Connect with us

Foreign

Saudis, Israel pushed Trump to attack Iran

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman made multiple private phone calls to Trump over the past month advocating a US attack, despite his public support for a diplomatic solution

US President Donald Trump launched Saturday’s wide-ranging attack on Iran after a weeks-long lobbying effort by Israel and Saudi Arabia, said four people familiar with the matter, as Israeli and US forces toppled Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei after nearly four decades in power.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman made multiple private phone calls to Trump over the past month advocating a US attack, despite his public support for a diplomatic solution, the four people said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meanwhile, continued his long-running public campaign for US strikes against what he views as an existential enemy of his country. The combined effort helped lead Trump to order a massive aerial campaign against Iran’s leadership and military, which in its initial hour led to the death of Khamenei and several other senior Iranian officials.

The attack came despite US intelligence assessments that Iran’s forces were unlikely to pose an immediate threat to the US mainland, marking a stark shift from Trump’s earlier, narrower military forays.

Advertisement

The Saudi push came as envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner pursued negotiations with Iranian leaders over nuclear and missile programmes. As talks proceeded, Riyadh said—after a call between the crown prince and President Masoud Pezeshkian—that it would not allow its airspace or territory to be used in an attack on Iran.

However, in discussions with US officials, the Saudi leader warned Iran would emerge stronger and more dangerous if the US did not strike now, after amassing the largest military presence in the Middle East since 2003, said people familiar with the matter. His stance was reinforced by Defence Minister Khalid bin Salman, who held closed-door meetings with US officials in Washington in January and warned about the downsides of not attacking.

The Saudi leader’s position likely reflected a balance between fears of Iranian retaliation against vulnerable oil infrastructure and viewing Tehran as Riyadh’s ultimate foe. Iran, dominated by Shiite Muslims, and Saudi Arabia, led by Sunnis, have long had an intense rivalry that has generated proxy wars in the region. Following the US attack, Iran retaliated against Saudi Arabia.

Witkoff and Kushner held final talks with Iranian officials in Geneva on Thursday—their third since early February—but left believing Tehran was playing games over nuclear enrichment, a senior US official said.

Advertisement

The decision to launch the attack was in some ways foretold by the massive buildup of US forces over the past two months. In explaining his decision, Trump on Saturday reached all the way back to Iran’s 1979 revolution. Earlier on Saturday, Trump said the US had faced “imminent threats from the Iranian regime.” Tehran was continuing to work toward producing a nuclear weapon and development of “long-range missiles that … could soon reach the American homeland.”

Both of those assertions have been challenged. Trump himself has vehemently maintained that the US “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program with airstrikes this past summer. The International Atomic Energy Agency has said there is no evidence Iran has restarted its uranium enrichment program following those strikes or that it has an active bomb-building plan. In an assessment last year, the US Defence Intelligence Agency cited no indication that Iran was embarking on development of an intercontinental ballistic missile. If it decided to do so, the DIA said, it would take a decade to produce.

Trump directed anti-government Iranians to “take over” their government, but his call included no details. He declared that those within Iran’s extensive military and security infrastructure would be given “complete immunity” but provided no explanation how or by whom that would be done.

And it remains unclear whether aircraft and missile strikes can achieve his ever-expanding goals – among them new, US-friendly regimes in Iran and Venezuela; an end to Iran-backed militant operations in Yemen; and the defeat of Islamic terrorist operations in Nigeria and Somalia. “History is not kind to efforts to fundamentally alter and restructure the internal politics of a country using air power alone,” said Aaron David Miller, a former US diplomat.

Advertisement

Months of planning for the 2003 US toppling of Saddam Hussein included thousands of invading American forces that remained there for nearly a decade. Top Trump officials – some of whom have been sharp critics of the Iraq effort and other US forays into the Middle East – have insisted in recent days that this time will be different. Vice President JD Vance on Thursday told The Washington Post that he still considers himself a “sceptic” of foreign military interventions – a description he said still applied to Trump, too. He said there was “no chance” any military operation by the US in Iran would lead to a drawn-out war involving the Trump administration.

For now, Trump says that he hopes that in the face of the death of Khamenei, Iran’s security forces and police “will peacefully merge with the Iranian Patriots, and work together as a unit to bring back the Country to the Greatness it deserves.” In January, those security forces killed thousands of Iranian protesters.

He vowed that “the heavy and pinpoint bombing, however, will continue, uninterrupted throughout the week or, as long as necessary to achieve our objective of PEACE THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST AND, INDEED, THE WORLD!”

Souad Mekhennet, Ellen Nakashima and Noah Robertson in Washington; Matt Viser in Corpus Christi, Texas; and Greg Miller in London contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Foreign

Drug trafficking: Court sentences popular tv presenter, 11 others to death

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

 

An Egyptian court has sentenced popular television presenter, Sarah Khalifa and 11 others to death over their alleged involvement in the production and trafficking of narcotics.

 

Khalifa, 39, is a well-known television personality and the presenter of ‘Mission Impossible’, a programme that focuses on security and crime-related issues.

Advertisement

 

According to the state-linked Al-Ahram newspaper, a Cairo court found Khalifa and the 11 other defendants guilty of forming an organized criminal gang involved in procuring materials used to manufacture narcotics for trafficking.

 

The defendants were also convicted of possessing and carrying unlicensed firearms and ammunition.

Advertisement

 

The court reached the death sentence after seeking the religious opinion of Egypt’s Grand Mufti, as required by law in capital punishment cases.

 

However, the verdict is subject to appeal.

Advertisement

 

State-run Akhbar Al-Youm newspaper reported that the defendants were accused of producing synthetic drugs for trafficking after allegedly importing the materials needed for their manufacture from outside Egypt.

 

Authorities reportedly seized more than 750 kilogrammes of narcotics and raw materials during investigations into the case. They also discovered two apartments allegedly being used as drug laboratories, alongside unlicensed firearms and ammunition.

Advertisement

 

Khalifa, who also owns a plastic surgery clinic and a production company involved in organizing parties and events, was further sentenced to five years in prison with other defendants in a separate case involving the kidnapping and assault of a young man.

 

Egyptian law allows the death penalty for offences including premeditated murder, terrorism, certain rape cases and drug trafficking. Data from the Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms showed that 541 death sentences were handed down in Egypt in 2025

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Foreign

US Will Destroy Oil Tankers If American Ships Are Attacked – Hegseth Warns Iran

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The United States has issued a fresh warning to Iran, threatening to destroy and sink Iranian oil tankers if Tehran launches further attacks against American naval vessels.

U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth issued the warning on Saturday, September 5, 2026, shortly after American forces struck three Iranian oil tankers following what Washington described as ballistic-missile attacks by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) against two U.S. Navy warships.

Hegseth, in a statement on X, said the United States would respond directly by targeting Iran’s oil fleet if American ships came under fire.

“It’s simple: if Iran shoots at U.S. ships, we will destroy (and sink) their oil tankers,” Hegseth said, adding that Iran only needed to refrain from attacking the U.S. Navy.

Advertisement

He further claimed that Iran’s oil tanker fleet was vulnerable because, according to him, Tehran lacked the naval and air capabilities necessary to protect the vessels.

“Iran’s oil tanker fleet is defenseless — Iran has no navy or air force. Our planes, ships & subs can strike them all,” Hegseth said, referring to areas under the U.S. Central Command and U.S. Indo-Pacific Command.

US strikes three Iranian tankers

The warning came after U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed that American forces had struck three Iranian crude oil carriers.

Advertisement

CENTCOM said the action followed missile attacks by the IRGC against a U.S. aircraft carrier and a guided-missile destroyer. According to the command, both American warships successfully evaded the missiles and no U.S. personnel were injured.

The American military identified two of the vessels as M/T Downy, which was struck off Kharg Island, and M/T Stark 1, targeted near Jask.

Both vessels were described by CENTCOM as “permanently disabled.”

A third tanker, M/T Kylo, also known as Noxen, was attacked in the Gulf of Oman. CENTCOM said the crew was warned to abandon the vessel before it was destroyed.

Advertisement

The U.S. military said the tankers were connected to what it described as a multibillion-dollar “shadow network” allegedly used to finance Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and its regional allies.

US threatens wider action

The commander of U.S. Central Command, Admiral Brad Cooper, also warned that Washington would impose an even greater economic cost on Tehran if Iranian forces continued attacking American vessels.

“If you shoot at two of our ships, we will impose an even higher economic cost — taking out three of yours,” Cooper said.

Advertisement

He added that the United States would not hesitate to defend its forces and, if necessary, destroy Iran’s “limited and exposed oil fleet.”

The latest threats signal a potentially significant expansion of the maritime confrontation between Washington and Tehran, with Iranian oil shipments increasingly becoming a direct target of U.S. military pressure.

Iran condemns attacks

Iran has condemned the American strikes on its oil tankers, describing the attacks as illegal and warning that Washington and its allies would bear responsibility for the consequences of continued attacks.

Advertisement

Iranian authorities have also warned that further attacks on Iranian vessels could trigger retaliation against American interests in the region.

The escalation is particularly significant because it is unfolding around the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy shipping routes.

The waterway connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and is a critical route for global oil supplies. Continued attacks on commercial vessels could therefore have wider implications for international energy markets and global shipping.

With the United States now openly threatening to target Iran’s oil fleet in response to attacks on its Navy, the latest confrontation could mark a new and more dangerous phase in the ongoing U.S.-Iran conflict.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Foreign

UN Backs New World Map To Correct Africa’s Distorted Size

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

 

The United Nations General Assembly has overwhelmingly backed a Togo-led resolution calling for a more accurate representation of the world’s continents, particularly Africa, on global maps.

The resolution, “Correct the Map: Rebalancing Global Cartographic Representation and Promoting Equitable Representation of the World’s Regions, Particularly Africa,” was adopted on Friday, September 4, with 164 countries voting in favour, six abstaining and only the United States voting against.

The initiative promotes the gradual adoption of the Equal Earth projection, which represents the relative areas of continents more accurately than the centuries-old Mercator projection. The Mercator map, developed in 1569 primarily for navigation, significantly enlarges landmasses closer to the poles while making equatorial regions such as Africa appear disproportionately smaller.

Advertisement

Togo, which spearheaded the initiative with African Union backing, argued that maps are not merely geographical tools but also shape how societies perceive the world and their place in it.

The resolution is not legally binding and does not ban the Mercator projection, which remains useful for maritime navigation. Instead, it encourages governments, educational institutions and other users to consider more geographically accurate alternatives.

The vote also exposed differing political interpretations of the initiative. The United States was the sole country to oppose the resolution, arguing that the United Nations should concentrate on more pressing global challenges rather than what Washington characterised as an ideological agenda.

The measure nonetheless represents a significant diplomatic victory for African countries seeking to challenge longstanding distortions in the way the continent is visually represented on commonly used world maps.

Advertisement

Africa has not changed its size. The map is finally being asked to show it.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News