subsisting judgement raises questions on the commission’s statutory powers to regulate broadcasting and enforce compliance with broadcasting standards in Nigeria.
The commission argued that the subsisting judgment is capable of creating uncertainty regarding its regulatory powers if it is allowed to stand.
The NBC also argued that without the pronouncement by the appellate court on the issues raised in the appeal, its regulatory framework would be weakened.
“A weakened regulatory framework may embolden non-compliance with established broadcasting standards, thereby increasing the dissemination of false, misleading and unverified information capable of causing unnecessary public anxiety, panic and social unrest,” the NBC said.
“Absence of effective regulatory oversight may further encourage irresponsible broadcasting practices and the misuse of broadcast and digital media platforms by persons who deliberately publish sensational, inaccurate or inflammatory content to intimidate, harass or unduly influence individuals, institutions and public discourse.”
News
Senate threatens sanctions as CBN, NUPRC, NDDC, others shun committee
The Senate’s ambitious investigation into the billions of naira in oil and gas revenues suffered a setback yesterday after several key government agencies failed to honour summons before the Senate Public Accounts Committee over issues arising from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) audit reports.
Affected were the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC).
The committee, chaired by Senator Ibrahim Hassan Dankwambo (PDP, Gombe North), reacted angrily to the agencies’ absence, describing it as a blatant disregard for the National Assembly’s constitutional oversight powers and a direct affront to Nigerians who expect transparency and accountability in the management of public resources.
Yesterday’s hearing marked the commencement of a comprehensive legislative investigation into the 2021, 2022 and 2023 NEITI Oil and Gas Industry Audit Reports, a process expected to scrutinise oil sector revenues, remittances to the Federation Account, statutory financial obligations, royalty payments, regulatory compliance and the operational activities of over 60 Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), regulators, government-owned enterprises, as well as indigenous and multinational oil companies.
Despite formal invitations, public notices published in national newspapers and weeks of advance notice, the invited agencies failed to appear before the committee. Their absence forced the lawmakers to suspend the proceedings after waiting for over an hour.
Visibly displeased, members of the committee accused the agencies of treating the Senate with contempt and undermining legislative efforts to ensure accountability in one of Nigeria’s most strategic economic sectors.
Leading the criticism, Senator Babangida Hussaini described the repeated failure of government agencies to honour Senate invitations as a “recurring decimal,” arguing that such conduct erodes public confidence in democratic institutions and weakens parliamentary oversight.
According to him, the committee derives its investigative powers from the Constitution and the Senate Standing Orders, making compliance with its summons a legal obligation rather than a matter of discretion.
He lamented that lawmakers had cut short their yearly recess and constituency engagements to attend the hearing, only to discover that none of the invited agencies considered it necessary to send either their chief executives or representatives to explain their absence.
Hussaini warned that if the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria could summon heads of agencies and they failed to appear without consequences, it would send the wrong message about accountability in government. He urged the committee to invoke the appropriate constitutional powers to address what he described as a disgrace to the nation.
Similarly, Senator Francis Ndubuezecriticised the agencies for failing to provide any explanation for their absence, noting that no letters were written, no excuses offered and no representatives sent to brief the committee. He argued that such conduct showed a lack of respect for the Senate and its constitutional oversight responsibilities, insisting that the integrity of the National Assembly must be protected.
Following the debate, the committee unanimously resolved to grant the defaulting agencies one final opportunity to appear before it on Thursday, August 6, 2026.
The committee also directed its secretariat to immediately communicate the resolution to all affected organisations and notify them that failure to honour the rescheduled hearing could compel the Senate to invoke its constitutional powers to enforce compliance.
MEANWHILE, the federal government has barred MDAs from awarding contracts, signing agreements, or incurring financial obligations without approved expenditure warrants and cash backing, in a move aimed at strengthening fiscal discipline and improving public financial management.
The directive, contained in a Federal Treasury Circular dated July 31, 2026, and released yesterday, introduces stricter guidelines for implementing the 2026 capital budget as the government seeks to curb the award of unfunded contracts and ensure that spending aligns with available resources.
Signed by the Accountant-General of the Federation, ShamseldeenOgunjimi, the circular was addressed to ministers, permanent secretaries, heads of extra-ministerial departments and agencies, service chiefs, the CBN Governor, the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court, heads of diplomatic missions and other federal institutions.
Under the new guidelines, MDAs are prohibited from issuing letters of award, signing contracts, or entering into any financial commitment unless they have first received the appropriate Warrant or Authority to Incur Expenditure (AIE) covering either the full contract value or the portion to be committed.
“In compliance with the provisions of Financial Regulations 318 and 415, respectively, no expenditure shall be incurred except on the authority of a Warrant/AIE (including employee payables),” the circular stated.
News
2027: There Will Be Voter Apathy If… —Cardinal Onaiyekan
The Archbishop Emeritus of Abuja, John Cardinal Onaiyekan, has said that any belief by Nigerians that the outcome of the 2027 elections would be in favour of the All Progressives Congress (APC) could lead to voter apathy.
Onaiyekan said this during an interview on Frontline, a current affairs programme on Eagle 102.5 FM, Ilese-Ijebu, Ogun, on Monday.
According to him, any perception that the ruling party is guaranteed victory would discourage voter participation and ultimately weaken the legitimacy of the government that emerges from the polls.
He noted that voter apathy in recent elections in the country reflected a growing distrust in the electoral system, a situation he said must be urgently addressed before the next general election.
Cardinal Onaiyekan said restoring public confidence in the electoral process was essential to improving governance, insisting that democracy can only thrive where elections are genuinely free, fair and credible.
The cleric maintained that Nigeria has yet to conduct a truly free and fair election, linking low voter turnout to widespread public disillusionment with the electoral process.
“I fear that it becomes very clear to Nigerians that no matter what happens, the APC will win, then most people won’t even bother to go to the election. And even if the government, the real power, wins, it will not bring a real victory, actually. And it is not going to be possible to deliver good government.”
-
News18 hours agoAtiku, Obasanjo face-off may not stop until one finally dies– Shehu Sani
-
News17 hours agoKidnapped Kebbi Judge Faruku Bunza finally goes home after relaxing in abductors ‘paradise’ for one week
-
News17 hours agoTehran Denies Negotiating With US After Trump Announces Talks
-
Economy17 hours agoSee Dollar to Naira exchange rate today, August 3, 2026
-
Sports17 hours agoInfantino Could Have Earned £47m Annually From Abandoned World Cup Proposal
-
News17 hours agoINEC unveils Final list of candidates for 2027 elections, Jonathan, Nwoko, Goje, others missing
-
Education16 hours agoNYSC makes NERD clearance mandatory for corps members’ mobilisation
-
Economy17 hours agoCBN lists 5 strategies to drive next stage of Fintech growth in Nigeria

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login