News
6 things to do when invited by the police
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Police-1.jpg&description=6 things to do when invited by the police', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Police-1.jpg&description=6 things to do when invited by the police', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
6 things to do when invited by the police
Olalekan Abayomi received an invitation from the police to answer questions regarding a phone theft. However, upon arrival, he was immediately arrested. As he discovered, an invitation by the police can quickly turn into an arrest if the police suspect the individual’s involvement in a crime. In his case, his friendship with the person who allegedly purchased the stolen phone led to his arrest.
Upon arrival at the police station, Abayomi was immediately instructed to write a statement. He claimed that during this process, an officer pressured him to include certain incriminating details. Abayomi’s refusal to implicate himself in the statement led to threats of detention by the police. It was only through the timely intervention of his family and friends that he avoided spending the night in a police cell.
The police are known for inviting people to gather information and facts related to a complaint. In such situations, the intention is not necessarily to arrest or charge the person in question, but rather to gather facts and evidence. This approach allows for a cooperative dialogue that can aid in the resolution of a case without resorting to immediate arrests.
Receiving an invitation for a police interview can be very unsettling if you are unsure of what to do. You may have some understanding of the situation or none at all. The case of Abayomi serves as a stark example of the potential dangers that can arise during such encounters
Here are six things to do when the police invite you to appear at their station.
Ensure the invite is formal
The Force Public Relations Officer of the Nigeria Police Force, Olumuyiwa Adejobi, said it was unprofessional for the police to invite a person through a phone call.
On August 26, 2023, an X (formerly Twitter) user, Onyedikachi Azunna, had asked Adejobi whether it was proper to accept calls from policemen who claimed a matter was reported to them and threatened an individual to report at the station.
The Force spokesperson answered, “You can receive and honour their calls if you so wish. But it’s not professional. It’s either you write to invite someone or arrest him. The development of calling suspects on the phone is strange to the police. I don’t appreciate that development. Arrest or write to invite.”
There are claims that the police often invite people through telephone calls. There are also claims that the calls come with threats to compel the person to appear before the police. Before honouring a police invite, be sure the invite is formal and does not raise any suspicion of illegality.
Be prepared to honour it
When you are sure that the invite is formal, be prepared to attend the interview. A human rights lawyer, Taiwo Olawanle, said a police invite should be honoured as long as it is made formally.
He said, “There is no way to respond to it than to honour it. The police have the power to invite anyone for questioning, it is their constitutional right.”
The lawyer, however, added that the person should clarify the purpose of the invitation with the police to ensure they have a clear understanding of the invitation.
“In my years of practice, I have observed that police formations are used to the practice of not stating why a person is being invited with a view to preparing themselves for the interview.
“They keep the person in the dark. This is against the constitutional provision to the effect that a suspect should be given adequate facility and time to prepare for their defence,” he said.
Inform your lawyer
The next thing to do, according to Olawanle, is to inform a lawyer before meeting with the police. Consult with a lawyer who can provide you with the necessary guidance and protect your rights during the process.
Olawanle said, “Whenever someone is being invited by the police, such a person is required to consult a lawyer on why he is being invited. The lawyer then gives the necessary advice.
“The role of the lawyer is to guide the person and as well assist the police in their investigation. A lawyer is not expected to answer questions on behalf of the suspect. That could amount to obstruction of justice.”
Answer questions truthfully
You should answer all questions truthfully and to the best of your knowledge during the interview. There are cases where an invitee says more than they know and end up implicating themselves.
Olawanle said the person should “answer all questions in his personal knowledge.”
“As lawyers too, we are officers of the law and we are not expected to shield any person from answering questions that could lead to detecting and preventing crimes. However, I don’t expect any person to answer any question in a manner that would implicate them,” he added.
Manage emotional reactions
If the police provide you with instructions regarding your statement, remain calm and assertive. Seek clarification on any ambiguous or potentially self-incriminating elements and request to exclude or modify them.
The police can ask provoking questions to force the person to react in a way that can implicate them. While the lawyer has a duty to keep his client in check while answering questions, the person must also manage their reactions well.
A litigation lawyer, Akin Adegbayi, said the police could trick a person into making statements the person would otherwise not make.
He said, “Police can deliberately push you to a corner or ask you questions just to ruffle you. If you allow them to get inside your head, it can worsen the matter even if you know nothing about it. It is always advisable to be calm.”
The lawyer added that one way to manage emotional reactions to certain questions was to wait a few seconds before answering.
Enforce your right of refusal
You are under no obligation to answer any questions that may incriminate you or that you are uncomfortable answering. Politely inform the police that you will exercise your right to remain silent and wait for further legal advice.
“Such persons should conduct themselves with decorum and answer the questions put to them. Let it be noted that they cannot be compelled to answer questions they wish not to answer,” Olawanle added.
It is also essential to approach these situations with knowledge, composure, and a steadfast commitment to safeguarding your rights.
Legal experts also said the police are expected to release a person after questioning or grant bail if needed. However, the experts argued that if the questioning will go beyond 24 hours, the police must get a court order to detain the person beyond the 24 or 48 hours constitutionally allowed to detain a suspect.
News
Angry protesters lockdown Ibadan, want immediate rescue of abducted Oyo teachers, pupils
Angry protesters lockdown Ibadan, demand urgent rescue of abducted Oyo teachers, pupils
Hundreds of teachers and civil society activists marched through Ibadan on Friday, demanding immediate action to free colleagues and pupils kidnapped in Oriire Local Government Area.
The protest, led by the Oyo State Teachers Action Group and the Nigeria Teachers Congress, NTC, followed the May 15 abduction of victims in Esiele and Yawota communities near Ogbomoso.
—“Do more to rescue them”—
NTC National President Rev. Bunmi Thomas told protesters the rally was lawful and necessary. “We are demanding pragmatic action from government to secure the release of the abducted teachers and students,” he said.
Advertisement
While acknowledging ongoing rescue efforts, Thomas insisted more must be done: “If the government is trying and the result is not there, then efforts must be intensified.”
He raised alarm over the children’s condition: “We have kids as young as two and three years old in the bush, exposed to rain and harsh weather.”
Thomas also called for security in all public schools: “We cannot continue to work while living in danger. Government must attach security personnel to every government school.”
He stressed the protest was not against Governor Seyi Makinde: “No reasonable teacher in Oyo State is against Governor Makinde because he has performed excellently well.”
—Government responds–,
Executive Assistant on Security Matters, retired CP Sunday Odukoya, addressed protesters on behalf of the state government. “It is your constitutional right to protest and let government know your concerns,” he said, assuring that rescue operations were ongoing.
Odukoya also promised no teacher would be victimized for joining the protest.
Protesters said their only demand is the safe and swift return of the kidnapped teachers and pupils.
[ Channels TV]
News
How NDC Senatorial primary was conducted in closed room-Aisha Yesufu
A Federal Capital Territory, FCT, senatorial aspirant under the platform of the Nigerian Democratic Congress, NDC, has revealed how the primary election was allegedly manipulated by some party leaders.
Recall that the activist-turned politician contested for the FCT Senate but pulled out over alleged misconduct by officials.
In a lengthy statement detailing how the primary election was conducted, Aisha alleged that the exercise was conducted in a closed room with “predetermined outcome dressed in procedural formalities”.
She said after the exercise was “repeatedly postponed”, the venue was also “changed at the last minute”.
Aisha alleged that the “guidelines of the party were not followed. Delegate based process was introduced to be conducted at a central location instead of the direct primaries to be conducted at Local Government headquarters.
“When the moment came, the contest was not decided by delegates in the open; it was affirmed in a closed room, away from the people whose voices it was supposed to reflect.
“The party will indeed go on to release statements upon statements about the free and fair nature of the Abuja FCT primaries.
“They are entitled to their voice, but the facts that transpired when litigated by conscience and the guidelines of the electoral act do not reflect justice and fairness”.
News
CJ Reassigns Nafiu-Bala’s Case Against ADC Leadership To Justice Lifu
The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tshoho, has transferred the suit challenging the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) to a new judge for an accelerated hearing.
The lawsuit, which was filed by Nafiu-Bala Gombe, a former National Deputy Chairman of the party, was moved from Justice Emeka Nwite to Justice Peter Lifu following Justice Nwite’s recent promotion to the Court of Appeal.
In the lawsuit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, Gombe is seeking an order to stop the embattled National Chairman, Senator David Mark, National Secretary Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, and other members of the interim National Working Committee (NWC) from parading themselves as leaders of the ADC.
Gombe contends that the current leadership setup violates both the party’s internal constitution and the Electoral Act. The case names the ADC, Mark, Aregbesola, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), and former party chairman Ralph Nwosu as defendants.
The reassignment follows a directives from the Supreme Court, which intervened in the internal party dispute on April 30. The apex court set aside an earlier Court of Appeal order that had caused INEC to derecognize the David Mark-led faction, and instead ordered all parties back to the Federal High Court for a swift and conclusive trial.
Before the case was transferred, it had faced a series of delays. Justice Nwite had previously halted the matter indefinitely while waiting for the Supreme Court’s decision.
When the case resumed on May 8, Gombe’s legal team, led by Luka Haruna (SAN), requested that the Chief Judge reassign the case to another courtroom.
Defense lawyers representing the ADC, Mark, Aregbesola, and Nwosu strongly opposed changing judges at the time. They argued that the court should instead wait for a certified true copy of the Supreme Court judgment to guide the lower court’s proceedings.
Consequently, the case was briefly paused again before the Chief Judge eventually made the decision to reassign the file to Justice Lifu.
-
Metro9 hours agoPolice Arrest Mother, Daughter Over Alleged ₦18m Romance Scam Targeting Malta-Based Victim
-
News9 hours agoAkpabio Hails Tinubu’s Reforms, Endorses Re-Election as President Marks Three Years in Office
-
Politics8 hours agoNollywood Actress Gets 2027 Presidential Ticket
-
News8 hours agoThe Politics Of Maturity: Why Rivers May Need Healing More Than Victory
-
News9 hours agoSouth African Lawmaker, MK Party Chief Whip Arrested Over Alleged R233,000 Salary Fraud
-
News9 hours agoLawyer Petitions NBC, Seeks Suspension of BBNaija Over Alleged Indecent Content
-
News8 hours agoNigerian Governors Propose ₦100,000 New Minimum Wage
-
Sports8 hours agoBrazilian Teenager Fonseca Knocks Djokovic Out Of French Open

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login