Connect with us

News

Falana Cautions Senate, Security, Against Probing Natasha’s New York Trip

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…to address IPU amid suspension controversy

Fiery Nigerian human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) has warned the Senate and security agencies against investigating Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan over her recent trip to New York, stating that such actions could bring unnecessary embarrassment to the country.

Falana’s statement comes amid controversy surrounding Akpoti-Uduaghan’s engagement with the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) regarding her suspension from the Senate.

Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan earlier reported her suspension by the Senate, as well as her case against Senate President Akpabio, to the IPU.

Advertisement

The Kogi Central lawmaker described the Senate’s action as “illegal” and a reflection of the challenges women face in Nigeria.

Thereafter, Akpabio accused the senator of disgracing the Nigerian government by taking the issue to an international platform.

Meanwhile, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan has alleged that plans are being made to arrest her upon her return to Nigeria after attending the IPU meeting in New York.

However, Falana in a statement on Sunday, countered this claim, asserting that the real embarrassment lies in the Senate’s decision to involve security agencies like the Department of State Services (DSS) and the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) in probing a legislative matter.

Advertisement

He urged these agencies to study the case of political exiles under the late dictator Sani Abacha before embarking on what he described as a “futile attempt” to penalise Akpoti-Uduaghan.

The human rights lawyer also pointed out the irony in the Senate’s stance, noting that several top officials in President Bola Tinubu’s administration had, in the past, travelLed abroad to challenge Nigeria’s military rulers.

He warned that any probe into Akpoti-Uduaghan’s trip could revive discussions about those past incidents and further expose Nigeria to global scrutiny.

Recalling his own ordeal, Falana recounted how, in 1994, Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti, then Chairman of the Campaign for Democracy (CD), traveLled to India to attend a meeting of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative. At the time, he was the only African member of the body.

Advertisement

Falana explained that around the same period, Ransome-Kuti travelled to Canada to deliver lectures on Nigeria’s human rights situation. While in Canada, he received an award on behalf of the CD.

Upon their return to Nigeria on January 14, 1995, both men were arrested and detained at the Nigeria Immigration Service Guest House in Ikoyi, Lagos.

According to Falana, a combined team from the State Security Service (SSS), the NIA, and the Nigeria Immigration Service interrogated them, accusing them of traveLling out of Nigeria illegally, as they had not passed through official routes.

It was further stated that we ought to have obtained security clearance since we were aware that our names were on a ‘watch list’ compiled by the security forces,” Falana said.

Advertisement

He argued that the so-called watch list was discriminatory and illegal, citing the case of Shugaba v Minister of Internal Affairs, in which the Court of Appeal ruled that a Nigerian citizen has the right to enter and exit the country freely.

He noted that at that stage, security agents demanded that they surrender their passports.

However, Falana and Ransome-Kuti refused, fearing their documents would be confiscated to prevent further travel. They informed the interrogators that their passports were kept with a comrade in Cotonou, Benin Republic, which had become their alternative travel route.

He explained that the security officials confirmed through airport, seaport, and land border checks that the two men had not presented their passports to immigration officers for stamping.

Advertisement

Falana responded that, daily, over a million Nigerians travel across the artificial borders created by colonial powers without stamping their passports, particularly within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

Due to mounting international pressure demanding their release, the military government eventually granted them bail.

However, their lawyer, Chief Gani Fawehinmi, stood as surety.

Although they were detained for a week, they were never formally charged with any offence related to “illegal travel.”

Advertisement

The statement read, “In 1994, Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti, the Chairman of the Campaign for Democracy (CD) travelled to India to attend the meeting of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative. At the material time, he was the only African member of the international body. At about the same time, I travelled to Canada to deliver some lectures on the human rights situation in Nigeria. During my stay in Canada, I received an award on behalf of the CD.

“Upon our return to Nigeria on January 14, 1995, both of us were arrested and kept at the Nigeria Immigration Service Guest House at Ikoyi, Lagos State. A combined team of State Security Service, Nigeria Intelligence Agency and Nigeria Immigration Service personnel interrogated us. We were accused of travelling out of Nigeria illegally as we did not pass through any of the official routes.

“It was further stated that we ought to have obtained security clearance since we were aware that our names were on the “watch list” compiled by the security forces. I pointed out to the interrogators that the so-called watch list was discriminatory and illegal. I referred to the case of Shugaba v Minister of Interior wherein the Court of Appeal had ruled that a Nigerian citizen has the right of egress and ingress.

“At that stage, we were asked to produce and submit our passports. We flatly turned down the request on the ground that they were likely to be confiscated to prevent us from further exercising our fundamental right to freedom of movement guaranteed by article 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act.

Advertisement

“Indeed, we informed our interrogators that the passports were kept in the house of a comrade in Cotonou, Benin Republic which was our adopted route for travelling out of Nigeria.

“Our interrogators said that they had confirmed from the airports, seaports and land borders that we did not present our passports to immigration officers for stamping. We replied that on a daily basis, over a million Nigerian people travel in and out of Nigeria without stamping their passports in the artificial borders created by the British and French colonialists which are maintained by the neo-colonialists in power; in the member states of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

As the federal military regime was completely embarrassed by the global demand for our release, the security forces granted us bail pending the conclusion of investigation.”

“Our lawyer, Chief Gani Fawehinmi, stood surety for us and we were released to him. Even though we were detained for a week, we were not charged for the alleged offence of illegal travelling out of Nigeria,” he explained.

Advertisement

Falana drew the attention of the Senate and the security forces to the case of the “Speaker, Bauchi State House of Assembly v Honourable Rifkatu Danna (2017) 49 WRN 82”.

He said the respondent was the only woman in the House of Assembly of 31 members.

Falana said, “She was suspended indefinitely for criticising the relocation of the Tafawa Balewa Local Government Area. As far as the House members were concerned, her speech was considered ‘derogatory’.

“In setting aside her indefinite suspension from the House, the Bauchi Chief Judge held that her suspension beyond 14 days was illegal and uncomfortable. But the Court of Appeal declared that the House lacks the vires to subject her to any form of suspension from the House as it was a denial of the rights of the people of her Bogoro Constituency to be represented in the government.

Advertisement

“In the leading judgment of the Court of Appeal, Tur JCA held inter alia that the acts of the Appellants violated articles 8 and 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights Act which guarantee the respondent’s fundamental rights to freedom of conscience, the right to receive and disseminate information and to express opinions within the ambit of the law….Not even the military would have behaved in this dastardly manner.

“This is a flagrant abuse of the constitutional powers vested in the Speaker and members of the Bauchi State House of Assembly which no right- thinking member of the society ought to tolerate.”

Falana said, “Finally, it is public knowledge that the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio had accused Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan of embarrassing the government and people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria by reporting her suspension by the Senate to the Inter Parliamentary Union.

“Contrary to the jaundiced views of the Senate leader, it is the official probe of the circumstances of her trip by security forces that will expose Nigeria to needless embarrassment and undeserved ridicule

Advertisement

“Therefore, the SSS and NIA may study the report of the investigation of our illegal travelling by the Sani Abacha military junta before embarking on the futile attempt to probe Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for having the temerity to externalise the ‘internal affair of the Senate.’”

In fact, the probe will particularly embarrass some top officials of the Bola Tinubu administration who were once accused of travelling out of Nigeria to embarrass the defunct military junta,” Falana added.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Reps Unveil Final Constitution Amendment Bills, Set for Crucial Vote on State Police

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…security, electoral reforms, devolution of powers among key proposals

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives has released the final version of the Constitution Alteration Bills ahead of a decisive vote scheduled for Thursday, signalling a major step in the ongoing effort to reshape key aspects of Nigeria’s constitutional framework.

The proposed amendments, which are expected to come before lawmakers during plenary, are the product of months of consultations, public hearings and stakeholder engagements conducted across the country by the House Committee on Constitution Review.

Advertisement

According to the House, the bills emerged after extensive consideration of proposals submitted by lawmakers, government agencies, professional bodies, traditional institutions, civil society organisations and ordinary Nigerians.

The review process included zonal and national public hearings, expert sessions, consultative meetings and town hall engagements held across the six geopolitical zones to gather public input on critical constitutional issues.

The bills cover a wide range of national concerns, including electoral reforms, judicial reforms, security and policing, local government administration, devolution of powers, fiscal reforms, human rights, citizenship, traditional institutions, legislative matters and the creation of states and local governments.

At the centre of public attention is the proposal seeking constitutional backing for the establishment of state police, a reform that has generated intense debate and attracted widespread support and opposition across the federation.

Advertisement

The proposed legislation seeks to create an additional layer of policing within Nigeria’s security structure while providing constitutional safeguards, operational guidelines and oversight mechanisms to define the relationship between federal and state policing authorities.

The House said the proposal reflects growing national calls for more localised and responsive approaches to tackling insecurity.

Speaking on the release of the final draft, the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives and Chairman of the House Committee on Constitution Review, Rt. Hon. Benjamin Kalu, described the development as a significant milestone in the constitutional review process.

According to him: “The release of the final print of these Constitution Alteration Bills reflects the extensive consultations, careful scrutiny, and bipartisan collaboration that have characterised this reform process. These proposals embody the aspirations, concerns, and recommendations expressed by Nigerians from all walks of life.

Advertisement

“Of particular significance is the proposal on State Police, which responds to longstanding calls for a more effective and decentralised policing framework capable of addressing emerging security challenges across the federation. As the House prepares to vote, we remain guided by our constitutional responsibility to strengthen democratic governance, deepen federalism, promote inclusion, enhance security, and build institutions capable of meeting the demands of a modern and prosperous nation.”

The House is expected to vote on the bills during plenary on Thursday, provided the constitutionally required quorum is achieved. If the required number of lawmakers is not present, consideration of the amendments will be postponed to the next legislative sitting in line with constitutional provisions and House rules.
The House leadership reiterated its commitment to an open and transparent constitutional review process, expressing confidence that the proposed reforms would strengthen democratic institutions, improve governance, promote national unity and respond to the evolving aspirations of Nigerians.

Continue Reading

News

SEDC Clears Air on Spending as Senate Review Continues

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…says no fund paid for Enugu headquarters rehabilitation, pledges full disclosure of records by June 23

By Gloria Ikibah

The South East Development Commission (SEDC) has reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, accountability and full cooperation with the National Assembly, following its appearance before the Senate Committee on the South East Development Commission.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, the Commission said it used the oversight session to provide detailed briefings on its finances, operational activities, procurement procedures, institutional growth, strategic partnerships and ongoing programmes across the South-East.

Advertisement

According to the Commission, the Senate Committee requested additional documentation relating to certain aspects of its operations and expenditure. It said it welcomed the request and sought a short period to compile and submit the required records.

“Following discussions, proceedings were adjourned to a later date pending submission of the requested documents, which the Commission will provide on or before 23 June 2026,” the statement said.

The Commission also addressed issues that have generated public discussion in recent days, particularly expenditure linked to its Abuja Liaison Office and references to what has been described as “implied expenditure”.

Abuja Liaison Office Explained
SEDC said the expenditure associated with its Abuja Liaison Office covered the establishment and operation of a fully furnished office at the Congress Building in Maitama, Abuja.

Advertisement

The Commission explained that the facility serves as its operational base for engagements with the National Assembly, federal ministries and agencies, development finance institutions and strategic partners.

“The expenditure cited reflects the cumulative cost of establishing and running the office since its inauguration on 11 February 2025 to date, covering rent, operational costs, utilities, and basic fit-out works across that entire period”, the statement read.

The Commission added that its board and management remain committed to relocating to its designated headquarters in Enugu as soon as possible.

According to the statement, rather than incur the cost of acquiring a new property, the Commission secured the transfer of an existing building from the Enugu State Government and entered into an agreement with the state to accelerate rehabilitation works and facilitate its relocation.

Advertisement

Clarification on ‘Implied Expenditure’
Responding to reports about so-called “implied expenditure”, SEDC said the references relate to a contract awarded for the rehabilitation of its future headquarters in Enugu.

The building, it noted, was transferred by the Enugu State Government but requires extensive work before it can serve as the Commission’s permanent headquarters.

It further clarified that the expenditure being discussed represents approved financial commitments rather than actual payments.

“The contract was awarded in accordance with the Public Procurement Act 2007, following approval by the Bureau of Public Procurement and the concurrence of the supervising ministry.

Advertisement

“These commitments represent budgeted obligations that have been lawfully committed but not yet disbursed, consistent with established public sector financial management practice. To be precise: this money has not left the Commission’s accounts,” the Commission stated.

Capital Funds Yet to Be Released
SEDC disclosed that it has not received any funding from its capital budget allocation.

Despite this, it said efforts have continued to advance strategic development initiatives across the region while laying the institutional groundwork required for future project implementation.

The Commission noted that spending so far has focused on two key areas: building its operational structure and advancing project development activities that would ordinarily be financed through capital releases.

Advertisement

“It is worth recalling that the Commission received its first disbursement of funds after more than ten months of being in existence,” the statement further said.

The Commission explained that institutional expenditure has included payment of staff salaries and arrears, training for seconded personnel, establishment of operational offices in Abuja and Enugu, and procurement of essential information and communications technology infrastructure.

Project Development and Regional Initiatives
On programme implementation, SEDC said it has financed feasibility studies and due diligence exercises for priority regional projects, including a proposed gas infrastructure partnership with significant economic and industrial implications for the South-East.

The Commission also highlighted its participation in the Intra-African Trade Fair in Algeria, which it said has opened discussions with Afreximbank on establishing a Project Preparation Fund aimed at reviving dormant industries across the region.

Advertisement

Other initiatives cited include the South East Vision 2050 Stakeholder Forum and the South East Venture Capital Programme.

According to the statement, the venture capital initiative has already provided investment support to 25 start-ups drawn from across the South-East.

Records to Be Submitted
SEDC assured the Senate Committee that comprehensive records would be submitted before the next hearing.

Reiterating its commitment to openness and accountability, the Commission said it remains focused on its mandate of driving economic transformation, infrastructure development, investment mobilisation and regional prosperity across the South-East.

Advertisement

“The Commission will submit comprehensive documentation, including procurement records, contract details, payment schedules, and supporting financial records, to the Senate Committee on or before 23 June 2026.

“The Commission remains focused on that mandate and is confident that a full review of the facts and supporting documentation will provide a complete picture of its activities and stewardship of public resources,” the statement added.

Continue Reading

News

Sparks Over ‘Cognate Legislative Experience’

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

Proceedings grew animated during debate on a motion by Rep. Jimi Benson seeking a precise definition of “cognate legislative experience” in the House Standing Orders.

Presenting the motion, Benson said the aim was to strengthen institutional memory and ensure experienced leadership within the chamber.

“The House notes that Order 7, Rule 15… states that only members with cognate legislative experience as members of the House of Representatives shall be eligible for appointment as principal officers of the House,” he said.

Advertisement

He added that global parliamentary best practice supported reserving principal offices for seasoned lawmakers to promote continuity and competence.

“The House resolves to define cognate legislative experience as meaning members who have completed at least one full four-year term.

“Resolves to state unequivocally that there is no other definition to the term cognate legislative experience other than as stated”, he stated.

While the motion was seconded and adopted by voice vote, some members raised concerns about its necessity.

Advertisement

Rising on a point of order, Rep. Bob Solomon argued: “Order 7, Rule 1, Sub-Rule 10 has already conferred on you the power to interpret the rules. You are there as an arbiter. This motion is totally redundant.

“What it means is that we are amending our rules for you to be able to exercise that power… You are in the position of a judge, an arbiter. What you say about the rules is final.”

In response, the Speaker maintained that once a question had been put and decided, it could not be revisited.

“After hitting the gavel, we cannot revisit any issue that has already been put to question,” he ruled, drawing the matter to a close.

Advertisement

With the day’s agenda concluded, the House adjourned after setting in motion legislative processes that could reshape price regulation, military pensions, and internal parliamentary governance.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News