Connect with us

Entertainment

“Single Mothers Can’t Raise Proper Men Without Male Influence” – Jim Iyke

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Nollywood actor Jim Iyke has stated that single mothers are not capable of raising boys into “proper men” without the presence of a male figure.

Speaking in a recent interview on Okay 101.7 FM in Accra, Ghana, the Nigerian film star stated that women, by nature, are not built to instill the kind of discipline and resilience required in raising male children alone.

His words: “A woman can’t raise a man. You can’t, you’re not built for it. A single mother cannot raise a man properly.

“You need a male influence, your brother, your father, or any man you trust. There has to be a male presence in it.”

Advertisement

Jim Iyke argued that while women are naturally nurturing and loving, those qualities alone are not enough to shape boys into strong men, emphasizing the role of male figures in enforcing discipline and building mental toughness.

“What you’re going to raise is a very weak man. He’s going to be everything like the men that left you.

“You need somebody that would discipline him, tell him ‘No’ as often as possible, and put him in the grind,” he added.

To illustrate his point, Iyke recounted a personal story involving his four-year-old son during a family vacation in the south of France.

Advertisement

According to him, the boy, despite being outplayed by other children on the beach, was forced to stand his ground when the others tried to prevent him from taking back his own football.

“My son is a horrible footballer. So they dribbled the hell out of him. He got tired, grabbed his ball, and they didn’t want him to leave. There was a scuffle,” he said.

Iyke said when his son came crying to him, he refused to intervene, even stopping his wife from helping the boy. He insisted that it was an opportunity for his son to learn how to handle conflict on his own.

“That’s the natural propensity of a woman, to go aid him. And I told her, ‘Don’t you dare come near him. This is a conversation between two men,’” he said.

Advertisement

He said the boy eventually returned to confront the children, fought them off, and reclaimed his ball, an action that, according to Iyke, demonstrated strength and independence.

“He went in there, kicked some ass, pushed down the biggest kid, grabbed his ball, and started coming back. I’ve never been more proud of him,” he recalled.

Jim Iyke concluded by reiterating his parenting philosophy, stating that his role as a father is not to offer constant assistance but to guide, protect, and provide, leaving the child to figure out life’s challenges independently.

“I’m not here to help you. I’m here to guide you. I’m here to protect you. I’m here to provide for you. The rest, you figure it out by yourself. That’s what makes tough kids,” he said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

Chris Brown to cough out $13m as US Court orders him to pay Ex-House keeper over dog attack

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

American R&B singer Chris Brown has been ordered by a California court to pay nearly $13 million in damages to his former housekeeper, Maria Avila, after she was severely injured in a dog attack at his Los Angeles-area home.

The verdict was delivered on Tuesday, June 30, following a two-week trial in which a jury found Brown and his company, Black Pyramid LLC, liable for negligence over the December 2020 incident.

According to court proceedings, Avila was attacked by Hades, a 200-pound Caucasian shepherd kept on Brown’s Tarzana, California, property, while she was taking out the trash. The attack left her with serious injuries.

Avila was awarded $12.9 million in damages. In addition, her sister, Patricia Avila, who witnessed the attack while working at the property, received $885,000 for emotional distress. Maria Avila’s husband, Oscar Olivo, was also awarded $50,000. Speaking after the ruling, the family’s attorney, Michael C. Murphy Jr., expressed satisfaction with the outcome, saying the verdict brought justice after more than five years of legal proceedings.

Advertisement

Brown maintained during the trial that the dog was kept strictly for security purposes and was not his personal pet. However, testimony presented in court alleged that after the attack, the singer left the scene instead of assisting the victim or calling emergency services.

According to evidence heard by the jury, Brown drove around for several hours while members of his staff contacted emergency responders and attended to the injured housekeeper. Brown told the court he stayed away because he feared his presence would trigger intense media attention if he appeared at the scene or spoke during the emergency call.

Before the trial, Brown acknowledged some responsibility for the incident. He also testified that he had warned Maria Avila and her sister not to enter certain outdoor areas unless accompanied by security personnel because of the dogs on the property.

The two sisters disputed that claim, telling the court they never received such a warning and suggesting language barriers would have made such a conversation unlikely. The ruling comes just days after Brown launched a co-headlining stadium tour across the United States with fellow R&B star Usher.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Peller Shuts Down Pregnancy Speculations About Fiancée Jarvis, Insists He’s not set for baby

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Nigerian TikTok content creator Habeeb Hamzat, widely known as Peller, has rubbished widespread speculation that his fiancée, Jarvis, is expecting their first child, insisting the couple has no immediate plans to start a family.

Speculations about Jarvis’ alleged pregnancy have circulated across social media in recent weeks, with many users claiming that recent photos and videos of the influencer suggested she was showing a baby bump.

The speculation intensified after footage of the couple shopping for their wedding asoebi fabric surfaced online.

Some social media users pointed to Jarvis’ appearance in the video, alleging that her stomach looked noticeably larger and concluding that she might be pregnant.

Advertisement

Addressing the claims during a livestream, Peller firmly denied the rumours, describing them as false and urging fans to stop spreading unverified information about their personal lives.

According to the social media personality, he and Jarvis have agreed to focus on building their careers and financial stability before considering parenthood.

Expressing his frustration over the persistent speculation, Peller explained that people had misinterpreted Jarvis’ appearance, stating that her stomach looked bigger simply because she had eaten late at night rather than because she was pregnant.

“I’m vexed that people are saying you’re pregnant. Can a pregnant woman cook at this time? I will get her pregnant, but right now, I’m still making a token for myself. I’m not ready for a baby,” he said.

Advertisement

He added that becoming financially successful remains his priority before taking on the responsibilities of raising children.

“I have to be making billions before thinking about pregnancy. Don’t put any pregnancy on my head. It’s late-night food that’s causing that big stomach,” he added.

Peller’s comments have since generated mixed reactions online, with some fans praising him for being open about his plans and emphasising the importance of financial preparedness before starting a family. Others, however, criticised the growing culture of speculating about the private lives of public figures based solely on their appearance.

The couple, who are among Nigeria’s most followed social media personalities, have continued to attract public attention since announcing their engagement.Geographic Reference

Advertisement

Peller proposed to Jarvis during a romantic trip to Ghana, a moment that quickly went viral across several social media platforms.

Shortly after the engagement, he also revealed that he had paid Jarvis’ bride price, signalling another major step toward their planned wedding and further exciting fans who have closely followed their relationship.

Despite the excitement surrounding their upcoming marriage, Peller has made it clear that becoming parents is a decision the couple intends to make only when they both feel fully prepared.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Regina Daniels’ Child Custody Dispute: Lawyer outlines court conditions for actress’s access to children

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Francesca Hangeior

Celebrity lawyer Rita Amy Aduba has weighed in on the reported child custody dispute involving actress Regina Daniels and her estranged husband, Senator Ned Nwoko, explaining the conditions the actress must reportedly meet before gaining access to their two sons.

Speaking in a video, Aduba said she reviewed a 15-page High Court judgment, which she claimed granted Regina supervised access to the children rather than denying her visitation rights.

According to the lawyer, the court ordered that Regina’s visits be supervised by the Abuja Social Welfare Office, stressing that neither parent should be excluded from the children’s lives.

Advertisement

Aduba listed the reported conditions contained in the judgment as follows:
Regina’s access to the children must be supervised by the Abuja Social Welfare Office.

The visits must ensure the children are protected from harm.

She is reportedly prohibited from bringing the children into contact with four named individuals: Samuel Ojeugu, Destiny Ojeofo, Ngozi Aniote Izuegu and Ijeoma Josephine Otabofina, popularly known as Phyna.

Temporary custody of the children remains with Senator Ned Nwoko pending the determination of the case.

Advertisement

Regina is required to undergo confirmatory drug tests at designated laboratories to establish that she is free from substance abuse.

She must also demonstrate that she is mentally fit during visits with the children.

Aduba maintained that the court’s decision was aimed at protecting the welfare of the children while preserving the parental rights of both parties.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News