News
Edo guber: S’Court reserves judgment on PDP, Ighodalo’s appeal
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Supreme-Court.jpg&description=Edo guber: S’Court reserves judgment on PDP, Ighodalo’s appeal', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Supreme-Court.jpg&description=Edo guber: S’Court reserves judgment on PDP, Ighodalo’s appeal', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
The Supreme Court has reserved judgment on the appeal filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Mr. Asue Ighodalo, challenging the outcome of the September 21, 2024 governorship election in Edo State, won by Governor Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC).
In the appeal, marked: SC/CV/536/2025, the appellants are praying the court to set aside the May 29 judgment of the Court of Appeal, which dismissed their case and affirmed Governor Okpebholo as the valid winner of the gubernatorial contest.
They have maintained that the appellate court failed to properly evaluate the case they filed to challenge the outcome of the election, which they insisted was not conducted with substantial compliance with provisions of the Electoral Act.
A five-member panel of justices of the Supreme Court led by Garba Lawal adjourned to deliver judgment on the matter after all the parties adopted their final briefs of argument.
While the PDP and its candidate prayed the court to upturn the concurrent decision of the Edo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal and the Court of Appeal, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Okpebholo and the APC urged the court to dismiss the appeal and uphold the outcome of the election.
Specifically, Ighodalo whose appeal was argued by Ken Mosia, SAN, prayed the court to nullify the election that pronounced Okpebholo as winner of the polls.
He submitted that he scored the majority of lawful votes cast in the election.
However, the INEC, represented by Kanu Agabi, SAN, urged the court to dismiss the appeal in its entirety.
The former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice (AGF) argued that Ighodalo and his political platform, the PDP, had in their petition stigmatised as invalid and unlawful on ground of non-compliance with the Electoral Act 2022.
On its part, INEC submitted that having declared the election as unlawful and illegal, the appellants cannot turn around and pray the court to declare them as winners of illegality.
The electoral body equally accused the appellants of being inconsistent in the grievances against the election and pleaded that their case be dismissed for want of merit.
Responding, the apex court panel, led by Justice Lawal said it would communicate the judgement date to the parties.
A three-member panel of the Appeal Court, led by Justice M. A. Danjuma, had declined to nullify Okpebholo’s election.
The Court of Appeal held that it found no reason to dislodge the May 15 judgement of the tribunal, which validated the result of the election announced by INEC.
However, dissatisfied with the affirmation of the judgment by the appellate court, PDP and Ighodalo took the case to the Supreme Court.
The Justice Wilfred Kpochi-led three-member tribunal had dismissed as lacking in merit, petitions by the PDP and its candidate; the Action Alliance (AA) and its National Chairman, Adekunle Rufai Omoaje, as well as a case that was brought before it by the Accord Party (AP) and its own candidate, Dr. Bright Enabulele.
INEC had declared that Okpebholo of the APC secured a total of 291,667 votes to defeat his closest rival, Ighodalo of the PDP, who got a total of 247,655 votes.
Dissatisfied with the result, the petitioners approached the tribunal, alleging that the election was not conducted in substantial compliance with provisions of the Electoral Act, 2022.
In the petition marked: EPT/ED/GOV/02/2024, PDP and its candidate alleged that Governor Okpebholo did not secure the highest number of lawful votes that were cast at the election.
It was equally the contention of the petitioners that INEC failed to serialise and pre-record some of the sensitive materials that were deployed for the poll, a situation they said aided the rigging of the election in favour of the APC and its candidate.
Specifically, PDP and its candidate alleged that there was wrong computation of results in 765 polling units in the state, even as they produced 19 witnesses that testified and tendered exhibits before the tribunal.
Among the exhibits the petitioners tendered before the tribunal were 153 Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) machines that were used in 133 polling units.
According to the petitioners, results from the polling units were manipulated at the collation centres, a situation they said resulted in over-voting in Okpebholo’s favour.
In its judgement, the tribunal held that the petitioners failed to, by way of credible evidence, establish why the outcome of the election should be set aside.
It held that the onus of proving that Okpebholo was unduly returned by INEC rested squarely on the petitioners, a legal burden it said was not successfully discharged.
According to the tribunal, the PDP and its candidate merely dumped exhibits before it without demonstrating them through competent witnesses as required by the law.
It held that most of the witnesses, who testified for the petitioners gave hearsay evidence, stressing that the failure to produce polling unit agents, presiding officers or voters who participated in the election to testify proved fatal to the case of the petitioners.
The tribunal held that section 137 of the Electoral Act did not preclude the petitioners from producing necessary and competent witnesses to testify in support of their case.
It further dismissed the contention of the petitioners that, contrary to the provision of section 73(2) of the Electoral Act, INEC failed to pre-record most of the materials that were deployed for the election.
In addition, the tribunal held that none of the BVAS machines tendered before it was switched on to demonstrate that the number of votes recorded in the disputed polling units exceeded the total number of accredited voters.
News
New NAJUC Chairman, Olakunle Olasanmi raises bar for court reporting ahead of 2027 Elections
By Francesca Hangeior, Abuja
The newly elected Chairman of the National Association of Judiciary Correspondent (NAJUC), Abuja chapter, Mr Olakunle Olubunmi Olasanmi has stressed on the need for members of the association to be accurate in their reporting of court proceedings, especially as the 2027 election approaches.
The chairman who observed that court reporting is a very sensitive area of journalism noted that members by being factual and accurate in their reports would go a long way in curtailing fake and false news, as well as deliberate misrepresentation of court’s decisions and pronouncements by some politicians and mischief makers.
Meanwhile, Olasanmi assured that NAJUC will work closely with stakeholders in the judiciary and security agencies to ensure conveyers of fake news and unaccredited journalists covering the courts are phased out.
Speaking over the weekend, shortly after the inauguration of the eight-member Executive Committee, the chairman also assured members that the new leadership will do its best to ensure it leaves behind a remarkable footprint by the time they would be handing over to the next administration.
“As part of plans to hit the ground running, we are going to pay all those who have had reasons to celebrate one thing or the other, like marriages, child birth, burial etc, who are being owed their entitlement in the next one month.
“I and my EXCO will look at our financial books and see the possibilities of settling all outstandings.
“Henceforth, we will take the issue of payment of monthly dues by members very seriously. As a matter of fact, subject to ratification by the NAJUC Congress, we are going to increase the monthly dues from N500 to N1000 and already, the newly elected EXCO has fashioned out ways to ensure every member pays”, he assured.
As part of efforts to ensure that the new administration excel, Olasanmi, acting on the powers conferred on him as chairman announced the setting up of a three- man Standing Committee, comprising of Mr Joseph Kadiri, Mr Sunday Benjamin Ejike and a member of the EXCO, Mr Garry Ochigbo.
He disclosed that the Committee shall be called upon to assist the EXCO in one way or the other whenever necessary.
“In the next few weeks, when Congress is called, we shall take another look at the recommendation made by the Constitution Review Committee and the amendment sought to be made to our Constitution.
“No doubt, there is need for our law book to be amended but that can only be done at our Congress, where everyone will have the opportunity to contribute one way or the other to the amendment”, he added.
Meanwhile, the chairman thanked all NAJUC members and those who stood by him, supported and believed in him, even, before the election and promised not to let them down.
“I also want to thank the out-gone EXCO for a job well done, they did their best and by the grace of God, we shall pick it from where they stopped. Also, I want to say a BIG thank you to every member of this noble association, the National Association of Judiciary Correspondent, NAJUC, for giving me your mandate.
“Before I end this address, I want to thank Mr Kayode Lawal, the immediate past Chairman of this association, for his advise, counsel and all before the election. I want to also, thank the NAJUC Electoral Committee, headed by Elder Andrew Orolua for a job well done in conducting a rancour free election and not forgetting Mr Joseph Kadiri, who has been and is still my very staunch supporter, thank you very much.
“Lastly, on behalf of the newly elected EXCO headed by my humble self, I am assuring you that as you have elected us today, we all have resolved to work for you to the very best of our abilities and in the course of performing our responsibilities, we will step on toes, pls forgive us ahead”, he pleaded.
Earlier, the immediate past chairman, Mr Kayode Lawal, expressed his gratitude to all members for making his tenure not only remarkable but peaceful and hitch free.
Recalling that the administration first came on board in 2020, shortly after the COVID-19, when everything was down in the country, but, through the unwavering support of members they were able to succeed and made some achievements.
“Upon our assumption of leadership, we made great efforts to implement some of the promises we made during electioneering process.
“Looking back today in the area of unity of members, we fare very well and we thank you all for that.
“In the area of training, we did not default. In the area of welfare, you are all in a better position to assess us.
“Nevertheless, let me say that we held our National Conference six times despite challenges. With the sustained collaboration with the NJI, we had the training six times during the six years period.
“We may not have achieved everything we promised giving the prevailing circumstances on ground, we are happy that we did not let you down”, Mr Lawal said.
He however, appealed that the same cooperation, even greater, be extended to the new leadership, noting that it takes a good followership to have a good leadership.
He also prayed the Lord to be with you the new leadership and give them the necessary strength, wisdom, tolerance and knowledge to steer the ship of NAJUC to the Promised Land.
Also speaking, chairman of the NAJUC 2026 Election Committee, Elder Andrew Orolua, congratulated the new leadership and thanked them for their cooperation throughout the election process, as well as ensuring that their campaigns were sane and met the basic requirements.
“And to other contestants who made the contest worth its name, tomorrow is another day”, he advised.
Elder Orolua, however called on all members to take the issue of payment of dues very seriously, as the association cannot make any meaningful impact when a large number of members are defaulting in their obligations.
Members of the new exco are; Chairman, Olakunle Olubunmi Olasanmi; Vice Chairman, Emmanuella Ekele; General Secretary, Alexander Enumah; Assistant Secretary, Godfrey Eshiemoghe; Treasurer, Wandoo Sombo; Financial Secretary; Austin Okezie; Welfare Officer, Oluwafemi Kuku; and Provost, Garry Ochigbo.
News
Ramaphosa urges peace ahead of June 30 protest
By Francesca Hangeior
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has acknowledged that citizens’ concerns over illegal immigration are legitimate but warned that violence, intimidation and vigilantism will not be tolerated during planned nationwide protests on June 30.
In his weekly newsletter released on Monday, Ramaphosa urged protesters to exercise their constitutional right peacefully and within the confines of the law, stressing that no grievance justifies unlawful conduct.
The president said South Africans had raised genuine concerns over undocumented immigration, border management, pressure on public services, and criminal syndicates exploiting the country’s immigration system.
While affirming that the right to protest is guaranteed under South Africa’s Constitution, he cautioned that such freedom does not permit threats, intimidation, vandalism or violence.
It partly reads, “South Africans have raised deep concerns about illegal immigration, border management, pressure on public services, criminal syndicates that exploit our immigration system and the impact these challenges have on communities. These concerns are real and they deserve to be heard.
“The right to protest is enshrined in our Constitution. It is a credit to our robust democratic order that people are able to express their grievances openly. But the right to protest and freedom of expression does not allow people to threaten or intimidate others, or to engage in acts of vandalism or violence.
“South Africa is a constitutional republic governed by the rule of law. The exercise of rights by any citizen in a constitutional democracy cannot be determined by intimidation, threats or ultimatums. It must be determined through democratic institutions, evidence and the rule of law.”
Ramaphosa disclosed that his government had accepted the need for substantial reforms to the country’s immigration system, including strengthening border management, increasing enforcement against undocumented immigration, improving the integrity of asylum and visa systems, and tackling corruption that has weakened immigration controls.
“We also recognise that where our systems have failed, they must be corrected. Where corruption has enabled illegal immigration, those responsible must be held accountable. Where enforcement has been inadequate, it must improve,” it reads.
“Over the last few weeks, we have seen support for these measures and for government’s stance from across society. We have held meetings with the country’s traditional monarchs and other traditional and Khoi-San leaders, with trade union and business leaders, with the religious community and with other formations in society.
News
No technical meeting expected with US in coming days – Iran
By Francesca Hangeior
Iran’s foreign ministry on Monday denied reports that Iranian and American technical teams will meet in the coming days to discuss the implementation of the deal to end the Middle East war.
Both sides have traded fire in the Gulf in recent days, testing their fragile ceasefire.
“No technical meetings of the working groups are planned for this week,” Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said, quoted by state TV, referring to the Iranian week ending on Friday.
Citing US officials, American news site Axios reported on Sunday that Tehran and Washington would hold a meeting in Qatar on Tuesday to resolve their dispute over the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
CNN reported similar comments from a Trump administration official, though the White House has not issued an official statement.
Qatar, alongside Pakistan, has acted as a mediator in talks between Iran and the United States aimed at ending the war in the Middle East.
The most recent discussions between Tehran and Washington took place in Switzerland on June 21 with the attendance of delegations from all four countries.
Qatar — located across the Gulf from Iran — is playing a key role in the financial aspects of the negotiations.
Iran holds assets there that have been frozen due to US sanctions.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated on Monday that the necessary steps to unfreeze these funds were “underway”.
“In accordance with established plans, $6 billion out of the total $12 billion held in Qatar will be released and returned to the country,” he said, quoted by the presidency.
-
News19 hours agoSAD! Bandits’ bomb hits vehicle, kills one, injures many in Sokoto
-
News19 hours agoSaudi Arabia ‘s Aramco Helicopter Crashes, Kills 14
-
Entertainment8 hours ago‘I didn’t sell my husband properties alone’ – Mr Ibu’s wife
-
News23 hours agoISWAP commanders reportedly clash, many feared dead
-
News1 hour agoPhotos: DAY 14 of Projects Commissioning in the FCT: See Karu road during construction by Nigerian contractor
-
Sports8 hours ago‘It’s a disaster World Cup’ — Iran captain Taremi slams FIFA over visa, travel chaos
-
Foreign8 hours agoTrump threatens to annihilate Iran after new exchange of attacks
-
News1 hour agoCJN declares war on delayed Justice, orders Judges to embrace active case management

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login